Collaboration through innovation: implications for expertise in the AEC sector

References

• Alin, P., Iorio, J. and Taylor, J.E. (2013) Digital boundary objects as negotiation facilitators: spanning boundaries in virtual engineering project networks. Project Management Journal, 44(3), 48–63.10.1002/pmj.v44.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institute of Architects. (2007) Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide, AIA National and AIA California, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Anvuur, A.M., Kumaraswamy, M. and Fellows, R. (2012) Perceptions of status and TMO workgroup cooperation: implications for project governance. Construction Management and Economics, 30(9), 719–737.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden, B.K. and Price, A.D.F. (2011) The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 129–36.10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BC Green Building Roundtable. (2007) Roadmap for the Integrated Design Process, BC Green Building Roundtable, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Bedwell, W.L., Wildman, J.L., Diaz Granados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W.S. and Salas, E. (2012) Collaboration at work: an integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 128–45.10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Baxter, R. and Lyytinen, K. (2010) Dynamics of inter-organizational knowledge creation and information technology use across object worlds: the case of an innovative construction project. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 569–88.10.1080/01446193.2010.489926
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2009) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2013) A Realist Theory of Science, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L.J., Carlile, P.R. and Repenning, N.P. (2004) A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: building on barley’s study of ct scanning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 572–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boujut, J.-F. and Blanco, E. (2003) Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(2), 205–19.10.1023/A:1023980212097
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P.R. (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchio, F., Forgues, D., Paradis, D. and Iordanova, I. (2011) Teamwork in integrated design projects: understanding the effects of trust, conflict, and collaboration on performance. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 78–91.10.1002/pmj.v42.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S. and Marshall, D. (2005) Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 523–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–96.10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Computer Integrated Construction Research Group. (2010) Bim Project Execution Planning Guide, The Pennsylvania State Univesity, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Constructing Excellence. (2011) Constructing Excellence through Collaborative Working, Constructing Excellence, London.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (1996) Relational competence and strategic procurement management: towards an entrepreneurial and contractual theory of the firm. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2(1), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, R. (2011) The Impact of Building Information Modelling: Transforming Construction, Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• den Otter, A. and Emmitt, S. (2007) Exploring effectiveness of team communication: balancing synchronous and asynchronous communication in design teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 408–19.10.1108/09699980710780728
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–47.10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, P., Eskerod, P., Dalcher, D. and Sandhawalia, B. (2010) The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 59–78.10.1002/pmj.20194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Ling, F.Y.Y., Ofori, G, and Silva, N D. (2002) Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 30(4), 237–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C.M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R. and Liston, K. (2011) Bim Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, 2nd edn, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Elvin, G. (2007) Integrated Practice in Architecture: Mastering Design-build, Fast-track, and Building Information Modeling, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998) What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S. (2010) Managing Interdisciplinary Projects: A Primer for Architecture, Engineering and Construction, Spon Press, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington-Darby, T. and Wilson, J.R. (2006) The nature of expertise: a review. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 17–32.10.1016/j.apergo.2005.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, R.F. and Liu, A.M.M. (2012) Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction Management and Economics, 30(8), 653–71.10.1080/01446193.2012.668199
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. and Kunz, J. (2004) The scope and role of information technology in construction, Journal of Construction Managment and Engineering, JSCE, 63(763), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, L.H. and Ahmed, S.M. (2011) Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2014) Getting real about bim: critical realist descriptions as an alternative to the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(3), 405–22.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, L.A., Cushman, M. and Rosenhead, J. (2004) Project review and learning in the construction industry: embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 586–601.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruchter, R. (1999) A/E/C teamwork: a collaborative design and learning space. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(4), 261–9.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:4(261)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1985) Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. and Wood, D.J. (1991a) Towards a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. and Wood, D.J. (1991b) Collaborative alliances: moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.10.1177/0021886391271001
   Google Scholar
• Hartono, E. and Holsapple, C. (2004) Theoretical foundations for collaborative commerce research and practice. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, C. (2008) Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory. Construction Management and Economics, 26(10), 1029–41.10.1080/01446190802298413
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., Williams, T. and Ren, Z. (2012) Differing perspectives on collaboration in construction. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 12(3), 355–68.10.1108/14714171211244613
   Google Scholar
• Isikdag, U. and Underwood, J. (2010) Two design patterns for facilitating building information model-based synchronous collaboration. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 544–53.10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (1992) Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction, Stanford University (Technical Report No. 72, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering), Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (2000) An Exploration Towards a Production Theory and Its Application to Construction, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (2003) Is structural change the primary solution to the problems of construction? Building Research & Information, 31(2), 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K.U. (2012) Organizational learning in project-based companies: a process thinking approach. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40–9.10.1002/pmj.v43.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzee, B. (2014) Expertise, fluency and social realism about professional knowledge. Journal of Education and Work, 27(2), 161–78.10.1080/13639080.2012.738291
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M., Anvuur, A. and Mahesh, G. (2008) Contractual frameworks and cooperative relationships, in Smyth, H. and Pryke, S. (eds.) Collaborative Relationships in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks, Wiley, Chinchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M., Ling, F.Y.Y., Rahman, M. and Phng, S.T. (2005) Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1076–86.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1076)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvan, T. (2000) Collaborative design: what is it? Automation in Construction, 9(4), 409–15.10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00025-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H.J. (1965) Applied organizational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches, in March, G. (ed.) Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 1144–70.
   Google Scholar
• Linderoth, H.C.J. (2010) Understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor networks. Automation in Construction, 19(1), 66–72.10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Andersson, M. and Henfridsson, O. (2008) Multi-contextuality in boundary-spanning practices. Information Systems Journal, 18(6), 641–61.10.1111/isj.2008.18.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A.M.M. and Walker, A. (1998) Evaluation of project outcomes. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2), 209–19.10.1080/014461998372493
   Google Scholar
• Longoria, R.A. (2005) Is inter-organizational collaboration always a good thing? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32(3), 123–38.
   Google Scholar
• MacGrath, K. (2013) The potential of generative mechanisms for is research, in Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M.L., Liew, P.-S., Gu, N. and Ding, L. (2005) An agent approach to supporting collaborative design in 3D virtual worlds. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 189–95.10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattessich, P.W., Murray-Close, M., Monsey, B.R. and Amherst, H.W.F. (2001) Collaboration: What Makes It Work. A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration, Vol. 2, Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, Saint Paul, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A. (2012) A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R. and Flores, F. (1992) The action workflow approach to workflow management technology, in Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, Toronto, Ontario, ACM, Canada, pp. 281–8.
   Google Scholar
• Merschbrock, C. (2012) Collaboration in multi-actor BIM design, in Gudnason, G., Scherer, R. (eds.) Ework and Ebusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, pp. 793–9, CRC Press, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B.A. (1996) Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition, in Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction, in Nardi, B.A. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 69–102.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Building Science. (2007) National Building Information Modeling Standard – Version 1.0 – Part 1- Overview, Principles and Methodologies. U.S. National Institute of Building Science Facilities Information Council, BIM Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Holti, R. and Smalley, M. (2001) Integrating project activities: the theory and practice of managing the supply chain through clusters. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 37–47.10.1080/014461901452067
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Mengis, J. and Swan, J. (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–29.10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–28.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the “it” in it research – a call to theorizing the it artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–34.10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, H., Pettitt, M. and Wilson, J.R. (2012) Factors of collaborative working: a framework for a collaboration model. Applied Ergonomics, 43(1), 1–26.10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomaki, H. and Wight, C. (2000) After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213–37.10.1111/isqu.2000.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, F.T.T. (2012) Construction management research at the individual level of analysis: current status, gaps and future directions. Construction Management and Economics, 31(2), pp. 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D. and Neely, A. (2004) Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5(3–4), 137–68.10.1111/ijmr.2004.5-6.issue-3-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, E.A., Staub-French, S. and Forgues, D. (2015) Embedded contexts of innovation: Bim adoption and implementation for a specialty contracting sme. Construction Innovation, 15(1), 42–65.10.1108/CI-01-2014-0013
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D.V. (2013) Morphogenesis and social change, in Archer, M.S. (ed.) Social Morphogenesis, Vol. 1. Aufl.;2013;1, pp. 25–37, Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S.D. (2004) Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 22(8), 787–97.10.1080/0144619042000206533
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S. and Smyth, H. (2012) The Management of Complex Projects: A Relationship Approach, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science, Sage, London.10.4135/9781446218730
   Google Scholar
• Schade, J., Olofsson, T. and Schreyer, M. (2011) Decision-making in a model-based design process. Construction Management and Economics, 29(4), 371–82.10.1080/01446193.2011.552510
   Google Scholar
• Schöttle, A., Haghsheno, S. and Gehbauer, F. (2014) Defining cooperation and collaboration in the context of lean construction, in Proceedings of the 22th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Schweber, L. and Harty, C. (2010) Actors and objects: a socio-technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 657–74.10.1080/01446191003702468
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, M. and Barrett, P. (2003) A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: insights, ambiguities and questions. Construction Management and Economics, 21(6), 613–22.10.1080/0144619032000134147
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, Vol. 136, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. (2008) Developing trust, in: Smyth, H. and Pryke, S (eds.) Collaborative Relationships in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks, 1st edn, Wiley-Blackwell, Chinchester.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. and Pryke, S. (2008) Collaborative Relationships in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks, 1st edn, Wiley-Blackwell, Chinchester.10.1002/9781444301069
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald, D.H. (1996) Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17(3), 277–301.10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6
   Google Scholar
• Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Succar, B. (2009) Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–75.10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Succar, B., Sher, W. and Williams, A. (2013) An integrated approach to bim competency assessment, acquisition and application. Automation in Construction, 35, 175–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. (2007) Antecedents of successful three-dimensional computer-aided design implementation in design and construction networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(12), 993–1002.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(993)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. and Bernstein, P.G. (2009) Paradigm trajectories of building information modeling practice in project networks. Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(2), 69–76.10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:2(69)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. and Levitt, R. (2007) Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: an integrative model for change. Project Management Journal, 38(3), 22–35.10.1002/pmj.20003
   Google Scholar
• Trompette, P. and Vinck, D. (2009) Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1), 3–25.10.3917/rac.006.0003
   Google Scholar
• Tryggestad, K., Georg, S. and Hernes, T. (2010) Constructing buildings and design ambitions. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 695–705.10.1080/01446191003755441
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2001) What is the problem with experts? Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 123–49.10.1177/030631201031001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J. (2006) Hybrid agency in co-configuration work. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 8(1), 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, N., Letsky, M. and Cowen, M. (2005) Cognitive model of team collaboration: macro-cognitive focus. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3), 269–73.10.1177/154193120504900312
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, Vol. 3, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M. (2010) Managing Construction Projects, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A.K.D., Wong, F.K.W. and Nadeem, A. (2010) Attributes of building information modelling implementations in various countries. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(4), 288–302.10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS6
   Google Scholar
• Xue, X., Shen, Q. and Ren, Z. (2010) Critical review of collaborative working in construction projects: business environment and human behaviors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(4), 196–208.10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar