Revenue guarantee in public–private partnerships: a win–win model

References

• Amram, M. and Kulatilaka, N., 1999. Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Arthur, 2000. General and specific methodologies for valuing contingent liabilities. (Contingent fund project report unpublished). Washington, DC: Arthur Andersen.
   Google Scholar
• Ashuri, B., et al., 2012. Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee option. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138 (4), 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, F. and Scholes, M.S., 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of political economy, 81 (3), 637–659.10.1086/260062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandao, L.E. and Saraiva, E., 2008. The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects. Construction management and economics, 26 (11), 1171–1180.10.1080/01446190802428051
   Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., and Pellegrino, R., 2014a. Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: a fair risk allocation model. Construction management and economics, 32 (4), 403–415.10.1080/01446193.2014.906638
   Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., and Pellegrino, R., 2014b. Concession period for PPPs: a win–win model for a fair risk sharing. International journal of project management, 32 (7), 1223–1232.10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., et al., 2015. Risk management in motorway PPP projects: empirical-based guidelines. Transport reviews, 35 (2), 162–182.10.1080/01441647.2015.1012696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoenpornpattana, S., Minato, T., and Nakahama, S. (2002) Government supports as bundle of real options in built-operate-transfer highways projects. Proceedings of 7th annual real options conference, July 10–12, 2003, Washington, DC. (Masters dissertation). University of Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, C. and Liu, J., 2006. Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation. Construction management and economics, 24, 545–554.10.1080/01446190500435572
   Google Scholar
• Chiara, N. and Kokkaew, N., 2013. Alternative to government revenue guarantees: dynamic revenue insurance contracts. Journal of infrastructure systems, 19 (3), 287–296.10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiara, N., Garvin, M., and Vecer, J., 2007. Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects. ASCE journal of infrastructure systems, 13 (2), 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIPE (2003). Primo programma delle opere strategiche - Legge n. 443/2001 - Ponte sullo stretto di Messina. GU n. 257 del 5-11-2003.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, N. and Pellegrino, R., 2010. Choosing between single and multiple sourcing based on supplier default risk: a real options approach. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16 (1), 27–40.10.1016/j.pursup.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino, N. and Pellegrino, R., 2015. Public–private partnership implementation: cross-case analysis. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-management, procurement and law, 168 (4), 164–176.10.1680/mpal.1400025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. and Rubinstein, M., 1979. Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal of financial economics, 7, 229–263.10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damodaran, A., 2001. The promise and peril of real options, Stern school of business. London: Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S., 1995. The options approach to capital investment. Harvard business review, 3 (3), 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• EPEC., 2010. Eurostat treatment of public-private partnerships purposes, methodology and recent trends.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., Zhang, S.B., and Gao, Y., 2015. Modeling the impact of government guarantees on toll charge, road quality and capacity for Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) road projects. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 78, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, M.J. and Cheah, C.Y.J., 2004. Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions. Construction management and economics, 22 (4), 373–383.
   Google Scholar
• Hawas, F. and Cifuentes, A., 2016. Valuation of projects with minimum revenue guarantees: a Gaussian copula–based simulation approach. The engineering economist, 62, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemming, R., 2006. Public-private partnerships, government guarantees, and fiscal risk. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S.P. and Liu, L.Y., 2002. An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects. Construction management and economics, 20 (2), 143–156.10.1080/01446190110110533
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. and Chou, S., 2006. Valuation of the minimum revenue guarantee and the option to abandon in BOT infrastructure projects. Construction management and economics, 24, 379–389.10.1080/01446190500434997
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, B.G., Zhao, X., and Gay, M.J.S., 2013. Public private partnership projects in Singapore: factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors. International journal of project management, 31 (3), 424–433.10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, T., 2003. Public money for private infrastructure. Paper no. 26601. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/r44
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, K.C. and Sagheer, M., 2011. A real options based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate- transfer highway projects in India. Construction management and economics, 29 (8), 771–779.10.1080/01446193.2011.597412
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., 2016. Selection of PPP Projects in China Based on Government Guarantees and Fiscal Risk Control. International journal of financial research, 8 (1), 99.10.5430/ijfr.v8n1p99
   Google Scholar
• Kokkaew, N. and Chiara, N., 2013. A modeling government revenue guarantees in privately built transportation projects: a risk-adjusted approach. Transport, 28 (2), 186–192.10.3846/16484142.2013.803262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, D.M. and Pinches, G.E., 1998. Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 38, 537–567.10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80089-1
   Google Scholar
• Li, B., et al., 2005. Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry. Construction management and economics, 23 (5), 459–471.10.1080/01446190500041537
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. and Cheah, C.Y.J., 2009. Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation. Construction management and economics, 27 (4), 331–342.10.1080/01446190902807071
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Yu, X., and Cheah, C.Y.J., 2014. Evaluation of restrictive competition in PPP projects using real option approach. International journal of project management, 32 (3), 473–481.10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff, F.A. and Schwartz, E.S., 2001. Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Review of financial studies, 14 (1), 113–147.10.1093/rfs/14.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. and Loosemore, M., 2007. Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure. International journal of project management, 25 (1), 66–76.10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Park, T., Kim, B., and Kim, H., 2013. Real option approach to sharing privatization risk in underground infrastructures. ASCE journal of construction engineering and management, June, 685–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, R., et al., 2011. A real options-based model to supporting risk allocation in price cap regulation approach for public utilities. Construction management and economics, 29 (12), 1197–1207.10.1080/01446193.2011.647828
   Google Scholar
• Pichayapan, P., Hino, S., Kishi, K., and Satoh, K., 2003. Real option analysis in evaluation of expressway projects under uncertainties. Journal of the Eastern Asia society for transportation studies, 5, 3015–3030.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, R., Vajdic, N., and Carbonara, N., 2013. Real option theory for risk mitigation in transport PPPs. Built environment project and asset management, 3 (2), 199–213.10.1108/BEPAM-05-2012-0027
   Google Scholar
• Power, G.J., Burris, M., Vadali, S., and Vedenov, D., 2016. Valuation of strategic options in public–private partnerships. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 90, 50–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, L., Garvin, M.J., and Kumar, R., 2010. Collar options to manage revenue risks in real toll public–private partnership transportation projects. Construction management and economics, 28 (10), 1057–1069.10.1080/01446193.2010.506645
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L., 1999. Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vassallo, J. and Soliño, A., 2006. Minimum income guarantee in transportation infrastructure concessions in Chile. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 1960, 15–22.10.3141/1960-03
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. and Liu, J., 2015. Evaluation of the excess revenue sharing ratio in PPP projects using principal–agent models. International journal of project management, 33 (6), 1317–1324.10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibowo, A., 2004. Valuing guarantees in a BOT infrastructure project. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 11 (6), 395–403.10.1108/09699980410571543
   Google Scholar
• Yun, S., et al., 2015. Critical organizational success factors for public private partnership projects–a comparison of solicited and unsolicited proposals. Journal of civil engineering and management, 21 (2), 131–143.10.3846/13923730.2013.802715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar