The challenges and potentials of utilizing building information modelling in facility management: the case of the Center for Properties and Facilities of the University of Helsinki

References

• Arayici, Y., Onyenobi, T. and Egbu, C. (2012) Building information modelling (BIM) for facilities management (FM): the MediaCity case study approach. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling, 1(1), 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, S., Khalfan, M. and Maqsood, T. (2012) Building information modeling (BIM): now and beyond. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(4), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. and von Hippel, E. (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N. and Calis, G. (2012) Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T. (eds.) (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, T., Davies, A. and Gann, D. (2005) Can integrated solutions business models work in construction? Building Research & Information, 33(6), 571–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• BuildingSMART Finland (2012) Common BIM Requirements 2012. Series 12: use of models in facility management, available at goo.gl/y5AH9p.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2007) Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, Liber/CBS Press, Malmö/Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. and Harty, C. (2013) Measurement and exploration of individual beliefs about the consequences of building information modelling use. Construction Management and Economics, 31(11), 1110–1127.
   Google Scholar
• East, B. (2014) Construction-Operations Building Information Exchange (COBie), available at goo.gl/mfDZCr (accessed 4 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R. and Liston, K. (2011) BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007) Enriching the theory of expansive learning: lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Enkovaara, E., Salmi, M. and Sarja, A. (1988) RATAS Project: Computer Aided Design for Construction, Karisto Oy, Hämeenlinna.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, J. (1994) Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy, 23(6), 637–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S. and Hietanen, J. (2007) Interorganizational use of building information models: potential for automational, informational and transformational effects. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3), 289–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, N. and London, K. (2010) Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 988–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen, R., Jokela, M., Aavaharju, H. and Reinikainen, E. (2010) Insinööritoimisto Olof Granlund Oy. Suomalaista talotekniikan suunnittelua ja konsultointia vuodesta 1960, Otavan Kirjapaino Oy, Keuruu.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, A. (2013) Value of BIM in FM/OM – why have we failed in attracting owners and operators? Paper presented at BIM and Facility Management Seminar, Aalto University, Espoo, 4 April.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, M. (2006) General introduction. Pro IT, available at goo.gl/91XfpA (accessed 19 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kujala, S. (2003) User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. and Akin, Ö. (2009) Shadowing tradespeople: inefficiency in maintenance fieldwork. Automation in Construction, 18(5), 536–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., Green, S.D. and Raja, J.Z. (2009) Living up to the value agenda: the empirical realities of through-life value creation in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), 271–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., Riley, D. and Elmualim, A. (2010) Defining high performance buildings for operations and maintenance. International Journal of Facility Management, 1(2).
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2005) Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 455–473.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. and Hasu, M. (2002) Articulating user needs in collaborative design: towards an activity theoretical approach. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 11(1–2), 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, R. S. (2004) Inadequate interoperability in construction wastes 415.8 billion. AECNews.com, 13, Article 342.
   Google Scholar
• Penttilä, H., Rajala, M. and Freese, S. (2007) Building information modelling of modern historic buildings, in Predicting the Future: 25th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-0-9541183-6-5, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 26–29 September 2007, pp. 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., Williams, R. and Proctor, R. (2003) Fitting standard software packages to non-standard organizations: the ‘biography’ of an enterprise-wide system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Hao, Q., Mak, H., Neelamkavil, J., Xie, H., Dickinson, J., Thomas, R., Pardasani, A. and Xue, H. (2010) Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: a review. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(2), 196–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. and Williams, R. (2005) The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user, in Howcroft, D. and Trauth, E.M. (eds.) Handbook of Critical Information System Research: Theory and Applications, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 195–221.
   Google Scholar
• Succar, B. (2009) Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teknologian ja innovaatioiden kehittämiskeskus (2002) Vera. Tietoverkottunut rakennusprosessi, Tekes, available at http://goo.gl/0A7Fna9 (accessed 19 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Vanlande, R., Nicolle, C. and Cruz, C. (2008) IFC and building lifecycle management. Automation in Construction, 18(1), 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, B. and Boynton, A. (1998) Invented Here: Maximizing Your Organization’s Internal Growth and Profitability, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, R., Stengel, J. and Schultmann, F. (2014) Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings – literature review and future needs. Automation in Construction, 38, 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar