Can project monitoring and control be fully automated?

References

• Ahsan, K. and Gunawan, I. (2010) Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jibouri, S.H. (2003) Monitoring systems and their effectiveness for project cost control in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 145–54.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, T. and Tommelein, I.D. (2004) Simulation of buffering and batching practices in the interface detailing-fabrication-installation of HVAC ductwork. Presented at the 12th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-12), 2–6 August, Elsinore, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (1995) Toward construction JIT, in . Proceedings of the 11th Annual ARCOM Conference, Reading, , UK, pp. 304–12 18-20 September.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (1998) Shielding production: essential step in production control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, M. (2008) Visone: software for the analysis and visualization of social networks, PhD thesis, Fakultat fur Informatik, Universitat Fridericiana.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Haim, Y. (2006) Info-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty, 2nd edn, Academic Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, S. and Augenbroe, G. (2002) Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications. Energy and Buildings, 34(9), 951–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann, J.E. and Al-Tabtabai, H. (1992) Knowledge-based approach to construction project control. International Journal of Project Management, 10(1), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gantt, H.L. (1913) Work, Wages, and Profits, Engineering Magazine Co, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbreth, F.B. and Gilbreth, L.M. (1916) The effect of motion study upon the workers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 65, 272–6.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, E. and Navon, R. (1996) Automated real-time manpower productivity control, in . The Eighth International Symposium on Organization & Management of Construction, Glasgow, UK, pp. 199–205 28 August – 3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Heckel, R. (2006) Graph transformation in a nutshell. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 148, 187–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hegazy, T. and Petzold, K. (2003) Genetic optimization for dynamic project control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), 396–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, B., Thomas, S., Haas, C. and Caldas, C. (2009) Measuring the impact of rework on construction cost performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(3), 187–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, S. and Navon, R. (2009) Modeling building projects as a basis for change control. Automation in Construction, 18(5), 656–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Pena-Mora, F. and Park, M. (2006) Reliability and stability buffering approach: focusing on the issues of errors and changes in concurrent design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(5), 452–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Holt, G.D., Shen, L.Y., Li, H. and Irani, Z. (2002) Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 425–36.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P., Edwards, D., Watson, H. and Davis, P. (2010) Rework in civil infrastructure projects: determination of cost predictors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(3), 275–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. (2005) Automated project performance control of construction projects. Automation in Construction, 14(4), 467–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. (2007) Research in automated measurement of project performance indicators. Automation in Construction, 16(2), 176–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. (2008) Automated productivity control of labor and road construction, in. 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp. 29–32 27–29 June.
   Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Berkovich, O. (2006) An automated model for materials management and control. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 635–46.
   Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Goldschmidt, E. (2003) Can labor inputs be measured and controlled automatically? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), 437–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Haskaya, I. (2006) Is detailed progress monitoring possible without designated manual data collection? Construction Management and Economics, 24(12), 1225–9.
   Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Kolton, O. (2007) Algorithms for automated monitoring and control of fall hazards. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 21(1), 21–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Shpatnitsky, Y. (2005) A model for automated monitoring of road construction. Construction Management and Economics, 23(9), 941–51.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, S., Akinci, B., Garrett, J., Soibelman, L., Ergen, E., Pradhan, A., Tang, P., Berges, M., Atasoy, G., Liu, X., Shahandashti, S. and Anil, E. (2011) Sensing and field data capture for construction and facility operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), 870–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, F.W. (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper & Brothers, New York.
   Google Scholar