How relational contract theory influence management strategies and project outcomes: a systematic literature review

References

• Abd El-Moneim, M. M., El-Anwar, O. H., and El-Adaway, I. H., 2017. Investigating the performance of relational contracts using social network analysis. In: K.Y. Lin, N. Elgohary and P. Tang, eds. ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering (IWCCE). Seattle: University Washington, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Alarcón, L.F. & Mardones, D.A. 1998. Improving the design-construction interfaceed. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the International Group for Lean Construction, Guarujá, Brazil: IGLC. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, R.B., Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and De La Garza, J.M., 2016. Identifying and prioritizing best practices to achieve flash track projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142, 04015077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Howell, G.A., 2005. Relational contracting and lean construction. Lean construction journal, 2, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Blois, K.J., and Ivens, B.S., 2007. Method issues in the measurement of relational norms. Journal of business research, 60, 556–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., and Papaioannou, D., 2016. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London, United Kingdom: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., and Lumineau, F., 2015. Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: a qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of operations management, 33, 15–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and Manley, K., 2014. Validation of an instrument to measure governance and performance on collaborative infrastructure projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140, 04014006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S.O., Yiu, K.T., and Chim, P.S., 2006. How relational are construction contracts? Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 132, 48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colledge, B., 2005. Relational contracting: creating value beyond the project. Lean Construction Journal, 2, 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., 2016. Is a relational contract a legal concept? In: S. Degeling and J. Edelman, eds. Contract in commercial law. Australia: Thomson Reuters Australia, 518.
   Google Scholar
• De La Garza, J.M., and Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., 2018. Workflow process model for flash track projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144, 06018001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diathesopoulos, M., 2010. Relational contract theory and management contracts: a paradigm for the application of the Theory of the Norms. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1625348
   Google Scholar
• Edkins, A.J., and Smyth, H.J., 2006. Contractual management in PPP projects: evaluation of legal versus relational contracting for service delivery. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 132, 82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking Construction: The Egan Report. London: HMSO, 37.
   Google Scholar
• El-Adaway, I., Abotaleb, I., and Eteifa, S., 2017. Framework for multiparty relational contracting. Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 9, 04517018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebø, A., et al., 2020a. High-performance building projects: how to build trust in the team. Architectural engineering and design management, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1811078. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebø, A., et al., 2020b. Collaborative project delivery methods: a scoping review. Journal of civil engineering and management, 26 (3), 278–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E., 2010. Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? Construction management and economics, 28, 905–917.
   Google Scholar
• Faisol, N., Dainty, A. R., and Price, A. D., 2005. The concept of 'relational contracting' as a tool for understanding inter-organizational relationships in constructioned. In: 21st Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management London, United Kingdom: ARCOM.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D.A., Costa, A.A., and Lahdenpera, P., 2018. Key features of a project alliance and their impact on the success of an apartment renovation: a case study. International journal of construction management, 18, 482–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, N., 2009. Developing cooperative project client-supplier relationships: how much to expect from relational contracts? California management review, 51, 144–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandori, A., and Furlotti, M., 2006. The bearable lightness of interfirm strategic alliances: Resource-based and procedural contracting. In A. Ariño & J.J. Reuer (eds.) Strategic Alliances: Governance and Contracts. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grandori, A., and Furlotti, M., 2009. Facio ut Facias. International studies of management & organization, 39, 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gransberg, D.D., and Scheepbouwer, E., 2015. US partnering programs and international partnering contracts and alliances: comparative analysis. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2504: 73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., Algiers, A., and Levitt, R.E., 2018. Identifying the role of supply chain integration practices in the adoption of systemic innovations. Journal of management in engineering, 34, 04018030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., and Scott, W.R., 2019. Early stages in the institutionalization of integrated project delivery. Project management journal, 50, 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C.M., Molenaar, K.R., and Cannon, J.P., 2016. Measuring constructs of relational contracting in construction projects: the owner's perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142, 04016053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, A., et al., 2017. Relational base contracts–needs and trends in Northern Europe. Procedia computer science, 121, 1088–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M., et al., 2019. Converging and diverging governance mechanisms: the role of (Dys) function in long‐term inter‐organizational relationships. British journal of management, 30, 624–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., et al., 2016. Performance-based contracting in the defence industry: exploring triadic dynamics between government, OEMs and suppliers. Industrial marketing management, 59, 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivens, B.S., and Blois, K.J., 2004. Relational exchange norms in marketing: a critical review of Macneil’s contribution. Marketing theory, 4, 239–263.
   Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, M., 2017. Public private partnerships in India: problems and solutions. In: U.P. Singh, B.R. Chahar, H.R.P. Yadav & S.K. Vij, eds. American-Society-of-Civil-Engineers India Conference 2017 on: Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies, New Delhi, India: ASCE, 507–517.
   Google Scholar
• Jelodar, M.B., Yiu, T.W., and Wilkinson, S., 2016a. A conceptualisation of relationship quality in construction procurement. International journal of project management, 34, 997–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelodar, M.B., Yiu, T.W., and Wilkinson, S., 2016b. Relationship-quality judgment model for construction project procurement: a conjoint measurement. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142, 04016012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobidon, G., Lemieux, P., and Beauregard, R., 2018. Implementation of integrated project delivery in quebec's procurement for public infrastructure: a comparative and relational perspective. Sustainability, 10, 2648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobidon, G., Lemieux, P., and Beauregard, R., 2019. Comparison of Quebec’s project delivery methods: relational contract law and differences in contractual language. Laws, 8, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, F., et al., 2020. The framing of a sustainable development goals assessment in decarbonizing the construction industry–Avoiding “Greenwashing. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 131, 110029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsaas, B.T., Nwajei, U.O.K., and Bydall, C., 2020. A critical perspective on Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) applied in a Norwegian public hospital project. Matec web of conferences, 312, 07001.
   Google Scholar
• Kapsali, M., Roehrich, J.K., and Akhtar, P., 2019. Effective contracting for high operational performance in projects. International journal of operations & production management, 39, 294–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, Y.J., Gajendran, T. & Davis, P.R., 2015a. Relational contracting in the construction industry: mapping practice to theory. In: C.H. Raebel, eds. AEI 2015: birth and life of the integrated building. Milwaukee, WI: ASCE, 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, Y.J., Ling, F.Y.Y., and Zou, P.X.W., 2015b. Effects of contract strategy on interpersonal relations and project outcomes of public-sector construction contracts in Australia. Journal of management in engineering, 31, 04014062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreye, M.E., Roehrich, J.K., and Lewis, M.A., 2015. Servitising manufacturers: the impact of service complexity and contractual and relational capabilities. Production planning & control, 26, 1233–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M., et al., 2005a. Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131, 1076–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M., et al., 2005b. Reconstructing cultures for relational contracting. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131, 1065–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2016a. Preparing a framework for two-stage target-cost arrangement formulation. International journal of managing projects in business, 9, 123–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2016b. Formularising two-stage target-cost arrangements for use in practice. International journal of managing projects in business, 9, 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, S. M., 1994. Constructing the team:   Final report of government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry. London, United Kingdom: H.M.S.O.
   Google Scholar
• Lenferink, S., Tillema, T., and Arts, J., 2013. Towards sustainable infrastructure development through integrated contracts: experiences with inclusiveness in Dutch infrastructure projects. International journal of project management, 31, 615–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J., 2003. Relational incentive contracts. American economic review, 93, 835–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtig, W.A., 2005. Sutter health: Developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery. Lean Construction Journal, 2, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., et al., 2014a. Key relational contracting practices affecting performance of public construction projects in China. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140, 04013034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., et al., 2013. Modeling relational transaction and relationship quality among team members in public projects in Hong Kong. Automation in construction, 36, 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., et al., 2014b. Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: comparative study of Beijing and Sydney. International journal of project management, 32, 275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., Rahman, M.M., and Ng, T.L., 2006. Incorporating contractual incentives to facilitate relational contracting. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 132, 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., et al., 2015. Effect of adoption of relational contracting practices on relationship quality in public projects in Singapore. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 22, 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., et al., 2020. Relational determinants of construction project outcomes: a social network perspective. Construction management and economics, 38, 1061–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., 2016. The performance of performance-based contracting in human services: a quasi-experiment. Journal of public administration research and theory, 26, 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, S., 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. American sociological review, 28 (1), 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I.R., 1973. The many futures of contracts. Southern California law review, 47, 691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I.R., 1977. Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern university law review, 72, 854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I.R., 1980. The new social contract. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macneil, I.R., 1999. Relational contract theory: challenges and queries. Northwestern university law review, 94, 877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, S.A., Hadikusumo, B.H.W., and Sunindijo, R.Y., 2015. Using social interaction theory to promote successful relational contracting between clients and contractors in construction. Journal of management in engineering, 31, 04014095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa, H.A., Molenaar, K.R., and Alarcon, L.F., 2019. Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery. International journal of project management, 37, 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, Y., and Ling, F.Y.Y., 2013. Reducing hindrances to adoption of relational behaviors in public construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139, 04013017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, Y., and Ling, F.Y.Y., 2014. Boosting public construction project outcomes through relational transactions. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140, 04013037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaneeswaran, E., et al., 2003. Curing congenital construction industry disorders through relationally integrated supply chains. Building and environment, 38, 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pherson, K. H., and Pherson, R. H., 2012. Critical thinking for strategic intelligence. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., and Zenger, T., 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic management journal, 23, 707–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M., and Kumaraswamy, M.M., 2004. Contracting relationship trends and transitions. Journal of management in engineering, 20, 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M., and Kumaraswamy, M.M., 2008. Relational contracting and teambuilding: assessing potential contractual and noncontractual incentives. Journal of management in engineering, 24, 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M., and Kumaraswamy, M.M., 2012. Multicountry perspectives of relational contracting and integrated project teams. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138, 469–480. Asce,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M., Kumaraswamy, M.M., and Ling, F.Y.Y., 2007. Building a relational contracting culture and integrated teams. Canadian journal of civil engineering, 34, 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrich, J.K., et al., 2020. Inter-organizational governance: a review, conceptualisation and extension. Production planning & control, 31, 453–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakal, M.W., 2005. Project alliancing: a relational contracting mechanism for dynamic projects. Lean construction journal, 2, 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepbouwer, E., and Humphries, A.B., 2011. Transition in adopting project delivery method with early contractor involvement. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2228, 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selviaridis, K., and Wynstra, F., 2015. Performance-based contracting: a literature review and future research directions. International journal of production research, 53, 3505–3540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A. & Harper, C., 2018. Using Project team integration to predict cost and schedule performance in public transportation projects. In: C. Wang, C. Harper, Y. Lee, R. Harris & C. Berryman, eds. Construction Research Congress 2018: Infrastructure and Facility Management. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASCE, 680–690.
   Google Scholar
• Steinle, C., Schiele, H., and Ernst, T., 2014. Information asymmetries as antecedents of opportunism in buyer-supplier relationships: testing principal-agent theory. Journal of business-to-business marketing, 21, 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahorn, S., Brewer, G., and Gajendran, T., 2017. The influence of trust on project management practice within the construction industry. Construction economics and building, 17, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawalare, A., and Laishram, B., 2018. Relational contracting conceptual model for public sector construction organisations: an Indian context. Construction economics and building, 18, 70–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P.J., and Sanders, S.R., 1998. Partnering continuum. Journal of management in engineering, 14, 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2020. The SDG Partnership Guidebook: A practical guide to building high impact multi-stakeholder partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals. Oxford, United Kingdom: The Partnering Initiative and UN DESA.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D., and Lloyd-Walker, B., 2015. Collaborative project procurement arrangements. Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D.D., Fang, S.Z., and Fu, H.W., 2019. The effectiveness of evolutionary governance in mega construction projects: a moderated mediation model of relational contract and transaction cost. Journal of civil engineering and management, 25, 340–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, J., et al., 2004. Learning subjective language. Computational linguistics, 30, 277–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E., 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The journal of law and economics, 22, 233–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E., 1988. Corporate finance and corporate governance. The journal of finance, 43, 567–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J.K., and Duran, J., 2006a. Utilizing dispute review boards in relational contracting: a case study. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 132, 334–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J.K., and Epstein, A., 2006b. Avoiding and minimizing construction delay claim disputes in relational contracting. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 132, 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C., and Chan, D.W.M., 2012a. Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy. International journal of project management, 30, 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C., and Chan, D.W.M., 2012b. Fuzzy set theory approach for measuring the performance of relationship-based construction projects in Australia. Journal of management in engineering, 28, 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Roehrich, J.K., and Lewis, M.A., 2008. The dynamics of contractual and relational governance: evidence from long-term public–private procurement arrangements. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 14, 43–54.
   Google Scholar