Slacks-based data envelopment analysis for eco-efficiency assessment in the Australian construction industry

References

• Abdallah, M., El-Rayes, K., and Liu, L., 2013. Operational performance of sustainable measures in public buildings. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139 (12), A4013008.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asafu-Adjaye, J. and Mahadevan, R., 2013. Implications of CO2 reduction policies for a high carbon emitting economy. Energy economics, 38, 32–41.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmild, M., et al., 2004. Combining DEA window analysis with the malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of productivity analysis, 21 (1), 67–89.10.1023/B:PROD.0000012453.91326.ec
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlin, W.F., 1998. Measuring performance: an introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). The journal of cost analysis, 15 (2), 3–27.10.1080/08823871.1998.10462318
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q. and Hoffman, J.J., 2011. A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system. International journal of project management, 29 (2), 155–164.10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Lacouture, D., Medaglia, A.L., and Skibniewski, M., 2007. Supply chain optimization tool for purchasing decisions in B2B construction marketplaces. Automation in construction, 16 (5), 569–575.10.1016/j.autcon.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2 (6), 429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., and Antunes, P., 2002. From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environmental quality management, 12 (2), 51–64.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6483
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld, J.R., 2005. Eco-efficiency: philosophy, theory, and tools. Journal of industrial ecology, 9 (4), 6–8.10.1162/108819805775248070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S., 1998. Shadow pricing of good and bad commodities. American journal of agricultural economics, 80 (3), 584–590.10.2307/1244563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Margaritis, D., 2011. Malmquist productivity indexes and DEA. In: W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, eds. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Berlin: Springer, 127–149.10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8
   Google Scholar
• Ghimire, S.R. and Barkdoll, B.D., 2007. Incorporating environmental impact in decision making for municipal drinking water distribution systems through eco-efficiency analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Tampa, FL: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, M.R., 2008. Nothing focuses the mind on productivity quite like the fear of liquidation: changes in airline productivity in the United States, 2000–2004. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 42 (2), 414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, A. and Veeman, T.S., 2001. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American journal of agricultural economics, 83 (3), 605–616.10.1111/ajae.2001.83.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinterberger, F., et al., 2000. Eco-efficiency of regions: how to improve competitiveness and create jobs by reducing environmental pressure. Vienna: Sustainnabl Europe Research Institute (sERI). Retrieved August 1, 2015, from http://web205.vbox-01.inode.at/Data/projects/eco-efficency-regions/download/eeregion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horta, I.M., Camanho, A.S., and Da Costa, J.M., 2010. Performance assessment of construction companies integrating key performance indicators and data envelopment analysis. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (5), 581–594.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Liu, C., 2015. Managing undesirable outputs in the Australian construction industry using data envelopment analysis models. Journal of cleaner production, 101, 148–157.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Liu, C., 2016. Profitability performance assessment in the Australian construction industry: a global relational two-stage DEA method. Construction management and economics, 34 (3), 147–159.10.1080/01446193.2016.1180415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapelko, M., Oude Lansink, A., and Stefanou, S.E., 2014. Assessing dynamic inefficiency of the Spanish construction sector pre-and post-financial crisis. European Journal of Operational Research, 237 (1), 349–357.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibert, C. J. (2012) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C., 2013. The role of coordinate-based decision-making in the evaluation of sustainable built environments. Construction management and economics, 31 (1), 62–77.10.1080/01446193.2012.738920
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. and Ding, G., 2001. Sustainable practices in the built environment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinmann.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. and Liu, C., 2010. Malmquist indices of total factor productivity changes in the Australian construction industry. Construction management and economics, 28 (9), 933–945.10.1080/01446191003762231
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., et al., 2010. A methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of residential development at city level. Building and environment, 45 (3), 566–573.10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y., and Lu, W.-M., 2016. Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33–45.10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S. and Gutiérrez, E., 2011. Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs. Computers and operations research, 38 (1), 131–139.10.1016/j.cor.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W.-M., Wang, W.-K., and Kweh, Q.L., 2014. Intellectual capital and performance in the Chinese life insurance industry. Omega, 42 (1), 65–74.10.1016/j.omega.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, S. and Gee, D. (Eds.). 1999. Making sustainability accountable: eco-efficiency, resource productivity and innovation. In: Proceedings of a workshop on the occasion of the Fifth Anniversary of the European Environment Agency (EEA), 28–30 October 1998 Copenhagen (No. 11-1999). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgal, F. and Jalali, S., 2012. Earth construction: lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction. Construction and building materials, 29, 512–519.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgal, F. and Labrincha, J.A., 2013. The future of construction materials research and the seventh UN millennium development goal: a few insights. Construction and building materials, 40, 729–737.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Wong, W., Gholipour, H.F., and Bazrafshan, E., 2012. How efficient are real estate and construction companies in Iran’s close economy? International journal of strategic property management, 16 (4), 392–413.10.3846/1648715X.2012.740513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell, A., 2007. The ecological modernisation of SMEs in the UK’s construction industry. Geoforum, 38 (1), 114–126.10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., and Portillo-Tarragona, P., 2016. The “economic–finance interface” for eco-innovation projects. International journal of project management, 34, 1012–1025.10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidheiny, S., 1992. Changing course: a Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., et al., 2012. Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: a review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16 (7), 4465–4469.10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C.C., 2011. Evaluating and benchmarking productive performances of six industries in Taiwan Hsin Chu Industrial Science Park. Expert systems with applications, 38 (3), 2195–2205.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, V.W., et al., 2006. Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry. Construction management and economics, 24 (11), 1113–1123.10.1080/01446190600799620
   Google Scholar
• Tatari, O. and Kucukvar, M., 2012. Eco-efficiency of construction materials: data envelopment analysis. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138 (6), 733–741.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K., 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 130 (3), 498–509.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner, P., 2000. Trade apprenticeships in the australian construction industry. Labour and industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 11 (2), 39–58.10.1080/10301763.2000.10669237
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2011. Implementing stricter environmental regulation to enhance eco-efficiency and sustainability: a case study of Shandong Province’s pulp and paper industry, China. Journal of cleaner production, 19 (4), 303–310.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2013. A total factor productivity measure for the construction industry and analysis of its spatial difference: a case study in China. Construction management and economics, 31 (10), 1059–1071.10.1080/01446193.2013.826371
   Google Scholar
• Wise, D. and James, M., 2013. Positioning a price on carbon: applying a proposed hybrid method of positioning discourse analysis for public relations. Public relations inquiry, 2 (3), 327–353.10.1177/2046147X13494966
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., et al., 2014. Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 74, 96–104.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J., 2014. Design and construction for sustainable industrial construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140 (4), B4014005.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N. and Choi, Y., 2013. Environmental energy efficiency of China’s regional economies: a non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. The social science journal, 50 (2), 225–234.10.1016/j.soscij.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.-J. and Da, Y.-B., 2015. The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 41, 1255–1266.10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Ang, B., and Poh, K., 2006. Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological economics, 60 (1), 111–118.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar