The non-adoption of supply chain management

References

• Andersen, P.H. and Kragh, H. (2010) Sense and sensibility: two approaches for using existing theory in theory-building qualitative research, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astley, W.G. (1984) Subjectivity, sophistry and symbolism in management science, Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, R., Webster, M. and Campbell, K.M. (2005) An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry, International Journal of Project Management, 23(8), 611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. and Jayes, S. (1998) The Seven Pillars of Partnering: A Guide to Second Generation Partnering, Reading Construction Forum, University of Reading, Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Borgström, B. (2012) Towards a methodology for studying supply chain practice, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8), 843–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossink, B.A.G. and Vrijhoef, R. (2011) Innovation management in the construction supply chain, in O’Brien, W.J., Formoso, C.T., Vrijhoef, R. and London, K. (eds.) Construction Supply Chain Management Handbook, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 14/1-14/21.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L.J. III (1979) Toward a method of middle-range theorizing, Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 443–447.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. (2009) Learning to co-operate and co-operating to learn: knowledge, learning and innovation in construction supply chains, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2001) Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5/6), 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G. and Dainty, A. (2005) Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal?, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G., Dainty, A., Millett, S.J. and Neale, R.H. (2004) Client-led strategies for construction supply chain improvement, Construction Management and Economics, 22(2), 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1996) Organizational learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, in Cohen, M.D. and Sproull, L.S. (eds.) Organizational learning, Sage, London, pp. 58–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (2010) Grounded theory in historical perspective: an epistemological account, in Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage, London, pp. 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. (1987) Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence, American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2011) Government Construction Strategy, Cabinet Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, G. (2008) Advocating an ambivalent approach to theorizing the built environment, Building Research & Information, 36(3), 280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C.R. (2011) A call for theory: the maturation of the supply chain management discipline, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Sage Publications Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Chima, C.M. (2007) Supply-chain management issues in the oil and gas industry, Journal of Business & Economics Research, 5(6), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, T.Y. and Wacker, J.G. (2011) Theory building in the OM/SCM field: pointing to the future by looking at the past, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 8–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, T.Y. and Wu, Z. (2009) Triads in supply networks: theorizing buyer-supplier-supplier relationships, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(1), 8–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R. and Bailey, J.R. (eds) (2008) International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Constructing Excellence (2005) Why Use a Framework Agreement? Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment, available at http://bit.ly/16ZGbgk.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A., Watson, G., Lonsdale, C. and Sanderson, J. (2004) Managing appropriately in power regimes: relationship and performance management in 12 supply chain cases, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 357–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A., Ireland, P. and Townsend, M. (2006) Managing in Construction Supply Chains and Markets, Thomas Telford, London.
   Google Scholar
• Croom, S., Romano, P. and Giannakis, M. (2000) Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, C., Harre, R. and Clare, T. (2002) Qualitative research and computing: methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD∗IST, International Journal of Social Science Methodology, 5(3), 193–197.
   Google Scholar
• de Beuckelaer, A. and Wagner, S.M. (2012) Small sample surveys: increasing rigor in supply chain management research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(7), 615–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHoratius, N. and Rabinovich, E. (2011) Field research in operations and supply chain management, Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 371–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk, N., Kaufmann, L. and Carter, C.R. (2012) Increasing the rigor of grounded theory research – a review of the SCM literature, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 742–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (2007) Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry, Emerald, Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1991) Introduction, in DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, London, pp. 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Fredriksson, P. (2008) Cooperating and competing in supply networks: making sense of a triadic sourcing strategy, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14(3), 170–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E. (2000) Supply strategy and network effects – purchasing behaviour in the construction industry, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(3/4), 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L. (2002) The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation, Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Nepal, M.P. and Park, M. (2005) A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance, Construction Management and Economics, 23(6), 565–577.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G. (1981a) Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G. (1981b) The quasifirm in the construction industry, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), 335–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A.C. and McManus, S.E. (2007) Methodological fit in management field research, Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction, Construction Task Force Report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, J. (2002) Rethinking Construction Innovation and Research – A Review of the Government’s R&D Policies and Practices, Department for Transport and Industry, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A. (2003) Research Methods for Construction, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Solis, J. (2008) The systemic nature of the construction industry, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(1), 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S. and Thorpe, A. (2007) Exploring change in construction: supply chain management, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(4), 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Gammelgaard, B. and Flint, D. (2012) Qualitative research in logistics and supply chain management: beyond the justification for using qualitative methods. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), Editorial, available at http://bit.ly/1b4Vd5d.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. (2002) Conceptualization: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. (2002b) Constructivist grounded theory? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. (2007) Doing formal theory, in Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage, London, pp. 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Holton, J. (2004) Remodelling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5, available at http://bit.ly/guaN2M.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (1998) Grounded theory: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (1999) Grounded theory: some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions. University of Wolverhampton, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1978) Threshold models of collective behaviour, American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. and May, S.C. (2003) Re-engineering construction: going against the grain, Building Research & Information, 31(2), 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S., Fernie, S. and Weller, S. (2005) Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction, Construction Management and Economics, 23(6), 579–593.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S., Kao, C.-C. and Larsen, G.D. (2010) Contextualist research: iterating between methods while following an empirically grounded approach, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. and Wu, S. (2012) Establishing the association between collaborative working and construction project performance based on client and contractor perceptions, Construction Management and Economics, 30(4), 299–308.
   Google Scholar
• Gruneberg, S. and Hughes, W. (2004) Construction consortia: do they serve any real purpose? in Khosrowshahi, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, Edinburgh, 1–3 September, ARCOM, Vol. 1, pp. 343–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, G. (2003) All research is interpretative!, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18, 482–492.
   Google Scholar
• Haig, D.B. (1995) Grounded theory as scientific method. Philosophy of, Education, 281–90.
   Google Scholar
• Halldorsson, A., Kotzab, H., Mikkola, J.H. and Skjøtt-Larsen, T. (2007) Complementary theories to supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. and Caerteling, J. (2010) Subcontractor procurement in construction: the interplay of price and trust, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(5), 354–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, H. and Cowley, S. (2004) Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2), 141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M. (2010) Infrastructure Cost Review: Main Report, TSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, N.L. (2003) Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Holti, R., Nicolini, D. and Smalley, M. (2000) The Handbook of Supply Chain Management, CIRIA and The Tavistock Institute, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, J. (2007) Orthodoxy vs. power: the defining traits of grounded theory, in Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage, London, pp. 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J.M. and Higgins, C.A. (1990) Champions of technological innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S.-C. and Whittington, R. (1997) Strategies and institutions: a pluralistic account of strategies in the Taiwanese computer industry, Organization Studies, 18(4), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, K. and Kelly, J. (2008) Grounded theory: in Knight, A. and Ruddock, L. (eds) Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ingirige, B. and Sexton, M. (2006) Alliances in construction: investigating initiatives and barriers for long-term collaboration, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(5), 521–535.
   Google Scholar
• Innovation Growth Team (2010) Low Carbon Construction: Final Report, HM Government, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, Y.-H. (2004) The application of grounded theory and symbolic interactionism, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(3), 249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R.L. (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism, in Powell, J.A. and Dimaggio, P.J. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, L. and Denk, N. (2011) How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 64–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, U. (2005) “Emergence” vs. “Forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of “Grounded Theory” reconsidered. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, Art. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D.J. and Hult, G.T.M. (2011) Building theory about supply chain management: some tools from the organizational sciences, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A.P. and Pitt, M.C. (2009) Supply chain management: a main contractor’s perspective, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 182–198.
   Google Scholar
• Korczynski, M. (1990) (1996) The low-trust route to economic development: inter-firm relations in the UK engineering construction industry in the 1980s and, Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 787–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (2008) Is a theory of the built environment needed?, Building Research & Information, 36(3), 211–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzab, H., Teller, C., Grant, D.B. and Sparks, L. (2011) Antecedents for the adoption and execution of supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, G. (2005) Horses for courses: relating innovation diffusion concepts to the stages of the diffusion process, Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), 787–792.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M. (1994) Constructing the Team, Final Report of the Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R. and Cardellino, P. (2008) Tales of the expected: investigating the rhetorical strategies of innovation champions, Construction Management and Economics, 26(10), 1043–1054.
   Google Scholar
• London, K.A. and Kenley, R. (2001) An industrial organization economic supply chain approach for the construction industry: a review, Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), 777–788.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M. (1999) A grounded theory of construction crisis management, Construction Management and Economics, 17(1), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D.K. and Ferguson, N. (1994) Partnership Sourcing: An Integrated Supply Chain Approach, Financial Times/Pitman Publishing, London.
   Google Scholar
• Manuj, I. and Pohlen, T.L. (2012) A reviewer’s guide to the grounded theory methodology in logistics and supply chain management research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 784–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, J.E. and Flint, D.J. (2009) A refined view of grounded theory and its application to logistics research, Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Sun, M. and Jones, M. (2011) Maturity model for supply chain relationships in construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(2), 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D. and Zacharia, Z.G. (2001) Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Bonner, A. and Francis, K. (2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Morledge, R., Knight, A. and Grada, M. (2009) The concept and development of supply chain management in the UK construction industry, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. and Langford, D. (2003) Construction Reports 1944–98, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B. (1997) Leaders and champions for construction innovation, Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, F. and Gammelgaard, B. (2012) Moving beyond the systems approach in SCM and logistics research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 764–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, W.J., Formoso, C.T., London, K.A. and Vrijhoef, R. (2009) Introduction, in O’Brien, W.J., Formoso, C.T., Vrijhoef, R. and Kerry, L.A. (eds.) Construction Supply Chain Management Handbook, Taylor & Francis, London. 1/1–1/5.
   Google Scholar
• Omar, A., Davis-Sramek, B., Fugate, B.S. and Mentzer, J.T. (2012) Exploring the complex social processes of organizational change: supply chain orientation from a manager’s perspective, Journal of Business Logistics, 33(1), 4–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. (2005) Ethnographic Methods, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Orrù, M., Biggart, N.W. and Hamilton, G.G. (1991) Organizational isomorphism in East Asia, in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 361–389.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, B. (2011) Hard numbers. Building Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W.G. (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans, Administrative Science Quarterly, 276(14), 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W.G. (1981) Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Addison-Wesley, London.
   Google Scholar
• Prajogo, D., Huo, B. and Han, Z. (2012) The effects of different aspects of ISO 9000 implementation on key supply chain management practices and operational performance, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 306–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, S. (2009) Introduction, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, W.S. and Mello, J.E. (2012) Grounded theory: an inductive method for supply chain research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 863–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reve, T. and Levitt, R. (1984) Organization and governance in construction, International Journal of Project Management, 2(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R.G. Jr, Roath, A.S., Whipple, J.M. and Fawcett, S.E. (2010) Exploring a governance theory of supply chain management: barriers and facilitators to integration, Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, B. (2009) Slough estates in the 1990s – client driven SCM, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. (2010) Top 150: how much further? Building Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn, The Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, S. (1999) A definition of procurement systems, in Rowlinson, S. and McDermott, P. (eds.) Procurement Systems: A Guide to Best Practice in Construction, E & FN Spon, London, pp. 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (2010) Contracts in Use: A Survey of Building Contracts in Use during 2007, RICS, London.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, M., Jones, M. and James, P. (2002) A review of the progress towards the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) relationships in construction, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(3), 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L. (2008) Circulating ideas: imitation, translation and editing, in Greenwood, D., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage, London, pp. 218–242.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R.W. (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. (1999) Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms, California Management Review, 41(3), 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitmore, M. and Smyth, H. (2009) Marketing and pricing strategy, in Pryke, S. (ed.) Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P.N. (2010) On solid ground: essential properties for growing grounded theory, in Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Sage, London, pp. 114–126.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, I.F. (1997) Supply-chain strategy: organizational influence through supplier alliances, British Journal of Management, 8(3), 223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2006) What grounded theory is not, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. (2010) Grounded theory in practice: issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers, Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, S. and Fernie, S. (2012) The commercial currency of construction framework agreements, Building Research & Information, 40(2), 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R.W., Clifford Defee, C., Randall, W.S. and Williams, B. (2011) Assessing the managerial relevance of contemporary supply chain management research, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(7), 655–667 6/1–6/22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., Ballard, G. and Kaminsky, P. (2009) Supply chain management for lean project delivery, in O’Brien, W.J., Formoso, C.T., Vrijhoef, R. and London, K.A. (eds.) Construction Supply Chain Management Handbook, Taylor & Francis, Taylor & Francis, London. 6/1–6/22.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H. and Myers, M.D. (2010) Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems, Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, B., Szen, Z. and Enbiyaoġlu, H. (1988) Strategies and boundaries: subcontracting in construction, Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 633–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meter, K. (1990) Methodological and design issues: techniques for assessing representatives of snowballing samples, in Lambert, E.Y. (ed.) The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L. (2000) The four roles of supply chain management in construction, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(3/4), 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. and Myrick, F. (2006) Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure, Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2003) Teaching qualitative analysis using QSR NVivo, The Qualitative Report, 8(2), 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M. and Fynes, B. (2012) ISO 14000 certification and investments in environmental supply chain management practices: identifying differences in motivation and adoption levels between western European and North American companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–11, available at http://bit.ly/1bbtR0H.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, M.M. (2011) Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: linking dyadic and network levels of analysis, Journal of Operations Management, 29(7/8), 663–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A.L. and Ouchi, W.G. (1983) Efficient cultures: exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 468–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G. (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction, Building Research & Information, 26(5), 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme, A. (2009) Never Waste a Good Crisis: A Review of Progress since Rethinking Construction and Thoughts for Our Future, Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, M. and Hoffman, A.J. (2008) Organizational fields: past, present and future, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, Sage, London, pp. 130–147.
   Google Scholar