557
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Critical essay: sociotechnical construction

, , , &
Pages 251-265 | Received 16 Dec 2021, Accepted 21 Aug 2023, Published online: 12 Oct 2023

References

  • Adler, P. S., and Cole, R. E., 1994. Designed for learning: a tale of two auto plants. In: A. Sandberg, ed. Enriching production: perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Adler, N., and Docherty, P., 1998. Bringing business into sociotechnical theory and practice. Human relations, 51 (3), 319–345.
  • AIA California Council. 2007. Integrated project delivery: A guide. Version 1, California. Washington, DC: AIA and AIA California Council.
  • AIA California Council. 2014. Integrated project delivery: a working definition. 2nd ed. California: AIA California Council.
  • Arnold, J., Cooper, C.L., and Robertson, I.T., 1995. Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. London: Pitman.
  • Babalola, O., Ibem, E.O., and Ezema, I.C., 2019. Implementation of lean practices in the construction industry: A systematic review. Building and environment, 148, 34–43.
  • Banwell, H., 1964. The placing and managing of contracts for building and civil engineering work. In: A report of the committee under the chairmanship of Sir Harold Banwell. London: HMSO.
  • Beekun, R.I., 1989. Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: antidote or fad? Human relations, 42 (10), 877–897.
  • Benders, J., 1996. Leaving lean? Recent changes in the production organization of some Japanese car plants. Economic and industrial democracy, 17 (1), 9–38.
  • Berggren, C., 1994. NUMMI vs. Uddevalla. Sloan management review, 35, 37–45.
  • Bertalanffy, L. v., 1950. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111, 23–29.
  • Blomgren, H., and Karlson, B., 1995. Assembly skills, process engineering and engineering design. In: A. Sandberg, ed. Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury, 127–136.
  • Bolt, H.M., et al., 2012. Pre-conditioning success – analysis of human and organizational factors. Learning Legacy: Lessons Learned from the London 2012 Games construction project. London: Olympic Delivery Authority.
  • Bordass, W., and Leaman, A., 1997. Design for manageability. Building research and information, 25 (3), 148–157.
  • Brahmi, B.F., et al., 2022. IPD and BIM-focussed methodology in renovation of heritage buildings. Construction management and economics, 40 (3), 186–206.
  • Bryde, D.J., and Schulmeister, R., 2012. Applying lean principles to a building refurbishment project: experiences of key stakeholders. Construction management and economics, 30, 777–794.
  • Building Safety Bill. (2021). A Bill to make provision about the safety of people in or about buildings and the standard of buildings, to amend the Architects Act 1997, and to amend provision about complaints made to a housing ombudsman. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3021?=5
  • Cabinet Office. 2020. The construction playbook: Government guidance on sourcing and contracting public works projects and programmes. London: Cabinet Office.
  • de Carvalho, P. V. R., 2006. Ergonomic field studies in a nuclear power plant control room. Progress in nuclear energy, 48, 51–69.
  • Chapanis, A., Garner, W. R., and Morgan, C. T., 1949. Applied experimental psychology: Human factors in engineering design. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Cherns, A., 1976. The principles of sociotechnical design. Human relations, 29 (8), 783–792.
  • Cherns, A., 1987. Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human relations, 40 (3), 153–162.
  • Cherns, A.B., and Bryant, D.T., 2006. Studying the client’s role in construction management. Construction management and economics, 2 (2), 177–184.
  • Chrichton, C., 1966. Interdependence and uncertainty: A study of the building industry. London, Tavistock Press.
  • Clark, D.M., 2005. Human redundancy in complex, hazardous systems: A theoretical framework. Safety science, 43, 655–677.
  • Clegg, C.W., 2000. Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied ergonomics, 31, 463–477.
  • Conway, N., 2019. After Hinkley: Construction’s mental health crisis is out in the open. Construction news. London: EMAP.
  • Cummings, T.G., Molloy, E.S., and Glen, R., 1977. A methodological critique of fifty-eight selected work experiments. Human relations, 30 (8), 675–708.
  • Damodaran, L., and Shelbourn, M., 2006. Collaborative working – the elusive vision. Architectural engineering and design management, 2 (4), 227–243.
  • Dankbaar, B., 1997. Lean production: denial, confirmation or extension of sociotechnical systems design? Human relations, 50 (5), 567–583.
  • Davey, C.L., et al., 2002. Action learning in a medium-sized construction company. Building research and information, 30 (1), 5–15.
  • Dowsett, R., Harty, C. and Davies, R. (2017) Epistemological differences and new technology in construction. In: 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK, pp. 714–723. Available from: http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/74717/
  • Dunphy, D., and Bryant, B., 1996. Teams: panaceas or prescriptions for improved performance? Human relations, 49 (5), 677–699.
  • Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction: The report of the construction task force. London: HMSO.
  • Ellegard, K., 1994. The creation of a new production system at the Volvo automobile assembly plant in Uddevalla, Sweden In: A. Sandberg, ed. Enriching production: perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Emery, F., 1959. Characteristics of socio-technical systems , Reprinted in Emery, F. 1978, The emergence of a new paradigm of work. Canberra: Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University.
  • Emmerson, H., 1962. Survey of problems before the construction industries: A report prepared for the ministry of works by Sir Harold Emmerson. London: HMSO.
  • Farmer, M., 2016. The farmer review of the UK construction labour model: Modernise of die: Time to decide the industry’s future. London: CLC.
  • Fernandez-Solis, J.L., 2008. The systemic nature of the construction industry. Architectural engineering and design management, 4 (1), 31–46.
  • Fernandez-Solis, J.L., 2013. Building construction: a deterministic non-periodic flow – A case study of chaos theories in tracking production flow. Architectural engineering and design management, 9 (1), 21–48.
  • Fernie, S., Leiringer, R., and Thorpe, T., 2006. Change in construction: a critical perspective. Building research and information, 34 (2), 91–103.
  • Fitts, P.M., and Jones, R.E., 1947. Analysis of factors contributing to 460 “pilot error” experiences in operating aircraft controls. Dayton, OH: Aero Medical Laboratory, Air Material Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
  • Green, D.M., and Swets, J.A., 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley.
  • Green, S., and May, S., 2003. Re-engineering construction: going against the grain. Building research and innovation, 31 (2), 97–106.
  • Green, S.D., 1999. The missing arguments of lean construction. Construction management & economics, 17 (2), 133–137.
  • Green, S.D., 2016. Modernise… or not. Construction research and innovation, 7 (4), 24–27.
  • Green, S.D., et al., 2008. On the discourse of construction competitiveness. Building research and information, 36 (5), 426–435.
  • Gronning, T., 1994. Recent developments at Toyota Motor Co. In: A. Sandberg, ed. Enriching production: perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Hackman, J. R., and Oldman, G., 1980. Work redesign. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Harty, C., 2005. Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building research and information, 33 (6), 512–522.
  • Health and Safety Executive. (2020). Construction statistics in Great Britain: 2020. Accessed frome: https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/industry/construction.pdf
  • Higgins, G., and Jessop, N., 1965. Communications in the construction industry. London: Tavistock Institute.
  • Hill, R., 2007. God’s architect. Pugin and the building of romantic Britain. London: Penguin.
  • Hofstede, G., 1998. Attitudes, values and organizational culture: disentangling the concepts. Organization studies, 19 (3), 477–493.
  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., and Leveson, N. G., 2006. Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
  • ICE. 2017. From transactions to enterprises: a new approach to delivering high performing infrastructure. Project 13. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
  • Imanghaliyeva, A. (2021). Managing sociotechnical risks in infrastructure projects: sociotechnical system (STS) perspectives on systems failure. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Heriot-Watt University.
  • Jenkins, D. P., et al., 2009. Cognitive work analysis: Coping with complexity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  • Jorgensen, B., and Emmitt, S., 2008. Lost in transition: the transfer of lean manufacturing to construction. Engineering construction and architectural management, 15 (4), 383–398.
  • Karunaratne, N., 2019. The shaky foundations of UK construction. Investors’ Chronicle. London: Financial Times.
  • Koskela, L., and Vrijhoef, R., 2001. Is the current theory of construction a hinderance to innovation. Building research and information, 29 (3), 197–207.
  • Koskela, L., 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Technical Report No 72. Stanford University, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering.
  • Koskela, L., 2003. Is structural change the primary solution to the problems of construction? Building research and information, 31 (2), 85–96.
  • Koskela, L., 2004. Moving on – beyond lean thinking. Lean construction journal, 1, 24–37.
  • Lahdenpera, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30 (1), 57–79.
  • Larsen, G.D., 2005. Horses for courses: relating innovation diffusion concepts to the stages of the diffusion process. Construction management and economics, 23 (8), 787–792.
  • Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the team: final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry. London: HMSO.
  • Lindholm, R., and Norstedt, J. P., 1975. Volvo report. Stockholm, SE: Swedish Employers’ Confederation.
  • McKinsey. 2021. Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
  • Mintzberg, H., 1979. The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Moldaschl, M., and Weber, W.G., 1998. The “three waves” of industrial group work: historical reflections on current research on group work. Human relations, 51 (3), 347–388.
  • Mumford, E. 2000. Socio-technical design: an unfulfilled promise or a future opportunity? In: R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. DeGross, eds. Organizational and social perspectives on information technology. IFIP TC8 WG8.2 International Working Conference on the Social and Organizational Perspective on Research and Practice in Information Technology June 9–11, Aalborg, Denmark. London: Springer, 33–6.
  • Mumford, E., 2006. The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Journal of information systems, 16, 317–342.
  • National Economic Development Office. 1983. Faster building for industry: Economic development committee for building. London: HMSO.
  • Niepce, W., and Molleman, E., 1998. Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design? Human relations, 51 (3), 259–287.
  • Office for National Statistics. (2019). Construction statistics, Great Britain: 2019. Accessed from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/constructionindustry/articles/constructionstatistics/2019#comparisons-and-contributions-to-the-economy
  • Pasmore, W., et al., 1982. Sociotechnical systems: a north American reflection on empirical studies of the seventies. Human relations, 35 (12), 1179–1204.
  • Pasquire, C., and Connor, P., 2011. Where does the theory informing the international group for lean construction come from? Lean construction journal.
  • Rasmussen, J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety science, 27 (2/3), 183–213.
  • Read, G.J.M., Salmon, P.M., and Lenne, M.G., 2017. The cognitive work analysis design toolkit. In: N.A. Stanton, P.M. Salmon, G.H. Walker, and D.P. Jenkins. Cognitive work analysis. Boca-Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Reason, J., 1990. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reber, A. S., 1995. Dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin.
  • Restoration & Renewal. 2022. Values and behaviours. Available at: https://www.restorationandrenewal.uk/work-with-us/values-and-behaviours [Accessed 28 Mar 2022].
  • Salmon, P.M., et al., 2020. The big picture on accident causation: A review, synthesis and meta-analysis of AcciMap studies. Safety science, 126, 1–15.
  • Sandberg, A., 1995. Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Shimizu, K., 1994. Humanization of the production system and work at Toyota Motor Co and Toyota Motor Kyushu. In: A. Sandberg, ed. Enriching production: perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Shirazi, B., Langford, D.A., and Rowlinson, S.M., 1996. Organizational structures in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 14 (3), 199–212.
  • Sitter, L.U., Hertog, J.F., and Dankbaar, B., 1997. From complex organizations with simple jobs to simple organizations with complex jobs. Human relations, 50 (5), 497–536.
  • Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., and Walker, G.H., 2019. Systems thinking in practice: Applications of the event analysis of systemic teamwork method. Boca-Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Sunding, L., and Ekholm, A., 2015. Applying social sciences to inspire behavioural change in the construction sector: an experimental study. Construction management and economics, 33 (9), 695–710.
  • Trist, E., and Bamforth, K., 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human relations, 4, 3–38.
  • Trist, E. L., 1978. On socio-technical systems. In: W.A. Pasmore, and J.J. Sherwood, eds., Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego, CA.: University Associates.
  • Vischer, J.C., 2008. Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building research and information, 36 (3), 231–240.
  • Walker, D., and Rowlinson, S., 2020. Routledge handbook of integrated project delivery. Boca-Raton, FL: CRC Press
  • Walker, G. H., et al., 2009. Command and control: The sociotechnical perspective. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  • Walker, G.H., and Strathie, A., 2015. Leading indicators of operational risk on the railway: A novel use for underutilised data recordings. Safety science, 74, 93–101.
  • Walker, G.H., 2013. Evolution, co-evolution, and complexity: an anniversary systems journey through the grid. Journal of civil engineering and environmental systems, 30 (3–4), 249–262.
  • Walker, G.H., 2015. Come back sociotechnical systems theory, all is forgiven. Journal of civil engineering and enviromental systems, 32 (1–2), 170–179.
  • Walker, G.H., et al., 2008. A review of sociotechnical systems theory: A classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 9 (6), 479–499.
  • Walker, G.H., et al., 2010. Translating concepts of complexity to the field of ergonomics. Ergonomics, 53 (10), 1175–1186.
  • Waterman, L., 2021. Personal communication.
  • Winby, S., and Mohrman, S.A., 2018. Digital sociotechnical system design. The journal of applied behavioral science, 54 (4), 399–423.
  • Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., and Roos, D., 1990. The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production – Toyota’s secret weapon in the global car wars that is revolutionizing world industry. New York: Free Press.
  • Wright, S., 2021. Personal communication.