381
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

User experiences of situational awareness systems in infrastructure construction

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 06 Dec 2023, Accepted 05 Jun 2024, Published online: 25 Jun 2024

References

  • Aerts, G., Dooms, M., and Haezendonck, E., 2017. Knowledge transfers and project-based learning in large scale infrastructure development projects: an exploratory and comparative ex-post analysis. International journal of project management, 35 (3), 224–240.
  • Akinci, B., 2015. Situational awareness in construction and facility management. Frontiers of engineering management, 1 (3), 283–289.
  • Baker, S. E., Edwards, R., and Doidge, M., 2012. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research.
  • Barnett, M.L., 2005. Searching for the root causes of maritime casualties:—Individual competence or organisational culture? WMU journal of maritime affairs, 4, 131–145.
  • Bedny, G., and Meister, D., 1999. Theory of activity and situation awareness. International journal of cognitive ergonomics, 3 (1), 63–72.
  • Biersteker, E., and Marrewijk, A.V., 2023. Integrating knowledge in infrastructure projects: the interplay between formal and informal knowledge governance mechanisms. Construction management and economics, 41(10), 859–874.
  • Bolstad, C.A. and Endsley, M.R., 2000. The effect of task load and shared displays on team situation awareness. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 1 July Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 189–192.
  • Brehmer, B., 2007. Understanding the functions of C2 is the key to progress. International C2 journal, 1 (1), 211–232.
  • Brinkmann, S., 2014. Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In: Leavy, P. ed. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cheng, T., and Teizer, J., 2013. Real-time resource location data collection and visualization technology for construction safety and activity monitoring applications. Automation in construction, 34, 3–15.
  • Cheng, T., and Teizer, J., 2014. Modeling tower crane operator visibility to minimize the risk of limited situational awareness. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 28 (3), 04014004.
  • Cloutier, C., and Ravasi, D., 2021. Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic organization, 19 (1), 113–133.
  • Collinson, S., and Rugman, A.M., 2010. Case selection biases in management research: the implications for international business studies. European journal of international management, 4 (5), 441–463.
  • Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D.T., 2002. Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 28 (10), 1379–1387.
  • DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M.S., 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5 (2), 121–147.
  • Du, J., Li, N.N., and Luo, Y.J., 2020. Authoritarian leadership in organisational change and employees’ active reactions: have-to and willing-to perspectives. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 3076.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M., and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
  • Endsley, M.R., 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors, 37 (1), 32–64.
  • Endsley, M.R., 2015. Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, 9 (1), 4–32.
  • Endsley, M. R., and Jones, D. G., 2004. Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Fang, Y., et al., 2016. Case study of BIM and cloud-enabled real-time RFID indoor localization for construction management applications. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142 (7), 05016003.
  • Fereday, J., and Muir-Cochrane, E., 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5 (1), 80–92.
  • Flach, J.M., 1995. Situation awareness: proceed with caution. Human factors, 37 (1), 149–157.
  • Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M.K., and Buhl, S.L., 2003. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transport reviews, 23 (1), 71–88.
  • Flyvbjerg, B., and Gardner, D., 2023. How big things get done: the surprising factors that determine the fate of every project, from home renovations to space exploration and everything in between. New York: Crown Currency.
  • Friese, S., Soratto, J., and Pires, D., 2018. Carrying out a computer-aided thematic content analysis with ATLAS.ti. MMG working paper, 18 (2), 1–30.
  • Georg, S., and Tryggestad, K., 2009. On the emergence of roles in construction: the qualculative role of project management. Construction management and economics, 27 (10), 969–981.
  • Ghimire, S., et al., 2017. IoT based situational awareness framework for real-time project management. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, 30 (1), 74–83.
  • Gilson, R.D., et al., 1994. Situational awareness in complex systems. In: R. Gilson, D. Garland, and J. Koonce, eds. Proceedings of a CAHFA conference. 1–3 February 1993 Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Grigg, N.S., 2000. Where are we in infrastructure education? Public works management & policy, 4 (3), 256–259.
  • Halttula, H.P.I. and Seppänen, O., 2022. Situational awareness in construction projects using takt production. In: F. Hamzeh and T. Alves, eds. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the international group for lean construction. 25–31 July 2022, Edmonton, Canada, 164–174.
  • Han, K.K., and Golparvar-Fard, M., 2017. Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study. Automation in construction, 73, 184–198.
  • Hennink, M.M., Kaiser, B.N., and Marconi, V.C. et al., 2017. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative health research, 27 (4), 591–608.
  • Horita, F., Baptista, J., and de Albuquerque, J.P., 2023. Exploring the use of IoT data for heightened situational awareness in centralised monitoring control rooms. Information systems frontiers, 25 (1), 275–290.
  • Jensen, E., 2007. Sensemaking in military planning: a methodological study of command teams. Cognition, technology, and work, 11 (2), 103–118.
  • Jones, P.E., and Roelofsma, P.H., 2000. The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms. Ergonomics, 43 (8), 1129–1152.
  • Kane, G., 2019. The technology fallacy: people are the real key to digital transformation. Research-technology management, 62 (6), 44–49.
  • Kärkkäinen, R., et al., 2019. Situation picture through construction information management. In: I. Lill and E. Witt, eds. 10th Nordic conference on construction economics and organization. 7–8 May 2019. Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, vol. 2. Leeds, UK: Emerald, 155–161.
  • Lappalainen, E.M., et al., 2021. Transformation of construction project management toward situational awareness. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28 (8), 2199–2221.
  • Lonsdale, J.H., 2004. Situational awareness and risk perception of operatives using portable ladders in the construction industry. In: F. Khosrowshahi, ed. Proceedings of the 20th annual ARCOM conference, 1–3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK, 1, 515–23.
  • Lundberg, J., 2015. Situation awareness systems, states and processes: a holistic framework. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 16 (5), 447–473.
  • Martinez, J.G., et al., 2023. Situational awareness in construction using a serious game. Journal of construction engineering and management, 149 (3), 04022183.
  • Moerman, G., 2010. Probing behaviour in open interviews: a field experiment on the effects. Dissertation (PhD). Vrije University, Amsterdam.
  • Moh’d, S.S., Černe, M., and Zhang, P., 2021. An exploratory configurational analysis of knowledge-hiding antecedents in project teams. Project management journal, 52 (1), 31–44.
  • Munir, A., Aved, A., and Blasch, E., 2022. Situational awareness: techniques, challenges, and prospects. AI, 3 (1), 55–77.
  • Nadj, M., Maedche, A., and Schieder, C., 2020. The effect of interactive analytical dashboard features on situation awareness and task performance. Decision support systems, 135, 113322.
  • Nofi, A. A., 2000. Defining and measuring shared situational awareness. Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, 1–74.
  • Oloufa, A.A., Ikeda, M., and Oda, H., 2003. Situational awareness of construction equipment using GPS, wireless, and web technologies. Automation in construction, 12 (6), 737–748.
  • Orlikowski, W.J., 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11 (4), 404–428.
  • Pakhale, P.D., and Pal, A., 2020. Digital project management in infrastructure project: a case study of Nagpur Metro Rail Project. Asian journal of civil engineering, 21, 639–647.
  • Pena-Mora, F., and Dwivedi, G.H., 2002. Multiple device collaborative and real time analysis system for project management in civil engineering. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 16 (1), 23–38.
  • Pronin, E., 2007. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11 (1), 37–43.
  • Reinbold, A., et al., 2019. Integrating indoor positioning systems and BIM to improve situational awareness. In: C. Pasquire and F.R. Hamzeh, eds. Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019, Dublin, Ireland, 1141–1150.
  • Ridder, H.G., 2017. The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business research, 10, 281–305.
  • Robinson, O.C., 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative research in psychology, 11 (1), 25–41.
  • Sacks, R., et al., 2020. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-centric engineering, 1, e14.
  • Salmon, P.M., et al., 2009. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 39 (3), 490–500.
  • Salmon, P.M., 2008. Distributed situation awareness: advances in theory, measurement, and application to teamwork. [Doctoral Dissertation, Brunel University]. FL: CRC Press.
  • Sarikaya, A., et al., 2018. What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE transactions on visualisation and computer graphics, 25 (1), 682–692.
  • Sarter, N.B., and Woods, D.D., 1991. Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International journal of aviation psychology, 1 (1), 45–57.
  • Sezer, A.A., and Bröchner, J., 2019. Site managers’ ICT tools for monitoring resources in refurbishment. Engineering, construction, and architectural management, 27 (1), 109–127.
  • Sheng, Z., 2018. Fundamental theories of mega infrastructure construction management. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 99–104.
  • Singh, R., 2010. Delays and cost overruns in infrastructure projects: extent, causes, and remedies. Economic and political weekly, 45 (21), 43–54.
  • Smith, K., and Hancock, P.A., 1995. Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human factors, 37 (1), 137–148.
  • Soman, R.K., and Whyte, J.K., 2020. Codification challenges for data science in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146 (7), 04020072.
  • Stanton, N.A., Chambers, P.R., and Piggott, J., 2001. Situational awareness and safety. Safety science, 39 (3), 189–204.
  • Stanton, N.A., et al., 2017. State-of-science: situation awareness in individuals, teams, and systems. Ergonomics, 60 (4), 449–466.
  • Taneja, S., et al., 2011. Sensing and field data capture for construction and facility operations. Journal of construction engineering and management, 137(10), 870–881.
  • Taylor, R. M., and Selcon, S. J., 1994. Situation in mind: theory, application and measurement of situational awareness. Situational awareness in complex settings, 69–78.
  • Tikanmäki, I. and Ruoslahti, H., 2019. How are situation picture, situation awareness, and situation understanding discussed in recent scholarly literature? In J. Bernardino, A. Salgado, and J. Filipe, eds. IC3K 2019/KMIS 2019, Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Jyväskylä, Finland. SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, 3, 419–426.
  • Vaismoradi, M., et al., 2016. Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of nursing education and practice, 6 (5), 100–110.
  • Williams, T., et al., 2006. Learning from project failure. In P.S.W Fong, Z. Irani, and P.E.D. Love, eds. Management of knowledge in project environments. Routledge, London, 219–234.
  • Williams, M., and Moser, T., 2019. The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International management review, 15 (1), 45–55.
  • Yin, R. K., 2009. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Zhang, Z., and Guo, B.H., et al., 2023. Digital technology enhanced situation awareness for construction safety: systematic review and future research directions. Safety science, 167, 106280.