Practitioners deconstructing and reconstructing practices when responding to the implementation of BIM

References

• Alin, P., Maunula, A.O., Taylor, J.E. and Smeds, R. (2013) Aligning misaligned systemic innovations: Probing inter-firm effects development in project networks. Project Management Journal, 44(1), 77–93.10.1002/pmj.v44.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1976) Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–75.10.2307/2391848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azhar, S. (2011) Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–52.10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, B. and Leaman, A. (2013) A new professionalism: Remedy or fantasy? Building Research & Information, 41(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, E.M. and Fales, A.W. (1983) Reflective learning: key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117.10.1177/0022167883232011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A. and Swan, J. (2005) Implementing change in construction project organizations: Exploring the interplay between structure and agency. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 547–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryde, D., Broquetas, M. and Volm, J.M. (2013) The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–80.10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes, B. (1992) Managing Change, Pitman Publishing, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cañas, J., Quesada, J., Antoli, A. and Fajardo, I. (2003) Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46, 482–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, D., Li, H. and Wang, G. (2014) Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(12), 04014056.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerovsek, T. (2011) A review and outlook for a ‘building information model’ (BIM): A multi-standpoint framework for technological development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(2), 224–44.10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambliss, D. (1989) The mundanity of excellence: An ethnographic report on stratification and olympic swimmers. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 70–86.10.2307/202063
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. (2006) Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics, in Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J. and Hoffman, R.R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–30.10.1017/CBO9780511816796
   Google Scholar
• Chynoweth, P. (2009) The built environment interdiscipline. Structural Survey, 27(4), 301–10.10.1108/02630800910985090
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E. (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35 (4), Academy of Management, 579-603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. and Harty, C. (2013) Measurement and exploration of individual beliefs about the consequences of building information modelling use. Construction Management and Economics, 31(11), 1110–27.10.1080/01446193.2013.848994
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1985) Letter to a Japanese friend, in Wood, D. and Bernasconi, R. (eds.) Derrida and Difference, Parousia Press, Warwick, RI, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education, MacMillan, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C. and McNiff, S. (2013) BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in Construction, 36, 145–51.10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkjaer, B. and Simpson, B. (2011) Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory? in Tsoukas H. and Chia R. (eds.) Research in the sociology of organizations Vol 32. Philosophy and organization theory. Emerald, Bingley, pp. 55–84.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J., Mieg, H.A., Felt, U. and (2006) Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: A sociological perspective, in Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. and Hoffman, R.R., (2006) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105–23.10.1017/CBO9780511816796
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–45.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2006) Organizational knowledge. The texture of workplace learning, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gorli, M., Nicolini, D. and Scaratti, G. (2015) Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship. Human Relations, 68, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, T.K. and Gohary, H. (2012) Boundary action in construction projects: New collaborative project practices. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 364–76.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. and Clark, T. (2006) Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–53.10.1111/joms.2006.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartenberger, U., Lorenz, D. and Lützkendorf, T. (2013) A shared built environment professional identity through education and training. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 60–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C. and Whyte,J. (2010) Emerging hybrid practices in construction design work: Role of mixed media. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136( Special Issue), 468-76.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, M. and Linderoth, H.C.J. (2010) The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: A Swedish case study. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1), 13–23.10.1080/01446190903406154
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat, S., Whyte, J. and Luck, R. (2013) Professionalism in digitally mediated project work. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 51–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P. (2012) Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79.10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, T. and Kerosuo, H. (2015) Site manger’s daily work and the uses of building information modelling in construction site management. Construction Management and Economics, 33(3), 163–75.10.1080/01446193.2015.1028953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (1990) Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1(4), 339–59.10.1287/orsc.1.4.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihindu, S. and Arayici, Y. (2008) Digital construction through BIM systems will drive the re-engineering of construction business practices, in International Conference Visualisation, July 2008, IEEE, pp. 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mullarkey, J. (1999) Bergson and Philosophy, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M.D., Scott, G.M., Gaddis, B. and Strange, J.M. (2002) Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–50.10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., Perera, S. and Heaney, G. (2015) Innovation management model: a tool for sustained implementation of product innovation into construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 33(3), 209–32.10.1080/01446193.2015.1031684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2013) Practice Theory, Work, & Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, D., Thomson, D. and Dainty, A. (2015) Evaluating the design of hospitals within a practice order network. Construction Management and Economics, 33(5–6), 415–27.10.1080/01446193.2015.1072639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavola, S. and Miettinen, R. (2013) Digital artifacts of collaboration? Building information modeling as a multifunctional instrumentality. 29th EGOS Colloquium 2013, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Peansupap, V. and Walker, D.H.T. (2006) Innovation diffusion at the implementation stage of a construction project: A case study of information communication technology. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 321–32.10.1080/01446190500435317
   Google Scholar
• Price, A. and Chahal, K. (2006) A strategic framework for change management. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 237–51.10.1080/01446190500227011
   Google Scholar
• Rasche, A. (2011) Organizing Derrida organizing: Deconstruction and organization theory, in Tsoukas, Haridimos and Chia, Robert (eds.) Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 32; Philosophy and Organization Theory, Bingley, Emerald, pp. 251–80.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Rosen, M.A. and DiazGranados, D. (2010) Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36(4), 941–73.10.1177/0149206309350084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. and Pinnington, A.H. (2009) Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1138–70.10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., Laurent, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L. and Newell, S. (2004) Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–600.10.1177/0170840604048001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2001) Introduction practice theory, in Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory, Routledge, London, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2011) Where the action is (on large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes). Sustainable Practices Research Group Working Paper, ( November), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.(1983) reprinted 2011 The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Ashgate, London.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., Josephson, P. and Knauseder, I. (2004) Learning capabilities in organizational networks: Case studies of six construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 22(9), 957–66.10.1080/0144619042000241417
   Google Scholar
• Succar, B. (2009) Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–75.10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I. (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–86.10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2009) What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1339–64.10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar