Construction labour, subcontracting and masculinity: “construction is a man’s job”

References

• Agapiou, A., 2002. Perceptions of gender roles and attitutes toward work among male and female operatives in the Scottish construction industry. Construction management and economics, 28(8), 697–705.
   Google Scholar
• Ajslev, J.Z.N., et al., 2013. Habituating pain: questioning pain and physical strain as inextricable conditions in the construction industry. Nordic journal of working life studies, 3(3), 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, O., 2016. İnşaat sektörü neyin lokomotifi. In: T. Bora, ed. İnşaat ya resulullah. Istanbul: Birikim Publications, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bolak-Boratav, H., Okman- Fişek, G., and Eslen- Ziya, H., 2017. Erkekliğin Türkiye halleri. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bosson, J.K., and Vandello, J.A., 2011. Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current directions in psychological science, 20(2), 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosson, J.K., et al., 2009. Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 35(5), 623–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandth, B., and Haugen, M.S., 2000. From lumberjack to business manager: masculinity in the Norwegian forestry press. Journal of rural studies, 16(2000), 343–355.
   Google Scholar
• Braundy, M.A., 2005. Men and women and tools: reflections on male resistance to women in trades and technology. Thesis (PhD). The University of British Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G., 2005. Women and minority groups in UK construction: recent trends. Construction management and economics, 23(10), 1001–1005.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Clarke, L., and Meer, M.V.D., 2005. Gender and ethnic minority exclusion from skilled occupations in construction: a western European comparison. Construction management and economics, 23(10), 1025–1034.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P.W., 2013. Queer eye on a ‘straight’ life: deconstructing masculinities in construction. Construction management and economics, 31(8), 816–831.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y., 2009. Subcontracting and its ramifications: a survey of the building industry in Hong Kong. International journal of project management, 27, 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry, R.M., and Fang, D., 2008. Why operatives engage in unsafe behavior: investigating factors on construction sites. Safety science, 46, 566–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury, T., 2013. Experiences of women as workers: a study of construction workers in Bangladesh. Construction management and economics, 31(8), 883–898.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, S., 2014. Taşeron çalışma ilişkilerinde inşaat işçileri. Sosyoloji araştirmalari dergisi, 17(2), 37–70.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W., 2005. Masculinities. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W., 1987. Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G., 1981. Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm. Administrative science quarterly, 26(3), 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R.J., and Meyerson, D.E., 2010. An organizational approach to undoing gender: the unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in organizational behavior, 30(2010), 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fielden, S.L., et al., 2000. Women in construction: the untapped resource. Construction management and economics, 18(1), 113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Forestell, M.N., 2006. And I feel like I’m dying from mining for gold”: disability, gender and the mining community 1920–1950. Labor: studies in working-class history of the Americas, 3(3), 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• George, M., and Loosemore, M., 2019. Site operatives’ attitudes towards traditional masculinity ideology in the Australian construction industry. Construction management and economics, 37(8), 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoune, D., 2005. Real men are tough guys”: hegemonic masculinity and safety in the construction industry. Journal of men’s studies, 13(2), 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Ibanez, M., and Narocki, C., 2012. Occupational risk and masculinity: the case of the construction industry in Spain. Journal of workplace rights, 16(2), 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization (ILO). 2001. The construction industry in the twenty-first century: its image, employment prospect and skill requirements [online]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb283/pdf/tmcitr.pdf [Accessed 12 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Krings, T., et al., 2011. From bomm to bust: migrant labour and employers in the Irish construction sector. Economic and industrial democracy, 32(3), 459–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manu, P., et al., 2013. Mitigating the health and safety influence of subconracting in construction: the approach of main contractors. International journal of project management, 31, 1017–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, K., 2012. Constructing masculinity in the building trades: ‘most jobs in the construction industry can be done by women’. Gender, work & organization, 19(6), 654–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K.J., et al., 2015. The impact of masculinity on safety oversights, safety priority and safety violation in two male-dominated occupations. Safety science, 76, 82–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap, K., 2006. Working construction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumens, N., 2013. Queering men and masculinities in construction: towards a research agenda. Construction management and economics, 31(8), 802–815.
   Google Scholar
• Sancar, S., 2009. Erkeklik: İmkansız iktidar. Istanbul: Metis Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Selek, P., 2013. Sürüne sürüne erkek olmak. Istanbul: Iletişim Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., 2013. Trading in gender for women in trades: embodying hegemonic masculinity, femininity and being a gender hotrod. Construction management and economics, 31(8), 861–873.
   Google Scholar
• Sözen, Z., and Küçük, M.A., 1999. Seceondary subcontracting in the Turkish construction industry. Construction management and economics, 17(2), 215–220.
   Google Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita, M., et al., 2015. Danger zone: men, masculinity and occupational health and safety in high risk occupations. Safety science, 80, 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnell-Read, T., and Parker, A., 2008. Men, masculinities and firefighting: occupational identity, shop-floor culture and organizational change. Emotion, space and society, 1 (2), 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Toksöz, G., 2008. Türkiye’ye yönelik düzensiz göçler ve göçmenlerin inşaat sektöründe enformel istihdamı [online]. Ankara Üniversity. Available from: http://acikarsiv.ankara.edu.tr/browse/5317/Microsoft%20Word%20-%205964.pdf?show [Accessed 20 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT)., 2017a. Employment rates. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT)., 2017b. Gross domestic product. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
   Google Scholar
• Türkoğlu, B., 2013. Fay hattında erkeklikler: çalışma ve işsizlik ekseninde erkekliğe bakış. Mülkiye journal, 37(4), 33–61.
   Google Scholar
• Üsdiken, B., Sözen, Z., and Enbiyaoğlu, H., 1989. Örgütlerin sınırları: inşaat firmalarında alt yüklenici kullanımı. Boğaziçi üniversity institute of social sciences research report. Turkey: Boğaziçi University, SBE/AD 89-02.
   Google Scholar
• Vandello, J.A., Bosson, J.K., and Cohen, D., 2008. Precarious manhood. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95 (6), 1325–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J., 2007. Informality in the construction sector in developing countries. Construction management and economics, 25(1), 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., and Zimmerman, D.H., 1987. Doing gender. Gender & society, 1(2), 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 1986. The labour process and labour market in construction. International journal of sociology and social policy, 6(2), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Wittock, M., 2002. Women’s experience of non-traditional employment: is gender equality in this area a possibility? Construction management and economics, 20(5), 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T., 2013. Uncovering sexuality and gender: an intersectional examination of women’s experience in UK construction. Construction management and economics, 31 (8), 832–844.
   Google Scholar
• You-Jie, L. and Fox, P.W., 2001. The construction industry in China: its image, employment prospects and skill requirements [online]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242494768_THE_CONSTRUCTION_INDUSTRY_IN_CHINA_ITS_IMAGE_EMPLOYMENT_PROSPECTS_AND_SKILL_REQUIREMENTS/download [Accessed 30 April 2019].
   Google Scholar