The impact of the change in institutional regulation on construction productivity: firm-level evidence in a developing economy

References

• Ab Rani, N.I., et al., 2018. Local contractors’ awareness on competitiveness towards liberalisation and globalisation in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of construction in developing countries, 23, 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ab Rani, N.I., et al., 2021. Competitiveness framework of local contractors in the Malaysian construction industry towards globalisation and liberalisation. International journal of construction management, 23, 553–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahab, M., and Vogl, B., 2011. Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan. Construction management and economics, 29, 635–644.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., 2009. Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., and Dell, M., 2010. Productivity differences between and within countries. American economic journal: macroeconomics, 2, 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J.A., 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1. Elsevier, 385–472.
   Google Scholar
• Agostino, M., et al., 2020. Institutional quality and firms’ productivity in European regions. Regional studies, 54, 1275–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alashwal, A.M., and Alduais, H.S., 2019. Performance strategies of Malaysian international contractors during boom and recession periods. International journal of construction management, 19, 453–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderton, R., Di Lupidio, B., and Jarmulska, B., 2020. The impact of product market regulation on productivity through firm churning: Evidence from European countries. Economic modelling, 91, 487–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas, B., Fernie, S., and Dainty, A., 2021. Understanding policy and change: using a political economy analysis framework. Construction management and economics, 40, 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.2015795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansar, A., et al., 2016. Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China. Oxford review of economic policy, 32, 360–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azman, M.A., et al., 2019. A Meta-frontier method of decomposing long-term construction productivity components and technological gaps at the firm level: evidence from Malaysia. Construction management and economics, 37, 72–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azman, M.A., et al., 2021. Product diversification and large construction firm productivity: the effect of institutional environments in Malaysia. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28, 994–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azman, M.A., et al., 2022. Internationalization and productivity of construction firms in a developing country: the effect of institutional environment and ownership on Malaysian construction firms. Journal of management in engineering, 38, 04021081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, C., and Gunduz, K.A., 2017. When, why and how institutional change takes place: a systematic review and a future research agenda on the importance of policy entrepreneurship in macroeconomic bureaucracies. Policy and society, 36, 479–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamgbade, J.A., et al., 2018. Does government support matter? Influence of organizational culture on sustainable construction among Malaysian contractors. International journal of construction management, 18, 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank Negara, ed., 2009. Liberalisation of the financial sector. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara.
   Google Scholar
• Bank Negara, ed., 2011. Financial sector blueprint 2011–2020. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, F., et al., 2017. Reinventing construction through a productivity revolution. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/reinventing-construction-through-a-productivity-revolution
   Google Scholar
• Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R., and Lundblad, C., 2011. Financial openness and productivity. World development, 39, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, P.R., and Bhatt, R.R., 2017. Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate governance,
   Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. K., Dimova, R., Kumbhakar, S. C., and Sun, K. (2018). Is tinkering with institutional quality a panacea for firm performance? Insights from a semiparametric approach to modeling firm performance. Review of Development Economics, 22(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, E., Del Bo, C., and Florio, M., 2016. Institutions and firms’ productivity: evidence from electricity distribution in the EU. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 78, 170–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, G.S., 2005. Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel-data models with a small number of individuals. The stata journal, 5, 473–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, C., and Abbott, M., 2012. A review of productivity analysis of the New Zealand construction industry. Construction economics and building, 12, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, P., Del Bo, C.F., and Florio, M., 2019. Quality of institutions and productivity of State-Invested Enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies. European journal of political economy, 58, 102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiprasit, S., and Swierczek, F.W., 2011. Competitiveness, globalization and technology development in Thai firms. Competitiveness review: an international business journal, 21, 188–204.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, F.C., et al., 2014. Economic development and construction productivity in Malaysia. Construction management and economics, 32, 874–887.
   Google Scholar
• Ciani, A., et al., 2020. Making it big: why developing countries need more large firms. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• CIDB, 2017. Construction statistics quarterly bulletin 2017. Kuala Lumpur: CIDB.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, P.P., and Cerqueira, P.A., 2017. Assessing the determinants of household electricity prices in the EU: a system-GMM panel data approach. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 73, 1131–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Valence, G., and Abbott, M., 2015. A review of the theory and measurement techniques of productivity in the construction industry. Measuring construction: prices, output and productivity. London: Routledge, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, S., et al., 2019. Evolution of studies in construction productivity: a systematic literature review (2006–2017). Ain Shams engineering journal, 10, 555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., et al., 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of financial economics, 88, 430–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Égert, B., 2016. Regulation, institutions, and productivity: new macroeconomic evidence from OECD countries. American economic review, 106, 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquivias, M.A., and Harianto, S.K., 2020. Does competition and foreign investment spur industrial efficiency?: firm-level evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 6, e04494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert, G., Heylen, F., and Schoonackers, R., 2015. Fiscal policy and TFP in the OECD: measuring direct and indirect effects. Empirical economics, 49, 605–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrante, L., Fontana, S., and Reito, F., 2019. Mafia and bricks: unfair competition in local markets and policy interventions. Small business economics, 56, 1461–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganau, R., and Rodríguez‐Pose, A., 2019. Do high‐quality local institutions shape labour productivity in Western European manufacturing firms? Papers in regional science, 98, 1633–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, E., et al., 2014. The institution-based view of strategy: how to measure it. BRQ business research quarterly, 17, 82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gen, T.Z., and Ng, A., 2017. Productivity in progress: labour productivity in Malaysia over the last three decades. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Giang, D.T., and Pheng, L.S., 2011. Role of construction in economic development: review of key concepts in the past 40 years. Habitat international, 35, 118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, A., et al., 2018. Factors affecting construction productivity: a 30 year systematic review. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 25 (7), 916-937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., and Levitsky, S., 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on politics, 2, 725–740.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R.M., et al., 2013. The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of management, 39, 531–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, F.C., 2017. Duty import exemption on heavy construction machinery–go or no go? Building & investment. B&I worldwide, 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, F.C., et al., 2016. A study on the readiness of Malaysian contractors towards trade liberalization. Malaysian construction research journal, 18, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• İmrohoroğlu, A., and Tüzel, Ş., 2014. Firm-level productivity, risk, and return. Management science, 60, 2073–2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund, 2015. Structural reforms and macroeconomic performance: country cases Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, R., Rosa, A., and Sulaiman, N., 2012a. Globalisation and labour productivity in the Malaysian manufacturing sector. Review of economic and finance, 2, 76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, R., Sulaiman, N., and Abidin, S., 2012b. Globalisation and total factor productivity in the selected Malaysian construction sector. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke, VII (1), 400–408.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, S.M., 2015. Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on productivity? Comparative evidence from developed and transition economies. Technological forecasting and social change, 94, 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan, R., and Managi, S., 2018. Economic growth and sustainable development in Indonesia: an assessment. Bulletin of Indonesian economic studies, 54, 339–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagni, A., Nifo, A., and Vecchione, G., 2015. Firm productivity and institutional quality: evidence from Italian industry. Journal of regional science, 55, 774–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-H., and Chou, P.-I., 2018. Financial openness and market liquidity in emerging markets. Finance research letters, 25, 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.-W., and Han, S.H., 2017. Quantitative analysis for country classification in the construction industry. Journal of management in engineering, 33, 04017014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, A., 2019. Banking competition, financial dependence and productivity growth in Europe. International economics, 159, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Maddala, G.S., and Wu, S., 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 61, 631–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick, A.V., and Cabral, R., 2009. Productivity effects on Mexican manufacturing employment. The North American journal of economics and finance, 20, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodley, K., Smith, N., and Preece, C.N., 2008. Stakeholder matrix for ethical relationships in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 26, 625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Na, L.J., et al., 2007. Role of national institutions in promoting innovation by contractors in Singapore. Construction management and economics, 25, 1021–1039.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, H., et al., 2014. An analysis of construction productivity differences between Canada and the United States. Construction management and economics, 32, 595–607.
   Google Scholar
• National Economic Action Council, 2010. New economic model for Malaysia: part 1. In: P.M. Department, ed. Putrajaya: National Economic Action Council.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, T., and Yu, L., 2014. Which types of institutions hinder productivity among private manufacturing firms in China? China economic review, 31, 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, C. J., 2018. Productivity and efficiency analysis: an economic approach to measuring and explaining managerial performance. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J., 2014. Econometric estimation of distance functions and associated measures of productivity and efficiency change. Journal of productivity analysis, 41, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J., 2016. Using information about technologies, markets and firm behaviour to decompose a proper productivity index. Journal of econometrics, 190, 328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, M., et al., 2020. How effective are labor wages on labor productivity?: an empirical investigation on the construction industry of New Zealand. Technological and economic development of economy, 26, 258–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20, 597–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Policardo, L., Punzo, L.F., and Carrera, E.J.S., 2019. On the wage–productivity causal relationship. Empirical economics, 57, 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y., and Chen, H., 2022. A systematic review of the knowledge domain of institutional theory in construction project management. Engineering, construction and architectural management. 30(6), 2523–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, Z., Diaz-Sanchez, J.L., and Varoudakis, A., 2015. The post-crisis growth slowdown in emerging economies and the role of structural reforms. Global journal of emerging market economies, 7, 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, R., and Bondibene, C.R., 2017. Raising the standard: minimum wages and firm productivity. Labour economics, 44, 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D., 2009a. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The stata journal, 9, 86–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D., 2009b. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 71, 135–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, F., 2022. The rule of law and labor productivity growth by businesses: evidence for the EU, 1998–2005. Intangible capital and growth. Cham: Springer, 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Slesman, L., Abubakar, Y.A., and Mitra, J., 2021. Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: does the role of institutions matter? International business review, 30, 101774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, M., 2009. System GMM estimation with a small sample. https://www.iae.csic.es/investigatorsMaterial/a111411124703archivoPdf29632.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sufian, F., and Habibullah, M.S., 2010. Does economic freedom fosters banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia. Journal of contemporary accounting & economics, 6, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2017. Can we fix it? The construction industry’s productivity problem. The Economist, 19 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• The Heritage Foundation, 2017. Index of economic freedom 2017: Institute for economic freedom Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• The Heritage Foundation, ed., 2020., Index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Veerasanai, R., and Alias, A., 2022. A review of foreign construction firm presence in the Malaysian construction industry. International journal of construction management, 22(10), 1830-1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt, S., 2013. How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of institutional economics, 9, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2016. The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: evidence from the international construction industry. Journal of cleaner production, 137, 1313–1322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil, D., 2013. Economic growth. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Windmeijer, F., 2005. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of econometrics, 126, 25–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., et al., 2015. PPP application in infrastructure development in China: institutional analysis and implications. International journal of project management, 33, 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar