To trust or not to trust: is trust a prerequisite for solving design quality problems?

References

• Aapaoja, A., et al., 2013. The characteristics of and cornerstones for creating integrated teams. International journal of managing projects in business, 6 (4), 695–713.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, N., Gravell, A. W., and Wills, G. B, 2008. Historical roots of agile methods: where did “agile thinking” come from?, Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. 9, pp. 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, U., 2017. Trust – the Nordic Gold. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Aasrum, J., et al., 2016. Communication in building design management: a comparative study of Norway and Germany. In: T. Kim and Y.-W. Kim, eds. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 19 July 2016, Boston. Boston, MA: IGLC, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye, A. and Main, J., 2007. Collaborative relationships in construction: the UK contractors’ perception. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 14 (6), 597–617.
   Google Scholar
• Al Hattab, M. and Hamzeh, F., 2017. A process-social perspective for understanding design information flow. Lean construction journal, 11, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Arain, F. M., Sadi, A., and Low, S. P, 2004. Causes of discrepancies between design and construction. Architectural Science Review 47 (3): 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Badenfelt, U., 2010. I trust you, I trust you not: a longitudinal study of control mechanisms in incentive contracts. Construction management and economics, 28 (3), 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, A.N., et al., 1999. Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design. Construction management & economics, 17 (2), 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Zabelle, T., 2000. Lean design: process, tools & techniques. London, UK: Lean Construction Institute, White Paper No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Koskela, L., 2013. Rhetoric and design. In: U. Lindemann, et al., eds. The 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, 19–22 August 2013, Seoul. Seoul, Korea: Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, H.G., 2000. The last planner system of production control. Thesis (PhD). The University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y., 2004. Making things work: solving complex problems in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: NECSI/Knowledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9 (2), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J.K., Jr, 1999. Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency. Group & organization management, 24 (2), 217–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerić, A., 2015. Trust in construction projects. Exeter, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D.W., and Kumaraswamy, M.M., 1997. A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. International journal of project management, 15 (1), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Che Ibrahim, C.K.I., Costello, S.B., and Wilkinson, S., 2013. Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects. Construction management and economics, 31 (11), 1128–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S.O., Yiu, T.W., and Lam, M.C., 2013. Interweaving trust and communication with project performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139 (8), 941–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V., 2008. Social network model of construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134 (10), 804–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchio, F., et al., 2011. Teamwork in integrated design projects: understanding the effects of trust, conflict, and collaboration on performance. Project management journal, 42 (6), 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, W. K., and Low, S. P, 2006. Latent building defects: causes and design strategies to prevent them. Journal of performance of constructed facilities 20 (3): 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave, B., et al., 2015. ViBR–conceptualising a virtual big room through the framework of people, processes and technology. Procedia economics and finance, 21, 586–593.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A., 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44 (2), 350–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Reifi, M.H. and Emmitt, S., 2013. Perceptions of lean design management. Architectural engineering and design management, 9 (3), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• El Samad, G., Hamzeh, F.R., and Emdanat, S., 2017. Last planner system–the need for new metrics. In: K. Walsh, I. Brilakis, and R. Sacks, eds. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 9–12 July 2017, Heraklion. Heraklion, Greece: IGLC, 637–644.
   Google Scholar
• Evbuomwan, N.F. and Anumba, C.J., 1998. An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Advances in engineering software, 29 (7–9), 587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, M., and Liker, J.K., 1992. The hidden professionals: product designers and their impact on design quality. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 39 (3), 254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U., 2007. Concepts of triangulation. In: U. Flick, ed. Qualitative research kit: managing quality in qualitative research. London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd., 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fosse, R. and Ballard, G. 2016. Lean design management in practice with the last planner system. In: T. Kim and Y.-W. Kim, eds. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 19 July 2016, Boston. Boston, MA: IGLC, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, B., et al., 2017. Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B.L., 2013. Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in experimental social psychology, 47 (1), 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gehbauer, F., Ballard, G., and Leonova, M., 2017. How research can help transform the construction industry. In: K. Walsh, I. Brilakis, and R. Sacks, eds. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 9–12 July 2017, Heraklion. Heraklion, Greece: IGLC, 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Higgin, G. and Jessop, N., 2001. Communication in the building industry: the report of a pilot study. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B.J., 2007. Lean information management: understanding and eliminating waste. International journal of information management, 27 (4), 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S., and Rothstein, B., 2020. Social trust – the Nordic Gold? QoG working paper series, 2020 (1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G.A., et al., 2004. Leadership and project management: time for a shift from fayol to flores. In: S. Bertelsen and C.T. Formoso, eds. 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 3–5 August 2004, Helsingør. Helsingør, Denmark: IGLC.
   Google Scholar
• Kärnä, S. and Junnonen, J.M., 2017. Designers’ performance evaluation in construction projects. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 24 (1), 154–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., Huovila, P., and Leinonen, J., 2002. Design management in building construction: from theory to practice. Journal of construction research, 3 (1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J.P., 1996. Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M., et al., 2005. Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131 (10), 1076–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kpamma, E.Z. and Adjei-Kumi, T., 2011. Management of waste in the building design process: the Ghanaian consultants’ perspective. Architectural engineering and design management, 7 (2), 102–112.
   Google Scholar
• Laan, A., et al., 2012. Levels of interorganizational trust in construction projects: empirical evidence. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138 (7), 821–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. and Rowlinson, S., 2011. The implications of trust in relationships in managing construction projects. International journal of managing projects in business, 4 (4), 633–659.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.H., Pena-Mora, F., and Park, M., 2003. Reliability and stability buffering approach in concurrent design and construction projects. In: J.C. Martinez and C.T. Formosa, eds. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 22–24 July 2003, Blacksburg. Blacksburg, VA: IGLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H. and Guerrero, J.R., 2020. Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Construction management and economics, 38 (5), 468–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhard, S. and Larsen, J.K., 2016. Identifying the key process factors affecting project performance. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 23 (5), 657–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindskold, S., 1978. Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. Psychological bulletin, 85 (4), 772–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P.E., Holt, G.D., and Li, H., 2002. Triangulation in construction management research. Engineering construction and architectural management, 9 (4), 294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E., Davis, P., and Ellis, J., 2010. Dispute causation: identification of pathogenic influences in construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 17 (4), 404–423.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E. and Li, H., 2000. Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction management & economics, 18 (4), 479–490.
   Google Scholar
• Lumineau, F., 2017. How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of management, 43 (5), 1553–1577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P., Khalfan, M., and Swan, W., 2005. Trust in construction projects. Journal of financial management of property and construction, 10 (1), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• McGeorge, J.F., 1988. Design productivity: a quality problem. Journal of management in engineering, 4 (4), 350–362.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R. and Dainty, A.R., 2001. Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change. Construction management & economics, 19 (6), 559–562.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Y. and Sayar, T., 2001. Web-based information flow modelling in construction. In: A. Akintoye, ed. 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5–7 September 2001, Salford. Salford, UK: University of Salford, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, Y., et al., 2019. Understanding clients’ experience of trust and distrust in dwelling fit-out projects. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 26 (3), 444–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J.T. and Woo, J., 2017. Proactive approach to engineering and design deliverables quality enhancement. Journal of management in engineering, 33 (4), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R.L. and Koskela, L., 2006. Agile construction project management. In: R.D.G. Amaratunga, ed. 6th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment, 6–7 April 2006, Salford. Salford, UK: University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Pikas, E., 2019. Causality and interpretation: integrating the technical and social aspects of design. Thesis (Doctoral). Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. and Beliveau, Y.J., 2016. A schema of trust building attributes and their corresponding integrated project delivery traits. International journal of construction education and research, 12 (2), 142–160.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., and Fico, F., 1998. Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research. London, UK: Mahwah.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., 2016. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction management and economics, 34 (9), 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. A., and Owen, R., 2010. Interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (9), 968–980.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, O., Ballard, G., and Pesonen, S., 2010. The combination of last planner system and location-based management system. Lean Construction Journal, 6 (1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. J., 2005. Trust in the design team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3 (1), 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L., Mohamed, Y., and AbouRizk, S.M., 2009. Early contractor involvement in design and its impact on construction schedule performance. Journal of management in engineering, 25 (1), 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streule, T., et al., 2016. Implementation of scrum in the construction industry. Procedia engineering, 164, 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Tauriainen, M., et al., 2016. The effects of BIM and lean construction on design management practices. Procedia engineering, 164, 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, P.A., 2005. Lean design management: a new paradigm for managing the design and documentation process to improve quality? In: K. Russell, ed. Proceedings of the 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, July 19–21 2005, Sydney. Sydney, Australia: IGLC, 283–295.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, P., Wyatt, A., and Mohamed, S., 1997. Indicators of design and documentation deficiency. In: S.N. Tucker, ed. 5th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, 16–17 July 1997, Gold Coast. Gold Coast, Australia: Griffith University, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Tribelsky, E. and Sacks, R., 2010. Measuring information flow in the detailed design of construction projects. Research in engineering design, 21 (3), 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribelsky, E. and Sacks, R., 2011. An empirical study of information flows in multidisciplinary civil engineering design teams using lean measures. Architectural engineering and design management, 7 (2), 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Uusitalo, P., et al., 2017. Review of lean design management: processes, methods and technologies. In: K. Walsh, I. Brilakis, and R. Sacks, eds. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 9–12 July 2017, Heraklion. Heraklion, Greece: IGLC, 571–578.
   Google Scholar
• Uusitalo, P., et al., 2019. Solving design management problems using lean design management: the role of trust. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 26 (7), 1387–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M.D. and Marsh, E.E., 2006. Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library trends, 55 (1), 22–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P.S., Cheung, S.O., and Ho, P.K., 2005. Contractor as trust initiator in construction partnering—prisoner’s dilemma perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131 (10), 1045–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W.K., et al., 2008. A framework for trust in construction contracting. International journal of project management, 26 (8), 821–829.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, L. and Zhang, L., 2020. Interplay of contractual governance and trust in improving construction project performance: dynamic perspective. Journal of management in engineering, 36 (4), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., and Perrone, V., 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization science, 9 (2), 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S.B., Chen, J., and Fu, Y., 2020. Contract complexity and trust in construction project subcontracting. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 27 (9), 2477–2500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimina, D., Ballard, G., and Pasquire, C., 2012. Target value design: using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construction management and economics, 30 (5), 393–398.
   Google Scholar