Innovation management model: a tool for sustained implementation of product innovation into construction projects

References

• Abernathy, W.J. and Clark, K. (1985) Mapping the winds of change. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernathy, W.J. and Utterback, J.M. (1978) Patterns of innovation in technology. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, F. and Manseau, A. (1999) A systemic approach to generation/transmission/use of innovation in construction activities. Innovation: Management Policy and Practice, 2(5–6), 43.
   Google Scholar
• Andrey, P., Carvalho, A. and Helman, H. (1998) Looking for what could be wrong: an approach to lean thinking. Proceedings from the Sixth Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Guaruja, Brazil, 13–15 August.
   Google Scholar
• Aouad, G., Ozorhon, B. and Abbott, C. (2010) Facilitating innovation in construction: directions and implications for research and policy. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 10(4), 374–394.10.1108/14714171011083551
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, S., Hein, M. and Sketo, B. (2008) Building information modelling (BIM) benefits, risks and challenges, in Proceedings of the 44th ASC National Conference, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Lovell, K. and Harris, N. (2006) How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘expert’within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher, 14(1), 59–70.10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blayse, A.M. and Manley, K. (2004) Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation, 4(3), 143–154.10.1108/14714170410815060
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N. and Wakefield, R. (2009) Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9(1), 72–83.10.1108/14714170910931552
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2001) Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(5–6), 335–345.10.1046/j.1365-232X.2001.00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Caerteling, J.S., Hartmann, A. and Tijhuis, W. (2006) Innovation processes in construction: two case studies. Joint Conference on Construction Culture, Innovation and Management, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., Yung, E., Lam, P., Tam, C. and Cheung, S. (2001) Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 699–718.10.1080/01446190110066128
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., Kagioglou, M., Aouad, G., Hinks, J., Sexton, M. and Sheath, D. (1998) The development of a generic design and construction process, in European Conference, Product Data Technology (PDT) Days, March 1998, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., Aouad, G., Lee, A., Wu, S., Fleming, A. and Kagioglou, M. (2005) Process management in design and construction, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Corotis, R.B., Harris, J.C. and Fox, R.R. (1981) Delphi methods: theory and design load application. Journal of the Structural Division, 107(6), 1095–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainty, A.R., Bryman, A., Price, A.D., Greasley, K., Soetanto, R. and King, N. (2005) Project affinity: the role of emotional attachment in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 23(3), 241–244.10.1080/01446190500040596
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N., Brown, B. and Cochran, S. (1970) The Delphi method III: use of self-ratings to improve group estimates. Technological Forecasting, 1, 283–291.10.1016/0099-3964(70)90029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T.H. (2013) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H. and Gustafson, D.H. (1975) Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Dewick, P. and Miozzo, M. (2004) Networks and innovation: sustainable technologies in Scottish social housing. R&D Management, 34(3), 323–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M. (2000) The management of technological innovation: an international and strategic approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dossick, C.S. and Neff, G. (2011) Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using building information modelling. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(2), 83–93.10.1080/21573727.2011.569929
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P.F. (1986) Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Pan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.E. (2002) The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management & Economics, 20(7), 621–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (2000) Procuring for innovation: the integrating role of innovation in construction procurement, in Proceedings of ARCOM 2000 Conference, Glasgow, pp. 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Ling, F., Ofori, G. and De Silva, N. (2002) Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building Research and Information, 30(4), 237–247.10.1080/09613210110115207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, D., Akbiyikli, R. and Dickinson, M. (2006) An evaluation of the stimulants and impediments to innovation within PFI/PPP projects. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 6(2), 63–67.10.1108/14714170610710668
   Google Scholar
• Edum-Fotwe, F.T. and McCaffer, R. (2000) Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 18, 111–124.10.1016/S0263-7863(98)90075-8
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction. Report from the Construction Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Egbu, C.O. (1999) Skills, knowledge and competencies for managing construction refurbishment works. Construction Management & Economics, 17(1), 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• El Asmar M. and Francom T. (2013) Assessing the impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) on construction project performance, in Hajdu, M. and Skibniewski, M. (eds.) Procs Creative Construction Conference, 6–9 July 2013, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S. (2001) Technological gatekeepers: the management of trade literature by design offices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(1), 2–8.10.1046/j.1365-232x.2001.00166.x
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1989) The Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M. (2000) Building Innovation: Complex Constructs in a Changing World, Thomas Telford, London.10.1680/bicciacw.25967
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M. and Salter, A.J. (2000) Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., Dainty, A.R. and Gibb, A.G. (2008) New build: materials, techniques, skills and innovation. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4534–4538.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, N. and London, K. (2010) Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in construction, 19(8), 988–999.10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkola, J. and Greve, A. (1995) Diffusion of technology: cohesion or structural equivalence? in Academy of Management Proceedings, No. 1, 422–426.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. (2006) The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24, 567–578.10.1080/01446190600790629
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., Van Meerveld, H., Vossebeld, N. and Adriaanse, A. (2012) Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods. Automation in Construction, 22, 605–613.10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. and Clark, K. (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–22.10.2307/2393549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Y.T. and Feng C.W. (2013) An information-flow-based organisational framework to streamline the process of employing BIM within construction projects, in Hajdu, M.: Skibniewski, M. (eds.) Procs Creative Construction Conference, 6–9 July 2013, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 163–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, W. (1991) Modelling the construction projects using plans of work, in 4th Yugoslav Symposium on Organization and Management in Construction, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, pp. 81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. and Moselhi O. (2013) Self adaptive forecasting for construction projects, in Hajdu, M. and Skibniewski, M. (eds.) Procs Creative Construction Conference, 6–9 July 2013, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Javidan, M. (1998) Core competence: what does it mean in practice? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60–71.10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. and Schwartz, N. (1975) Market structure and innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, A. and Turner, J.R. (2002) The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning, 35(4), 367–388.10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00069-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. and Majchrzak, A. (1996) Concurrent engineering tools: are the human issues being ignored. Engineering Management, 43(2), 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnear, P.R. and Gray, C.D. (2004) SPSS 12 made simple, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, A., Tarandi, V., Karlshøj, J., Bell, H. and Karud, O.J. (2008) Review of the development and implementation of IFC compatible BIM.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. and Vrijhoef, R. (2001) Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? Building Research and Information, 29(3), 197–207.10.1080/09613210110039266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakye, A.A. (1997) Construction Project Administration in Practice. Longman [co-published with] the Chartered Institute of Building.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, M. and Sanvido, V. (1994) Introducing new process technologies into construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(3), 488–508.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:3(488)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J. (2001) The core competencies of effective project execution the challenge of diversity. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 471–483.10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00042-4
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M. (1994) Constructing the Team: Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry. Government Report.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., Sacks, R. and Eastman, C.M. (2006) Specifying parametric building object behaviour (BOB) for a building information modelling system. Automation in Construction, 15, 758–776.10.1016/j.autcon.2005.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y. (2003) Managing the implementation of construction innovations. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 635–649.10.1080/0144619032000123725
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H.A. and Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975) The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Vol. 29, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Walker, B., Mills, A. and Walker, D. (2014) Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3), 229–45.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, K., Blayse, A. M. and McFallan, S. (2005) Demonstrating the benefits of construction innovation, in Creating an Entrepreneurial Economy: The Role of Enterprise and Innovation, International Research Conference, 7–8 July, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Manseau, A. and Shields, R. (2005) Building Tomorrow: Innovation in Construction and Engineering, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, D.G. (1968) The anatomy of successful innovations. Readings in the management of innovation, Tushman, M.L. and Moore, W.L. (eds.), Ballinger Publishing Co, Boston, MA, pp. 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D.C. (1973) Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migilinskas, D., Popov, V., Juocevicius, V. and Ustinovichius, L. (2013) The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia Engineering, 57, 767–774.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M. and Dewick, P. (2002) Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction. Research Policy, 31(6), 989–1008.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00173-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitropoulos, P. and Tatum, C.B. (1999) Technology adoption decisions in construction organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), 330–338.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(330)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R. and Dainty, A.R. (2001) Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change. Construction Management & Economics, 19(6), 559–562.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. E. (2014) Implementing innovation: a stakeholder competency-based approach for BIM. Construction Innovation, 14(4), 433–452.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. E., Heaney G. and Perera S. (2011) A methodology for evaluating construction innovation constraints through project stakeholder competencies and FMEA. Journal of Construction Innovation, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 11(4), 416–440.10.1108/14714171111175891
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. E. Heaney G. and Perera S. (2013) Modeling construction innovation constraints: a tool for sustaining innovation in projects, in Hajdu, M. and Skibniewski, M. (eds.) Proceedings, Creative Construction Conference 2013, 6–9 July 2013, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 525–535.
   Google Scholar
• Nahod, M.-M., Vukomanovic, M., and Radujkovic, M. (2013a) Framework for measuring and evaluating behavioral competencies in construction projects, in Hajdu, M. and Skibniewski, M. (eds.) Procs Creative Construction Conference 2013, 6–9 July 2013, Budapest, Hundary, pp. 536–545.
   Google Scholar
• Nahod, M.-M., Vukomanovic, M. and Radujkovic, M. (2013b) The impact of ICB 3.0 competencies on project management success. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Science, 74(1), 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B. (1989) Toward an understanding of product innovation process in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(4), 517–534.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:4(517)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B. (1997) Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction Management Economics, 15, 259–270.10.1080/014461997372999
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P.W. (1999) Modelling innovation in AEC: understanding the fourth dimension of competition, http://bit.ly/1Bdp8Ug (accessed 19 July 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. (2002) Use of FMEA – failure modes effects analysis on moisture problems in buildings. 6th Symposium on Building Physics in the Nordic Countries, Trondheim, Norway, June 17.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, D. (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design consideration and applications. Information and Management, 42, 15–29.10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005) Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, OECD publishing, European Commission, Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, S., Pearson, J., Zhou, L. and Ekundayo, D. (2013) Professional, academic and industrial development needs: a competency mapping and expert opinion review. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Special Issue in Construction Education, 17(2), 143–160.10.3846/1648715X.2013.806966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, F. and Janszen, F. (1995) Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment. Construction Management and Economics, 13, 43–51.10.1080/01446199500000006
   Google Scholar
• Riddle, D. (2000) Why innovate? International Trade Forum, 2, 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box, Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. (1976) Innovation in textile machinery: some significant factors in success and failure, Science Policy Research Unit, Occasional Paper Series No. 2, June.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. (1992) Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B.A. and Owen, R. (2010) Interaction of lean and building information modelling in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(9), 968–980.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A. and Gann, D. (2003) Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy, 32(8), 1309–1324.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J.B. (1995) New product mytopia. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Winter 10(1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1947) The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7, 149–159.10.1017/S0022050700054279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaden, G. (1996) Economics of innovation in the construction industry. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2(3), 103–107.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(103)
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian, R. (2011) Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(2), 176–187.10.1108/09699981111111148
   Google Scholar
• Shields, T., Silcock, G., Donegan, H. and Bell, Y. (1987) Methodological problems associated with the use of the Delphi technique. Fire Technology, 23(3), 175–185.10.1007/BF01036934
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S. (1998) Models of construction innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(3), 226–231.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S. (2000) Implementation of construction innovations. Building Research and Information, 28(1), 2–17.10.1080/096132100369055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S.M. and Spencer, L.M. (1993) Competence at work: models for superior performance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L.S. and Goodman, P.S. (1990) Technology and organizations: integration and opportunities. Technology and organizations, 254–265.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, J., Drogemuller, R. and Toth, B. (2012) Model interoperability in building information modelling. Software & Systems Modelling, 11(1), 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, J. and Murray, M. (2004) Creating, supporting and sustaining a culture of innovation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 316–322.10.1108/09699980410558502
   Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B. (1986) Potential mechanisms for construction innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(2), 178–191.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:2(178)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B. (1988) Classification system for construction technology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(3), 344–363.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1988)114:3(344)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B. (1989) Organizing to increase innovation in construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(4), 602–617.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:4(602)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Toole, T.M. (1998) Uncertainty and home builders’ adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), 323–332.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(323)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.10.2307/2392832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urabe, K. (1988) Innovation and the Japanese management system, in Urabe, K., Child, J. and Kagono, T. (eds.) Innovation and Management, International Comparisons, De Gruyter & Co., Berlin, pp. 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Panne, G., Van Beers, C. and Kleinknecht, A. (2003) Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338.10.1142/S1363919603000830
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ven, A.H. (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C.A. (1988) Implementation: a key issue in manufacturing technology: the need for a field of study. Research Policy, 17, 55–63.10.1016/0048-7333(88)90021-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadalkar, M.S. and Pimplikar, S.S. (2012) Effective training program for gap closing in construction industry. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 3, 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H.T., Morton, S.C., Dainty, A.R. and Burns, N.D. (2011) Path dependent constraints on innovation programmes in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Research, 49(11), 3069–3085.10.1080/00207543.2010.482569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G. (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation. Building Research and Information, 26(5), 268–279.10.1080/096132198369751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wix, J. and Katranuschkov, P. (2002) Defining the matrix of communication processes in the AEC/FM industry: current developments and gap analysis, CIB w78 Conference, Aarhus School of Architecture, Denmark, pp. 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990) The Machine that Changed the World. Rawson Associates: Maxwell Macmillan, New York; Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F., Chan, A.P., Chan, D.W. and Li, L.K. (2007) Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics, 25(12), 1219–1237.10.1080/01446190701598673
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W.D., Cheng, S.T., Wu, C.M. and Lou, H.R. (2012) A self-evolutionary model for automated innovation of construction technologies. Automation in Construction, 27, 78–88.10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuppa, D., Issa, R.R. and Suermann, P.C. (2009) BIM’s impact on the success measures of construction projects. Technical Council on Computing and Information Technology of ASCE Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar