Off-site construction in highways projects: management, technical, and technology perspectives from the United Kingdom

References

• Abanda, F.H., Tah, J.H.M., and Cheung, F.K.T., 2017. BIM in off-site manufacturing for buildings. Journal of building engineering, 14, 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulaziz, J.M., 2016. Effect of buildability on labor productivity: a practical quantification approach. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142 (2), 06015002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, F.F.A., et al., 2016. Accounting for transport times in planning off-site shipment of construction materials. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142 (1), 04015050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, S., et al., 2020. Comparison of worker safety risks between onsite and offsite construction methods: a site management perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (9), 05020010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alazzaz, F. and Whyte, A., 2015. Linking employee empowerment with productivity in off-site construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 22 (1), 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou, F. and Marinelli, M., 2020. Proposal for the promotion of standardization of precast beams in highway concrete bridges. Frontiers in built environment, 6, 119.
   Google Scholar
• Arif, M. and Egbu, C., 2010. Making a case for offsite construction in China. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 17 (6), 536–548.
   Google Scholar
• Arif, M., Goulding, J., and Rahimian, F.P., 2012. Promoting off-site construction: future challenges and opportunities. Journal of architectural engineering, 18 (2), 75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Assaad, H.R., et al., 2022. Quantification of the state of practice of offsite construction and related technologies: current trends and future prospects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 148 (7), 04022055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz, Z., Riaz, Z., and Arslan, M., 2017. Leveraging BIM and Big Data to deliver well maintained highways. Facilities, 35 (13/14), 818–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Tommelein, I., 2012. Lean management methods for complex projects. Engineering project organization journal, 2 (1–2), 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., 2013. Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N., Pasquire, C., and Gibb, A., 2006. Benefit evaluation for off‐site production in construction. Construction management and economics, 24 (2), 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N., et al., 2005. Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Architectural engineering and design management, 1 (3), 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N. and Wakefield, R., 2009. Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction innovation, 9 (1), 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, N., Khalfan, M.M.A., and Maqsood, T., 2013. Off-site construction of apartment buildings. Journal of architectural engineering, 19 (1), 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Canning, L. and Luke, S., 2010. Development of FRP bridges in the UK — an overview. Advances in structural engineering, 13 (5), 823–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, D., Li, H., and Wang, G., 2014. Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140 (12), 04014056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A.P.C., et al., 2001. Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction management and economics, 19 (7), 699–718.
   Google Scholar
• Charlson, J. and Dimka, N., 2021. Design, manufacture and construct procurement model for volumetric offsite manufacturing in the UK housing sector. Construction innovation, 21 (4), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2019-0108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Okudan, G.E., and Riley, D.R., 2010. Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in construction, 19 (2), 235–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.O., Chen, X.B., and Kim, T.W., 2019. Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. International journal of construction management, 19 (2), 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhari, S.C., Adil, G.K., and Ananthakumar, U., 2012. Exploratory case studies on manufacturing decision areas in the job production system. International journal of operations & production management, 32 (11), 1337–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chris, G., et al., 2019. Modularisation and offsite in engineering construction: an early decision-support tool. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-civil engineering, 172 (6), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, G. and Madrazo, L., 2015. Connecting building component catalogues with BIM models using semantic technologies: an application for precast concrete components. Automation in construction, 57, 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, J., Goodrum, P.M., and Maloney, W.F., 2009. Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 135 (3), 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, E.I., et al., 2017. The relationship between the last planner® system and collaborative planning practice in UK construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 24 (3), 407–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave, B., et al., 2018. A framework for integrating BIM and IoT through open standards. Automation in construction, 95, 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Looze, M.P., et al., 2016. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59 (5), 671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, J.M.D., et al., 2019. Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption. Journal of building engineering, 26, 100868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, J.M.D., et al., 2020. Augmented and virtual reality in construction: drivers and limitations for industry adoption. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (7), 04020079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfT, 2015. Road investment strategy: for the 2015/16–2019/20 road period. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408514/ris-for-2015-16-road-period-web-version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfT, 2020. Road investment strategy 2: 2020–2025. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/951100/road-investment-strategy-2-2020-2025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowsett, R., et al., 2019. Projecting at the project level: MMC supply chain integration roadmap for small housebuilders. Construction innovation, 19 (2), 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C.M. and Sacks, R., 2008. Relative productivity in the AEC industries in the United States for on-site and off-site activities. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134 (7), 517–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 2002. Rethinking construction accelerating change–a consultation paper by the strategic forum for construction.
   Google Scholar
• Ehwi, R.J., et al., 2022. Offsite manufacturing research: a systematic review of methodologies used. Construction management and economics, 40 (1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Razek, M.E.A., Bassioni, H.A., and Mobarak, A.M., 2008. Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134 (11), 831–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia, G., Margherita, A., and Passiante, G., 2021. Management engineering: a new perspective on the integration of engineering and management knowledge. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 68 (3), 881–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, M., et al., 2021. Precast system and assembly connection of cement concrete slabs for road pavement: a review. Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (english edition), 9 (2), 208–222.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A.M.M., 2012. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction management and economics, 30 (8), 653–671.
   Google Scholar
• Fifield, L.J., et al., 2018. Hospital wards and modular construction: summertime overheating and energy efficiency. Building and environment, 141, 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, X., et al., 2018. Barriers to the transition towards off-site construction in China: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Jin, R., and Lu, W., 2020. Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: a review. Building research & information, 48 (5), 538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Low, S.P., and Nair, K., 2018. Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA): a preliminary study of factors influencing its adoption in Singapore. Architectural engineering and design management, 14 (6), 440–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gbadamosi, A.-Q., et al., 2019. Offsite construction: developing a BIM-Based optimizer for assembly. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 1180–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gbadamosi, A.-Q., et al., 2020. Big data for design options repository: towards a DFMA approach for offsite construction. Automation in construction, 120, 103388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, A.G., 1999. Off-site fabrication: prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularisation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G., 2012. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European journal of information systems, 21 (2), 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodier, C. and Gibb, A., 2007. Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Construction management and economics, 25 (6), 585–595.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrum, P.M., Zhai, D., and Yasin, M.F., 2009. Relationship between changes in material technology and construction productivity. Journal of construction engineering and management, 135 (4), 278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., et al., 2016. Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: an international perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142 (11), 04016062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, J., et al., 2012. Construction industry offsite production: a virtual reality interactive training environment prototype. Advanced engineering informatics, 26 (1), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, J., et al., 2015. New offsite production and business models in construction: priorities for the future research agenda. Architectural engineering and design management, 11 (3), 163–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S.D., Fernie, S., and Weller, S., 2005. Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction. Construction management and economics, 23 (6), 579–593.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, T., et al., 2019. Effective use of offsite manufacturing for public infrastructure projects in Australia. In: International conference on smart infrastructure and construction 2019 (ICSIC) driving data-informed decision-making.
   Google Scholar
• Hairstans, R. and Smith, R.E., 2018. Offsite HUB (Scotland): establishing a collaborative regional framework for knowledge exchange in the UK. Architectural engineering and design management, 14 (1–2), 60–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällmark, R., White, H., and Collin, P., 2012. Prefabricated bridge construction across Europe and America. Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 17 (3), 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksworth, D., 2014. Use of the strategic road network. Department for Transport. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/343412/strategic-road-network-report.pdf#:∼:text=The%20Strategic%20Road%20Network%20%28SRN%29%20comprises%20approximately%204%2C300,of%20the%20total%20motor%20vehicle%20traffic%20in%20England
   Google Scholar
• Hijazi, A.A., et al., 2021. Rationale for the integration of BIM and blockchain for the construction supply chain data delivery: a systematic literature review and validation through focus group. Journal of construction engineering and management, 147 (10), 03121005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMG, 2018. Industrial strategy: construction sector deal. Her Majesty’s Government (HMG). http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2018-0670/BEIS_Construction_Sector_Deal_DPS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HMT, 2020. National infrastructure strategy. HM Treasury (HMT). Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938539/NIS_Report_Web_Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M.R., et al., 2018. Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a scientometric analysis. Automation in construction, 87, 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, L., et al., 2020. Towards a more extensive application of off-site construction: a technological review. International journal of construction management, 22 (11), 2154–2165. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1768463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Chong, H.-Y., 2020. Integrated frameworks of construction procurement systems for off-site manufacturing projects: social network analysis. International journal of construction management, 22 (11), 2089–2097. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1766188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Chong, H.-Y., and Wang, X., 2019a. Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia. Journal of cleaner production, 227, 346–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., et al., 2019b. Understanding stakeholders in off-site manufacturing: a literature review. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145 (8), 03119003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, M., et al., 2021. Modelling in off-site construction supply chain management: a review and future directions for sustainable modular integrated construction. Journal of cleaner production, 310, 127503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPA, 2018. Analysis of the national infrastructure and construction pipeline. Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/759222/CCS207_CCS1118987248-001_National_Infrastructure_and_Construction_Pipeline_2018_Accessible.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, H., Jollands, M., and Setunge, S., 2015. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings—a review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 42, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iuorio, O., Wallace, A., and Simpson, K., 2019. Prefabs in the North of England: technological, environmental and social innovations. Sustainability, 11 (14), 3884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R.J., Wojcik, A., and Miodownik, M., 2018. 3D printing of asphalt and its effect on mechanical properties. Materials & design, 160, 468–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillon, L. and Poon, C.S., 2008. Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study. Construction management and economics, 26 (9), 953–966.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, R., et al., 2018. A holistic review of off-site construction literature published between 2008 and 2018. Journal of cleaner production, 202, 1202–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali, M. and Hewage, K., 2016. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: a critical review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 62, 1171–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali, M. and Hewage, K., 2017. Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 3592–3606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis, B., 2004. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Automation in construction, 13 (1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotnour, T. and Farr, J.V., 2005. Engineering management: past, present, and future. Engineering management journal, 17 (1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., et al., 2014. Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers. Construction management and economics, 32 (1–2), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, J. and Simonsson, P. (2012). Barriers and drivers for increased use of off-site bridge construction in Sweden. In: Annual ARCOM conference: 03/09/2012–05/09/2012. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-40067
   Google Scholar
• Lerche, J., et al., 2020. Application of last planner system to modular offshore wind construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (11), 05020015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J., Zhang, H., and Sher, W., 2017. Insights into architects’ future roles in off-site construction, Construction Economics and Building, 17 (1), 107–120. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/5252.
   Google Scholar
• Lusby-Taylor, P., et al., 2004. Design and modern methods of construction. London: The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE).
   Google Scholar
• Magill, L.J., et al., 2020. 4D BIM integrated construction supply chain logistics to optimise on-site production. International journal of construction management, 22 (12), 2325–2334. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1786623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, C., et al., 2018. Structural equation modeling to analyze the critical driving factors and paths for off-site construction in China. KSCE journal of civil engineering, 22 (8), 2678–2690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, C., et al., 2015. Major barriers to off-site construction: the developer’s perspective in China. Journal of management in engineering, 31 (3), 04014043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, P., et al., 2020. Simulation-driven design of wood framing support systems for off-site construction machinery. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (7), 04020075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiling, J., Backlund, F., and Johnsson, H., 2012. Managing for continuous improvement in off‐site construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 19 (2), 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, W. and Goulding, J.S., 2009. Offsite production in the UK: the construction industry and academia. Architectural engineering and design management, 5 (3), 136–152.
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, W. and Goulding, J.S., 2011. Offsite production: a model for building down barriers. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 18 (1), 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirian, A., et al., 2019. Optimal work assignment to multiskilled resources in prefabricated construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145 (4), 04019011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naus, R., et al., 2010. Rollpave, a prefabricated asphalt wearing course. In: 11th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements (ISAP), Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• NH, 2020. Highways England delivery plan 2020–2025. Highways England. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/910866/5-year_Delivery_Plan_2020-2025_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J.T., O’Brien, W.J., and Choi, J.O., 2014. Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization. Journal of construction engineering and management, 140 (6), 04014012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J.T., O’Brien, W.J., and Choi, J.O., 2015. Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141 (9), 04015026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oti-Sarpong, K., et al., 2021. How countries achieve greater use of offsite manufacturing to build new housing: identifying typologies through institutional theory. Sustainable cities and society, 76, 103403. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670721006764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Gibb, A.G.F., and A.R.J. Dainty, 2007. Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Construction management and economics, 25 (2), 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W. and Sidwell, R., 2011. Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK. Construction management and economics, 29 (11), 1081–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Piroozfar, P., et al., 2019. Configuration platform for customisation of design, manufacturing and assembly processes of building façade systems: A building information modelling perspective. Automation in construction, 106, 102914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragab, M.A. and Marzouk, M., 2021. BIM adoption in construction contracts: content analysis approach. Journal of construction engineering and management, 147 (8), 04021094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M., 2014. Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction. Journal of management in engineering, 30 (1), 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razkenari, M., et al., 2020. Perceptions of offsite construction in the United States: an investigation of current practices. Journal of building engineering, 29, 101138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, O.C., 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative research in psychology, 11 (1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., et al., 2018. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Said, H., 2015. Prefabrication best practices and improvement opportunities for electrical construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141 (12), 04015045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, T., et al., 2017. Near optimum selection of module configuration for efficient modular construction. Automation in construction, 83, 316–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanā, J., 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, M.A., et al., 2021. Recent developments in the prefabricated bridge deck systems. Case studies in construction materials, 15, e00750.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, V., Gadde, L.-E., and Hulthén, K., 2018. Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance. Construction management and economics, 36 (1), 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutrisna, M. and Goulding, J., 2019. Managing information flow and design processes to reduce design risks in offsite construction projects. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 26 (2), 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, V.W.Y., et al., 2015. Best practice of prefabrication implementation in the Hong Kong public and private sectors. Journal of cleaner production, 109, 216–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, T., et al., 2020. Construction-oriented design for manufacture and assembly guidelines. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (8), 04020085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.D., 2010. A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector. Construction management and economics, 28 (8), 885–896.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M.D., 2020. A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector: ten years on. International journal of construction management, 22 (15), 2877–2885. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1829783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, W., 1997. Application of a case study methodology. The qualitative report, 3 (3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tezel, A., et al., 2021. Insights into blockchain implementation in construction: models for supply chain management. Journal of management in engineering, 37 (4), 04021038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel, A., Koskela, L., and Aziz, Z., 2018. Lean thinking in the highways construction sector: motivation, implementation and barriers. Production planning & control, 29 (3), 247–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomek, R., 2017. Advantages of precast concrete in highway infrastructure construction. Procedia engineering, 196, 176–180.
   Google Scholar
• UK Highway Agency, 2009. Manual of contract documents for highway works (MCHW). London: UK Highway Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., et al., 2020a. Framework for an IoT-based shop floor material management system for panelized homebuilding. International journal of construction management, 20 (2), 130–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., et al., 2020b. A systematic review of digital technology adoption in off-site construction: current status and future direction towards Industry 4.0. Buildings, 10 (11), 204. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/11/204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warszawski, A., 2003. Industrialized and automated building systems: a managerial approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P., Zwar, C., and Gharaie, E., 2017. Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143 (7), 04017020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, P.A., et al., 2021. Off-site modular construction and design in nuclear power: a systematic literature review. Progress in nuclear energy, 134, 103664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., et al., 2022. Critical review of data-driven decision-making in bridge operation and maintenance. Structure and infrastructure engineering, 18 (1), 47–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P., et al., 2019. Perceptions towards risks involved in off-site construction in the integrated design & construction project delivery. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 899–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni, I.Y. and Shen, G.Q.P., 2019. Holistic review and conceptual framework for the drivers of offsite construction: a total interpretive structural modelling approach. Buildings, 9 (5), 117. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/9/5/117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2011. Applications of case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, X., et al., 2019. Building information modelling for off-site construction: review and future directions. Automation in construction, 101, 72–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, B., et al., 2015. Developing temporary manufacturing facilities for residential building: A case of the modern flying factory. In: ARCOM 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yunus, R. and Yang, J., 2012. Critical sustainability factors in industrialised building systems. Construction innovation, 12 (4), 447–463.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, X., Reed, R., and Mills, A., 2014. Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice. Construction management and economics, 32 (1–2), 40–52.
   Google Scholar