Navigating paradoxes of identity and leadership in the age of digital transformation of construction industry: architects’ experiences and perceptions

References

• Abdirad, H., and Dossick, C.S., 2019. Restructuration of architectural practice in integrated project delivery (IPD): two case studies. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 26 (1), 104–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adekunle, S.A., Aigbavboa, C.O., and Ejohwomu, O.A., 2022. Understanding the BIM actor role: a study of employer and employee preference and availability in the construction industry. Engineering, construction and architectural management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, S., 2023. Professional identity threats in interprofessional collaborations: a case of architects in professional service firms. Journal of management studies, 60 (2), 428–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, S., Heizmann, H., and Clegg, S., 2019. Emotions and identity work: emotions as discursive resources in the constitution of junior professionals’ identities. Human relations, 72 (5), 988–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, S., Nikolova, N., and Clegg, S., 2017. Paradoxical identity: the changing nature of architectural work and its relation to architects’ identity. Journal of professions and organization, 4 (1), 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, S., Nikolova, N., and Clegg, S., 2020. Professional identity and anxiety in architect-client interactions. Construction management and economics, 38 (7), 589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintola, A.A., et al., 2021. Distilling agency in BIM-induced change in work practices. Construction innovation, 21 (3), 1471–4175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer, N.A., 2023. Architectural design in the light of AI concepts and applications. Engineering journal, 2 (2), 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S.H., and Corley, K.G., 2008. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of management, 34 (3), 325–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzouz, A., and Papadonikolaki, E., 2020. Boundary-spanning for managing digital innovation in the AEC sector. Architectural engineering and design management, 16 (5), 356–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai, A., and Misra, S.C., 2022. Evaluation of success factors to implement digitalization in the construction industry. Construction innovation,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, N. (2023). Architecture and design studios “need to be constantly thinking about the future.” https://www.dezeen.com/2023/04/27/architecture-design-succession-founders-starchitects/?fbclid=IwAR1q6chu0VFT8htYNqNGlO4R0R2nQODaMCRxAIgBbqia3XlnMJSe5mVBrEU [Accessed 4 May 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Berita Arkitek. (2021, March). Clients Perception Survey. Pertubuhan Arkitek Malaysia, 23–24. Retrieved from http://www.pam.org.my/images/publications/ba2021/mar/#p=1
   Google Scholar
• Bos-de Vos, M., Lieftink, B.M., and Lauche, K., 2019. How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects. Journal of professions and organization, 6 (2), 128–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-de Vos, M., Volker, L., and Wamelink, H., 2019. Enhancing value capture by managing risks of value slippage in and across projects. International journal of project management, 37 (5), 767–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• CIDB 2020. Construction 4.0 strategic plan (2021–2025). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: CIDB.
   Google Scholar
• CIDB. 2021. Better by design. CIDB Malaysia corporate communication division, 3, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, C., 2019. Figure heads: leadership and succession in architectural practice. Architectural design, 89 (6), 98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado-Perez, C., et al., 2022. Digital transformation in the australian AEC industry: prevailing issues and prospective leadership thinking. Journal of construction engineering and management, 148 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels, L., and Viaene, S., 2022. Identifying digital transformation paradoxes: a design perspective. Business and information systems engineering, 64 (4), 483–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, K., 2019. Professional pathways in BIM and digital construction. In: B. Kumar, F. Rahimian, D. Greenwood, and T. Hartmann, eds., Advances in ICT in design, construction and Management in Architecture, Engineering, Construction and Operations (AECO): Proceedings of the 36th CIB W78 2019 conference. Newcastle, UK: Northumbria University, 485–498.
   Google Scholar
• Ebekozien, A., et al., 2023. Integrated project delivery in the Nigerian construction sector: an unexplored approach from the stakeholders’ perspective. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 30 (4), 1519–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., 2005. Listening to people’s stories: the use of narrative in qualitative interviews. In: Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ernstsen, S.N., et al., 2021. How innovation champions frame the future: three visions for digital transformation of construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 147 (1), 05020022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K., and Kearney, E., 2021. How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: the role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 94 (3), 672–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, N., 2022. Digital transformation and organizational learning: situated perspectives on becoming digital in architectural design practice. Frontiers in built environment, 8 (July 2022), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., and Chen, M., 2020. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. Plos one. 15 (5), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H., and Brown, A.D., 2013. Organizational identity and organizational identification: a review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group and organization management, 38 (1), 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., and Greenwood, R., 2018. Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Information and organization, 28 (1), 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke, K.N., 2022. Understanding how managers balance the paradoxical nature of occupational safety through a practice-driven institutional lens. Safety science, 147 (November 2021), 105627.
   Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D., 2007. Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. 1st ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth, A., and Norberg, A., 2004. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 18 (2), 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor, B., Othman, I., and Pomares, J.C., 2021. Digital technologies in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry—a bibliometric—qualitative literature review of research activities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18 (11), 6135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M., 1996. The key informant technique. Family practice, 13 (1), 345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron-spektor, E., et al., 2018. Microfoundations of organizational paradox : the problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of management journal, 61 (1), 26–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, B., 2019. Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: the case of a design firm. Construction management and economics, 37 (7), 400–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, B., and Papadonikolaki, E., 2022. Digital leadership for the built environment. In: M. Bolpagni, R. Gavina and D. Ribeiro eds. Industry 4.0 for the built environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 591–608.
   Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., Brock, D.M., and Suddaby, R., 2013. Professions and institutional change: towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of management studies, 50 (5), 699–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olanipekun, A.O., and Sutrisna, M., 2021. Facilitating digital transformation in construction—a systematic review of the current state of the art. Frontiers in built environment, 7 (July), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Olasunkanmi, F., et al., 2023. Assessing the factors of transactional leadership style for construction projects: a case of Nigerian construction industry. Journal of engineering, design and technology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olugboyega, O., 2022. BIM leadership theory for organisational BIM transformation. Frontiers in built environment, 8 (October), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Omer, M.M., et al., 2022. Constructive and destructive leadership behaviors, skills, styles and traits in BIM-based construction projects. Buildings, 12 (12), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., van Oel, C., and Kagioglou, M., 2019. Organising and managing boundaries: a structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 37 (3), 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q., 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE Publications, inc.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, E.A., Forgues, D., and Staub-French, S., 2017. Understanding the impact of BIM on collaboration: a Canadian case study. Building research and information, 45 (6), 681–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruskova, K., and Kaiser, J., 2019. Implementation of BIM technology into the design process using the scheme of BIM execution plan. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471 (2), 022019.
   Google Scholar
• RIBA & Microsoft. (2018). Digital transformation in architecture. NBS Research. https://www.architecture.com/-/media/gathercontent/digital-transformation-in-architecture/additional-documents/microsoftribadigitaltransformationreportfinal180629pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schad, J., et al., 2016. Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward. Academy of management annals, 10 (1), 5–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahruddin, S., Zairul, M., and Haron, A.T., 2021. Redefining the territory and competency of architectural practitioners within a BIM-based environment: a systematic review. Architectural engineering and design management, 17 (5–6), 376–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahruddin, S., et al., 2022. Performance-based identity in a BIM environment: an architect’s perceptions and experiences. Open house international, 47 (4), 710–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W.K., and Lewis, M.W., 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management review, 36 (2), 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W.K., and Lewis, M.W., 2014. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California management review, 56 (3), 58–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoring, K., et al., 2021. The architecture of creativity: toward a causal theory of creative workspace design. International journal of design, 15 (2), 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., et al., 2022. Guest editorial: digital transformation, strategic management and entrepreneurial process: dynamics, challenges and opportunities. Journal of strategy and management, 15 (3), 329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoef, P.C., et al., 2021. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research, 122 (November 2019), 889–901.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, D.A., and Bowen, D.E., 2016. LEARNING TO BE A PARADOX-SAVVY LEADER. Academy of management perspectives, 30 (3), 316–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B.W., and Caprar, D.V., 2020. When performance gets personal: towards a theory of performance-based identity. Human relations, 73 (8), 1077–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., et al., 2022. From Industry 4.0 to Construction 4.0: barriers to the digital transformation of engineering and construction sectors. Engineering, construction and architectural management.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K.S.R., and Wäger, M., 2019. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long range planning, 52 (3), 326–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., 2018. Chapter 16: questionnaires, individual interviews and focus group interviews. In: Research methods: information, systems, and contexts. 2nd ed. Kidlington, UK: Elsevier Ltd., 379–403.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, I., et al., 2013. Professional identity in medical students: pedagogical challenges to medical education. Teaching and learning in medicine, 25 (4), 369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Fan, Y., and Jia, J., 2022. The Eastern construction of paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedents: a Yin–Yang balancing perspective. Chinese management studies, 16 (5), 1081–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zairul, M., 2021. Illustrasi Ringkas Analisa Tematik (AT) Menggunakan Perisian ATLAS.ti 8. 1st ed. Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia: UPM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2015. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences. Academy of management journal, 58 (2), 538–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., and Darko, A., 2018. How does transformational leadership promote innovation in construction? The mediating role of innovation climate and the multilevel moderation role of project requirements. Sustainability (switzerland), 10 (5): 1506.
   Google Scholar
• Zulu, S.L., and Khosrowshahi, F., 2021. A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 39 (7), 565–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulu, S.L., Saad, A.M., and Gledson, B., 2023. Individual characteristics as enablers of construction employees’ digital literacy: an exploration of leaders’ opinions. Sustainability (switzerland), 15 (2): 1531.
   Google Scholar