467
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of construction contractor performance: a critical analysis of some recent research

&
Pages 439-445 | Received 01 Apr 2005, Accepted 26 Sep 2005, Published online: 19 Mar 2010

References

  • Access Economics . 1999 . Australian construction productivity: international comparison, Australian Constructors Association
  • Anglo‐American Council on Productivity . 1950 . Productivity team report on building, report of a visit to the USA in 1949 of a productivity team representing the building industry, Anglo‐American Council on Productivity
  • Bernstein , H. 2003 . Measuring productivity: an industry challenge. . Civil Engineering , December : 46 – 53 .
  • Bon , R. and Pietroforte , R. 1990 . Historical comparison of construction sectors in United States, Japan, Italy and Finland using input‐output tables. . Construction Management and Economics , 8 : 233 – 247 .
  • CII . 1996 . Project definition and rating index: industrial projects, Implementation Resource 113–2, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX
  • CII . 1998 . Improving early estimates, Implementation Resource 131–2, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX
  • Croce , N. , Green , R. , Mills , B. and Toner , P. 1999 . Constructing the future: a study of major building construction in Australia, Employment Studies Centre, University of Newcastle
  • Crosthwaite , D. 2000 . The global construction market: a cross‐sectional analysis. . Construction Management and Economics , 18 : 619 – 27 .
  • Flanagan , R. , Norman , G. , Ireland , V. and Ormerod , R. 1986 . A Fresh Look at the UK & US Building Industries , London : Building Employers Confederation .
  • Freeman , I. 1981 . Comparative studies of the construction industries in Great Britain and North America: a review, Building Research Station, BRE
  • Goodchild , G. and Griffiths , D. 2004 . New Zealand's involvement in the joint OECD‐Eurostat Purchasing Power Parities Programme, Statistics New Zealand Information Paper 2004
  • Graves , A. and Rowe , D. 1999 . Benchmarking the Government Client: Stage Two Study, HM Treasury, London
  • Hammerton , M. 1975 . Statistics for the Human Sciences , London : Longman .
  • Ive , G. , Gruneberg , S. , Meikle , J. and Crosthwaite , D. 2004 . Measuring the Competitiveness of the UK Construction Industry , London : Department of Trade and Industry . Volume 1
  • Langston , C. and Best , R. 2001 . An investigation into the construction performance of high‐rise commercial office buildings based on productivity and resource consumption. . International Journal of Construction Management , : 57 – 76 .
  • Langston C, de Valence G. 1999. International cost of construction study ‐ stage 2: evaluation and analysis, Department of Industry Science and Resources, Canberra, available at www.isr.gov.au/library/content_library/BC‐CoCStage2.pdf (www.isr.gov.au/library/content_library/BC-CoCStage2.pdf)
  • Lynton . 1993 . The UK Construction Challenge , London : Lynton plc .
  • Meikle , J. 2004 . Personal communication, Davis Langdon Consultancy, London
  • OECD. 2004. PPPs for GDP – historical series, Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/56/1876133.xls (accessed: October 2004)
  • Proverbs , D. and Faniran , O. 2001 . International construction performance comparisons: a study of ‘European’ and Australian contractors. . Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management , 8 (4) : 284 – 91 .
  • Proverbs , D. , Holt , G. and Olomaiye , P. 1999 . Productivity rates and construction methods for high rise concrete construction: a comparative evaluation of UK, German and French contractors. . Construction Management and Economics , 17 : 45 – 52 .
  • Rittenau , R. 2002 . “ The great estimate ” . In Conference on the International Comparison Program Washington, DC, 11–14 March
  • Rowntree , D. 1991 . Statistics without tears: A primer for non‐mathematicians , London : Penguin .
  • Silver , M. and Heravi , S. 2002 . “ Quality adjustment for PPP: principles and an empirical study ” . In Conference on the International Comparison Program Washington, DC, 11–14 March
  • Statistics Bureau. 2004. Statistical Handbook of Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Japan, available at www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/c06cont.htm#cha6_6
  • Thompson , J. 2004 . Personal communication, Arizona State University
  • UNECE. 2002. United Nations Economic Commission to Europe, available at www.unece.org/env/hs/bulletin/02pdf/pubH13_02.pdf
  • Vermande , H. and van Mulligen , P‐H. 1999 . Construction costs in The Netherlands in an international context. . Construction Management and Economics , 17 : 269 – 83 .
  • Walker , D. 1995 . An investigation into construction time performance. . Construction Management and Economics , 13 : 263 – 74 .
  • Walsh , K. and Sawhney , A. 2002 . International comparison of cost for the construction sector: towards a conceptual model for purchasing power parity, report submitted to the World Bank Group, June 2002
  • Walsh , K. and Sawhney , A. 2004 . International Comparison of Cost for the Construction Sector: An Implementation Framework for the Basket of Construction Components Approach. Report submitted to the African Development Bank and the World Bank Group, June 2004
  • Xiao , H. , Proverbs , D. , Shaw , T. and Holt , G. 2000 . “ A new approach to comparing the performance of contractors internationally ” . In Proceedings of 16th ARCOM Conference in
  • Xiao , H. and Proverbs , D. 2002a . The performance of contractors in Japan, the UK and the USA. . International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , 19 (6) : 672 – 87 .
  • Xiao , H. and Proverbs , D. 2002b . The performance of contractors in Japan, the UK and the USA: a comparative evaluation of construction cost. . Construction Management and Economics , 20b : 425 – 35 .
  • Xiao , H. and Proverbs , D. 2002c . “ Construction time performance: An evaluation of contractors in Japan, the UK and the US. ” . In Engineering Architectural and Construction Management Vol. 2 , 81 – 9 .
  • Xiao , H. , Proverbs , D. and Holt , G. 2002d . “ A new paradigm for international contractor performance assessment. ” . In Journal of Construction Research in press

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.