Replacement optimization of ageing infrastructure under differential inflation

References

• Bellman, R., 1955. Equipment replacement policy. Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics, 3 (3), 133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, L.T. and Tarquin, A.J., 2012. Engineering economy. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brekelmans, R.C.M., et al., 2012. Safe dike heights at minimal costs: the nonhomogeneous case. Operations research, 60 (6), 1342–1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüktahtakın, İ.E. and Hartman, J.C., 2016. A mixed-integer programming approach to the parallel replacement problem under technological change. International journal of production research, 54 (3), 680–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christer, A.H. and Scarf, P.A., 1994. A robust replacement model with applications to medical equipment. The journal of the operational research society, 45 (3), 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CROW. 2018. Indexen Risicoregelingen GWW. Retrieved from Kennisplatform CROW, Ede, The Netherlands: https://www.crow.nl/publicaties/indexen-risicoregelingen-gww
   Google Scholar
• Dupuits, E.J.C., Schweckendiek, T., and Kok, M., 2017. Economic optimization of coastal flood defense systems. Reliability engineering and system safety, 159, 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahani, A., Wallbaum, H., and Dalenbäck, J.-O., 2018. Optimized maintenance and renovation scheduling in multifamily buildings – a systematic approach based on condition state and life cycle cost of building components. Construction management and economics, 1–17. DOI:10.1080/01446193.2018.1512750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J.C., 2004. Multiple asset replacement analysis under variable utilization and stochastic demand. European Journal of operational research, 159 (1), 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J.C. and Murphy, A., 2006. Finite-horizon equipment replacement analysis. IIE transactions, 38 (5), 409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J.C. and Tan, C.H., 2014. Equipment replacement analysis: a literature review and directions for future research. The engineering economist, 59 (2), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, N.A.J., 2015. Physical asset management. London; New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, F.S. and Lieberman, G.J., 2010. Introduction to operations research. 9th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Karsak, E.E. and Tolga, E., 1998. An overhaul-replacement model for equipment subject to technological change in an inflation-prone economy. International journal of production economics, 56–57, 291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, E. and Ala-Risku, T., 2008. Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies. Managerial auditing journal, 23 (3), 240–261.
   Google Scholar
• Lemer, A.C., 1996. Infrastructure obsolescence and design service life. Journal of infrastructure systems, 2 (4), 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Mardin, F. and Arai, T., 2012. Capital equipment replacement under technological change. The engineering economist, 57 (2), 119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzadeh, I., et al., 2014. Life cycle cost analysis based on the fundamental cost contributors for asphalt pavements. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 10 (12), 1638–1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, R. and Maor, D., 1995. Equipment replacement and optimal size of a civil engineering fleet. Construction management and economics, 13 (2), 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Newnan, D.G., Eschenbach, T.G., and Lavelle, J.P., 2009. Engineering economic analysis. 10th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newnan, D.G., Lavelle, J.P., and Eschenbach, T.G., 2016. Engineering economy analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C.S., 2011. Contemporary engineering economics. 5th ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier, E.V.A., Sharp, G., and Tovey, C., 2004. Replacement under ongoing technological progress. IIE transactions, 36 (6), 497–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safi, M., et al., 2013. Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 9 (12), 1240–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarf, P., et al., 2007. Asset replacement for an urban railway using a modified two-cycle replacement model. The journal of the operational research society, 58 (9), 1123–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W.G., Wicks, E.M., and Koeling, C.P., 2012. Engineering economy. Boston: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• van den Boomen, M., Schoenmaker, R., and Wolfert, A.R.M., 2017. A life cycle costing approach for discounting in age and interval replacement optimisation models for civil infrastructure assets. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 14 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boomen, M., et al., 2019. Untangling decision tree and real options analyses: a public infrastructure case study dealing with political decisions, structural integrity and price uncertainty. Construction management and economics, 37 (1), 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• van den Boomen, M., van den Berg, P.L., and Wolfert, A.R.M., 2019. A dynamic programming approach for economic optimisation of lifetime-extending maintenance, renovation, and replacement of public infrastructure assets under differential inflation. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 15 (2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H.M., 1975. Principles of operations research: with applications to managerial decisions. 2nd ed. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, C.S., 2016. System engineering analysis, design, and development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, M.K.W. and Ive, G., 2011. Orders and output in UK construction statistics: new methodology and old problems. Construction management and economics, 29 (7), 653–658.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaneveld, P.J. and Verweij, G., 2014. Safe dike heights at minimal costs – an integer programming approach. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, Den Haag. At 2019/01/10 retrieved from https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/cpb-discussion-paper-277-safe-dike-heights-minimal-costs-integer-programming-approach.pdf
   Google Scholar