2,606
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Working with Technology

A multi-level socio-technical systems telecommuting framework

, &
Pages 1257-1279 | Received 08 Dec 2010, Accepted 18 Jun 2012, Published online: 30 Jul 2012

References

  • Araújo, E. R. 2008. Technology, gender and time: a contribution to the debate. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(5), 477–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00414.x
  • Axtell, C., Hislop, D., and Whittaker, S. 2008. Mobile technologies in mobile spaces: findings from the context of train travel. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66(12), 902–915. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.001
  • Bailey, D. E., and Kurland, N. B. 2002. A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400 doi: 10.1002/job.144
  • Baker, E., Avery, G. C., and Crawford, J. 2006. Home alone: the role of technology in telecommuting. Information Resources Management Journal, 19(4), 1–22. doi: 10.4018/irmj.2006100101
  • Bélanger, F. 1999. Worker's propensity to telecommute: an empirical study. Information and Management, 35(3), 139–153. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00091-3
  • Bélanger, F., and Allport, C. 2008. Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study. Information Systems Journal, 18(1), 101–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00252.x
  • Bélanger, F., Collins, R., and Cheney, P. H. 2001. Technology requirements and work group communication for telecommuters. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 155–176. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.2.155.9695
  • Bélanger, F., and Collins, R. W. 1998. Distributed work arrangements: a research framework. The Information Society: An International Journal, 14(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/019722498128935
  • Bélanger, F., and Watson-Manheim, M. B. 2006. Virtual teams and multiple media: structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision and Negotiations, 15(4), 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8
  • Bélanger, F., Watson-Manheim, M. B., and Jordan, D. H. 2002. Aligning IS research and practice: a research agenda for virtual work. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(3), 48–70 doi: 10.4018/irmj.2002070104
  • Brodt, T. L., and Verburg, R. M. 2007. Managing mobile work – insights from European practice. New Technology, Work & Employment, 22(1), 52–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00183.x
  • Brown, O.Jr. 2002. Macroergonomics methods: participation. In Hendrick, H. W., and Kleiner, B. M. (Ed.), Macroergonomics: theory, methods, and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 412.
  • Cousins, K. C., and Robey, D. 2005. Human agency in a wireless world: patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments. Information and Organization, 15(2), 151–180. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.008
  • DeGreene, K. B. 1973. Sociotechnical systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Desrochers, S., Hilton, J. M., and Larwood, L. 2005. Preliminary validation of the work-family integration-blurring scale. Journal of Family Issues, 26(4), 442–466. doi: 10.1177/0192513X04272438
  • Gajendran, R. S., and Harrison, D. A. 2007. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
  • Golden, T. 2006. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 319–340. doi: 10.1002/job.369
  • Golden, T., and Viega, J. F. 2005. The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301–318. doi: 10.1177/0149206304271768
  • Golden, T. D. 2007. Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60(11), 1641–1667. doi: 10.1177/0018726707084303
  • Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., and Dino, R. N. 2008. The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421. doi: 10.1037/a0012722
  • Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–235. doi: 10.2307/249689
  • Hartig, T., Kylin, C., and Johansson, G. 2007. The telework tradeoff: stress mitigation vs. constrained restoration. Applied Psychology, 56(2), 231–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00252.x
  • Hendrick, H. W. 2002. An overview of macroergonomics. In Hendrick, H. W., and Kleiner, B. M. (Ed.), Macroergonomics: theory, methods, and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 412
  • Hendrick, H. W., and Kleiner, B. M. 2001. Macroergonomics: an introduction to work system design, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Hendrick, H. W., and Kleiner, B. M. (Ed.) 2002. Macroergonomics: theory, methods, and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hill, E. J., et al. 2010. Workplace flexibility, work hours, and work-life conflict: finding an extra day or two. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 349–358. doi: 10.1037/a0019282
  • Hislop, D., and Axtell, C. 2009. To infinity and beyond?: workspace and the multi-location worker. New Technology, Work & Employment, 24(1), 60–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00218.x
  • Holden, R. J., and Karsh, B. 2009. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1080/01449290601138245
  • Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., and Glaser, J. 2009. Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: antecedents and outcomes of i-deals from a managerial perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7–8), 738–764. doi: 10.1108/02683940910996770
  • Hunton, J. E., and Norman, C. S. 2010. The impact of alternative telework arrangements on organizational commitment: insights from a longitudinal field experiment. Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 67–90. doi: 10.2308/jis.2010.24.1.67
  • Igbaria, M. 1999. The driving forces in the virtual society. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 64–70. doi: 10.1145/322796.322812
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Lang, K. R. 2005. Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7–23. doi: 10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2
  • Joli, B. 2009. Telecommuting trends in the 2009 economy. Bright Hub [online], , Available from: http://www.brighthub.com/office/home/articles/22829.aspx [Accessed 2 July 2012]
  • Kakihara, M., and Sørensen, C. 2004. Practicing mobile professional work: tales of locational, operational, and interactional mobility. The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunication, Information and Media, 6(3), 180–187. doi: 10.1108/14636690410549507
  • Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. 1966. Common characteristics of open systems. In Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. (Ed.), The social psychology of organizations, New York: Wiley. 14–29
  • Khalifa, M., and Davison, R. M. 2008. Explaining the intended continuance level of telecommuting. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 5(3), 264–294. doi: 10.1504/IJIEM.2008.018312
  • Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., and Hall, R. J. 1994. Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229.
  • Kuldeep, K., van Fenema, P. C., and Glinow, M. A. 2009. Offshoring and the global distribution of work: implications for task interdependence theory and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(4), 642–667. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2008.77
  • Lee, H. G., Shin, B., and Higa, K. 2007. Telework vs. central work: a comparative view of knowledge accessibility. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 687–700 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.007
  • Leonard, B. 2000. Telework has many advantages. HRMagazine, (45). 23–24
  • Lim, E. T. K., Pan, S. L., and Tan, C. W. 2005. Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 135–149. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000531
  • Madsen, S. R. 2006. Work and family conflict: can home-based teleworking make a difference?. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(3), 307–350.
  • Markham, S. E. 1988. Pay-for-performance dilemma revisited: empirical example of the importance of group effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 172–180. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.172
  • Mayo, M., et al. 2009. Why some firms adopt telecommuting while others do not: a contingency perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 917–939. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20322
  • Mazmanian, M. A., Orlikowski, W. J., and Yates, J. 2005. Crackberries: the social implications of ubiquitous wireless e-mail devices. In Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., and DeGross, J. I. (Ed.), Designing ubiquitous information environments: socio-technical issues and challenges, New York: Springer. 337–343
  • McCloskey, D. W., and Igbaria, M. 1998. A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. In Igbaria, M., and Tan, M. (Ed.), The virtual workplace, Hershey: Idea Group Pub.. 338–358
  • Morrison, D., et al. 2005. Job design, opportunities for skill utilization, and intrinsic job satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(1), 59–79. doi: 10.1080/13594320444000272
  • Mortensen, M., Caya, O., and Pinsonneault, A. 2009. Understanding virtual team performance: a synthesis of research on the effects of team design, emergent processes, and emergent states. Research Paper No. 4738-09, Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
  • O'Neill, T. A., et al. 2009. Predicting teleworker success: an exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. New Technology, Work & Employment, 24(2), 144–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2009.00225.x
  • O'Leary, M. B., and Mortensen, M. 2010. Go (Con)figure: subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0434
  • Orlikowski, W., and Barley, S. R. 2001. Technology and institutions: what information systems research and organization studies can learn from each other?. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165. doi: 10.2307/3250927
  • Orlikowski, W., and Scott, S. 2008. Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology. Work, and Organization. AoM Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
  • Paez, A., and Scott, D. M. 2007. Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environment and Planning A, 39(3), 647–665. doi: 10.1068/a37424
  • Pasmore, W. A. 1988. Designing effective organizations: the sociotechnical systems perspective, New York: Wiley.
  • Pearce, J. A. 2009. Successful corporate telecommuting with technology considerations for late adopters. Organizational Dynamics, 38(1), 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.10.002
  • Pearlson, K., and Saunders, C. 2010. Managing and using information systems., 4th ed.. New York, NY: John-Wiley.
  • Pearlson, K. E., and Saunders, C. S. 2001. There's no place like home: managing telecommuting paradoxes. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 117–128. doi: 10.5465/AME.2001.4615008
  • Perez, M. P., Sanchez, A.M.L.C., and Pilar Jimenez, M. J. V. 2004. A technology acceptance model of innovation adoption: the case of Teleworking. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 280–291. doi: 10.1108/14601060410565038
  • Peters, P., and Heusinkveld, S. 2010. Institutional explanations for managers' attitudes towards telehomeworking. Human Relations, 63(1), 107–135. doi: 10.1177/0018726709336025
  • Pinsonneault, A., and Boisvert, M. 2001. The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: a review of the literature. In Johnson, N. J. (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: issues and opportunities, London: Idea Group Publishing. 163–185.
  • Pollster_YouGov_UK 2007. SW2000 Telework studies [online], Available from: http://www.noelhodson.com/index_files/statistics2006to2008.htm#_Toc229386682 [Accessed 8 January 2009]
  • Ramsower, R. M. 1985. Telecommuting: the organizational and behavioral effects of working at home, Michigan: UMI Research Press.
  • Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research. Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.7. 1–37
  • Ryan, S. D., and Harrison, D. A. 2000. Considering social subsystem costs and benefits in information technology investment decisions: a view from the field on anticipated payoffs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 11–40.
  • Sánchez, A. M., et al. 2007. Teleworking and workplace flexibility: a study of impact on firm performance. Personnel Review, 36(1), 42–64. doi: 10.1108/00483480710716713
  • Sánchez, A. M., et al. 2008. Telework adoption, change management, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(1), 7–31. doi: 10.1108/09534810810847011
  • Schweitzer, L., and Duxbury, L. 2006. Benchmarking the use of telework arrangements in Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 23(2), 107–109.
  • Siha, S. M., and Monroe, R. W. 2006. Telecommuting's past and future: a literature review and research agenda. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 455–482. doi: 10.1108/14637150610678078
  • Smith, R. L. J. 2004. Work at home grows in past year by 7.5% in US [online], Available from: www.workingfromanyywhere.org/news/pr090204.htm [Accessed 2 July 2012]
  • Sørensen, C., and Al-Taitoon, A. 2008. Organisational usabilityof mobilecomputing-Volatility and control in mobile foreign exchange trading. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66(12), 916–929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.002
  • Sørensen, C., et al. 2008. Enterprise mobility: lessons from the field. Information Knowledge Systems Management Journal – Special issue on Enterprise Mobility, 7(1 & 2), 243–271.
  • Towers, I., et al. 2006. Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management: Space and Time and Organisation Change, 19(5), 593–618. doi: 10.1108/09534810610686076
  • Trist, E. L., and Bamforth, K. W. 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. doi: 10.1177/001872675100400101
  • Venkatraman, N. 1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 423–444.
  • Vessey, I., and Galletta, D. 1991. Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.1.63
  • Virick, M., DaSilva, N., and Arrington, K. 2010. Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: the role of performance outcome orientation and worker type. Human Relations, 63(1), 137–154. doi: 10.1177/0018726709349198
  • Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., and Brown, J. E. 2008. Families without borders: mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635–652. doi: 10.1177/0038038508091620
  • Ward, N., and Shabha, G. 2001. Teleworking: an assessment of socio-psychological factors. Facilities, 19(1/2), 61–70. doi: 10.1108/02632770110362811
  • Watson-Manheim, M. B., and Bélanger, F. 2002. Support for communication-based work processes in virtual work. e-Services Quarterly, 1(3), 61–82. doi: 10.2979/ESJ.2002.1.3.61
  • Watson-Manheim, M. B., and Bélanger, F., 2007. Communication media repertoires: dealing with the multiplicity of media choices.. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 267–293.
  • Westfall, R. 2004. Does telecommuting really increase productivity?. Communications of the ACM, 47(8), 93–96. doi: 10.1145/1012037.1012042
  • Whittle, A., and Mueller, F. 2009. I could be dead for two weeks and my boss would never know: telework and the politics of representation. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(2), 131–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2009.00224.x
  • Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W., and Bommer, W. 2003. The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 199–219. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00041-1
  • WorldatWork 2009. Telework trendlines 2009 [online], Available from: http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=31295&from=presshome [Accessed 2 July 2012]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.