Assessment of current target value design practices: consistencies and inconsistencies of application

References

• American Institute of Architects (AIA). 2009. Document Comparison Matrix. https://www.consensusdocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Comparison_Matrix_7.0_ConDOCS_AIA_AGC_Updated.pdf. [Accessed April 25, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez-Perez, M.-Á., Pellicer, E., and Soler, M.J., 2018. Target value design: a different way of approaching the constructive process in Spain. Journal of modern project management, 2018, 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, T., Lichtig, W., and Rybkowski, Z.R., 2017. Implementing target value design: tools and techniques to manage the process. Herd: health environments research & design journal, 10 (3), 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo, P. 2014. Exploring decision-making methods for sustainable design in commercial buildings. PhD dissertation. Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, P., Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G., 2014a. Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design. Journal of construction engineering and management, ASCE, 04014063-1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, P., Tommelein, I., and Ballard, G., 2014b. Comparing Weighting Rating and Calculating vs. Choosing by Advantages to Make Design Choices. Proc. 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Oslo, Norway, June, 401–412.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. 2000. The last planner system of production control. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2008. The lean project delivery system: an update. Lean construction journal, 2008, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2009. Personal communication. Berkeley, CA. February 23.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2011. Target value design: current Benchmark 1.0. Lean construction journal, 2011, 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2020. Target Value Delivery. In: P. Tzortzopoulos, M. Kagioglou, and L. Koskela, eds. Lean construction: core concepts and new frontier. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Reiser, P. 2004. The St. Olaf College Fieldhouse Project: a case study in designing to target cost, Proc. 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Elsinor, Denmark, 234–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J.T., Brown, J.E., and Ward, V.M., 1992. Techniques for analyzing focus group data. Evaluation review, 16 (2), 198–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charette, R. P., and Marshall, H. E., 1999. UNIFORMAT II elemental classification for building specifications, cost estimating, and cost analysis, October, US Department of Commerce, 109 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.T., Chang, P.-Y., and Huang, Y.-H., 2010. Assessing the overall performance of value engineering workshops for construction projects. International journal of project management, 28, 514–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, M. B., et al., 2004. Target costing: market-driven product design. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W., and Parrish, K. 2014. The need for integrated project delivery in the public sector. In: D. Castro-Lacouture ed. Proc. Construction Research Congress (CRC), May 19–21, Atlanta, GA., 10 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., and Slagmulder, R., 1997. Target costing and value engineering. Portland, UK: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Melo, R. S. S., Granja, A. D., and Ballard, G., 2013. Collaboration to extend target costing to non-multi-party contracted projects: evidence from literature. In: Formoso, C. T. & Tzortzopoulos, P., ed. Proc. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Fortaleza, Brazil, 31–2 Aug., 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• de Melo, R.S.S., et al., 2016. Target value design in the public sector: evidence from a hospital project in San Francisco, CA. Architectural engineering and design management, 12 (2), 125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denerolle, S., 2013. The application of target value design to the design phase of 3 hospital projects. Berkeley, CA: Project Production Systems Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley: Available at: www.p2sl.berkeley.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Do, D., et al., 2014. Target value design as a method for controlling project cost overrun. Proc. 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Oslo, Norway, June
   Google Scholar
• Do, D., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. D., 2015. An analysis of potential misalignments of commercial incentives in integrated project delivery and target value design. In: O. Seppänen, V. A. González, & P. Arroyo, Proc. 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Perth, Australia, July 29–31, 277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., 2019. The Fearless Organization: creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction: report of the construction task force. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Emuze, F., and Mathinya, L. 2016. Assessing the feasibility and use of target value design in South African Construction. Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Boston, MA, USA, 20–22 Jul 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, L. H., and Ahmed, S., 2020. Lean project delivery and integrated practices in modern construction, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K., Copeland, K., and Pikel, C., 2016. Target value delivery: practitioner guidebook to implementation, Current State 2016. Arlington, VA: Lean Construction Institute, 173.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S., and Parrish, K., 2013. The contractor's self-perceived role in sustainable construction: survey results. Proc. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Fortaleza, Brazil, July 31-Aug. 2, 905–914.
   Google Scholar
• International Group for Lean Construction. n.d. http://www.iglc.net/. [Accessed July 5, 2009].
   Google Scholar
• JSR. 1991. Worth less? Architectural Record, December, 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, P.-E., and Hammarlund, Y., 1999. The causes and costs of defects in construction: a study of seven building projects. Automation in construction, 8, 681–687.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, W., et al., 2012. Understanding of target value design for integrated project delivery with the context of game theory. Construction research congress, 2012, 556–563.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and Lee, H.W., 2010. Analysing user costs in a hospital: methodological implication of space syntax to support whole-life target value design. Lean construction journal, 2010, 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., 1995. Qualitative research. introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311 (7000), 299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M., 1997. Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 4 (2), 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., et al., 2002. The foundations of lean construction. In: R. Best, and G. de Valence, eds. Design and construction: building in value. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the team. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lean Construction Institute (LCI). ( n.d.-a). 01_What is Lean? LCI Lean Learning Series. https://www.leanconstruction.org/uploads/wp/2019/06/01_LCI_What-is-Lean.pdf. [Accessed June 16, 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Lean Construction Institute (LCI). ( n.d.-b). LCI Lean Project Delivery Glossary. https://www.leanconstruction.org/media/docs/LCI_Glossary12232015.pdf. [Accessed on June 17, 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Tommelein, I. D., and Ballard, G., 2010. Lean design management in an infrastructure design-build project – a case study. Proc. 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Haifa, Israel, July 14–16, 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.W., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I.D., 2012. Developing a target value design protocol for commercial energy retrofits – part 1. Construction research congress, ASCE, 2012, 1710–1719.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtig, W., 2006. The integrated agreement for lean project delivery. Construction lawyer, 26 (3), 25–32. 53–54.
   Google Scholar
• Macomber, H., Howell, G., and Barberio, J. 2005. Target-value design: seven foundational practices for delivering surprising client value. http://www.leanproject.com/community/downloads/Target%20Value%20Design.pdf [Accessed August 25, 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Macomber, H., Howell, G., and Barberio, J. 2008. Target-value design: nine foundational practices for delivering surprising client value. http://www.aia.org/nwsltr_pm.cfm?pagename=pm_a_112007_targetvaluedesign [Accessed July 30, 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Mckew, H., 1999. Why doesn’t value engineering work? Excuses are plentiful. Engineered systems, 16 (5), 86.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, L., 1961. Techniques of value analysis and engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miron, L. I. G., Kaushik, A., and Koskela, L., 2015. Target value design: the challenge of value generation. Proc. 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Perth, Australia, July 29–31, 815–825.
   Google Scholar
• Morêda Neto, H., Costa, D., and Coelho, T.R., 2019. Recommendations for target value design implementation for real estate development in Brazil. Architectural engineering and design management, 15 (1), 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morêda Neto, H., Costa, D., and Thomas, L. 2016. Target value design approach for real estate development. Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Boston, MA, USA, sect.3, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Munankami, M. 2012. Development and Testing of Simulation (Game) to illustrate basic principles of integrated project delivery and target value design: a first run study. Thesis, presented to Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Musa, M. & Pasquire, C. 2020. Target value delivery in bid process. In: Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Berkeley, California, USA, 6–10 July, 709–720
   Google Scholar
• Musa, M., Pasquire, C., and Hurst, A., 2019. Using TVD simulation to improve collaboration. In: Pasquire C. and Hamzeh F.R. ed. Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 503–514.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, U.K., Rybkowski.,   et al., 2017. A value analysis of lean processes in target value design and integrated project delivery: stakeholder perception. Herd: health environments research & design journal, 10 (3), 99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., et al., 2000. Can target costing and whole life costing be applied to the construction industry? evidence from two case studies. British journal of management, 11, 303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, V., 2014. Design management of sustainability values: a learning organization perspective. Architectural engineering and design management, 10, 3–4. 218–232.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, V. 2012. Managing sustainability value in design: a systems approach. PhD dissertation, Environmental Design and Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, C. A. & Granja, A. D. 2019. Target value design in real estate market: a conceptual map model. Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Dublin, Ireland, 3–5 July 2019,1479–1492
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, C. A., et al., 2016. Assessing suitability of target value design adoption for real estate developers in Brazil. Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Boston, MA, 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, C. A. & Granja, A. D. 2013. An investigation into collaborative practices in social housing projects as a precondition for target value design adoption. In: Formoso, C. T. & Tzortzopoulos, P. eds. Proc. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Fortaleza, Brazil, Aug, 429–437
   Google Scholar
• Orihuelaa, P., Orihuelab, J., and Pachecob, S., 2015. Communication protocol for implementation of Target Value Design (TVD) in Building Projects. Creative construction conference, procedia engineering 123, 361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, K., Wong, J. M., Tommelein, I. D., & Stojadinovic, B. 2007. Exploration of set-based design for reinforced concrete structures. Proc. 15th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), East Lansing, MI, United States, July, 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, K., Tommelein, I., and Ballard, G. 2009. Use of A3 reports to focus design and construction conversations. Proc. Construction Research Congress, 5–7 April, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, K., et al., 2008. Set-based design: a case study on innovative hospital design. In: Tzortzopoulos P. and Kagioglou M. eds. Proc. 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), 16–18 July, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Russell-Smith, S., and Lepech, M.D., 2015. Cradle-to-gate sustainable target value design: integrating life cycle assessment and construction management for buildings. Journal of cleaner production, 100, 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell-Smith, S., et al., 2015. Sustainable target value design: integrating life cycle assessment and target value design to improve building energy and environmental performance. Journal of cleaner production, 88, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybkowski, Z. K. 2009. The application of root cause analysis and target value design to evidence-based design in the capital planning of healthcare facilities. PhD dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Rybkowski, Z. K., Abdelhamid, T., and Forbes, L., 2013. On the back of a cocktail napkin: an exploration of graphic definitions of lean construction. Proc. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), July 31–August 2, Fortaleza, Brazil, 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rybkowski, Z. K., Munankami, M., Shepley, M. M., and Fernández-Solis, J. L. 2016. Development and testing of a lean simulation to illustrate key principles of target value design: a first run study. Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), July 20–22, Boston, MA, Sect. 4, 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rybkowski, Z.K., Mardelle, M.S., and Ballard, G.H., 2012. Target value design: applications to newborn intensive care units. HERD, 5 (4), 5–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silveira, S.S., and Alves, T.D., C. 2018. Target value design inspired practices to deliver sustainable buildings. Buildings, 8 (9), 116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoge, G. Y., Torp, O. & Johansen, A. 2020. Maturity of TVD implementation in norwegian public building projects In: Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, California, USA, 6–10 Jul 2020. pp 385–396.
   Google Scholar
• Sobek II, D. K. 2008. Steps of the A3 Process. http://www.coe.montana.edu/IE/faculty/sobek/A3/steps.htm [Accessed August 30, 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Sobek, D. K., II,., and Smalley, A., 2008. Understanding A3 thinking: a critical component of Toyota's PDCA Management System. LLC, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 186 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C., and Flores, F., 2001. Building trust in business, politics, relationships, and life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr, J., 1999. The choosing by advantages decision-making system. Westport, CT: Quorum.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H., 2001. Construct for excellence: report of the construction review committee. Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, P. A., Do, D., and Ballard, G., 2017. A case study on the success factors of target value design. In: Walsh, K., Sacks, R., Brilakis, I. eds. LC3 2017 Volume II - Proc. 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Heraklion, Greece, 563–570.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I. D., and Ballard, G., 2016. Target value design: introduction, framework & current benchmark. Arlington, VA: Lean Construction Institute. 73 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Torp, O., 2019. How stochastic cost estimates could be applied in relation to target value design. In: Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Dublin, Ireland, 3–5 Jul, 595–606.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzopoulos, P., dos Santos Hentschke, C., and Kagiolou, M., 2020. Chapter 2: lean product development and design management. In: Patricia Tzortzopoulos, Mike Kagioglou, and Lauri Koskela, eds. Lean construction: 25 years of development.  Routledge: Taylor and Francis, p. 14–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, V.M., Bertrand, J.T., and Brown, L.F., 1991. The comparability of focus group and survey results: three case studies. Evaluation review, 15 (2), 266–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A., et al., 1995. The Second Toyota Paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan management review, 36 (3), 43– 61.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T., 2003. Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K., 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods, 6th ed. New York: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimina, D., Ballard, G., and Pasquire, C., 2012. Target value design: using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construction management and economics, 30, 383–398.
   Google Scholar