Festschrift honouring Dr. Glenn Ballard

References

• Abdelhamid, T., and Mossman, A., 2004. Editors’ note. Lean construction journal, 1 (1), i–iii. https://leanconstruction.org/uploads/wp/media/docs/lcj/V1_N1/LCJ_04_0000.pdf [Accessed 1 May 2022]
   Google Scholar
• Alarcón, L., ed., 1997. Lean construction. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arbulu, R. and Ballard, G., 2004. Lean supply systems in construction. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC12), Helsingør, Denmark, 3–5 August, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, P., Tommelein, I., and Ballard, G., 2012. Deciding a sustainable alternative by ‘Choosing By Advantages’ in the AEC industry. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC20), San Diego, CA, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, P., Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G., 2015. Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141 (1), 04014063.
   Google Scholar
• Bade, M., and Haas, C., 2015. Using lean design and construction to get more from capital projects. Government finance review, 31 (2), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. 1997. Lookahead planning. In: Proceedings of 5th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC5), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, July.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 1981. Crew level planning. In: 1981 Conference on Construction Productivity Improvement, 15–16 September, University of Texas, Austin, 133–144, Reprinted: Ballard, G., 2015. Crew level planning. Lean construction journal, 15–24. www.leanconstructionjournal.org
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 1994. The last planner. Monterey, CA: Northern California Construction Institute, 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 1999a. Improving work flow reliability. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA, 26–28 July, 275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 1999b. Work structuring. LCI White Paper No. 5, June. https://p2sl.berkeley.edu/white-papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2000a. Lean project delivery system. LCI White Paper No. 8, September 23, revision 1, https://p2sl.berkeley.edu/white-papers/.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2000b. Positive vs negative iteration in design. In: Proceedings Eighth Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC-6, Brighton, UK, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2000c. The Last Planner System of production control. Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2002. Managing work flow on design projects: a case study. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 9 (3), 284–291.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2008. The lean project delivery system: an update. Lean construction journal, 2008, 1–19. https://leanconstruction.org/uploads/wp/media/library/id53/The_Lean_Project_Delivery_System_An_Update.pdforhttps://leanconstruction.org/pages/learning/publications/lean-construction-journal/lcj-back-issues/2008-issue/
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2012. Should Project budgets be based on worth or cost. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, CA, 761–770.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2020a. In memoriam: Gregory Alvin Howell. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (10).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballard, G., 2020b. Target value delivery. In: P. Tzortzopoulos, M. Kagioglou, and L. Koskela, eds. Lean construction: core concepts and new frontiers. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 148–161.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Arbulu, R., 2004. Making prefabrication lean. In: Proceedings of 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 3–5 Aug 2004. Helsingør, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., Carsten, M., and Howell, G. 1996. PARC: a case study. In: Proceedings of 4th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Birmingham, UK, 14 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G., 1994. Implementing lean construction: stabilizing work flow. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Santiago, Chile, in Alarcon, L. (ed.)(1997) Lean construction, The Netherlands: AA Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G., 1998a. What kind of production is construction. In: Proceedings of 6th Annual Conferene International Group for Lean Construction. Guarujá, Brazil, 13–15 Aug 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Howell, G., 1998b. Shielding production: essential step in production control. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124 (1), 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G.A., 2003. Competing construction management paradigms. In: Construction research congress: wind of change: integration and innovation, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Howell, G.A., 2005. Relational contracting and lean construction. Lean construction journal, 2 (1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., et al., 2007. Road map for lean implementation at the project level. The Construction Industry Institute, Research Report 234–11. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. & Koskela, L. 1998. On the agenda of design management research. In: Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 13–15 Aug 1998. Guarujá, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Koskela, L. 2009. Design is a Physical Process, Too. In: DS 58-2: proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th international conference on engineering design, vol. 2, design theory and research methodology, 24–27 August 2009. Palo Alto, CA, 251–262.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Koskela, L., 2013. Rhetoric and design. In: DS 75-2: proceedings of 19th international conference on engineering design (ICED13), design for harmonies, vol. 2: design theory and research methodology, 19–22 August 2013. Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., Koskela, L., Howell, G. and Zabelle, T., 2001. Production system design in construction. In: G. Ballard and D. Chua, eds. Proceedings of 9th Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 6–8 August 2001 Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Morris, P.H., 2010. Maximizing owner value through target value design. AACE international transactions, 1 (1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., Harper, N., and Zabelle, T., 2003. Learning to see work flow: application of lean production concepts to precast concrete fabrication. Journal of engineering, construction and architectural management, 10 (1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Reiser, P., 2004. The St. Olaf College fieldhouse project: a case study in designing to target cost. In: Proceedings of 12th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 August, 234–249. Helsingør, Denmark
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Rybkowski, Z.K., 2009. Overcoming the hurdle of first cost: Action research in target costing. In: Construction research congress 2009: building a sustainable future. Seattle, Washington: ASCE, 1038–1047.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I.D., 2012. Lean management methods for complex projects. Engineering project organization journal, 2 (1–2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.641117.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Tommelein, I. D. 2016. Current process benchmark for the last planner system. Online at p2sl.berkeley.edu and reprinted in the Lean Construction Journal, 2016, 57–89, www.leanconstruction.org/media/docs/lcj/2016/LCJ_16_011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Tommelein, I.D., 2021. 2020 Current process benchmark for the last planner® system of project planning and control. Project Production Systems Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 111 pp [online]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t90q8q9 and reprinted in the Lean Construction Journal, 53–155, https://www.leanconstruction.org/uploads/wp/media/docs/lcj/2021/LCJ_21_001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsen, S., Koskela, L., Henrich, G. and Rooke, J., 2006. Critical flow – towards a construction flow theory. In: Proceedings of 14th annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC14), Santiago, Chile, 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, H.J., et al., 1999. WorkPlan: constraint-based database for work package scheduling. journal of construction engineering and management, 125 (3), 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, Sir J. 1998. Rethinking construction. https://constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/rethinking_construction_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elfving, J.A., Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G. 2004. Improving the delivery process for engineered-to-order products – lessons learned from power distribution equipment. In: Proceedings of 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC12), 3–5 August. Helsingør, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Elfving, J.A., Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G., 2005. Consequences of competitive bidding in project-based production. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 11 (4), 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J., 2014. Lean project planning in shipbuilding. Journal of ship production and design, 30 (02), 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A., Berghede, K., and Tommelein, I., 2013. Takt time planning for construction of exterior cladding. In: Proceedings of 21st annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC21), Fortaleza, Brazil, 527–536.
   Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, F., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I.D., 2012. Rethinking lookahead planning to optimize construction workflow. Lean construction journal, 2012, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G., and Ballard, G. 1994. Implementing lean construction: reducing inflow variation. In: Proceedings of 2nd international group for lean construction conference, Santiago, Chile, in Alarcon, L. (ed.)(1997) Lean construction, AA Balkema, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G. and Ballard, G. 1998. Implementing lean construction: understanding and action. In: 6th Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 13–15 August 1998. Guarujá, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G. A., and Ballard, G., 1995. Managing uncertainty in the piping function. Report to Constr. Industry Institute, University of Texas, Austin, TX, November, 103 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G. A., Ballard, G., Abdelhamid, T. S. and Mitropoulos, P., 2002. Working near the edge: a new approach to construction safety. In: Proceedings of 10th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 6–8 August. Gramado, Brazil, 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G., Laufer, A., and Ballard, G., 1993. Interaction between subcycles: one key to improved methods. The journal of construction engineering and management, 119, 714–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, and B. Rama, eds. Contribution of working group ii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. and Ballard, G., 2000. Is the earned-value method an enemy of work flow? In: 8th Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 17–19 July 2000. Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction (Vol. 72). Stanford: Stanford university.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2017. Why is management research irrelevant? Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2020. Theory of lean construction. In: P. Tzortzopoulos, M. Kagioglou, and L. Koskela, eds. Lean construction: core concepts and new frontiers. Lean construction: Core concepts and new frontiers, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., and Ballard, G., 2006. What is lean construction–2006. In: Proceedings of Construction in the XXI Century: local and global challenges-ARTEC-Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., and Ballard, G., 2012. Is production outside management? Building research & information, 40 (6), 724–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., Ballard, G., and Tanhuanpää, V. P., 1997. Towards lean design management. In: Proceedings of the 5th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, Gold Coast, Australia, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtig, W., 2006. The integrated agreement for lean project delivery. Construction lawyer, 26 (3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Liker, J. E., 2003. The Toyota way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Linnik, M., Berghede, K., and Ballard, G., 2013. An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive work. In: Proceedings of 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 31–2 August. Fortaleza, Brazil, 609–618.
   Google Scholar
• LIPS. 2019. lips2019.com/conference [Accessed 1 May 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri, H., et al., 2019. Survey comparing critical path method, last planner system, and location-based techniques. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145, 04019077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennanen, A., Ballard, G., and Haahtela, Y., 2011. Target costing and designing to targets in construction. Journal of financial management of property and construction, 16 (1), 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rooke, J.A., and Kagioglou, M., 2007. Criteria for evaluating research: the unique adequacy requirement of methods. Construction management and economics, 25 (9), 979–987.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., 2016. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction management and economics, 34 (9), 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., et al., 2020. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-centric engineering, 1, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., et al., 2010. The interaction of lean and building information modeling in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (9), 968–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, L.A., Ballard, G., Arroyo, P. and Alarcón, L.F., 2018. Indicators for observing elements of linguistic action perspective in Last Planner® System. In: Proceedings of 26th annual conference of the international. Group for lean construction (IGLC26), Chennai, India, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, O., Ballard, G., and Pesonen, S., 2010. The combination of last planner system and location-based management system. Lean construction journal, 2010, 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., 1998. Pull-driven scheduling for pipe-spool installation: simulation of lean construction technique. ASCE, Journal of construction engineering & management, 124 (4), 279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., 2015. Journey toward Lean Construction: Pursuing a Paradigm Shift in the AEC Industry. ASCE, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141 (6), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000926.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I. D., and Ballard, G., 2016. Target value design: introduction, framework, and current benchmark. Project Production Systems Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G., 1997a. Coordinating specialists. In: Proceedings of 2nd international seminar on lean construction, 20–21 October, Sao Paulo, Brazil, A.S.I. Conte (organizer), also Technical Report 97-8, Construction Engineering and Management Program, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34942/P2G59D.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., and Ballard, G., 1997b. Look-ahead planning: screening and pulling. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on Lean Construction, 20-21 October, Sao Paulo, Brazil, A.S.I. Conte (organizer), also Technical Report 97-9, Construction Engineering and Management Program, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34942/P2KW2X.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I. D., et al., 1999a. The last planner: improving reliability in planning and work flow. T4 workbook version 1.0. San Francisco, CA: Lean Construction Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I. D., et al., 1999b. Lookahead planning: streamlining the work flow that supports the last planner. T5 workbook version 1.0. San Francisco, CA: Lean Construction Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., Riley, D., and Howell, G.A., 1999c. Parade game: impact of work flow variability on trade performance. ASCE, journal of construction engineering and management, 125 (5), 304–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, C.C., et al., 2004. Work structuring to achieve integrated product–process design. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130 (6), 780–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzortzopoulos, P., Kagioglou, M. and Koskela, L., eds. 2020. Lean construction: core concepts and new frontiers. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 460 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Whelton, M. and Ballard, G. 2002. Project definition and wicked problems. In: Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC10), 6–8 August. Gramado, Brazil, 375–387.
   Google Scholar