Public sustainable-energy requirements and innovation in UK PFI school projects

References

• van Amstel, F.M., Zerjav, V., Hartmann, T., van der Voort, M.C., and Dewulf, G.P., 2015. Expanding the representation of user activities. Building research and information, 43 (2), 144–159.10.1080/09613218.2014.932621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., Cook, N., and Marceau, J., 2004. Dynamic innovation strategies and stable networks in the construction industry. Journal of business research, 57 (4), 351–360.10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00391-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badi, S.M. and Pryke, S., 2015. Assessing the quality of collaboration towards the achievement of Sustainable Energy Innovation in PFI school projects. International journal of managing projects in business, 8 (3), 408–440.10.1108/IJMPB-09-2014-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahill, A.T. and Dean, F., 1999. Discovering system requirements. In: A.P. Sage, ed. Handbook of system engineering and management. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 175–219.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J., 2000. Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 973–989.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00115-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. and Sexton, M., 2006. Innovation in small, project-based construction firms. British journal of management, 17 (4), 331–346.10.1111/bjom.2006.17.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. and Stanley, C., 1999. Better construction briefing. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., and Kobbacy, K., 2013. A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and environment, 59 (2013), 678–689.10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., and Sailer, L., 1984. The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual review of anthropology, 13 (1), 495–517.10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayse, A.M. and Manley, K., 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Construction innovation: information, process, management, 4 (3), 143–154.10.1108/14714170410815060
   Google Scholar
• Bossink, B.A.G., 2004. Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130 (3), 337–345.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:3(337)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. and Davies, A., 2000. Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 931–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. and Davies, A., 2004. Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization studies, 25 (9), 1601–1621.10.1177/0170840604048002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, P. and Lu, S.L., 2008. Clients driving innovation, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444301342
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N., 2000. Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances. Construction management and economics, 18 (5), 587–598.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2002. The energy review: a performance and innovation unit report. Available from: http://goo.gl/8Z8n
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S., Tepper, P., Acker, H., Seebach, D., Geuder, A., and Adell, A., 2009. Driving energy efficient innovation through procurement: a practical guide for public authorities. The SMART SPP Consortium. Available from: http://goo.gl/BErDJt
   Google Scholar
• Confederation of British Industry, 2006. Innovation and public procurement: a new approach to stimulating innovation. London: Confederation of British Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil International du Bâtiment, 2016. CIB research roadmap: sustainable construction. Delft, The Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Contraction.
   Google Scholar
• Dair, C.M. and Williams, K. (2006) Sustainable land reuse: the influence of different stakeholders in achieving sustainable brownfield developments in England. Environment and planning A, 38 (7), 1345–1366.10.1068/a37370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpé, R., DeBresson, C., and Xiaoping, H., 1992. The public sector as first user of innovations. Research policy, 21 (3), 251–263.10.1016/0048-7333(92)90019-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington, M. and Culley, S., 2004. A model of factors influencing the design requirement. Design studies, 25, 329–350.10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2007. The children’s plan. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2010. Road to zero-carbon, Final Report of the Zero-Carbon Task Force. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education, 2010. Impact on BSF schools by local authority. Available from: http://goo.gl/15AuCR
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills, 2004. Building schools for the future: a new approach to capital investment. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills, 2005. Building schools for the future, value for money assessment. Available from: http://goo.gl/wnU9rw
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2007. Draft climate change bill, DEFRA, HM government. Available from: http://bit.ly/2aVJ4aI
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2008. Climate change act 2008: impact assessment. London: The Stationary Office (TSO) for the DECC.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2012. Digest of United Kingdom energy statistics 2012. Available from: http://bit.ly/2b5LvHK
   Google Scholar
• Department of Trade and Industry, 2007. Meeting the energy challenge, A White Paper on Energy. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Dewick, P. and Miozzo, M., 2004. Networks and innovation: sustainable technologies in Scottish social housing. R&D management, 34 (3), 323–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, K.R., 2013. Sustainable product innovation: the importance of the front-end stage in the innovation process. In: D.A. Coelho, ed. Advances in industrial design engineering. Croatia: Intech.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J. and Georghiou, L., 2007. Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Research policy, 36 (7), 949–963.10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., Edquist, C., Georghiou, L., Rigby, J., Hafner, S., Hommen, L., Papadakou, M., Rolfstam, M., and Tsipouri, L., 2005. Innovation and public procurement: review of issues at stake. Brussels, Belgium: Study for the European Commission, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., 1998. The ISE final report: scientific findings and policy implications of the “innovation systems and european integration” (ise) research project. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Education Funding Agency, 2015. Guidance: PSBP: selected bidders – private finance batches. Available from: https://goo.gl/4pfqHK
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. and Shaoul, J., 2003. Controlling the PFI process in schools: a case study of the Pimlico project. Policy and politics, 31 (3), 371–385.10.1332/030557303322035009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkvist, P., Naucler, T., and Oppenheim, J., 2008. Business strategies for climate change. The McKinsey quarterly, 2, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E. and Westerberg, M., 2010. Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. International journal of project management, 29 (2), 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12 (2), 219–245.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D. and Salter, A., 2000. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 955–972.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D., Wang, Y., and Hawkins, R., 1998. Do regulations encourage innovation? - the case of energy efficiency in housing. Building research & information, 26 (5), 280–296.10.1080/096132198369760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Building Council Task Group, 2014. Building zero carbon – the case for action. London, UK Green Building Council. Available from: http://goo.gl/qJPiAZ
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, T. and Belloni, K., 2011. Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building research and information, 39 (3), 239–255.10.1080/09613218.2011.561948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. and Rush, H., 1998. Hotspots in complex product systems: emerging issues in innovation management. Technovation, 18 (8–9), 555–590.10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., 2008. Overcoming resistance to innovation: the integration champion in construction. In: P. Brandon and S. Lu, eds. Clients driving innovation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, T.G. and Garry, T., 2003. An overview of content analysis. The marketing review, 3 (4), 479–498.10.1362/146934703771910080
   Google Scholar
• Haugbølle, K. and Boyd, D., 2013. Clients and users in construction: research roadmap report. Delft, The Netherlands: CIB General Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Heavisides, B. and Price, I., 2001. Input versus output‐based performance mesurement in the NHS – the current situation. Facilities, 19 (10), 344–356.10.1108/EUM0000000005533
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E. and Lovio, R., 2007. User knowledge in housing energy innovation. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Consumer Policy Conference. Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgin, G. and Jessop, N., 1965. Communications in the building industry: the report of a pilot study. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hobday, M., 1998. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Research policy, 26 (6), 689–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M., 2004. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organization science, 15 (1), 70–81.10.1287/orsc.1030.0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons, 2007. Sustainable schools: are we building schools for the future? London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Huesemenn, M., 2003. The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean technology and environment policy, 5 (1), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, 2015. Renewable energy medium term market report 2015: market analysis and forecasts until 2020. Available from: http://bit.ly/2bj7b1d
   Google Scholar
• International Living Future Institute, 2012. Living building challenge 2.1: a visionary path to a restorative future. Seattle, WA: International Living Future Institute.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO), 2009. ISO 31000:2009, risk management—Principles and guidelines. Geneva: International Standards Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• James, S., 2011. Review of Education Capital. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. and Medcof, J., 2007. Motivating proactive subsidiary innovation: agent-based theory and socialization models in global R&D. Journal of international management, 13 (4), 472–487.10.1016/j.intman.2007.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A., Björlingson, E., and Karlsson, A., 2007. Procuring service innovations: contractor selection for partnering projects. International journal of project management, 25 (4), 375–385.10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Kamara, J.M., Anumba, C.J., and Evbuomwan, N.F.O., 2002. Capturing client requirements in construction projects. London: Thomas Telford.10.1680/ccricp.31036
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., 2008. Going green, the challenges and solutions. Automotive design and production, 120 (1), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. and Foxon, T., 2007. Eco-innovation from an innovation dynamics perspective, deliverable 1 of MEI project (D1). UNU-MERIT. Available from: http://goo.gl/7lTc9E
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M. and Dulaimi, M., 2001. Empowering innovative improvements through creative construction procurement. Engineering construction and architectural management, 8 (5–6), 325–334.10.1046/j.1365-232X.2001.00215.x
   Google Scholar
• Lam, P.T., Chan, E.H., Chau, C.K., and Poon, C.S., 2011. A sustainable framework of “green” specification for construction in Hong Kong. Journal of facilities management, 9 (1), 16–33.10.1108/14725961111105718
   Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., 2003. Technological innovations in the context of public- private partnership projects. Thesis (PhD). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, D. and Eckersly, Y., 1997. Driving innovation: the role of the client and the contractor. Sydney: CII, Report No. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, G. and Ryd, N., 2007. Clients’ goals and the construction project management process. Facilities, 25 (3/4), 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Livesey, P., 2012. Priority schol building programme. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Mallozzi, C.A., 2009. Voicing the interview: a researcher's exploration on a platform of empathy. Qualitative inquiry, 15 (6), 1042–1060.10.1177/1077800409334227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2 (1), 71–87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. and Huberman, A., 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M. and Dewick, P., 2002. Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction. Research policy, 31 (6), 989–1008.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00173-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1992. Strategies for technology push: lessons from construction innovations. Journal of construction engineering and management, 118 (3), 507–524.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(507)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1997. Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction management and economics, 15 (3), 259–270.10.1080/014461997372999
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, R., 2003. From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction management and economics, 21 (8), 841–848.10.1080/0144619032000072137
   Google Scholar
• Orstavik, F., Dainty, A.R., and Abbott, C., eds., 2015. Introduction, Construction innovation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, A.E., Hassan, T.M., and Pasquire, C.L., 2005. Analysis of factors that drive brief development in construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 12 (1), 69–87.10.1108/09699980510576907
   Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., 2012. Analysis of construction innovation process at project level. Journal of management in engineering, 29 (4), 455–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for Schools, 2006 The competitive dialogue procedure. Available from: http://goo.gl/OmL9Ma
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. and Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9 (4), 97–118.10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, G.Y., Shen, L.Y., Zeng, S.X., and Jorge, O.J., 2010. The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: an industry perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 18 (14), 1358–1365.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. and Lynes, J., 2007. Institutional motivations and barriers to the construction of green buildings on campus. International journal of sustainability in higher education, 8 (3), 339–354.10.1108/14676370710817183
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. and Scott, J., 2008. Service delivery and performance monitoring in PFI/PPP projects. Construction management and economics, 27 (2), 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J., 1980. Theory of economic development. New Jersey: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Seaden, G. and Manseau, A., 2001. Public policy and construction innovation. Building research and information, 29 (3), 182–196.10.1080/09613210010027701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S., 1998. Models of construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124 (3), 226–231.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P.G. and Reinersten, D.G., 1998. Developing products in half the time. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Sporrong, J. and Bröchner, J., 2009. Public procurement incentives for sustainable design services: Swedish experiences. Architectural engineering and design management, 5 (1), 24–35.10.3763/aedm.2009.0903
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N., 2006. Stern review on the economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Taiwo Gbadegesin, J. and Tajudeen Aluko, B., 2014. Public private partnerships/private finance initiatives for financing infrastructure in public tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Built environment project and asset management, 4 (2), 199–215.10.1108/BEPAM-04-2013-0010
   Google Scholar
• Tatum, C., 1984. What prompts construction innovation? Journal of construction engineering and management, 110 (3), 311–323.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1984)110:3(311)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawiah, P.A. and Russell, A.D., 2008. Assessing infrastructure project innovation potential as a function of procurement mode. Journal of management in engineering, 24 (3), 173–186.10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:3(173)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmann, P., 2007. Introduction to this issue. Energy policy, 35 (11), 5263–5266.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M., 1999. Output specifications for PFI projects, A 4P’s guide summary, public private partnerships programme. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M., 2003. PFI: meeting the investment challenge. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M., 2012. A new approach to public private Partnerships. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Treasury, H.M., 2015. The green book Appraisal and evaluation in central government: Treasury guidance. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzopoulos, P., Cooper, R., Chan, P., and Kagioglou, M., 2006. Clients’ activities at the design front-end. Design studies, 27 (6), 657–683.10.1016/j.destud.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S., 2000. Product design and development. 2nd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Ke, Y.J., and Xie, J., 2012. Public-private partnership implementation in China. In: G. Winch, M. Onishi and S. Schmidt, eds. Taking stock of PPP and PFI around the World. London: ACCA, Certified Accountants Educational Trust, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte and Sexton, 2011. Motivations for innovation in the built environment: new directions for research. Building research and information, 39 (5), 473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., 2002. Monitoring and evaluation of public policies for educational infrastructure, OECD programme on educational building. Mexico: International Seminar on Educational Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G., 1998. Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building research and information, 26 (5), 268–279.10.1080/096132198369751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., and Wall, K., 2007. A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future. Oxford review of education, 33 (1), 47–70.10.1080/03054980601094693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R., 2014. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, A.T. and Shen, G.Q., 2013. Problems and solutions of requirements management for construction projects under the traditional procurement systems. Facilities, 31 (5/6), 223–237.10.1108/02632771311307098
   Google Scholar
• Yu, A.T., Chan, E.H., Chan, D.W., Lam, P.T., and Tang, P.W., 2010 Management of client requirements for design and build projects in the construction industry of Hong Kong. Facilities, 28 (13/14), 657–672.10.1108/02632771011083694
   Google Scholar
• Yudelson, J., 2008. The green building revolution. Washington, DC: Island.
   Google Scholar