Addressing specialization and fragmentation: product platform development in construction consultancy firms

References

• Addis, M., 2016. Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management. Construction management and economics, 34 (7–8), 439–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alashwal, A.M. and Fong, P.S.-W., 2015. Empirical study to determine fragmentation of construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141 (7), 04015016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alblas, A.A. and Wortmann, J.C., 2014. Function-technology platforms improve efficiency in high-tech equipment manufacturing: a case study in complex products and systems (CoPS). International journal of operations and production management, 34 (4), 447–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J., et al., 2003. Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Building research & information, 31 (2), 134–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J.G. and Ozaki, R., 2001. Are you being served? Japanese lessons on customer focused housebuilding. Brighton, UK: SPRU, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, M., Choi, T.Y., and Li, M., 2011. Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of operations management, 29 (4), 329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossom, A.C., 1934. Building to the skies; the romance of the skyscraper. London, UK: The Studio Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S., 1997. How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built, phoenix illustrated. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D.C. and Riley, M.J., 2000. The application of BPR: a case study in construction. Knowledge and process management, 7 (4), 217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Manyika, J., and Woetzel, J., 2017. Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. San Francisco, CA: McKinsey.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, C.T., 2003. Building down barriers: a guide to construction best practice. London, UK: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J. and Hall, D., 2019. An overview of configurations for industralized construction: typologies, customer requirements, and technical approaches. In: Proceedings of the 2019 European Conference on Computing in Construction, 10–12 July, Crete, Greece. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin, 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, K.H., et al., 2012. Understanding competencies in platform-based product development: antecedents and outcomes. Journal of product innovation management, 29 (3), 452–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, N., Pellegrino, R., and Pietroforte, R., 2011. Asset specificity and specialization in the U.S. construction industry: a transaction cost theory interpretation. International journal of construction management, 11 (4), 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, S., 2014. Leader of the pack. Construction research and innovation, 5 (4), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., and Jakobsen, L., 2002. Explaining society: an introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. and Brady, T., 2000. Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 931–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, H. and Emilsson, E., 2019. Platforms for enabling flexibility at two construction companies. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 21–24 May, Banff, Canada. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta, 348–355.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J.K., 2007. Visual representations as “artefacts of knowing”. Building research & information, 35 (1), 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A.M.M., 2012. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction management and economics, 30 (8), 653–671.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, K.J., 1993. Impact of integration on industrial facility quality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, K.J. and Teicholz, P.M., 1996. Achieving industrial facility quality: integration is key. Journal of management in engineering, 12 (1), 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M., 1996. Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction management and economics, 14 (5), 437–450.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., 2014. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Research policy, 43 (7), 1239–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L.A., 1961. Snowball sampling. The annals of mathematical statistics, 32 (1), 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., Hewlett, B., and Naim, M.M., 2017. Extending customer order penetration concepts to engineering designs. International journal of operations & production management, 37 (4), 402–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., Whyte, J.K., and Lessing, J., 2020. Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study. Construction management and economics, 38 (4), 322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W.J., Levitt, R.E., and Scott, W.R., 2012. Toward a unified theory of project governance: economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting. Engineering project organization journal, 2, 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2013. Construction 2025 - Industrial Strategy: government and industry in partnership. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Governmaent.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, S. and Romme, J., eds., 1992. Integral logistic structures: developing customer-oriented goods flow. New York, NY: Industrial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H.C., et al., 1989. Computer integration: reducing fragmentation in AEC industry. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 3 (1), 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, G., Johnsson, H., and Engström, D., 2014. Platform use in systems building. Construction management and economics, 32 (1–2), 70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, G. and Viklund, E., 2015. Advancement of platform development in industrialised building. Procedia economics and finance, 21 (15), 461–468.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., Lidelöw, H., and Olofsson, T., 2015. Product configuration in construction. International journal of mass customisation, 5 (1), 73.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., Simpson, T.W., and Siddique, Z., 2007. Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 18 (1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., Zhang, L., and Pokharel, S., 2007. Process platform planning for variety coordination from design to production in mass customization manufacturing. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 54 (1), 112–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, H., et al., 2017. Development of product platforms: theory and methodology. Concurrent engineering research engineering, 25 (3), 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, H., 2013. Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building: exploring product development platforms. Construction management and economics, 31 (9), 941–958.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, H., Jansson, G. and Jensen, P., 2013. Modularization in a housing platform for mass customization. In: Proceedings 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, 2–4 September, Reading, UK. London, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., 2019. A framework for assessing interventions to promote the implementation of material innovations on construction projects. London, UK: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Kivrak, S., et al., 2008. Capturing knowledge in construction projects: knowledge platform for contractors. Journal of management in engineering,24 (2), 87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudsk, A., et al., 2013. Stepwise modularization in the construction industry using a bottom-up approach. The open construction and building technology journal, 7 (1), 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, J., 2006. Industrialised house-building, concept and processes. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Arditi, D., and Wang, Z., 2012. Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction management and economics, 30 (2), 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lidelöw, H., Jansson, G., and Viklund, E., 2015. Design breakdown in industrialized construction: supporting lean manufacturing. Modular and offsite construction (MOC) summit proceedings, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lidelöw, H., Jansson, G., Viklund, E., 2015 Design breakdown in industrialized construction: supporting lean manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the Modular and Offsite Construction Summit, 2015, University of Alberta Library, Canada, 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Gunasekaran, A., and Li, H., 1998. Concurrent engineering: a strategy for procuring construction projects. International journal of project management, 16 (6), 375–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lundbäck, M. and Karlsson, C., 2005. Inter-firm product platform development in the automotive industry. International journal of innovation management, 9 (2), 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, O. and Howell, G.A., 2005. Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting. Lean construction journal, 2 (1), 46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D.W. and Aitchison, M., 2017. Design-value in the platform approach. In: IGLC 2017 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 9–12 July, Heraklion, Greece. Auckland, NZ: International Group for Lean Construction, 349–356.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. 1993. Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P., 1997. The power of product platforms. New York, NY; London, UK: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., 1983. Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; London, UK: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, L., Gianecchini, M., & Campagnolo, D. (2021). Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective. Journal of Organization Design, 10(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1992. Noncontractual methods of integration on construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 118 (2), 385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S., et al., 2006. Sharing knowledge across projects: limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management learning, 37 (2), 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala, M., et al., 2016. Implementing commercial information exchange: a construction supply chain case study. Construction management and economics, 34 (12), 898–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Dainty, A.R.J., and Gibb, A.G.F., 2004. Encouraging the appropriate use of off-Site production (OSP): perspectives of designers. In: The 2nd CIB SC International Symposium. Beijing, China: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A.M., 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization science, 1 (3), 213–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K., 1998. Platform product development. Sloan management review, 39 (4), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, D.A., 2011. Innovation in modular industries: implementing energy-efficient innovations in US Buildings. Thesis (PhD). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, D.A. and Levitt, R.E., 2010. How industry structure retards diffusion of innovations in construction: challenges and opportunities. CRGP working paper, 59,
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, D.A. and Levitt, R.E. 2010. The Diffusion of Energy Saving Technologies in the Building Industry: Structural Barriers and Possible Solutions. Working Paper Number 57, Stanford University, Center for Research in Global Projects (CRGP), Stanford, CA, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N., 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T.W., Maier, J.R., and Mistree, F., 2001. Product platform design: method and application. Research in engineering design - design, 13 (1), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sköld, M. and Karlsson, C., 2013. Stratifying the development of product platforms: requirements for resources, organization, and management styles. Journal of product innovation management, 30 (1), 62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. and Gluch, P., 2010. Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge. Construction management and economics, 28 (6), 589–599.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., 2006. From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Academy of management journal, 49 (4), 633–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tee, R., Davies, A., and Whyte, J., 2019. Modular designs and integrating practices: managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation. Research policy, 48 (1), 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuesen, C. and Hvam, L., 2011. Efficient on-site construction: learning points from a German platform for housing. Construction innovation, 11 (3), 338–355.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, V.S., Halman, J.I.M., and Voordijk, J.T., 2006. A methodology for developing product platforms in the specific setting of the housebuilding industry. Research in engineering design, 17 (3), 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B., 1992. Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikberg, F., Olofsson, T., and Ekholm, A., 2014. Design configuration with architectural objects: linking customer requirements with system capabilities in industrialized house-building platforms. Construction management and economics, 32 (1–2), 196–207.
   Google Scholar
• Wikner, J. and Rudberg, M., 2005. Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point. International journal of operations & production management, 25 (7), 623–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E., 1971. The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. The American economic review, 61 (2), 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 2001. Governing the project process: a conceptual framework. Construction management and economics, 19 (8), 799–808.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 2003. Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction. Building research & information, 31 (2), 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortmann, H. and Alblas, A., 2009. Product platform life cycles: a multiple case study. International journal of technology management, 48 (2), 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research design and methods, clinical research. Los Angeles, CA; London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar