Highway maintenance: impact of framework agreements upon project financial performance

References

• Abdelsalam, H.M.E. and Gad, M.M. (2009) Cost of quality in Dubai: an analytical case study of residential construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 501–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoieong, R.T., Tang, S.L. and Ahmed, S.M. (2002) A process approach in measuring quality costs of construction projects: model development. Construction Management and Economics, 20(2), 179–92.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission (2011) Going the Distance: Achieving Value for Money in Road Maintenance, Audit Commission, London.
   Google Scholar
• Besterfield, D. (1994) Quality Control, Prentice Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T.L. and Potoski, M. (2003) Managing contract performance: a transaction costs approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 275–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Building Cost Information Service (2011) Proposed Standard Form of Civil Engineering Cost Analysis Consultation Document 7 – Definition of Standard Elements for Pipelines and Ducts, November 2011, Building Cost Information Service, London.
   Google Scholar
• Business and Enterprise Committee (2008) Construction Matters: Government Response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2007–08, House of Commons, 14 November 2008, The Stationery Office Limited, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2011) Government Construction Strategy, Cabinet Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, D. (2010) Framework agreement, available at http://goo.gl/OX4CXd ( accessed 6 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K.W., Raftery, J. and Walker, A. (1998) The baby and the bathwater: research methods in construction management, Construction Management and Economics, 16(1), 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. (1937) The nature of the firm, Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. (1990) The Firm, the Market and the Law, University of Chicago Press, ChicagoIL.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1998) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Constructing Excellence (2005) Why use a framework agreement? available at http://goo.gl/MdQAxQ ( accessed 23 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Constructing Excellence (2009) Never Waste a Good Crisis: A Review of Progress since Rethinking Construction and Thoughts for Our Future, Constructing Excellence, London.
   Google Scholar
• de Neufville, R. and King, D. (1991) Risk and need-for-work premiums in construction bidding. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), 659–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (2013) Industrial Strategy: Government and Industry in Partnership, Construction 2025, Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS), London.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2013) Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Quarterly Construction Price and Cost Indices: Table 4: ROADCON Tender Price Index of Road Construction ROADCON Series, available at: http://bit.ly/1sKcjfp ( accessed 10 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment (1992) Value for Money in New-build Housing, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking construction: the report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Construction Task Force, London.
   Google Scholar
• European Expert Group (2010) Cost Control and Management Issues of Global Research Infrastructures, Report of the European Expert Group, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A. (2008) Research Methods for Construction, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C.E. (2008) The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, P.M. (1974) Economic Theory and the Construction Industry, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, W.P., Hillebrandt, P., Greenwood, D.G. and Kwawu, W.E.K. (2006) Procurement in the Construction Industry: The Impact and Cost of Alternative Market and Supply Processes, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenpera, P. (2011) Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M. (1994) Constructing the team: final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Arditi, D. and Wang, Z. (2012) Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 30(2), 151–64.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1691) Some Considerations on the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest and the Raising of the Value of Money, Awnsham and John Churchill, London.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. (2012) The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 188–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. (2009) I will not be taken for granted: BAA’s boss on frameworks. Building Magazine, 26 June, pp. 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Morledge, R. and Smith, A. (2013) Building Procurement, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. and Hughes, W. (2008) Construction Contracts: Law and Management, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L.D., Ogunlana, S.O. and Lan, D.T. (2004) A study on project success factors in large construction projects in Vietnam, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 11(6), 404–13.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (2010) Construction Statistics Annual 2010, Office for National Statistics, Newport, South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (2011) Economic and Labour Market Review, Volume 5, number 4, April, Office for National Statistics, Newport, South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (2014) EARN03 Average Weekly Earnings by Industry Series F Column K583, available at: http://bit.ly/1o6g4vy ( accessed 10 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, J., McGeorge, D. and Walters, M. (1997) Breaking up methodological monopolies: a multi-paradigm approach to construction management research. Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), 291–7.
   Google Scholar
• Runeson, G. and Raftery, J. (1998) Neo-classical micro-economics as an analytical tool for construction price determination. Journal of Construction Procurement, 4(2), 116–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sha, K. (2011) Vertical governance of construction projects: an information cost perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1137–47.
   Google Scholar
• Shash, A.A. (1993) Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 11(2), 111–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, S. and Fernie, S. (2012) The commercial currency of construction framework agreements. Building Research & Information, 40(2), 209–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1975) Market and Hierarchies: Analysis of Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of International Organizations, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1997) Hierarchies, markets and power in the economy: an economic perspective, in Menard, C. (ed.) Transaction Cost Economics: Recent Developments, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar