Formal and informal relations within BIM-enabled supply chain partnerships

References

• Ahn, Y.H., Kwak, Y.H. and Suk, S.J., 2015. Contractors’ transformation Strategies for adopting Building Information Modeling. Journal of management in engineering, 32 (05015005), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Alsamadani, R., Hallowell, M. and Javernick-Will, A.N., 2013. Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis. Construction management and economics, 31, 568–579.10.1080/01446193.2012.685486
   Google Scholar
• Amor, R., 2015. Analysis of the evolving IFC schema. In: J. Beetz, L. Van Berlo, T. Hartmann, and R. Amor, eds. 32nd CIB W78 information technology for construction conference (CIB W78 2015), Eindhoven: CIB, 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F. and Dainty, A.R.J., 2006. The extent of team integration within construction projects. International journal of project management, 24, 13–23.10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M., 2009. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International association for the advancement of artificial intelligence (AAAI) conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM 8), San Jose, CA: ICWSM, 361–362.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A., 1950. Communication patterns in task‐oriented groups. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 22, 725–730.10.1121/1.1906679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. and Hertting, N., 2014. Generalization by mechanism: thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research. Philosophy of the social sciences, 44, 707–732.10.1177/0048393113506495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N., 2000. Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction management and economics, 18, 229–237.10.1080/014461900370852
   Google Scholar
• Bryde, D., Broquetas, M. and Volm, J.M., 2013. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 31, 971–980.10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buskens, V., 2002. Social networks and trust. Thesis. Amsterdam: Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology-Thela.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E. and Jahre, M., 2009. Balancing value creating logics in construction. Construction management and economics, 27, 695–704.10.1080/01446190903096609
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, G., et al., 2013. Collaborative BIM in the cloud and the communication tools to support ited. Proceedings of the 30th CIB W78 international conference on applications of IT in the AEC industry (CIB W78 2013), Beijing: CIB, 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V., 2008. Social network model of construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134, 804–812.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P.S., Diekmann, J. and O’Brien, J., 2010. Project organizations as social networks. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136, 452–458.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A.N., Chen, P.H., and Tiong, R.L., 2011. Analysing the structure of public–private partnership projects using network theory. Construction management and economics, 29, 247–260.10.1080/01446193.2010.537354
   Google Scholar
• Cic, 2011. A report for the government construction client group building information modelling (BIM) working party strategy paper [online]. Available from: http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/BIS-BIM-strategy-Report.pdf [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, J. and Ten Heuvelhof, E., 2008. Management in networks: on multi-actor decision making. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demian, P. and Walters, D., 2014. The advantages of information management through building information modelling. Construction management and economics, 32, 1153–1165.10.1080/01446193.2013.777754
   Google Scholar
• Dike, I.U. and Kapogiannis, G., 2014. A conceptual model for improving construction supply chain performanceed. Proceedings of the 30th annual association of researchers in construction management conference (ARCOM 2014), Portsmouth: ARCOM, 1029–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Z., Zuo, J., Wu, J., and Wang, J.Y., 2015. Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: a China study. Engineering construction and architectural management, 22, 732–748.10.1108/ECAM-04-2015-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorée, A.G., 2004. Collusion in the Dutch construction industry: an industrial organization perspective. Building research and information, 32, 146–156.10.1080/0961321032000172382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossick, C.S. and Neff, G., 2010. Organizational divisions in BIM-enabled commercial construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136, 459–467.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2000. Supply strategy and network effects – purchasing behaviour in the construction industry. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 6, 207–215.10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00016-2
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2002. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20, 621–631.10.1080/01446190210163543
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Ling, F.Y.Y., Ofori, G., and Silva, N., 2002. Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building research and information, 30, 237–247.10.1080/09613210110115207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, R., et al., 2013. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in construction, 36, 145–151.10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., et al., 2008. BIM handbook. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470261309
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction: report of the construction task force [online]. Available from constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/rethinking_construction_report.pdf [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50, 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmualim, A. and Gilder, J., 2014. BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation. Architectural engineering and design management, 10, 183–199.10.1080/17452007.2013.821399
   Google Scholar
• El-Sheikh, A. and Pryke, S.D., 2010. Network gaps and project success. Construction management and economics, 28, 1205–1217.10.1080/01446193.2010.506643
   Google Scholar
• Fernie, S. and Tennant, S., 2013. The non-adoption of supply chain management. Construction management and economics, 31, 1038–1058.10.1080/01446193.2013.830186
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12, 219–245.10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C., 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1, 215–239.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadde, L.-E. and Dubois, A., 2010. Partnering in the construction industry – Problems and opportunities. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16, 254–263.10.1016/j.pursup.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidado, K.I., 1996. Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning. Construction management and economics, 14, 213–225.10.1080/014461996373476
   Google Scholar
• Giel, B. and Issa, R.R.A., 2016. Framework for evaluating the BIM competencies of facility owners. Journal of management in engineering, 32 (04015024), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Golicic, S.L., Davis, D.F., and McCarthy, T.M., 2005. A balanced approach to research in supply chain management. In: H. Kotzab, S. Seuring, M. Müller and G. Reiner, eds. Research methodologies in supply chain management. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 15–29.10.1007/3-7908-1636-1
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., et al., 2015. Supplier development initiatives and their impact on the consistency of project performance. Construction management and economics, 33 (5–6), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M.S., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78, 1360–1380.10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C., 1996. Value for money: helping the UK afford the buildings it likes. Reading: Reading Construction Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, N. and London, K., 2010. Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in construction, 19, 988–999.10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G., Larsen, G.D., and Whyte, J., 2013. Digital interaction patterns on construction projects: a study of dynamic approval processesed. Proceedings of the 30th CIB W78 international conference on applications of IT in the AEC industry (CIB W78 2013), Beijing: CIB, 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Higgin, G. and Jessop, N., 1965. Communications in the building industry: the report of a pilot study London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L., 2009. Communications and coordination in construction projects. Construction management and economics, 27, 25–39.10.1080/01446190802558923
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L. and Wu, A., 2009. Communications network centrality correlates to organisational coordination. International journal of project management, 27, 795–811.10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, H., et al., 1989. Computer integration: reducing fragmentation in AEC industry. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 3, 18–32.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1989)3:1(18)
   Google Scholar
• Kassem, M., Succar, B., and Dawood, N., 2015. Building information modeling: analyzing noteworthy publications of eight countries using a knowledge content taxonomy. In: R. Issa and S. Olbina, eds. Building information modeling: applications and practices in the AEC industry. Reston, VA: ASCE Press, 329–371.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., 2008. Policy and implementation networks: managing complex interactions. In: S. Cooper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. Smith Ring (eds.) The oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–146.
   Google Scholar
• Klir, G., 2001. Facets of systems science. 2nd ed. New York: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4615-1331-5
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, J., et al., 2015. The challenges and potentials of utilizing building information modelling in facility management: the case of the center for properties and facilities of the university of Helsinki. Construction management and economics, 33, 3–17.10.1080/01446193.2015.1016540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., 2013. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, G.D., 2011. Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: awareness, influence and communication networks. Construction management and economics, 29, 987–1002.10.1080/01446193.2011.619994
   Google Scholar
• Leuschner, R., Rogers, D.S. and Charvet, F.F., 2013. A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. Journal of supply chain management, 49, 34–57.10.1111/jscm.2013.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, R., 2011. IFC file analyzer [online]. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available from: http://www.nist.gov/el/msid/infotest/ifc-file-analyzer.cfm [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Han, C., and Xu, W., 2015. Evolutionary analysis of the collaboration networks within national quality award projects of China. International journal of project management, 33, 599–609.10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, K. and Kenley, R., 2001. An industrial organization economic supply chain approach for the construction industry: a review. Construction management and economics, 19, 777–788.10.1080/01446190110081699
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., 1998. Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 5, 315–326.10.1108/eb021085
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E., et al., 2014. A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Automation in construction, 37, 1–10.10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I.R., 1977. Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern university law review, 72 (6), 854–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahamadu, A.-M., Mahdjoubi, L., and Booth, C.A., 2014. Determinants of building information modelling (BIM) acceptance for supplier integration: a conceptual model. In: A. Raiden and E. Aboagye-Nimo, eds. Proceedings 30th annual ARCOM conference, Portsmouth: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 723–732.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousant Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J.L., 1960. The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, S.C., et al., 2006. Managing relationships to improve performance: a case study in the global aerospace industry. International journal of production research, 44, 3227–3241.10.1080/00207540600577809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navendren, D., et al., 2014. Challenges to building information modelling implementation in UK: Designers’ perspectives. In: A. Raiden and E. Aboagye-Nimo, eds. Proceedings of the 30th annual association of researchers in construction management conference (ARCOM 2014), Portsmouth: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 733–742.
   Google Scholar
• van Nederveen, S., Beheshti, R., and de Ridder, H., 2010. Supplier-driven integrated design. Architectural engineering and design management, 6, 241–253.10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS2
   Google Scholar
• Nummelin, J., et al., 2011. Managing Building Information and client requirements in construction supply chain - Contractor’s viewed. Proceedings of the CIB W078-W102 joint conference: computer, knowledge, building, Sophia Antipolis: CIB.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H., et al., 2011. Social network analysis of collaborative ventures for overseas construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 137, 344–355.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., 2002. Construction coalitions and the evolving supply chain management paradox: progress through fragmentationed. Proceedings of the RICS foundation construction and building research conference, Nottingham: Nottingham Trend University.
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., 2004. Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis. Construction management and economics, 22, 787–797.10.1080/0144619042000206533
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., 2005. Towards a social network theory of project governance. Construction management and economics, 23, 927–939.10.1080/01446190500184196
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., 2012. Social network analysis in construction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118443132
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S. and Pearson, S., 2006. Project governance: case studies on financial incentives. Building research and information, 34, 534–545.10.1080/09613210600675933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryke, S., Zagkli, G., and Kougia, I., 2011. Resource provision ego-networks in small Greek construction firms. Building research and information, 39, 616–636.10.1080/09613218.2011.628558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezgui, Y., Beach, T., and Rana, O., 2013. A governance approach for bim management across lifecycle and supply chains using mixed-modes of information delivery. Journal of civil engineering and management, 19, 239–258.10.3846/13923730.2012.760480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan, X., et al., 2012. Knowledge integration process in construction projects: a social network analysis approach to compare competitive and collaborative working. Construction management and economics, 30, 5–19.10.1080/01446193.2011.654127
   Google Scholar
• Saldanā, J., 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 2012. Social network analysis. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sedita, S.R. and Apa, R., 2015. The impact of inter-organizational relationships on contractors’ success in winning public procurement projects: The case of the construction industry in the Veneto region. International journal of project management, 33, 1548–1562.10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D., 2013. RIBA plan of work 2013 overview [online]. Royal institute of british architects. Available from: https://www.ribaplanofwork.com/Download.aspx [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• Solis, F., Sinfield, J.V., and Abraham, D.M., 2012. Hybrid approach to the study of inter-organization high performance teams. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139, 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, H., Lee, S., and Kim, C., 2015. What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? an empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions. Automation in construction, 49 (Part A), 92–99.10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. and Levitt, R., 2007. Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: An integrative model for change. Project management journal, 38, 22–35.10.1002/pmj.20003
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, T. and Mead, S., 2001. Project-specific web sites: friend or foe? Journal of construction engineering and management, 127, 406–413.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(406)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R., 2011. Supply chain integration in the building industry: The emergence of integrated and repetitive strategies in a fragmented and project-driven industry. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L., 2000. The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European journal of purchasing and supply management, 6, 169–178.10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00013-7
   Google Scholar
• Wambeke, B.W., Liu, M., and Hsiang, S.M., 2011. Using Pajek and centrality analysis to identify a social network of construction trades. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138, 1192–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamelink, J. and Heintz, J., 2015. Innovating for integration: clients as drivers of industry improvement. In: F. Orstavik, A. Dainty, and C. Abbott, eds. Construction innovation. 1st ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. and Lobo, S., 2010. Coordination and control in project-based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery. Construction management and economics, 28, 557–567.10.1080/01446193.2010.486838
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G., 1998. Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building research and information, 26, 268–279.10.1080/096132198369751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 2002. Managing construction projects. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 2005. Rethinking project management: project organizations as information processing systems. In: D.P. Slevin, D.J. Cleland, and J.K. Pinto, eds. Innovations: Project Management Research 2004. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 1984. Case study research: design and methods. 1st ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar