52
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Public clients pursue innovation, but what’s going on at the project level? A case study of infrastructure operation and maintenance

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Received 29 Jun 2023, Accepted 01 Jul 2024, Published online: 11 Jul 2024

References

  • Artto, K., et al., 2008a. What is project strategy? International journal of project management, 26 (1), 4–12.
  • Artto, K., et al., 2008b. Project strategy: strategy types and their contents in innovation projects. International journal of managing projects in business, 1 (1), 49–70.
  • Blayse, A., and Manley, K., 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Construction innovation, 4 (3), 143–154.
  • Bygballe, L.E., and Ingemansson, M., 2011. Public policy and industry views on innovation in construction. The IMP journal, 5 (3), 157–171.
  • Carbonara, N., and Pellegrino, R., 2020. The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation. Construction management and economics, 38 (2), 140–156.
  • Crespin-Mazet, F., et al., 2021. The diffusion of innovation in project-based firms – linking the temporary and permanent levels of organisation. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 36 (9), 1692–1705.
  • Dubois, A., and Gadde, L.E., 2002. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20 (7), 621–631.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M., and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
  • Engwall, M., 2003. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Research policy, 32 (5), 789–808.
  • Eriksson, P.E., 2017. Procurement strategies for enhancing exploration and exploitation in construction projects. Journal of financial management of property and construction, 22 (2), 211–230.
  • Eriksson, P.E., Larsson, J., and Szentes, H., 2019. Reactive problem solving and proactive development in infrastructure projects. Current trends in civil & structural engineering, 3 (2).
  • Eriksson, P.E., Leiringer, R., and Szentes, H., 2017. The role of co-creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings. Project management journal, 48 (4), 22–38.
  • EU Directive, 2014. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/2024-01-01
  • European Commission, 2006. Putting Knowledge into Practice: A broad-based Innovation Strategy for the EU [online] Available from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/36fac83c-e34a-42fd-b5f9-71c5cd69240c
  • European Commission, 2021. The strategic use of public procurement for innovation in the digital economy SMART 2016/0040 – Final Report. [online] Available from: https://www.euriphi.eu/wp-content/uploads/kk0221251enn.en_.pdf
  • European Commission, 2022. A New European Innovation Agenda. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0332
  • European Council, 2005. Brussels European Council 22 and 23 March 2005, Presidency Conclusions [online] Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/84335.pdf
  • European Court of Auditors, 2023. Public procurement in the EU: less competition for contracts awarded for works, goods and services in the 10 years up to 2021. Special report 28, 2023, Publications Office of the European Union. [online] Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2865/04787
  • Feldman, M., and Orlikowski, W., 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization science, 22 (5), 1240–1253.
  • Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12 (2), 219–245.
  • Fred, M., 2015. Projectification in Swedish municipalities: a case of porous organizations. Scandinavian journal of public administration, 19 (2), 49–68.
  • Fred, M., 2020. Local government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective. Local government studies, 46 (3), 351–370.
  • Gann, D.M., and Salter, A.J., 2000. Innovation in project based, service enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research policy, 29 (7–8), 955–972.
  • Godenhjelm, S., Lundin, R.A., and Sjöblom, S., 2015. Projectification in the public sector–the case of the European Union. International journal of managing projects in business, 8 (2), 324–348.
  • Håkansson, H., and Axelsson, B., 2020. What is so special with outsourcing in the public sector? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35 (12), 2011–2021.
  • Håkansson, H., and Ingemansson, M., 2013. Industrial renewal within the construction network. Construction management and economics, 31 (1), 40–61.
  • Hartmann, A., Reymen, I.M.M.J., and van Oosterom, G., 2008. Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients. Building research & information, 36 (5), 436–449.
  • Hedborg Bengtsson, S., Karrbom Gustavsson, T., and Eriksson, P.E., 2018. Users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation: mapping the receptive context. Construction innovation, 18 (4), 488–504.
  • Hjelmar, U., 2021. The institutionalization of public sector innovation. Public management review, 23 (1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702
  • Ingemansson Havenvid, M., et al., 2016. Renewal in construction projects: tracing effects of client requirements. Construction management and economics, 34 (11), 790–807.
  • Jarzabkowski, P., 2004. Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization studies, 25 (4), 529–560.
  • Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., and Seidl, D., 2007. Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective. Human relations, 60 (1), 5–27.
  • Johnson, G., et al., 2007. Strategy as practice – research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Koch, C., Paavola, S., and Buhl, H., 2019. Social science and construction – an uneasy and underused relation. Construction management and economics, 37 (6), 309–316.
  • Konkurrensverket, 2017. Swedish public procurement act. [online] Available from: https://www.konkurrensverket.se/globalassets/dokument/informationsmaterial/rapporter-och-broschyrer/informationsmaterial/swedish-public-procurement-act.pdf
  • Kuitert, L., Volker, L., and Hermans, M.H., 2019. Taking on a wider view: Public value interests of construction clients in a changing construction industry. Construction management and economics, 37 (5), 257–277.
  • Langley, A., 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of management review, 24 (4), 691–710.
  • Larsson, J., et al., 2022. Innovation outcomes and processes in infrastructure projects: a comparative study of design-build and design-build-maintenance contracts. Construction management and economics, 40 (2), 142–156.
  • Leiringer, R., Green, S.D., and Raja, J.Z., 2009. Living up to the value agenda: the empirical realities of through‐life value creation in construction. Construction management and economics, 27 (3), 271–285.
  • Lindblad, H., and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2021. Public clients ability to drive industry change: the case of implementing BIM. Construction management and economics, 39 (1), 21–35.
  • Loosemore, M., 2015. Construction innovation: fifth generation perspective. Journal of management in engineering, 31 (6), 04015012.
  • Löwstedt, M., Räisänen, C., and Leiringer, R., 2018. Doing strategy in project-based organizations: actors and patterns of action. International journal of project management, 36 (6), 889–898.
  • Lundin, R.A., and Söderholm, A., 1995. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian journal of management, 11 (4), 437–455.
  • Midler, C., 1995. “Projectification” of the firm: the Renault case. Scandinavian journal of management, 11 (4), 363–375.
  • Mintzberg, H., 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management science, 24 (9), 934–948.
  • Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J., 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic management journal, 6 (3), 257–272.
  • Nilsson Vestola, E., et al., 2021. Temporary and permanent aspects of project organizing. International journal of managing projects in business, 14 (7), 1444–1462.
  • Nilsson Vestola, E., and Eriksson, P.E., 2023. Engineered and emerged collaboration: vicious and virtuous cycles. Construction management and economics, 41 (1), 79–96.
  • Nyström, J., 2008. A quasi‐experimental evaluation of partnering. Construction management and economics, 26 (5), 531–541.
  • OECD, 2023. Public procurement performance: a framework for measuring efficiency, compliance and strategic goals. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 36. Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] Available from:
  • Ozorhon, B., 2013. Analysis of construction innovation process at project level. Journal of management in engineering, 29 (4), 455–463.
  • Ozorhon, B., Oral, K., and Demirkesen, S., 2016. Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. Journal of management in engineering, 32 (3), 04015052.
  • Packendorff, J., 1995. Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scandinavian journal of management, 11 (4), 319–333.
  • Regeringskansliet, 2016. Nationella upphandlingsstrategin. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet. [online] Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/globalassets/regeringen/dokument/finansdepartementet/pdf/2016/upphandlingsstrategin/nationella-upphandlingsstrategin.pdf
  • Seidl, D., and Whittington, R., 2014. Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35 (10), 1407–1421.
  • SFS 2010:185, Förordning med instruktion för Trafikverket. [online] Available from: http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svenskforfattningssamling/forordning-2010185-med-instruktionfor_sfs-2010-185
  • Sjöblom, S., Löfgren, K., and Godenhjelm, S., 2013. Projectified politics – temporary organisations in a public context. Scandinavian journal of public administration, 17 (2), 3–12.
  • Söderlund, J., and Maylor, H., 2012. Project management scholarship: Relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools. International journal of project management, 30 (6), 686–696.
  • Trafikverket, 2016. Riktlinje utvecklingsfrämjande åtgärder. TDOK, 2016, 0073.
  • United Nations Environment Programme, 2022. Global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero‑emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector Nairobi.
  • Uyarra, E., and Flanagan, K., 2010. Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European planning studies, 18 (1), 123–143.
  • Vaara, E., and Whittington, R., 2012. Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. The academy of management annals, 6 (1), 285–336.
  • Vass, S., and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2017. Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change. Construction management and economics, 35 (10), 597–610.
  • Volker, L., 2019. Looking out to look in: inspiration from social sciences for construction management research. Construction management and economics, 37 (1), 13–23.
  • Weiser, A.K., Jarzabkowski, P., and Laamanen, T., 2020. Completing the adaptive turn: an integrative view of strategy implementation. Academy of management annals, 14 (2), 969–1031.
  • Whittington, R., 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization studies, 27 (5), 613–634.
  • Winch, G.M., 2014. Three domains of project organizing. International journal of project management, 32 (5), 721–731.