Competitive performance of public–private partnerships: unsolicited proposal projects and tendering rules in South Korea

References

• Abdel Aziz, A. and H. Nabavi (2014). “Unsolicited proposals for PPP Projects: private sector perceptions in the USA.” In: Construction Research Congress 2014, 1349–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel Aziz, A.M., 2007. Successful delivery of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development. Journal of construction engineering and management, 133 (12), 918–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albano, G. L., Dini, F., and Zampino, R., 2008. “Bidding for Complex Projects: Evidence from the Acquisitions of IT Services.” Nota Di Lavoro 86, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Albano, G. L., et al., 2006. “Preventing collusion in procurement.” In: N. Dimitri, G. Piga, and G. Spagnolo, eds. Handbook of procurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347–380.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, M., Saussier, S., and Yvrande-Billon, A., 2009. Auction procedures and competition in public services: the case of urban public transport in France and London. Utilities policy, 17 (2), 166–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith, S., et al., 2011. Public procurement regulation: an introduction. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (2008). Public-private partnership handbook. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Available from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/31484/public-private-partnership.pdf [Accessed 17 November 19, 2022]
   Google Scholar
• Asker, J., and Cantillon, E., 2008. Properties of scoring auctions. RAND journal of economics, 39 (1), 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asker, J., and Cantillon, E., 2010. Procurement when price and quality matter. RAND journal of economics, 41 (1), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez, P., et al., 2015. Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: a taxonomic review. Construction management and economics, 33 (4), 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez, P., et al., 2016. Scoring rules and competitive behavior in best-value construction auctions. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142 (9), 04016035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M.A., and Lundberg, S., 2013. Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19 (2), 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K., 2005. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapela, J.G., 2019. Weight values, scoring rules and abnormally low tenders criteria in multidimensional procurement: effects on price. Review of public economics, 228, 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, T.N., et al., 2024. Corruption, market structure, and industry competition in the Vietnamese construction sector. Construction management and economics, 42, 54–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.H., 2008. An economic approach to public procurement. Journal of public procurement, 8 (3), 407–430.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, E., Staropoli, C. and A. Yvrande-Billon 2012. “Auctions versus negotiations tradeoff in public procurement under political scrutiny.” In: Fifth international public procurement conference proceedings, 2743–2769.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, D.G., et al., 2008. The impact of public information on bidding in highway procurement auctions. European economic review, 52 (1), 150–181. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini, F., Pacini, R., and Valletti, T., 2006. “Scoring rules.” In: N. Dimitri, G. Piga, and G. Spagnolo, eds. Handbook of procurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Erridge, A., Fee, R., and McIlroy, J., 1999. An Assessment of Competitive Tendering Using Transaction Cost Analysis. Public Money & Management, 19 (3), 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and Iimi, A., 2008. “Procurement Efficiency for Infrastructure Development and Financial Needs Reassessed.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 4662, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., et al., 2009. Multidimensionality and renegotiation: evidence from transport-sector public-private-partnership transactions in Latin America. Review of industrial organization, 35 (1), 41–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. 2014. Directive 2014/24/EU on Public Procurement 24 February 2014. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj [Accessed 17 November, 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and Gijbels, I., 1996. Local polynomial modelling and its applications. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, G., Kulathunga, U., Thayaparan, M. and C. Hadiwattege. 2023. “Legal and regulatory framework related to unsolicited proposals in various countries: a systematic review for procurement stage.” In: Proceedings of the 11th World Construction Symposium, 712–726.
   Google Scholar
• Hanák, T., and Muchová, P., 2015. Impact of competition on prices in public sector procurement. Procedia computer science, 64, 729–735.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G.A., and Greve, C., 2017. On public–private partnership performance: a contemporary review. Public works management & policy, 22 (1), 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, J. T., and Dellacha, G., 2007. “Unsolicited Infrastructure Proposals: How Some Countries Introduce Competition and Transparency.” PPIAF Working Paper No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, J., 2003. “Unsolicited proposals: the issues of private infrastructure projects.” Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, A., Lundberg, S., and Toivanen, O., 2018. Design of public procurement auctions: evidence from cleaning contracts. RAND journal of economics, 49 (2), 398–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KDI-PIMAC 2020. KDI PIMAC Annual Report 2019. Korea Development Institute – Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center (KDI-PIMAC) (In Korean).
   Google Scholar
• KDI-PIMAC 2022. KDI PIMAC Annual Report 2021. Korea Development Institute – Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center (KDI-PIMAC). Sejong, Republic of Korea: Korea Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-H., et al., 2011. Public-private partnership infrastructure project: case studies from the Republic of Korea. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P., 2004. Auctions: theory and practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Komakech, R.A., 2016. Public procurement in developing countries: objectives, principles and required professional skills. Public policy and administration research, 6 (8), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, P., and van de Meerendonk, A., 2014. The impact of scoring weights on price and quality outcomes: an application to the procurement of welfare-to-work contracts. European economic review, 71 (C), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Krtalić, S., and Kelebuda, M., 2010. The role of the public-private partnership in providing of public goods: possibilities and constraints. In: Fifth International Conference of the School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo (ICES2010), Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J.K., and Raj, V., 2019. A study on key factors influencing bid decision model for construction projects. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, 574, 012004.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentziadis, P.L., 2010. Post-objective determination of weights of the evaluation factors in public procurement tenders. European journal of operational research, 200 (1), 261–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R.C., 2018. Empirical evidence of unsolicited proposals in PPP arrangements: a comparison of Brazil, Korea and the USA. Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, 20 (5), 435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, R.P., and McMillan, J., 1987. Auction and bidding. Journal of economic literature, 25 (2), 699–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy and Finance 2023. Announcement of Basic Plan for PPPs. 2023-84 (in Korean). Sejong, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Economy and Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, W., Ku, H.J., and Sim, J., 2023. The institutional effects of public-private partnerships on competition: unsolicited proposal projects. Journal of public procurement, 23 (1), 56–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na’aim, M.S.M., 2023. Appraising legal measures against bid rigging in Malaysia. Insight journal, 10 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Neves, P. and D. J. Kim (2017). “Managing unsolicited proposals in infrastructure: 5 key questions for governments.” World Bank Publication. Available from https://blogs.worldbank.org/ppps/managing-unsolicited-proposals-infrastructure-5-key-questions-governments [Accessed 19 November, 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S.T., Wong, J.M.W., and Wong, K.K.W., 2013. A public private people partnerships (P4) process framework for infrastructure development in Hong Kong. Cities, 31, 370–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyagormey, J.J., et al., 2022. Review on criteria for evaluating unsolicited public–private partnership PPP proposals from 2004 to 2018. International journal of construction management, 22 (12), 2243–2257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohashi, H., 2009. Effects of transparency in procurement practices on government expenditure: a case study of municipal public works. Review of industrial organization, 34, 267–285. 10.1007/s11151-009-9208-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei, R., et al., 2018a. Strategies for effective management of unsolicited public–private partnership proposals. Journal of management in engineering, 34 (3), 04018006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei, R., et al., 2018b. Motivations for adopting unsolicited proposals for public-private partnership project implementation: a survey of international experts. Journal of financial management of property and construction, 23 (2), 221–238. 10.1108/JFMPC-06-2017-0020.
   Google Scholar
• PPIAF 2009. Toolkit for public-private partnerships in roads and highways. Washington, D.C.: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.
   Google Scholar
• Raisbeck, P., Duffield, C., and Xu, M., 2010. Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Construction management and economics, 28 (4), 345–359.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, J., 2008. Benchmarking in public procurement. Benchmarking: an international journal, 15 (6), 782–793. 10.1108/14635770810915940.
   Google Scholar
• Roumboutsos, A., 2020. “Competition for Infrastructure Projects: Traditional Procurement and PPPs in Europe.” Working Paper, International Transport Forum, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, W.F., 1985. Competitive bidding with entry costs. Economics letters, 17 (1–2), 53–57. 10.1016/0165-1765(85)90126-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussier, S., Staropoli, C., and Yvrande-Billon, A., 2009. Public-private agreements, institutions, and competition: when economic theory meets facts. Review of industrial organization, 35 (1/2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, F. and S. Sherratt. 2018. “PPP problems: challenging academic compliance with economic opportunism and exploitation.” In: Proceeding of the 34th Annual ARCOM Conference, 413–422.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, F., Sherratt, S., and Ivory, C., 2020. Challenging complacency in construction management research: the case of PPPs. Construction management and economics, 38 (12), 1086–1100. 10.1080/01446193.2020.1744674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilger, P.S., Siderius, J., and Van Raaij, E.M., 2017. A comparative study of formulas for choosing the economically most advantageous tender. Journal of public procurement, 17 (1), 89–125.
   Google Scholar
• Takano, G., 2021. The competitive performance of public-private partnership markets. the case of unsolicited proposals in Peru. Utilities policy, 72, 101274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torvinen, H., and Ulkuniemi, P., 2016. End-user engagement within innovative public procurement practices: a case study on public–private partnership procurement. Industrial marketing management, 58, 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-C., et al., 2013. Applying the AHP to support the best-value contractor selection – lessons learned from two case studies in Taiwan. Journal of civil engineering and management, 19 (1), 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M., 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank 2017. Review of experience with unsolicited proposals in infrastructure projects. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank 2018. Policy guidelines for managing unsolicited proposals in infrastructure projects. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, S., et al., 2015. Critical organizational success factors for public private partnership projects – a comparison of solicited and unsolicited proposals. Journal of civil engineering and management, 21 (2), 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zin Zawawi, M.I., Kulatunga, U., and Thayaparan, M., 2016. Malaysian experience with public-private partnership (PPP): managing unsolicited proposal. Built environment project and asset management, 6 (5), 508–520. 10.1108/BEPAM-10-2015-0059.
   Google Scholar