What social value do Indigenous contractors create?

References

• AHRC. 2021. Right to self-determination. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission. Available from: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/rights-and-freedoms/right-self-determination [Accessed 17 April 2021]
   Google Scholar
• AIATSIS. 2020. AIATSIS code of ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General. 2020. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation targets in major procurements. Canberra: Australian National Audit Office, Auditor General Report No. 25 2019-20.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. et al. 2020. We are working for our people: Growing and strengthening the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workforce. Career Pathways Project Report. Melbourne: Lowitja Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bessarab, D., and Ng’andu, B., 2010. Yarning about yarning as a Legitimate method in Indigenous research. International journal of critical indigenous studies, 3 (1), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C., et al., 2019. Beyond the pipeline: A critique of the discourse surrounding the development of an Indigenous primary healthcare workforce in Australia. Australian journal of primary health, 25 (5), 389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, E., and Pasquire, C., 2019. Creating social value within the delivery of construction projects: the role of lean approach. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 26 (6), 1105–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCA/Jumbunna Institute. 2020. Gari Yala (speak the truth): centreing the work experiences of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Australians. Sydney: Diversity Council Australia/Jumbunna Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Denny-Smith, G., 2021. How compliance imperatives stifle the impact of social procurement. In: L. Scott and C. Neilson, eds. Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference. UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 634–643.
   Google Scholar
• Denny-Smith, G., Williams, M., and Loosemore, M., 2020. Assessing the impact of social procurement policies for Indigenous people. Construction management and economics, 38 (12), 1139–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DPMC. 2020. Closing the gap report 2020. Canberra: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Dudgeon, P., et al., 2020. Aboriginal participatory action research: an Indigenous research methodology strengthening decolonisation and social and emotional wellbeing. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis, C., and Cole, R., 2011. Motivating change: shifting the paradigm. Building research & information, 39 (5), 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon, P., et al., 2021. Connection between family, kinship and social and emotional wellbeing. Produced for the indigenous mental health and suicide prevention clearinghouse. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., et al., 2021. Indigenous business sector snapshot 1.0. Melbourne: Indigenous Business Research Group, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., and Williamson, I., 2017. Understanding the central tension of Indigenous entrepreneurship: purpose, profit and leadership. Academy of management journal, 2017 (1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.61 [Accessed 16 November 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, S., et al., 2020. Decolonising the commissioning of Indigenous health and wellbeing program evaluations in Australia. European journal of public health, 30 (Suppl 5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.762 [Accessed 24 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, S., et al., 2021. From the margins to the mainstream: deconstructing science communication as a white, Western paradigm. Journal of Science Communication, 20 (1), 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20010302 [Accessed 24 February 2021].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, D., 2000. Indigenous research, differing value systems. The Australian journal of indigenous education, 28 (1), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D., Corley, K., and Hamilton, A., 2013. ‘Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16 (1), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K., and Namey, E., 2014. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, T., 2021. True tracks: respecting indigenous knowledge and culture. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M., et al., 2022. Decolonising qualitative research with respectful, reciprocal, and responsible research practice: a narrative review of the application of yarning method in qualitative Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. International journal for equity in health, 21 (1), 134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinaway. 2020. Black cladding – are Indigenous businesses using culture to win government contracts? Melbourne: Kinaway Chamber of Commerce. Available from: https://kinaway.com.au/black-cladding-are-indigenous-businesses-using-culture-to-win-government-contracts/ [Accessed 21 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Kinsela, K., 2021. Supplier diversity how: a 5 step guide to Indigenous business procurement. 2nd ed. Port Macquarie, NSW: Kristal Kinsela Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Lashitew, A.A., et al., 2022. Creating social value for the “base of the pyramid”: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of business ethics, 178 (2), 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., Osborne, J., and Higgon, D., 2021. Affective, cognitive, behavioural and situational outcomes of social procurement: a case study of social value creation in a major facilities management firm. Construction Management and Economics, 39 (3), 227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., et al., 2022. The risks and opportunities of social procurement in construction projects: a cross-sector collaboration perspective. International journal of managing projects in business, 15 (5), 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., Alkilani, S., and Mathenge, R., 2020. The risks of and barriers to social procurement in construction: a supply chain perspective. Construction management and economics, 38 (6), 552–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K., and Mirraboopa, B., 2003. Ways of knowing, being and doing: a theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous and Indigenist re‐search. Journal of Australian studies, 27 (76), 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., 2005. Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. Journal of urban health, 82 (Suppl 2), ii3–ii12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muir, K., and Dean, A., 2017. Evaluating the outcomes of programs for Indigenous families and communities. CFCA practice resource – February 2017. Canberra: Child Family Community Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., 2010. Measuring social value. Stanford social innovation review, 8 (3), 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, C., et al., 2020. Social value for whom, by whom and when? Managing stakeholder dynamics in a UK megaproject. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers- Management, Procurement and Law, 173 (2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh, S., and Brooks, T., 2019. Critical success factors for social value in construction procurement in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of institution of civil engineers, 172 (5), 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• NIAA. 2020. Indigenous procurement policy. Canberra: National Indigenous Australians Agency.
   Google Scholar
• NIAA. 2021. Indigenous skills, engagement and employment program (ISEP). Discussion Paper July 2021. Canberra: National Indigenous Australians Agency.
   Google Scholar
• NIAA. 2022. Indigenous procurement policy. Canberra: National Indigenous Australians Agency. Available from: https://www.niaa.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/economic-development/indigenous-procurement-policy-ipp [Accessed 28 August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J., et al., 2012. A guide to social return on investment. Liverpool: Social Value UK.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, C., 2008. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International journal of social research methodology, 11 (4), 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2021. Aboriginal procurement policy, January 2021. Sydney: NSW Government.
   Google Scholar
• Panezi, M., 2020. The complex landscape of Indigenous procurement. In J. Borrows¸ed. Indigenous peoples and international trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–247.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, O., et al., 2020. Aboriginal community controlled health organisations address health equity through action on the social determinants of health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. BMC public health, 20 (1), 1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2020a. Indigenous evaluation strategy. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2020b. Indigenous evaluation strategy – background paper. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Raiden, A., et al., 2019. Social value in construction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raiden, A., and King, A., et al., 2021. ‘Social value: co-creation, challenges and assessment. In W. Filho¸ ed. No poverty. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals. Cham: Springer, 996–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckstuhl, K., Short, S., and Foote, J., 2021. Assessing the labour government’s new procurement approach through a Māori economic justice perspective. Aotearoa New Zealand social work, 33 (4), 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shirodkar, S., and Hunter, B., 2018. Factors underlying the likelihood of being in business for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Australian journal of labour economics, 21 (4), 273–296.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. 2nd ed. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Supply Nation. 2018. The sleeping giant: a social return on investment report on supply nation certified suppliers. Sydney: Supply Nation.
   Google Scholar
• Supply Nation. 2020. Black cladding. Sydney: Supply Nation. Available from: https://supplynation.org.au/about-us/black-cladding/ [Accessed 21 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., 2003. An Indigenous perspective on evaluations in the inter-cultural context: How far can one throw a Moree boomerang? Evaluation journal of Australasia, 3 (2), 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., 2018. Ngaa-bi-nya Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander program evaluation framework. Evaluation journal of Australasia, 18 (1), 6–20.
   Google Scholar