Anaerobic digestate as peat substitute and fertiliser in pot production of basil

References

• Abad M, Fornes F, Carrion C, Noguera P, Maguieira A, Puchades R, Puchades R. 2005. Physical properties of various coconut coir dusts compared to peat. Hortscience. 40(7):2138–2144. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abubaker J, Risberg K, Pell M. 2012. Biogas residues as fertilisers – effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Appl Energy. 99:126–134. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Farto M, Santos T, Palma P, Sengo J, Morais M-C, Cunha-Queda C. 2015. Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: benefits versus limiting factors. Waste Management. 40:44–52. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzee TJ, Edalati A, El-Mashad H, Wang D, Scow K, Zhang R. 2019. Digestate biofertilizers support similar or higher tomato yields and quality than mineral fertilizer in a subsurface drip fertigation system. Front Sustain Food Syst. 3. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00058
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand K-J, Asp H, Hultberg M. 2020a. Utilizing anaerobic digestates as nutrient solutions in hydroponic production systems. Sustainability. 12(23):10076. doi:10.3390/su122310076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand K-J, Löfkvist K, Asp H. 2020b. Dynamics of nutrient availability in tomato production with organic fertilisers. Biol Agric & Hort. 36(3):200–212. doi:10.1080/01448765.2020.1779816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. 2002. NH4+ toxicity in higher plants. A critical review. J Plant Physiol. 159(6):567–584. doi:10.1078/0176-1617-0774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceglie FG, Bustamante MA, Amara MB, Tittarelli F, Singer AC. 2015. The challenge of peat substitution in organic seedling production: optimization of growing media formulation through mixture design and response surface analysis. PLOS ONE. 10(6):e0128600. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2018. Regulation (EU) No 2018/848, of May 30 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products. Off J Eur. 61:5.
   Google Scholar
• European standards. 2007. EN 13040:2007 Soil improvers and growing media. Sample preparation for chemical and physical tests, determination of dry matter content, moisture content and laboratory compacted bulk density. 978 0 580 54504 7.
   Google Scholar
• European standards. 2011. EN 13038:2011. Soil improvers and growing media. Determination of Electrical Conductivity. 1-14. 978 0 580 68880 5.
   Google Scholar
• European standards. 2016. EN ISO 16634-2:2016. Food products- determination of the total nitrogen content by combustion according to the Dumas principle and calculation of the crude protein content. 1-24. 978 0 580 54276 3.
   Google Scholar
• Frerichs C, Daum D, Pacholski AS. 2020. Ammonia and ammonium exposure of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) growing in an organically fertilized peat substrate and strategies to mitigate related harmful impacts on plant growth. Front Plant Sci. 10:1696. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenway H, Munns R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 31(1):149–190. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks SB, Taylorson RB. 1974. Promotion of seed germination by nitrate, nitrite, hydroxylamine, and ammonium salts. Plant Physiol. 54(3):304–309. doi:10.1104/pp.54.3.304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1950. The culture method for growing plants without soil. In: Circ. Vol. 347. 1-32. Berkley (USA): California Agr. Exp. Stn. Univ. of California.
   Google Scholar
• Irandoust M. 2016. Modelling consumers’ demand for organic food product: the Swedish experience. Int J of Food and Agric Economics. 4:77–89.
   Google Scholar
• KRAV. 2021. Regler för KRAV-certifierad produktion 2021. (Regulations for KRAV (organic) – certified production 2021). KRAV Uppsala (Sweden. Swedish): 108–109, Krav ekonomisk förening.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ME, Steinman MW, St. Angelo SK. 2020. Biogas digestate as a renewable fertilizer: effects of digestate application on crop growth and nutrient composition. Renewable Agric and Food Systems. 1–9. doi:10.1017/S1742170520000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind PO, Hultberg M, Bergstrand K-J, Larsson-Jönsson H, Caspersen S, Asp H. 2020. Biogas digestate in vegetable hydroponic production: pH dynamics and ph management by controlled nitrification. Waste Biomass Valor. doi:10.1007/s12649-020-00965-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WK, Yang QC, Du LF, Cheng RF, Zhou WL. 2011. Nutrient supplementation increased growth and nitrate concentration of lettuce cultivated hydroponically with biogas slurry. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science. 61(5):391–394. doi:10.1080/09064710.2010.482539.
