The futures of construction management research

References

• Abbott, A., 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amer, M., Daim, T.U., and Jetter, A., 2013. A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46 (1), 23–40.10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A., 2009. Developments in construction education in the UK. In: D. Langford and W. Hughes, eds. Building a discipline: the story of construction management. Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. and Trowler, P.R., 2001. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., 1992. The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. In: W. Bijker and J. Law, eds. Shaping Technology/building society studies in sociotechnical change. The MIT Press: Cambridge MA, 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., and Daniel, H.-D., 2013. Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: the Leiden ranking 2011/2012. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 64 (8), 1649–1658.10.1002/asi.2013.64.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslau, D., 1997. Contract shop epistemology: credibility and problem construction in applied social science. Social studies of science, 27, 363–394.10.1177/030631297027003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., 2016. Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management. International journal of project management, 34 (2), 328–338.10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., 2017. Being careful what we wish for? Challenges and opportunities afforded through engagement with business and management research. Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 24–34.10.1080/01446193.2016.1270462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Burell, G., 2013. Journals à la mode? Twenty years of living alongside Mode 2 and the new production of knowledge. Organisation, 20 (1), 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J., 2009. Sweden. In: D. Langford and W. Hughes, eds. Building a discipline—the story of construction management. Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 133–134.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S.-J., 2012. Enhancing global competitiveness: university ranking movement in Asia. Evaluation in higher education, 6 (1), 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A., 2007. A review and critique of construction management research methods. In: Proceedings construction management and economics 25th anniversary conference, 16–18 July. Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A.R.J., 2008. Methodological pluralism in construction management research. In: A. Knight and L. Ruddock, eds. Advanced research methods in the built environment. Oxford: Wiley, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Elzinga, A., 1985. Research bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria. In: B. Wittrock and A. Elzinga, eds. The university research system: the public policies of the home of scientists. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, 191–220.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A., 1997. Research methods for construction. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S. and Leiringer, R., 2009. The construction management field: a bit of a dig. In: Proceedings of 5^th Nordic conference on construction economics and organisation, vol. 1, 10–12 June. Reykjavik: Reykjavík University, 110–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S., Leiringer, R., and Thorpe, T., 2006. Change in construction: a critical perspective. Building research and information, 34 (2), 91–103.10.1080/09613210500491639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, B. and Brundenius, C., eds., 2011. Universities in transition: the changing role and challenges for academic institutions. Singapore: International Development Research Centre. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S., 1998. The technocratic totalitarianism of construction process improvement: a critical perspective. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 5 (4), 376–386.10.1108/eb021090
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.D., 2011. Making sense of construction improvement. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444341102
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.D., Kao, C., and Larsen, G.D., 2010. Contextualist research: iterating between methods while following an empirically grounded approach. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (1), 117–126.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., 2007. Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: the rigour-relevance debate in management research. Academy of management journal, 50 (4), 775–782.10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., 2000. Varieties of social research: a typology. International journal of social research methodology, 3 (3), 221–229.10.1080/13645570050083706
   Google Scholar
• Harty, C. and Leiringer, R., 2007. Social Science Research and Construction: balancing rigour and relevance. In: Proceedings Construction Management and Economics 25th Anniversary Conference, Reading, July 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, C. and Leiringer, R., 2008. Construction management researchers as agents of change: balancing academic priorities and industry impact. In: Proceedings of the CIB W55/65 Joint International Symposium, Dubai, November 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Horner Reich, B., et al., 2013. Developing better theory about project organizations. International journal of project management, 31 (7), 938–942.10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, A.S. and Huff, J.O., 2001. Re-focusing the business school agenda. British journal of management, 12 (S1), S49–S54.10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Hult, M., 2010. Vassare profil och mer internationellt samarbete [Sharper profile and more international collaboration, online]. Available from: http://www.kth.se/abe/om-skolan/organisation/skolledning/stellanintervju-1.68471 [Accessed Jun 27 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T.A., et al., 2007. What causes a management article to be cited-article, author, or journal? Academy of management journal, 50 (3), 491–506.10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2017. Why is management research irrelevant? Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 4–23.10.1080/01446193.2016.1272759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, D., 2009. Early foundations of the discipline: the Post WWII Years. In: D. Langford and W. Hughes, eds. Building a discipline: the story of construction management. Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Learmonth, M., Lockett, A., and Dowd, K., 2012. Towards scholarship that matters: the usefulness of useless research and the uselessness of useful research. British journal of management, 23 (1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R. and Dainty, A., 2017. Construction management and economics: new directions. Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 1–3.10.1080/01446193.2017.1275159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, J.C. and Smith, H.J., 1992. The complex case of management education. Harvard business review, 16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. and Kam, J., 2010. Counting footnotes: citability in management studies. Scandinavian journal of management, 26 (2), 189–203.10.1016/j.scaman.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides, C., 2007. In search of ambidextrous professors. Academy of management journal, 50 (4), 762–768.10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag, R., Hambrick, D.C., and Chen, M.-J., 2007. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic management journal, 28 (9), 935–955.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRF, 2016. NRF rating [online]. South Africa: National Research Foundation. Available from: http://www.nrf.ac.za/rating [Accessed 17 Nov 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, A.L. and Montgomery, K., 2008. Using field-configuring events for sense-making: a cognitive network approach. Journal of management studies, 45 (6), 1147–1167.10.1111/joms.2008.45.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A., 1997. The double hurdles for management research. In: T. Clarke, ed. Advancement in organisational behaviour: essays in honour of Derek S. Pugh. London: Dartmouth Press, 277–296.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A., 2001. Management research after modernism. British journal of management, 12, S61–S70.10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of management review, 18, 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C.T., 2004. The business school ‘business’: some lessons from the US experience. Journal of management studies, 41 (8), 1501–1520.10.1111/joms.2004.41.issue-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raan, A.F.J., 2005. Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62 (1), 133–143.10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauhvargers, A., 2013. Global university rankings and their impact: report II. EUA Report on rankings 2013. Brussels: European University Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, N.R., Zacharia, Z.G., and Fugate, B.S., 2013. The interdisciplinary future of supply chain management research. Decision sciences, 44 (3), 413–429.10.1111/deci.2013.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber, L., 2015. Putting theory to work: the use of theory in construction research. Construction management and economics, 33 (10), 840–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber, L. and Leiringer, R., 2012. Beyond the technical: a snapshot of energy and buildings research. Building research and information, 40 (4), 481–492.10.1080/09613218.2012.675713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNI, 2016. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores [online]. Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación. Available from: http://sni.org.uy [Accessed 17 Nov 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J. and Bakker, R.M., 2014. The case for good reviewing. International journal of project management, 32 (1), 1–6.10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, K. and Madan, P., 2001. Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British journal of management, 12 (S1), S26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D., 1997. Pasteur’s quadrant basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, C. and Dainty, A., 2011. Knowledge co-production in construction management research. In: C. Egbu and E.C.W. Lou, eds. Proceedings 27th annual ARCOM conference, 5–7 september 2011. Bristol: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• THE, 2014. World university rankings 2013–2014 methodology. Times Higher Education [online]. Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/methodology [Accessed 27 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R., 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar