Extending and operationalizing construction productivity measurement on building projects

References

• Abbott, M., 2015. Determining levels of productivity in the construction industry using data envelopment analysis. In: Rick, B. and Meikle, J., eds. Measuring construction. New York: Taylor and Francis, 238–252.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahab, M. and Vogl, B., 2011. Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan. Construction management and economics, 29, 635–644.
   Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh, O., Dibert-Deyoung, A., and Jaselskis, E., 2004. Analysis of trends in construction research: 1985–2002. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130, 433–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian, J.J. and Boyer, L.T., 1976. Modeling method productivity. Journal of construction division American society of civil engineering, 102, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M.J., 1974. Information systems analysis: theory and applications. California: Science Research Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, C., Dungan, A., and Peetz, D., 2010. ‘Anomalies’, damned ‘anomalies’ and statistics: construction industry productivity in Australia. Journal of industrial relations, 52, 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S.G., 1985. Why construction industry productivity is declining. Massachusetts, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmon, E., et al., 2000. US construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998. Journal of construction engineering and management, 126, 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARCOM., 2018. ARCOM abstracts [Online]. London: Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Available from www.arcom.ac.uk/abstracts.php [Accessed 15 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez, P., et al., 2015. Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: a taxonomic review. Construction management and economics, 33, 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R., 2010. Using purchasing power parity to assess construction productivity. Australasian journal of construction economics and building, 10, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, L. and Song, H.S., 2014. Quality change and implications for productivity development: housing construction in Sweden 1990–2010. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141 (1), 05014014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourn, J., 2001. Modernising construction. UK: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J. and Olofsson, T., 2011. Construction productivity measures for innovation projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138 (5), 670–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office., 2011. Government Construction Strategy. London: UK Cabinet Office. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-construction-strategy. [Accessed 15 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Carson, C. and Abbott, M., 2012. A review of productivity analysis of the New Zealand construction industry. Construction economics and building, 12, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K., 1993. Estimating industry-level productivity trends in the building industry from building cost and price data. Construction management and economics, 11, 370–383.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K., 2009. Explaining total factor productivity trend in building construction: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong. International journal of construction management, 9, 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K. and Walker, A., 1988. The measurement of total factor productivity of the Hong Kong construction industry. Construction management and economics, 6, 209–224.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K.W. and Wang, Y.S., 2005. An analysis of productivity growth in the construction industry: a non-parametric approach. In 21st Annual ARCOM conference, 7–9 September 2005, SOAS, University of London, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1, 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-making Units. European journal of operations research, 2, 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., 1999. Systems thinking. In: W. Currie, and B. Galliers, eds. Rethinking Managment Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, F.C., et al., 2012. An analysis of construction productivity in Malaysia. Construction management and economics, 30 (12), 1055–1069.
   Google Scholar
• Crémer, J., 1995. Arm's length relationships. The quarterly journal of economics, 110, 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Goodrum, P.M., and Maloney, W.F., 2009. Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 135, 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valence, G. and Abbott, M., 2015. A review of the theory and measurement techniques of productivity in the construction industry. In: R. Best, and J. Meikle, eds. Measuring Construction Prices, Output and Productivity. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Durdyev, S. and Mbachu, J., 2011. On-site labour productivity of New Zealand construction industry: key constraints and improvement measures. Construction economics and building, 11, 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. The Egan report-rethinking construction. Report of the construction industry task force to the deputy prime minister. London.
   Google Scholar
• EL-Gohary, K.M. and Aziz, R.F., 2013. Factors influencing construction labor productivity in Egypt. Journal of management in engineering, 30, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R.D. Jr. and Lee, S.H., 2006. Measuring project level productivity on transportation projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 132 (3), 314–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enshassi, A., et al., 2007. Factors affecting labour productivity in building projects in the Gaza Strip. Journal of civil engineering and management, 13, 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M., 2016. The farmer review of the UK construction labour model. UK: Construction Leadership Council (CLC).
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, P. Assessing trade quality in construction–Objectivism versus subjectivism. Paper Delivered at CIB W55 and W65 Joint Triennial Symposium on Customer Satisfaction: A Focus for Research and Practice, Cape Town. 5–10 September 1999, pp. 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., 2008. Labour Productivity Indicators. Comparison of two OECD Databases, Productivity Differentials and the Balassa-Samuelson Effect. Retrieved from OECD Statistics Directorate Web site: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/15/41354425.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D.A., 1983. Quality on the line. Harvard business review, 61, 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrum, P.M., Haas, C.T., and Glover, R.W., 2002. The divergence in aggregate and activity estimates of US construction productivity. Construction management & economics, 20, 415–423.
   Google Scholar
• Grau, D., et al., 2009. Assessing the impact of materials tracking technologies on construction craft productivity. Automation in construction, 18, 903–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, D.W., et al., 1994. Action-response model and loss of productivity in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 120, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, A.S., et al., 2008. Impact of shift work on labor productivity for labor intensive contractor. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134, 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A.L., et al., 2009. Metrics and tools for measuring construction productivity: technical and empirical considerations. NIST SP-1101. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• International Construction Measurement Standards (ICMS)., 2017. Global Consistency in Presenting Construction Costs [online]. London. Available from: http://www.arquitecturatecnica.com/pdf/ICMS_standard_13_July_2017%20(1).pdf [Accessed 15 October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• International Construction Measurement Standards Coalition, 2017. Global Consistency in Presenting Construction Costs. London: International Construction Measurement Standards Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Jarkas, A. and Horner, M., 2011. Revisiting the applicability of learning curve theory to formwork labour productivity. Construction management and economics, 5, 483–493.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, J.B., Leem, C.S., and Lee, C.H., 2016. Research issues and trends in industrial productivity over 44 years. International journal of production research, 54 (5), 1273–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartam, S., Ballard, G., and Ibbs, C.W., 1997. Introducing a new concept and approach to modeling construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 123, 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, J., 1956. Productivity trends: capital and labor. In Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor. Washington, DC: NBER, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Korde, T., Li, M., and Russell, A.D., 2005. State-of-the-art review of construction performance models and factors. In Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives, 5–7 April 2005 San Diego, California, USA: ASCE, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C., 2013. The application of data envelopment analysis to the benchmarking of construction performance in Australian and American high-rise buildings. International journal of construction management, 13, 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. and Best, R., 2001. An investigation into the construction performance of high-rise commercial office buildings based on productivity and resource consumption. International journal of construction management, 1, 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the Team: The Latham Report. Final Report of the Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, F.S. and Borcherding, J.D., 1986. Work sampling can predict unit rate productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 112 (1), 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-L. and Huang, H.-M., 2010. Improved baseline productivity analysis technique. Construction engineering and management, 136, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., 2014. Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor's perspective. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 21 (3), 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute, 2017. Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. London: McKinsey Global Institute. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/reinventing-construction-through-a-productivity-revolution. [Accessed 15 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Nath, N.D. and Behzadan, A.H., 2017. Construction productivity and ergonomic assessment using mobile sensors and machine learning. In: K. Lin, N. El-Gohary and P. Tang, eds. Computing in civil engineering 2017: smart safety, sustainability, and resilience. Seattle: American Society of Civil Engineers, 434–441.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H.-S., Thomas, S.R., and Tucker, R.L., 2005. Benchmarking of construction productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131, 772–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekuri, A., Haapasalo, H., and Herrala, M., 2011. Productivity and performance management–managerial practices in the construction industry. International journal of performance measurement, 1, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pessali, H.F., 2006. The Rhetoric Of Oliver Williamson's Transaction Cost Economics. Journal of institutional economics, 2, 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, P.E., 1991. The measurement of construction prices: Retrospect and prospect. Fifty years of economic measurement: The jubilee of the conference on research in income and wealth, University of Chicago Press, 239–272.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, E.A., Staub-french, S., and Forgues, D., 2015. Measuring the impact of BIM on labor productivity in a small specialty contracting enterprise through action-research. Automation in construction, 58, 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhra, A., 1991. Construction productivity: concept, measurement and trends, organisation and management in construction. Proceedings of the 4th Yugoslavian Symposium on Construction Management, Dubrovnik, McGraw-Hill, 487–497.
   Google Scholar
• Rivas, R.A., et al., 2010. Analysis of factors influencing productivity using craftsmen questionnaires: case study in a Chilean construction company. Journal of construction engineering and management, 137, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, E.M. and Aramvareekul, P., 2003. Labor productivity drivers and opportunities in the construction industry. Journal of management in engineering, 19, 78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R., 1987. The Pareto principle: its use and abuse. Journal of services marketing, 1, 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sanvido, V.E., 1984. Framework for Designing and Analyzing Management and Control Systems to Improve the Productivity of Construction Projects. Stanford, CA: Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyer, P., 2001. The OECD productivity manual: a guide to the measurement of industry-level and aggregate productivity. International productivity monitor, 2 (2), 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sezer, A.A. and Bröchner, J., 2014. The construction productivity debate and the measurement of service qualities. Construction management and economics, 32, 565–574.
   Google Scholar
• Shehata, M.E. and EL-Gohary, K.M., 2011. Towards improving construction labor productivity and projects’ performance. Alexandria engineering journal, 50, 321–330.
   Google Scholar
• Sonmez, R. and Rowings, J.E., 1998. Construction labor productivity modeling with neural networks. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124, 498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talhouni, B.T., 1990. Measurement and analysis of construction labour productivity. PhD thesis. Scotland: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, W., 2000. Total factor productivity in Singapore construction. Engineering construction and architectural management, 7, 154–158.
   Google Scholar
• The Australian Building Codes Board, 2016. National Construction Code Volume 1. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R., 2012. Benchmarking construction labor productivity. Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 20, 04014048.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R. and Daily, J., 1983. Crew performance measurement via activity sampling. Journal of construction engineering and management, 109, 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R., Guevara, J.M., and Gustenhoven, C.T., 1984. Improving productivity estimates by work sampling. Journal of construction engineering and management, 110, 178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R., et al., 1990. Modeling construction labor productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 116, 705–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R. and Mathews, C.T., 1986. An analysis of the methods for measuring construction productivity. Austin: Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R., Mathews, C.T., and Ward, J.G., 1986. Learning curve models of construction productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 112, 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R. and Raynar, K.A., 1997. Scheduled overtime and labor productivity: quantitative analysis. Journal of construction engineering and management, 123, 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R. and Yiakoumis, I., 1987. Factor model of construction productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 113, 623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, H.R. and Završki, I., 1999. Construction baseline productivity: theory and practice. Journal of construction engineering and management, 125, 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trade Up., 2018. Home. [ONLINE] Available from: http://www.trade-up.com.au/ [Accessed 15 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., 1985. Project management in construction. New York: Collins P. and T. Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.S., 1998. An analysis of the technical efficiency in Hong Kong’s construction industry. Unpublished PhD thesis. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, W. and Chan, A.P., 2013. Critical review of labor productivity research in construction journals. Journal of management in engineering, 30, 214–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M.K. and Ive, G., 2008. The compilation methods of building price indices in Britain: a critical review. Construction management and economics, 26, 693–705.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. and Dungan, J.M., 2014. Improved baseline method to calculate lost construction productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140, 06013006-1–06013006-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi, M., et al., 2003. Total factor productivity growth accounting in the construction industry of Singapore. Construction management and economics, 21, 707–718.
   Google Scholar