   Google Scholar
• Marchner P, editor. 2012. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Third. London (UK): Academic press. 9780. 9780081014318. 081014318. 191–243.
   Google Scholar
• Moestedt J, Nilsson Påledal S, Schnürer A. 2013. The effect of substrate and operational parameters on the abundance of sulphate-reducing bacteria in industrial anaerobic biogas digesters. Bioresour Technol. 132:327–332. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K, Müller T. 2012. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci. 12(3):242–257. doi:10.1002/elsc.201100085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead KK, Graetz DA, Reddy KR. 1987. Decomposition of fresh and anaerobically digested plant biomass in soil. J Environ Qual. 16(1):25–28. doi:10.2134/jeq1987.00472425001600010031x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMKL. 1998. Determination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry after wet digestion in a microwave oven. ( NMKL 161, 1998). accessed 2022 Apr 5. https://nmkl.org/index.php/nb/.
   Google Scholar
• Pokhrel B, Sorensen JN, Moller HB, Petersen KK. 2018. Processing methods of organic liquid fertilizers affect nutrient availability and yield of greenhouse grown parsley. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 1–9. doi:10.1017/S1742170517000771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin AA. 2006. Effects of salinity and temperature on germination and seedling establishment of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 11(4):81–90. doi:10.1300/J044v11n04_09.
   Google Scholar
• Reganold JP, Wachter JM. 2016. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. NaT Plants. 2(2):15221. doi:10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo AP, Medina E, Pérez-Espinosa A, Agulló E, Bustamante MA, Mininni C, Bernal MP, Moral R. 2013. Substitution of peat in horticultural seedling: suitability of digestate-derived compost from cattle manure and maize silage codigestions. Com Soil Sci Pl Analysis. 44(1–4):668–677. doi:10.1080/00103624.2013.748004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmilewski G. 2009. Growing medium constituents used in the EU. Acta Hortic. 819(819):33–46. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.819.3.
   Google Scholar
• Spurway CH, Lawton K. 1949. Soil testing: a practical system of soil fertility diagnosis. East Lansing: Agriculture Experiment Station, Michigan state University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart WM, Dibb DB, Johnston AE, Smyth TJ. 2005. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J. 97(1):1–6. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoknes K 2020. Circular food; crops from digested waste in a controlled environment. Dissertation No. 2263, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Univ. of Oslo Norway. 1501-7710.
   Google Scholar
• Stoknes K, Scholwin F, Krzeinski W, Wojciechowska E, Jasinska A. 2016. Efficiency of a novel “food to waste to food” system including anaerobic digestion of food waste and cultivation of vegetables on digestate in a bubble-insulated greenhouse. Waste Management. dx, 56:466–476. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoknes K, Wojciechowska E, Jasińska A, Gulliksen A, Tesfamichael AA. 2018. Growing vegetables in the circular economy; cultivation of tomatoes on green waste compost and food waste digestate. Acta Hortic. (1215):389–396. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1215.71.
   Google Scholar
• Sverige A. 2020. Certification rules for digestate from biodegradable waste by the quality assurance system of avfall sverige – the Swedish waste management association. Accessed 2022 Apr 5. www.avfallsverige.se/fileadmin/user_upload/4_kunskapsbank/SPCR_120_2020_Slutversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tambone F, Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Schievano A, Orzi V, Salati S, Adani F. 2010. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere. 81(5):577–583. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittarelli F. 2020. Organic greenhouse production: towards an agroecological approach in the framework of the new European regulation – a review. Agronomy. 10(1):72. doi:10.3390/agronomy10010072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL. 2008. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol. 99(17):7928–7940. doi:10.1016/j.biotech.2008.02.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager T, Gilliam C, Bilderback TE, Fare D, Niemiera A, Tilt K. 1997. Best management practice, guide for producing container-grown plants. Atlanta: Southern Nursery Association. COMAR15.20.08.07B.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkler D, Peters A, Kaupenjohann M. 2014. Elemental composition of biogas residues: variability and alteration during anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy. 67:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar