Innovative construction and the role of boundary objects: a Gehry case study

References

• Bakker, R.M., Boroş, S., Kenis, P. and Oerlemans, L.A. (2013) It’s only temporary: time frame and the dynamics of creative project teams. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 383–97.10.1111/bjom.2013.24.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (2000) Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 973–89.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00115-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. and Oborn, E. (2010) Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams. Human Relations, 63(8), 1199–221.10.1177/0018726709355657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B.A. (2003a) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–30.10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B.A. (2003b) Object lessons: workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 720–52.10.1086/379527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B.A. (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3–21.10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Baxter, R. and Lyytinen, K. (2010) Dynamics of inter‐organizational knowledge creation and information technology use across object worlds: the case of an innovative construction project. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 569–88.10.1080/01446193.2010.489926
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W.E. (1995) Of Bicycles. Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–47.10.1287/orsc.1070.0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. (2010) Keeping it real? Constituting partnering through boundary objects. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 615–28.10.1080/01446191003587711
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Harty, C. (2010) Editorial: objects, knowledge sharing and knowledge transformation in projects. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 549–55.10.1080/01446193.2010.495850
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P.R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–55.10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P.R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–68.10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. (2012) Idea Work. Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity, Palgrave, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Ling, F.Y. and Bajracharya, A. (2003) Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 307–18.10.1080/0144619032000056144
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. (2009) Knowledge practices in design: the role of visual representations as epistemic objects. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30.10.1177/0170840608083014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.L. and Weeks, J. (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: the affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–34.10.1177/0170840606068310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–45.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsythe, P. (2015) It's innovation, but not as we normally know it, in Naar, L. and Clegg, S. (eds.) Gehry in Sydney: The Dr Chau Chak Wing Building, UTS, The Images Publishing Group, Mulgrave, pp. 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, T. and Fisher, M. (2007) Supporting the constructability review with 3D/4D models. Building Research & Information, 35(1), 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C. (2005) Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 512–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C. (2008) Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor‐network theory. Construction Management and Economics, 26(10), 1029–41.10.1080/01446190802298413
   Google Scholar
• Hobday, M. (2000) The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–93.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan, A. and Turner, J.R. (2002) The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning, 35(4), 367–88.10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00069-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.F. and Amjadi, M. (2014) The role of materiality: knowing through objects in work practice. European Management Journal, 32(5), 723–34.10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenfle, S. (2014) Toward a genealogy of project management: sidewinder and the management of exploratory projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6), 921–31.10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N. and Orlikowski, W.J. (2009) Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: a critical genre analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 672–703.10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N. and Vaast, E. (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y. (2003) Managing the implementation of construction innovations. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 635–49.10.1080/0144619032000123725
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M. (2014) Innovation, Strategy and Risk in Construction: Turning Serendipity into Capability, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R. (2010) Using objects to coordinate design activity in interaction. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 641–55.10.1080/01446193.2010.489924
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2009) The Global Architect: Firms, Fame and Urban Form, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Mengis, J. and Swan, J. (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–29.10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–28.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J.D. (1997) From inductive to iterative grounded theory: zipping the gap between process theory and process data. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 419–38.10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00027-4
   Google Scholar
• Oswick, C. and Robertson, M. (2009) Boundary objects reconsidered: from bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 179–93.10.1080/14697010902879137
   Google Scholar
• Pietroforte, R., Tombesi, P. and Lebiedz, D.D. (2012) Are physical mock-ups still necessary to complement visual models for the realization of design intents? Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18(1), 34–41.10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000060
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W.E. (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.10.1177/030631284014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooke, J. and Clark, L. (2005) Learning, knowledge and authority on site: a case study of safety practice. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 561–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, D.J., Dainty, A.R. and Brookes, N.J. (2010) Who reads the project file? Exploring the power effects of knowledge tools in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 629–39.10.1080/01446191003725154
   Google Scholar
• Sapsed, J. and Salter, A. (2004) Postcards from the edge: local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1515–34.10.1177/0170840604047998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, H., Panourgias, N.S. and Nandhakumar, J. (2015) Developing a relational view of the organizing role of objects: a study of the innovation process in computer games. Organization Studies, 36(2), 197–220.10.1177/0170840614557213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. and Wagner, I. (2004) Ordering systems: coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13(5–6), 349–408.10.1007/s10606-004-5059-3
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, V.P. and O’Mahony, S. (2014) Managing the repertoire: stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organization Science, 25(3), 691–712.10.1287/orsc.2013.0879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, F.E. and Bakker, H.J. (2012) Modelling the inter-subjective level of innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 60(3/4), 221–41.10.1504/IJTM.2012.049443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S.L. (2010) This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Science Technology Human Values, 35(5), 601–17.10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani, I. and Ravasi, D. (2012) Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1232–59.10.5465/amj.2010.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, R. and Perry, C. (2005) Case research about enterprises, in Hine, D. and Carson, D. (eds.) Innovative Methodologies in Enterprise Research, Edward Elgar, Northhampton, pp. 137–51.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. and Gluch, P. (2010) Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 589–99.10.1080/01446190903450061
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanian, E., Monarch, I., Konda, S., Granger, H., Milliken, R. and Westerberg, A. (2003) Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(2), 185–203.10.1023/A:1023976111188
   Google Scholar
• Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S. and Robertson, M. (2007) The object of knowledge: the role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–37.10.1177/0018726707084915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryggestad, K., Georg, S. and Hernes, T. (2010) Constructing buildings and design ambitions. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 695–705.10.1080/01446191003755441
   Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P.W., van Fenema, P.C. and Tiwari, V. (2008) Cocreating understanding and value in distributed work: how members of onsite and offshore vendor teams give, make, demand, and break sense. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 227–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, L. and Styhre, A. (2013) The role of organizational objects in construction projects: the case of the collapse and restoration of the Tjörn Bridge. Construction Management and Economics, 31(12), 1172–85.10.1080/01446193.2013.868632
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. and Lobo, S. (2010) Coordination and control in project-based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 557–67.10.1080/01446193.2010.486838
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G. (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 26(5), 268–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakura, E.K. (2002) Charting time: timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956–70.10.2307/3069324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Vol. 5, 4th edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Jr. and Lyytinen, K. (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organization Science, 17(2), 215–29.10.1287/orsc.1050.0168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar