The formation of a collaborative project identity in an infrastructure alliance project

References

• Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A., 1985. Organizational identity. In: L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw, eds. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 263–295.
   Google Scholar
• Anvuur, A.M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M., 2007. Conceptual model of partnering and alliancing. Journal of construction engineering and management, 133 (3), 225–234.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:3(225)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, N., 2009. Exploring tensions in projectified matrix organisations. Scandinavian journal of management, 25 (1), 97–107.10.1016/j.scaman.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F., and Dainty, A.R.J., 2006. The extent of team integration within construction projects. International journal of project management, 24 (1), 13–23.10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R.M., 2010. Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: a systematic review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 12 (4), 466–486.10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B., 2006. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization science, 17 (1), 3–21.10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, N. and Huxham, C., 2003. Cycles of identity formation in interorganizational collaborations. International studies of management & organization, 33 (3), 28–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bektas, E., Lauche, K., and Wamelink, H., 2015. Knowledge sharing in megaprojects: a case study of a co-location approach. In: A.H. Van Marrewijk, ed. Inside megaprojects: understanding cultural practices in project management. Copenhagen: CBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J., 2000. Actional legitimation: no crisis necessary. Journal of public relations research, 12 (4), 341–353.10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1204_3
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., 2009. Living the dream? Understanding partnering as emergent practice. Construction management and economics, 27 (10), 923–933.10.1080/01446190902974145
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N., 2002. The engineering or evolution of co-operation? A tale of two partnering projects. International journal of project management, 20 (7), 497–505.10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00043-6
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevakaia, A., and Swan, J., 2004. Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization studies, 25 (9), 1535–1555.10.1177/0170840604047999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C.M. and Morley, M.J., 2016. On temporary organizations: a review, synthesis and research agenda. Human relations, 69 (6), 1235–1258.10.1177/0018726715610809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., et al., 2012. Overview of alliancing research and practice in the construction industry. Architectural engineering and design management, 8 (2), 103–119.10.1080/17452007.2012.659505
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. and Courpasson, D., 2004. Political hybrids: tocquevillean views on project organizations. Journal of management studies, 41 (4), 525–547.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., et al., 2002. Governmentality matters: designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organization studies, 23 (3), 317–337.10.1177/0170840602233001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S.R., Rhodes, C., and Kornberger, M., 2007. Desperately seeking legitimacy: organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization studies, 28 (4), 495–513.10.1177/0170840606067995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S., 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. and Love, P., 2011. Alliance contracting: adding value through relationship development. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 18 (5), 444–461.10.1108/09699981111165167
   Google Scholar
• Department of Treasury and Finance, 2011. National alliance contracting guidelines - guide to alliance contracting. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J.E. and Dukerich, J.M., 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaption. Academy of management journal, 34 (3), 517–554.10.2307/256405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14 (4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K.D. and Kramer, R.M., 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative science quarterly, 41 (3), 442–476.10.2307/2393938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, M., 2003. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Research policy, 32 (5), 789–808.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen, J. and Dyer, L., 2004. Right from the start: exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 49 (3), 438–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M., and Corley, K.G., 2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of management review, 25 (1), 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., et al., 2010. Forging an identity: an insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative science quarterly, 55 (1), 1–46.10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., et al., 2013. Organizational identity formation and change. The academy of management annals, 7 (1), 123–193.10.1080/19416520.2013.762225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., 2002. Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in social context. Regional studies, 36 (3), 205–214.10.1080/00343400220122025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., 2004. Temporary architectures of learning: knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization studies, 25 (9), 1491–1514.10.1177/0170840604047996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M.S., 2002. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human relations, 55 (8), 989–1018.10.1177/0018726702055008181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H.G., 2001. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12 (4), 435–449.10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M. and Parboteeah, P., 2006. Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects. Human resource management, 45 (1), 67–79.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, L., Becerra, M., and Lunnan, R., 2004. Organizational identity and network identification: relating within and beyond imaginary boundaries. Scandinavian journal of management, 20 (1–2), 53–73.10.1016/j.scaman.2004.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Che Ibrahim, C.K.I.C., Costello, S.B., and Wilkinson, S., 2013. Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects. Construction management and economics, 31 (11), 1128–1143.10.1080/01446193.2013.854399
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies, M., John Brewer, G.J., and Gajendran, T., 2014. Using a case study approach to identify critical success factors for alliance contracting. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 21 (5), 465–480.10.1108/ECAM-01-2012-0007
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. and Lichtenstein, B., 2008. Temporary interorganizational projects: how temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In: S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. Smith Ring, eds. The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G.E., et al., 2015. Elasticity and the dialectic tensions of organizational identity: how can we hold together while we are pulling apart? Academy of management journal, 58 (4), 981–1011.10.5465/amj.2012.0462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laan, A., Voordijk, H., and Dewulf, G., 2011. Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance. International journal of managing projects in business, 4 (4), 660–679.10.1108/17538371111164065
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30 (1), 57–79.10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
   Google Scholar
• Lenfle, S., 2014. Toward a genealogy of project management: sidewinder and the management of exploratory projects. International journal of project management, 32 (6), 921–931.10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, H., et al., 2007. Improving employees’ work-life balance in the construction industry: project alliance case study. Journal of construction engineering and management, 133 (10), 807–815.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(807)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-walker, B.M., Mills, A.J., and Walker, D.H.T., 2014. Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances. Construction management and economics, 32 (3), 229–245.10.1080/01446193.2014.892629
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Mistry, D. and Davis, P.R., 2010. Price competitive alliance projects: identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (9), 947–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Davis, P.R., and Chevis, R., 2011. Risk/reward compensation models in alliances for the delivery of civil engineering infrastructure projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 137 (2), 127–136.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, R.A. and Söderholm, A., 1995. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian journal of management, 11 (4), 437–455.10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Phillips, N., and Hardy, C., 2001. When ‘silence=death’, keep talking: trust, control and the discursive construction of identity in the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain. Organization studies, 22 (2), 285–310.10.1177/0170840601222005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranto, R.T. and Skelley, B.D., 2003. Anticipating change in the higher civil service: affective commitment, organizational ideology, and political ideology. Public administration quarterly, 27 (3/4), 336–367.
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, A. and Smits, K., 2016. Cultural practices of governance in the panama canal expansion megaproject. International journal of project management, 34 (3), 533–544.10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Scott, R.W., 1983. Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: J.W. Meyer and W.R. Scott, eds. Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E., and Kramer, R.M., 1996. Swift trust and temporary groups. In: R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler, eds. Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 166–195.10.4135/9781452243610
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, J. and Morrissey, M.A., 1990. Trust in employee/employer relationships: a survey of west Michigan managers. Public personnel management, 19 (4), 443–486.10.1177/009102609001900408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, C., 2007. Can project alliancing agreements change the way we build? Architectural record, 3, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, S., Hovmark, S., and Zika-Viktorsson, A., 2004. Perceived time pressure and social processes in project teams. International journal of project management, 22 (6), 463–468.10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Panteli, N. and Sockalingam, S., 2005. Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decision support systems, 39 (4), 599–617.10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puusa, A. and Tolvanen, U., 2006. Organizational identity and trust. EJBO electronic journal of business ethics and organization studies, 11 (2), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ravasi, D. and Schultz, M., 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of management journal, 49 (3), 433–458.10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reger, R.K., et al., 1994. Reframing the organization: why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of management review, 19 (3), 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., 2003. Introduction to project alliancing. Paper presented at the Alliance Contracting Conference, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, M., Dorée, A. and Halman, J., 2009. Innovation and interorganizational cooperation: a synthesis of literature. Construction innovation, 9 (3), 285–297.10.1108/14714170910973501
   Google Scholar
• Ruuska, I., et al., 2009. Dimensions of distance in a project network: exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project. International journal of project management, 27 (2), 142–153.10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, C.S. and Ahuja, M.K., 2006. Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small group research, 37 (6), 662–700.10.1177/1046496406294323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, M. and Hernes, T., 2013. A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization science, 24 (1), 1–21.10.1287/orsc.1110.0731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R., 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of management review, 25 (1), 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sense, A. and Fernando, M., 2011. The spiritual identity of projects. International journal of project management, 29 (5), 504–513.10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snihur, Y., 2016. Developing optimal distinctiveness: organizational identity processes in new ventures engaged in business model innovation. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 28 (3–4), 259–285.10.1080/08985626.2016.1155745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.J. and Bogdan, R., 1984. Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S.M.B. and Zhu, X., 2006. Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of management review, 31 (9), 1077–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R., 2006. A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27 (2), 237–246.10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H. and Ring, P.S., 2006. Relying on trust in cooperative inter-organizational relationships. In: R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer, eds. Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 144–164.
   Google Scholar
• Van Os, A., et al., 2015. Project risk as identity threat: explaining the development and consequences of risk discourse in an infrastructure project. International journal of project management, 33 (4), 877–888.10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilasini, N., Neitzert, T., and Rotimi, J., 2014. Developing and evaluating a framework for process improvement in an alliance project: a New Zealand case study. Construction management and economics, 32 (6), 625–640.10.1080/01446193.2013.874565
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T. and Hampson, K.D., 2003. Project alliance member organisation selection. In: D.H.T. Walker and K.D. Hampson, eds. Procurement strategies: a relationship based approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 74–102.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T. and Lloyd-Walker, B.M., 2014. The ambience of a project alliance in Australia. Engineering project organization journal, 4 (1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T. and Lloyd-Walker, B.M., 2015. Collaborative project procurement arrangements. Newtown Square PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T., Hampson, K., and Peters, R., 2002. Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project. Supply chain management: an international journal, 7 (2), 83–91.10.1108/13598540210425830
   Google Scholar
• Webber, S.S., 2011. Dual organizational identification impacting client satisfaction and word of mouth loyalty. Journal of business research, 64 (2), 119–125.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D.A., 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited – strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of management inquiry, 15 (3), 219–234.10.1177/1056492606291200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybema, S., Vroemisse, M., and van Marrewijk, A., 2012. Constructing identity by deconstructing differences: building partnerships across cultural and hierarchical divides. Scandinavian journal of management, 28 (1), 48–59.10.1016/j.scaman.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar