Must evaluation methods be about usability? Devising and assessing the utility inspection method

References

• Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1998. Contextual design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Blandford, A., et al., 2008. Evaluating system utility and conceptual fit using CASSM. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66 (6), 393–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockton, G. and Woolrych, A. 2001. Understanding inspection methods: Lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. In A. Blandford, and J. Vanderdonckt, eds. People and computers XV: Interaction without frontiers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 171–191.
   Google Scholar
• Cockton, G., et al., 2003. Inspection-based evaluations. The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1118–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlbom, B. and Mathiasen, L. 1993. Computers in context: The Philosophy and Practice of Systems Design. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. 2004. Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (1), 31–46. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2003.822468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, J.S., Jacko, J.A. and Sears, A. 2003. User-based evaluations. The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1093–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra, D.J. 1993. A comparison of heuristic evaluation and usability testing: The efficacy of a domain-specific heuristic checklistUnpublished dissertation (PhD). Texas A&M UniversityTexas.
   Google Scholar
• Eason, K.D. 1984. Towards the experimental study of usability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 3 (2), 133–143. doi: 10.1080/01449298408901744
   Google Scholar
• Federoff, M. 2002. Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of FUN in video gamesUnpublished master. Indiana UniversityIndiana.
   Google Scholar
• Frøkjær, E. and Hornbæk, K. 2008. Metaphors of human thinking for usability inspection and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14 (4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J.D. and Lewis, C. 1985. Design for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28 (3), 300–311. doi: 10.1145/3166.3170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. and Buxton, B. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). The SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2008. New York: ACM Press, 111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. 1992. Utility and usability: Research issues and development contexts. Interacting with Computers, 4 (2), 209–217. doi: 10.1016/0953-5438(92)90005-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. and Markus, M.L. 1997. Organizational issues in development and implementation of interactive systems. Handbook of human–computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1457–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. 2006. User experience – A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (2), 91–97. doi: 10.1080/01449290500330331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjær, E. 2005. Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2005. New York: ACM Press, 391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjær, E. 2008. Making use of business goals in usability evaluation: An experiment with novice evaluators. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2008. New York: ACM Press, 903–912.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC 9126 2001. Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model. Geneva: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Karapanos, E., et al., 2009. User experience over time: An initial framework. Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2009. New York: ACM Press, 729–738.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E.L.C., Hvannberg, E. and Cockton, G. 2008. A green paper on usability maturation. In: E.L.C. Law, E. Hvannberg, and G. Cockton, eds. Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value. . London: Springer, 381–424.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 1982. Using the “thinking-aloud” method in cognitive interface design. Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Research Report RC9265.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G. and Parush, A. 2008. Utility and experience in the evolution of usability. In: E. Law, E. Hvannberg, and G. Cockton, eds. Maturing usability: Quality in software, interaction and value. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 222–240.
   Google Scholar
• Lottridge, D. and Mackay, W.E. 2009. Generative walkthroughs: To support creative redesign. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on creativity and cognition. New York: ACM Press, 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Mankoff, J., et al., 2003. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2003. New York: ACM Press, 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 1994. Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen, and R. Mack, ed. Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley, 25–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nørgaard, M. and Hornbæk, K. 2006. What do usability evaluators do in practice? An explorative study of think-aloud testing. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on designing interactive systems, DIS 2006. New York: ACM Press, 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pinelle, D., Wong, N. and Stach, T. 2008. Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2008. New York: ACM Press, 1453–1462.
   Google Scholar
• Scapin, D. and Batien, C. 1997. Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behavior & Information Technology, 16 (4–5), 220–231. doi: 10.1080/014492997119806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackel, B. and Richardson, S. 1991. Usability – Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Human factors for informatics usability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A., Thew, S. and Jarvis, P. 2011. Experience with user-centred requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 16, 267–280. doi: 10.1007/s00766-011-0118-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., et al., 2010. Identifying drivers and hindrances of social user experience in web services. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2010 .New York: ACM Press, 2499–2502.
   Google Scholar