Managing the unknown – Addressing the potential health risks of nanomaterials in the built environment

References

• AECOM, 2014. The blue book: property and construction handbook international edition. Available from: http://www.aecom.com/content/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/10/Blue-Book-2014.pdf [viewed 26 November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Allen, N.S., et al., 2008. Photocatalytic titania based surfaces: environmental benefits. Polymer degradation and stability, 93 (9), 1632–1646.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarmi, F., et al., 2015. Physicochemical characteristics and occupational exposure to coarse, fine and ultrafine particles during building refurbishment activities. Journal of nanoparticle research, 17 (8), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, M.e.a., 2015. July-last update, Safe handling of nano materials and other advanced materials at workplaces [Homepage of baua: Nanovalid, Online]. Available from: http://www.nanosafetycluster.eu/nanoToGo/Nano%20to%20go!/Brochure/Safe%20handling%20of%20nanomaterials%20and%20other%20advanced%20materials%20at%20workplaces_v1-0.pdf [viewed 26 Oct 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bartos, P.J., 2014. Editorial: photocatalytic concrete. Magazine of concrete research, 66 (5), 217–218.10.1680/macr.13.00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behm, M., 2005. Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety science, 43 (8), 589–611.10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi, E., et al., 2015. Impact and effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies on the insurability of nanomaterial production: evidences from industrial case studies. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 7 (6), 839-855.
   Google Scholar
• BiPRO, 2013. Study of the scope of a belgian national register for nanomaterials and products containing nanomaterials reference: DG5/MR/JP/12026. Munich: Belgium Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (FPS).
   Google Scholar
• Bochon, A., 2015. Febraury-last update, Growing issues in a miniature world: nanomaterials registers in the European Union [Homepage of Squire Patton Boggs, Online]. Available from: http://nanofutures.info/sites/default/files/Nano-Registers-in-European-Union.pdf [viewed 18 February 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Boverhof, D.R. and David, R.M., 2010. Nanomaterial characterization: considerations and needs for hazard assessment and safety evaluation. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 396 (3), 953–961.10.1007/s00216-009-3103-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G. and Dainty, A., 2005. Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? Supply chain management: an international journal, 10 (4), 319–326.10.1108/13598540510612794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Broekhuizen, F. and van Broekhuizen, P., 2009. Nano‐products in the European construction industry state of the art. Amsterdam: European Federation of Building and Wood Workers.
   Google Scholar
• van Broekhuizen, P., et al., 2011. Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof. Journal of nanoparticle research, 13 (2), 447–462.10.1007/s11051-010-0195-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI, 2011. PAS 71: Vocabulary. Nanoparticles [Homepage of BSI, Online]. Available from: http://shop.bsigroup.com/forms/Nano/PAS-71/ [viewed 4 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Busquets-Fité, M., et al., 2013. Exploring release and recovery of nanomaterials from commercial polymeric nanocomposites. In: Journal of physics: conference series (Vol. 429, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bussy, C., Ali-Boucetta, H., and Kostarelos, K. 2012. Safety considerations for graphene: lessons learnt from carbon nanotubes. Accounts of chemical research, 46 (3), 692–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, X., et al., 2013. Health effects of exposure to nano-TiO2: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Nanoscale research letters, 8 (1), 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A.L., 2014. A rational approach for the safe design of nanomaterials. In: Nancy A. Monteiro-Riviere and C. Lang Tran, eds. Nanotoxicology: progress toward nanomedicine. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• David, R.M., et al., 2013. Comparative assessment of nanomaterial definitions and considerations for implementation [Homepage of American Chemistry Council, Online]. Available from: http://nanotechnology.americanchemistry.com/Nanotechnology/Panel-Activities/Nanotechnology-Definitions/Nanotechnology-Panel-Presents-at-Society-of-Toxicology.pdf [viewed 2015, 15 January].
   Google Scholar
• Doll, R., 1955. Mortality from lung cancer in asbestos workers. British journal of industrial medicine, 12 (2), 81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson, K. and Poland, C.A., 2013. Nanotoxicity: challenging the myth of nano-specific toxicity. Current opinion in biotechnology, 24 (4), 724–734.10.1016/j.copbio.2013.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K., et al., 2013. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes and asbestos—Similarities and differences. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 65 (15), 2078–2086.10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA, 2015. March 11-last update, Decision on substance evaluation pursuant to article 46(1) of regulation (EC) NO 1907/2006 For silicon dioxide, CAS No 7631-86-9 (EC No 23 1-545-4) [Homepage of European Chemicals Agency, Online]. Available from: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/a94c8df7-81c5-4946-80ae-dfa9275897e1 [viewed 23 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. Commission staff working paper types and uses of nanomaterials, including safety aspects [Homepage of European Commission, Online]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0288:FIN:EN:PDF [viewed 4 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2015. November 20-last update, Key enabling technologies. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/key-enabling-technologies/index_en.htm [viewed 25 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Froggett, S.J., et al., 2014. A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites. Particle and fibre toxicology, 11 (1), 17.10.1186/1743-8977-11-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, D. and Greenberg, M., 2001. Asbestos: from ‘magic’ to malevolent mineral. In: Poul Harremoës, ed. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 52.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, A., et al., forthcoming. Nanotechnology in construction and demolition – what we know, what we don’t. Report for the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health. Wigston Magna: IOSH
   Google Scholar
• Greßler, S. and Gazsó, A., 2012. August-last update, Nano Trust dossier No. 032en Nano in the Construction Industry [Homepage of Institute of Technology Assessment of the Austrain Academy of Sciences, Online]. Available from: epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/nanotrust-dossiers/dossier032en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S.F., Jensen, K.A., and Baun, A., 2014. NanoRiskCat: a conceptual tool for categorization and communication of exposure potentials and hazards of nanomaterials in consumer products. Journal of nanoparticle research, 16 (1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanus, M.J. and Harris, A.T., 2013. Nanotechnology innovations for the construction industry. Progress in materials science, 58 (7), 1056–1102.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C., et al., 2007. The futures of construction: a critical review of construction future studies. Construction management and economics, 25 (5), 477–493.10.1080/01446190600879117
   Google Scholar
• Hincapié, I., et al., 2015. Use of engineered nanomaterials in the construction industry with specific emphasis on paints and their flows in construction and demolition waste in Switzerland. Waste management, 43, 398–406.10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirth, S., et al., 2013. Scenarios and methods that induce protruding or released CNTs after degradation of nanocomposite materials. Journal of nanoparticle research, 15 (4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F.L., 1918. Mortality from respiratory diseases in dusty trades (inorganic dusts). No. 231, US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• HSE, 2013. Using nanomaterials at work. Sudbury: Health and Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Iavicoli, S., Rondinone, B.M., and Boccuni, F., 2009. Occupational safety and health’s role in sustainable, responsible nanotechnology: gaps and needs. Human and experimental toxicology, 28 (6–7), 433–443.10.1177/0960327109105162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO, 2012. Nanomaterials – Preparation of material safety data sheet (MSDS) ISO/TR 13329:2012. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J.H. and Lucas, K.A., 2011. Nanogold synthesis in wool fibres: novel colourants. Gold bulletin, 44 (2), 85–89.10.1007/s13404-011-0012-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, W., et al., 2016. Nanomaterials in construction–what is being used, and where? Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, 1–14.10.1680/jcoma.16.00011
   Google Scholar
• Keleş, Y., 2009. June-last update, ObservatoryNano economical assessment/construction sector final report [Homepage of Bax and Willems Consulting Venturing/Observatory Nano, Online]. Available from: http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/reportpdf/report162.pdf [viewed 9 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Kosk-Bienko, J., 2009. Workplace exposure to nanoparticles [Homepage of European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), Online]. Available from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/literature_reviews/workplace_exposure_to_nanoparticles [viewed 4 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Krug, H.F., 2014. Nanosafety research – Are we on the right track? Angewandte chemie international edition, 53 (46), 12304–12319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch, T., Neumann, S. and Fissan, H., 2004. Number size distribution, mass concentration, and particle composition of PM1, PM2. 5, and PM10 in bag filling areas of carbon black production. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 1 (10), 660–671.10.1080/15459620490502242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch, T., et al., 2011. Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Particle and fibre toxicology, 8 (1), 22.10.1186/1743-8977-8-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P. and Morawska, L., 2014. Recycling concrete: an undiscovered source of ultrafine particles. Atmospheric environment, 90, 51–58.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanone, S., et al., 2013. Determinants of carbon nanotube toxicity. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 65 (15), 2063–2069.10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraza, Í., et al., 2015. April 30-last update, Best practice guide for risk prevention in relation with manufactured nanomaterials (mnms) in the construction sector SPD4 [Homepage of Scaffold, Online]. Available from: http://scaffold.eu-vri.eu/filehandler.ashx?file=13829 [viewed 28 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Mahendra, S., and Alvarez, P.J., 2010. Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS nano, 4 (7), 3580–3590.10.1021/nn100866w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.H., et al., 2012. Evaluation of information in nanomaterial safety data sheets and development of international standard for guidance on preparation of nanomaterial safety data sheets. Nanotoxicology, 7 (3), 338–345.10.3109/17435390.2012.658095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C.H., Solt, M.E., and Bailey, E.M., 2008. Diagnosing unforeseeable uncertainty in a new venture. Journal of product innovation management, 25 (1), 28–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López de Ipiña, J., et al., 2015. Strategies, methods and tools for managing nanorisks in construction. In: Journal of physics: conference series (Vol. 617, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madani, S.Y., et al., 2011. A new era of cancer treatment: carbon nanotubes as drug delivery tools. International journal of nanomedicine, 6, 2963–2979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillard, J. and Hartemann, P., 2013. Silver as an antimicrobial: facts and gaps in knowledge. Critical reviews in microbiology, 39 (4), 373–383.10.3109/1040841X.2012.713323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., 2006. October 31-last update, Nanotechnology and construction [Homepage of Nanoforum, Online]. Available from: http://nanotech.law.asu.edu/Documents/2009/10/Nanotech%20and%20Construction%20Nanoforum%20report_259_9089.pdf [viewed 17 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., et al., 2012. Mechanisms of toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles on human lung submucosal cells in vitro: protective effects of fisetin. Chemical research in toxicology, 25 (10), 2227–2235.10.1021/tx3002884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., Hodson, L., and Geraci, C., 2009. Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials – Part A. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 7 (3), 127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napierska, D., et al., 2010. The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Particle and fibre toxicology, 7 (1), 39.10.1186/1743-8977-7-39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIOSH, 2013. April-last update, Current intelligence bulletin 65 occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers [Homepage of NIOSH, Online]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-145/pdfs/2013-145.pdf [viewed 19 May 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., 2010. Safety assessment for nanotechnology and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology. Journal of internal medicine, 267 (1), 89–105.10.1111/jim.2009.267.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., et al., 1992. Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. Environmental health perspectives, 97, 193–199.10.1289/ehp.9297193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., et al., 1990. Increased pulmonary toxicity of ultrafine particles? II. Lung lavage studies. Journal of aerosol science, 21 (3), 384–387.10.1016/0021-8502(90)90065-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, K., et al., 2004. Effects of nano- scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: studies on viability, proliferation and inflammation. Journal of materials science: materials in medicine, 15 (4), 321–325.10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021095.36878.1b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinno, F., et al., 2012. Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. Journal of nanoparticle research, 14 (9), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, J.A., et al., 2011. Single-walled carbon nanotubes chemically functionalized with polyethylene glycol promote tissue repair in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Journal of neurotrauma, 28 (11), 2349–2362.10.1089/neu.2010.1409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RPA, et al., 2015. Study to assess the impact of possible legislation to increase transparency on nanomaterials on the market, options assessment report, for DG internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs, April. Loddon, Norfolk, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen, K., et al., 2010. Nanotechnologies, engineered nanomaterials and occupational health and safety – A review. Safety science, 48 (8), 957–963.10.1016/j.ssci.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCENIHR, 2014. Opinion on Nanosilver: safety, health and environmental effects and role in antimicrobial resistance. Brussels: Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, K., et al., 2010. Human safety review of “nano” titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. Photochemical and photobiological sciences, 9 (4), 495–509.10.1039/b9pp00180h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selikoff, I.J., Churg, J., and Hammond, E.C., 1964. Asbestos exposure and neoplasia, JAMA, 188 (1), 22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, S., et al., 2012. Pervious concrete with titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst compound for a greener urban road environment. Construction and building materials, 35, 874–883.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H., et al., 2013. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data. Particle and fibre toxicology, 10, 15.10.1186/1743-8977-10-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, E.T., 2014. A review of nanomaterials in civil engineering works. International journal of structural and civil engineering research, 3, 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Som, C., et al., 2014. LICARA guidelines for the sustainable competitiveness of nanoproducts. Dübendorf, St. Gallen, Zeist.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, V., et al., 2009. Engineered nanoparticles – Review of health and environmental safety. EU 7th research framework Programme [Homepage of European Commission, Online]. Available from: http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/whats-new/enhres-final-report [viewed 24 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Straif, K., et al., 2014. Future priorities for the IARC monographs, The lancet oncology, 15 (7), 683–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H., 2011. A report on responsible research & innovation (On the basis of material provided by the Services of the European Commission. Prepared for DG Research and Innovation, European Commission) [Homepage of MATTER, Online]. Available from: http://nanofutures.info/sites/default/files/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf [viewed 18 February 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Teizer, J., et al., 2009. Nanotechnology and its impact on construction CII report 251-11 [Homepage of Construction Industry Institute, Online].
   Google Scholar
• Valberg, P.A., Long, C.M., and Sax, S.N., 2006. Integrating studies on carcinogenic risk of carbon black: epidemiology, animal exposures, and mechanism of action. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 48 (12), 1291–1307.10.1097/01.jom.0000215342.52699.2a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duuren-Stuurman, B., et al., 2012. Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. The annals of occupational hygiene, 56 (5), 525–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquero, C., et al., 2015. April 30-last update, Best practice guide for risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) in the construction sector SPD9 [Homepage of Scaffold, Online]. Available from: http://scaffold.eu-vri.eu/filehandler.ashx?file=13832 [viewed 28 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• West, G.H., et al., 2016. Toward responsible development and effective risk management of nano-enabled products in the US construction industry. Journal of nanoparticle research, 18 (2), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, S.W.P., et al., 2009. Nano-silver – A review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology, 3 (2), 109–138.10.1080/17435390902725914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, S., et al., 2013. Specific surface area of titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles influences cyto- and photo-toxicity. Toxicology, 304, 132–140.10.1016/j.tox.2012.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar