Narrative shapes innovation: a study on multiple innovations in the UK construction industry

References

• Austin, J. L., 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartel, C.A., and Garud, R., 2009. The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization science, 20 (1), 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayse, A.M., and Manley, K., 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Construction innovation, 4 (3), 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R.J., and Tenkasi, R.V., 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization science, 6 (4), 350–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J., 1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., and Ingemansson, M., 2014. The logic of innovation in construction. Industrial marketing management, 43 (3), 512–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L., and Jahre, M., 2009. Balancing value creating logics in construction. Construction management and economics, 27 (7), 695–704.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J., et al., 2021. Cross-phase product configurator for modular buildings using kit-of-parts. Automation in construction, 123, 103437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, A., and Pitsis, T.S., 2020. We are projects: narrative capital and meaning making in projects. Project management journal, 51 (4), 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C., and Valentini, G., 2009. Organising R&D projects to profit from innovation: insights from co-opetition. Long range planning, 42 (2), 216–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, P.W., 2020. Revisiting basics: theoretically-grounded interesting research that addresses challenges that matter. Construction management and economics, 38 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Construction Innovation Hub, 2021. The digital innovation imperative: advancing progress towards a digital built Britain. London, UK: Construction Innovation Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., 2001. Narrative analysis in ethnography. In: P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, eds. Handbook of ethnography. London, UK: Sage, 384–393.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34 (3), 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A., Ninan, J., and Sankaran, S., 2020. 4D visualization to bridge the knowing-doing gap in megaprojects: an Australian case study. Construction economics and building, 20 (4), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Soto, B.G., et al., 2018. Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Automation in construction, 92, 297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuten, J.A., and Rip, A., 2000. Narrative infrastructure in product creation processes. Organization, 7 (1), 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., et al., 2002. Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building research & information, 30 (4), 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction. London, UK: Department of the Environment, Transport and Region (DETR).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. The academy of management review, 14 (4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enninga, T., and van der Lugt, R., 2016. The innovation journey and the skipper of the raft: about the role of narratives in innovation project leadership. Project management journal, 47 (2), 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B., Abbott, C., and Aouad, G., 2010. Construction in year 2030: developing an information technology vision. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 368 (1924), 3551–3565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., et al., 1997. Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research policy, 26 (4–5), 521–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G., and Till, J.E., 2001. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. Bmj (clinical research ed.), 323 (7321), 1103–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, M., 2016. The Farmer review of construction labour model: Modernise or die. London: Construction Leadership Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, C., and Langley, A., 2011. Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization studies, 32 (9), 1171–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterhoff, T.J., and Voelkel, D., 2006. Managing open innovation in biotechnology. Research-technology management, 49 (3), 14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, E.D., 2021. Accident and innovation in construction industry: Learning by doing to prevent accidents and improve the production. Safety science, 142, 105389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford, R., and Standing, C., 2014. Construction industry productivity and the potential for collaborative practice. International journal of project management, 32 (2), 315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M., 2000. Building innovation: complex construct in a changing world. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M., and Salter, A.J., 2000. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 955–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., and Calantone, R., 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19 (2), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., and Van de Ven, A.H., 2013. Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of management annals, 7 (1), 775–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J., Bygballe, L.E., and Hall, D., 2020. Call for papers – transforming construction: the multi-scale challenges of changing and innovating in construction. London, UK: University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/construction/sites/bartlett/files/call_for_papers_-_transforming_construction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.D., and Sergeeva, N., 2020. The contested privileging of zero carbon: plausibility, persuasiveness and professionalism. Buildings and cities, 1 (1), 491–503.
   Google Scholar
• Groat, L., and Wang, D., 2002. Architectural research methods. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, C., 2008. Implementing innovation in construction: Contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory. Construction management and economics, 26 (10), 1029–1041.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., 2006. The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms. Construction innovation, 6 (3), 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Havenvid, M., et al., 2019. The connectivity of innovation in the construction industry. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government 2013. Construction 2025. Industrial strategy: government and industry in partnership. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government 2018. Industrial strategy: construction sector deal. London, UK: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, C.E., and Lio, B.H., 2006. Innovation in non-profit and for-profit organizations: Visionary, strategic, and financial considerations. Journal of change management, 6 (1), 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ive, G., 1996. The client and the construction process: the Latham report in context. In: S. Gruneberg, ed. Responding to Latham: the views of the construction team. Ascot, UK: Chartered Institute of Building, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Izumi, C., et al., 2014. Application of a new monitoring scheme “On Site Visualization” for Safety management on Delhi Metro project. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 44, 130–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R.V., et al., 2010. Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74 (2), 71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., and Cardellino, P., 2008. Tales of the expected: investigating the rhetorical strategies of innovation champions. Construction management and economics, 26 (10), 1043–1054.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E., 2007. CEM research for the next 50 years: maximizing economic, environmental, and societal value of the built environment. Journal of construction engineering and management, 133 (9), 619–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J.N., and Ofori, G., 2007. Classification of innovation for strategic decision making in construction businesses. Construction management and economics, 25 (9), 963–978.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J.N., Schultmann, F., & Ofori, G., 2010. Tailoring competitive advantages derived from innovation to the needs of construction firms. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (5), 568–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H., and Guerrero, J.R., 2020. Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Construction management and economics, 38 (5), 468–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A.M., and Chan, I.Y., 2017. Understanding the interplay of organizational climate and leadership in construction innovation. Journal of management in engineering, 33 (5), 04017021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., 2015. Grassroots innovation in the construction industry. In: F. Orstavik, A. Dainty, and C. Abbott, eds. Construction innovation. New York: Wiley, 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ludema, J.D., Wilmot, T.B., and Srivastva, S., 1997. Organizational hope: reaffirming the constructive task of social and organizational inquiry. Human relations, 50 (8), 1015–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matinaro, V., and Liu, Y., 2017. Towards increased innovativeness and sustainability through organizational culture: a case study of a Finnish construction business. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 3184–3193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute, 2017. Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X., and Brown, A., 2018. Innovation in construction firms of different sizes: drivers and strategies. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 25 (9), 1210–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H., and Tatum, C.B., 1997. Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction management and economics, 15 (3), 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Naoum, S.G., 2016. Factors influencing labor productivity on construction sites. International journal of productivity and performance management, 65 (3), 401–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan, J., 2020. Online naturalistic inquiry in project management research: directions for research. Project leadership and society, 1 (1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ninan, J., 2021. Construction safety in media: an overview of its interpretation and strategic use. International journal of construction management. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1946898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan, J., Clegg, S., and Mahalingam, A., 2019. Branding and governmentality for infrastructure megaprojects: The role of social media. International journal of project management, 37 (1), 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan, J., Mahalingam, A., and Clegg, S., 2021. Asset creation team rationalities and strategic discourses: evidence from India. Infrastructure asset management, 8 (2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noktehdan, M., et al., 2019. Innovation Management and Construction Phases in Infrastructure Projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145 (2), 04018135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesterreich, T.D., and Teuteberg, F., 2016. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in industry, 83, 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., 2013. Analysis of construction innovation process at project level. Journal of management in engineering, 29, 455–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., Oral, K., and Demirkesen, S., 2016. Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. Journal of management in engineering, 32 (3), 04015052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschen, J.A., and Ison, R., 2014. Narrative research in climate change adaptation—exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance. Research policy, 43 (6), 1083–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer, E., et al., 2014. Model for systematic innovation in construction companies. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140 (4), B4014001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B.T., 1999. Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. The academy of management review, 24 (4), 711–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perttula, P., et al., 2006. Improving the safety and efficiency of materials transfer at a construction site by using an elevator. Journal of construction engineering and management, 132 (8), 836–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiden, A., et al., 2018. Social value in construction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renz, A., et al., 2016. Shaping the future of construction. A breakthrough in mindset and technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., 2003. Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosca, E., Arnold, M., and Bendul, J.C., 2017. Business models for sustainable innovation–an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. Journal of cleaner production, 162, S133–S145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., 2014. Understanding of labelling and sustaining of innovation in construction: a sensemaking perspective. Engineering project organization journal, 4 (1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., and Green, S.D., 2019. Managerial identity work in action: formalised narratives and anecdotal stories of innovation. Construction management and economics, 37 (10), 604–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., and Winch, G.M., 2020. Narrative interactions: how project-based firms respond to Government narratives of innovation. International journal of project management, 38 (6), 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., and Winch, G.M., 2021. Project narratives that potentially perform and change the future. Project management journal, 52 (3), 264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., and Zanello, C., 2018. Championing and promoting innovation in UK megaprojects. International journal of project management, 36 (8), 1068–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D., 2015. Interpreting qualitative data. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. M., 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15 (6), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., and Bessant, J. R., 2018. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tie, Y.C., Birks, M., and Francis, K., 2019. Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers. SAGE open medicine, 7, 2050312118822927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., 2016. Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.R., and Lecoeuvre, L., 2017. Marketing by, for and of the project: project marketing by three types of organizations. International journal of managing projects in business, 10 (4), 841–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., and O’Reilly, C., 1996. Winning through innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (New York, N.Y.), 211 (4481), 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., and Boje, D., 2016. Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: approaches and directions for future research. Academy of management annals, 10 (1), 495–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Marrewijk, A., 2007. Managing project culture: the case of Environ Megaproject. International journal of project management, 25 (3), 290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Veenswijk, M., Van Marrewijk, A., and Boersma, K., 2010. Developing new knowledge in collaborative relationships in megaproject alliances: organising reflection in the Dutch construction sector. International journal of knowledge management studies, 4 (2), 216–232.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E., and Roberts, K., 1993. Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative science quarterly, 38 (3), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., Mueller, F., and Mangan, A., 2008. In search of subtlety: discursive devices and rhetorical competence. Management communication quarterly, 22 (1), 99–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., and Sexton, M., 2011. Motivations for innovation in the built environment: new directions for research. Building research & information, 39 (5), 473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 1998. Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building research & information, 26 (4), 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G. M., 2010. Managing construction projects: an information processing approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., and Sergeeva, N., 2021. Temporal structuring in project organizing: a narrative perspective. International journal of project management.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme, A., 2009. Never waste a good crisis. A review of progress since Rethinking Construction and thoughts for our future. London, UK: Constructing Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, R.J., et al., 2020. Opportunities for improving construction health and safety using real-time H&S management innovations: a socio-technical-economic perspective. International journal of construction management, 20 (5), 534–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., and Gheisari, M., 2018. Unmanned aerial system applications in construction: a systematic review. Construction innovation, 18 (4), 453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar