An empirical investigation linking learners’ adoption of blended learning to their intention of full e-learning

References

• Abbad, M. M., Morris, D. B., and de Nahlik, C. B. 2009. Looking under the bonnet: factors affecting student adoption of E-learning systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Busaidi, K. A. 2009. The impact of learning management system characteristics and user characteristics on the acceptance of e-learning. International Journal of Global Management Studies, 1(2), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Busaidi, K. A., and Al-Shihi, H. 2012. Critical factors influencing instructors’ acceptance and use of learning management systems. In AzevedoA.and BaboR. Ed., Higher education institutions and learning management systems: adoption and standardization, Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 116–140
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., and Seaman, J. 2004. Entering the mainstream: the quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004 [online], Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Available from: http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/entering_mainstream.pdf [Accessed 13 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., and Garrett, R. 2007. Blending in: the extent and promise of blended education in the United States [online], Available from: http://www.blendedteaching.org/system/files/Blending_In.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Ambient Insight Research 2011. The worldwide market for self-paced elearning products and services: 2010–2015 forecast and analysis [online], Available from: http://www.ambientinsight.com/Resources/Documents/Ambient-Insight-2010-2015-Worldwide-eLearning-Market-Executive-Overview.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. 2000. Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction in Internet based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54. doi: 10.1177/105256290002400104
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. 2004. Distance training: how innovative organizations are using technology to maximize learning and meet business objectives. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 117–119. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2004.12436828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Evans, K. 2004. Employee and e-learning: what do the end users think?. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(6/7), 269–274. doi: 10.1108/00197850410563894
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Evans, K. 2006. Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156–163. doi: 10.1108/00197850610659427
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., and Levy, Y. 2008. Emerging educational technology: assessing the factors that influence instructors’ acceptance in information systems and other classrooms. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 431–443.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. doi: 10.2307/3250921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, T., Jenkins, M., and Walker, R. 2006. A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 177–192. doi: 10.1080/10494820600852795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantoni, V., Cellario, M., and Porta, M. 2004. Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 15(5), 333–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.-M. 2011. Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. 1998. The partial least square approach to structural equation modelling. In MarcoulidesG. A Ed., Modern methods for business research, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. 2001. PLS graph user's guide, version 3.0, Houston, TX: Bauer College of Business, University of Houston.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. doi: 10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 1992. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. 2002. Web-based training: creating e-learning experiences, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi, I., McBride, N., and Hardaker, G. 2005. Evaluating the factors affecting DSS usage by senior managers in local authorities in Egypt. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(2), 42–65. doi: 10.4018/jgim.2005040103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, M., and Hurtubis, C. 2009. The multifaceted nature of online MBA student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 304–312. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., and Haase, I. M. 2001. Online business education in the twenty-first century: an analysis of potential target markets. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(3), 246–260. doi: 10.1108/10662240110396432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathi, M., and Wilson, L. 2009. Strategic planning in colleges and universities. The Business Renaissance Quarterly: Enhancing the Quality of Life at Work, 4(1), 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grummon, P. 2009. SCUP trends in higher education. SCUP [online], 6(2), 1–10. Available from: http://www.scup.org/asset/55250/SCUP_TrendsWeb_v6n2.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., Connolly, J., and Feeney, L. 2009. Blended learning: overview and recommendations for successful implementation. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 155–163. doi: 10.1108/00197850910950961
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B. L., and Rudy, J. A. 2007. Educause core data service, Fiscal year 2006 summary report. Educause, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Kamel, S., and Assem, A. 2003. Assessing the introduction of electronic banking in Egypt using the technology acceptance model. In Khosrow-PourM. Ed., Annals of cases on information technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. 296–320.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T., and Bauer, D. 2004. Managing intellectual capital – via e-learning – at Cisco. In HolsappleC. Ed., Handbook on knowledge management 2: knowledge directions, Berlin: Springer. 511–532.
   Google Scholar
• Kerres, M., and De Witt, C. 2003. A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 38(2–3), 101–113. doi: 10.1080/1358165032000165653
   Google Scholar
• King, W. R., and He, J. 2006. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, R., and Festervand, T. A. 2005. An update on the high-tech MBA. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 240–244. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.80.4.240-244
   Google Scholar
• Laudon, K., and Laudon, J. 2003. Essentials of management information systems, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R. 1985. Microcomputers in education: motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V. 2003. Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., and Cheung, C. 2011. Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 91–99. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.490956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K.-M., Chen, N.-S., and Fang, K. 2011. Understanding E-learning continuance intention: a negative critical incidents perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/01449291003752948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouakket, S. 2010. The motivations for citizens’ adoption of e-government: an empirical study in the UAE. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 6(2), 240–264. doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2010.034356
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K., Quality management training to go, ASQ's annual quality congress proceedings. Kansas City, MO, May19–212003, 2003, 501–504. 57
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., and Hawkins, B. L. 2005. The myth about E-learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(4), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and Trigwell, K. 2005. Can blended learning be redeemed?. E-learning, 2(1), 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K. 2009. ‘I've stuck to the path I'm afraid’: exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00860.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, M., and Maier, B. 2010. Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–297. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. 2000. A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275. doi: 10.1023/A:1008191211004
   Google Scholar
• Pituch, K., and Lee, Y. 2006. The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaij, E., and Schepers, J. 2008. The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainer, R. K., Turban, E., and Potter, R. E. 2007. Introduction to information systems: Supporting and transforming business, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roca, J., Chiu, C., and Martinez, F. 2006. Understanding e-learning continuous intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G., and Straub, D. 1998. Predicting IT use: applying TAM to the Arab world. Journal of Global Information Management, 6(3), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Schillewaert, N. 2005. The adoption of information technology in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management. et al., 34(4), 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396–413. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, M., and Hostetler, D. 1999. Factors influencing the adoption of technology in teaching. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(1), 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., et al. 2006. Intentions to use information technologies: an integrative model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(3), 25–47. doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2006070102
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., Fang, Y., and Neufeld, H. 2007. The role of information technology in technology-mediated learning: a review of the past for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(2), 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, R., Griggs, K., and Downing, T. 2002. A framework for e-learning as a tool for knowledge management. Industrial Management and Data System, 102(7), 371–380. doi: 10.1108/02635570210439463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank 2003. Technical Cooperation Program Brief on GCC, Available from http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/countries/menaext/bahrainextn/0,,menupk:312668pagepk:141132pipk:141107thesitepk:312658,00.html [Accessed 1 April 2005].
   Google Scholar