The development of a portfolio of business models: a longitudinal case study of a building material company

References

• Abrahamsson, M. and Brege, S. (2004) Dynamic effectiveness: improved industrial distribution from interaction between marketing and logistics strategies. Journal of Marketing Channels, 12(2), 83–112.10.1300/J049v12n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Actenhagen, L., Melin, L. and Naldi, L. (2013) Dynamics of business models – strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, 46, 427–442.10.1016/j.lrp.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller, C. and Haeflinger, S. (2013) Business moels and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 419–426.10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller, C. and Mangematin, V. (2013) Business models: a challenging agenda. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 418–427.10.1177/1476127013510112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller, C. and Morgan, M.S. (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 156–171.10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brege, S., Stehn, L. and Nord, T. (2014) Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), 208–226.10.1080/01446193.2013.840734
   Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ricart, J.E. (2010) From strategy to business models and to tactics. Long Range Planning, 43, 195–215.10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. (1962) Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. (1972) Dependability of Behavioural Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles, Wiley, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A. (2008) Methodological pluralism in construction management research, in Knight, A. and Ruddock, L. (eds.) Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Day, J., Mang, P.Y., Richter, A. and Roberts, J. (2001) The innovative organization: why new ventures need more than a room of their own. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2(21), 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• George, G. and Bock, A.J. (2011) The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.10.1111/etap.2011.35.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S. and Gratton, L. (2003) Integrating the enterprise. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2005) Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution, HBS Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgren, E. and Stehn, L. (2014) The impact of clients' decision-making on their adoption of industrialized building. Construction Management and Economics, 32, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Kindström, D. (2010) Towards a service-based business model – key aspects for future competitive advantage. European Management Journal, 28(6), 479–490.10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarner, P. and Raisch, S. (2013) Move to the beat--rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160–184.10.5465/amj.2010.0767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, J. and Cantrell, S. (2000) Carved in water: changing business models fluidly, Accenture Institute for Strategic Change Research Report, 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• MacKey, R.B. and Chia, R. (2013) Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: a process understanding of the rise and fall of Northco automotive. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 208–230.10.5465/amj.2010.0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magretta, J. (2002) Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, May 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Markides, C. and Charitou, C. (2004) Competing with dual business models: a contingency approach. Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 22–36.10.5465/AME.2004.14776164
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1983) Structure in Fives: designing Effective Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. and Allen, J. (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 726–735.10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C.A. and Tushman, M. (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W. and Goodier, C. (2012) House-building business models and off-site construction take-up. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18, 84–93.10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000058
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review., 63(4), 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 11, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbauer, P. (2008) Triangulation, in Given, Lisa (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Sage Publications, 892, p. 894.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, V., Mangematin, V. and Rousselle, T. (2010) From recipe to dinner: business model portfolios in the european biopharmaceutical industry. Long Range Planning, 43, 431–447.10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D.L., Gilbert, D.T. and Wegner, D.M. (2011) Psychology, 2nd edn, Worth, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J. and Tell, F. (2009) The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950–2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 101–112.10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stähler, P. (2002) Business Models as an Unit of Analysis for Strategizing, International Workshop on Business Models, Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J. (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172–194.10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. and Huber, G.P. (1990) Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organization Science, 1(3), 213–219.10.1287/orsc.1.3.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, K., Arrto, K., Kujala, J. and Söderlund, J. (2010) Business models in project business. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 832–841.10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2008) The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar