Maintaining intimacy at a distance: an exploration of human–computer interaction's approach to mediating intimacy

References

• Alsheikh, T., Rode, J.A., and Lindley, S.E. 2011. (Whose) value-sensitive design? A study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. In: Proceedings of CHI, Hangzhou, China. New York: ACM Press, 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J. 2009. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In: Proceedings of CHI, Boston, MA. New York: ACM Press, 2357–2366.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. 2004. Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11 (1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. and DeGooyer, D.Jr. 2001. Perceived aesthetic characteristics of interpersonal conversations. Southern Communication Journal, 67 (1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10417940109373215
   Google Scholar
• Boehner, K., et al. 2007a. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (4), 275–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehner, K., et al. 2007b. How HCI interprets the probes. In: Proceedings of CHI, San Jose, CA. New York: ACM Press, 1077–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, S.D. 1994. Dispelling doubt and uncertainty: trust in romantic relationships. In: S. Duck, ed. Dynamics of relationships. Understanding relationship processes series (4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, M. 2004. Transnational television, cultural identity and change: when STAR came to India. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, M. 2009. The strategic use of transnational relationships in demarcating identity and managing difference. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35 (8), 1353–1371. doi: 10.1080/13691830903123153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S., West, L., and Acitelli, L.K. 1997. Sewing the field: the tapestry of relationships in life and research. In: S. Duck, ed. Handbook of personal relationships. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaes, K., et al. 2007. Designing technologies for presence-in-absence: illustrating the cube and the picture frame. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (5), 403–408. doi: 10.1007/s00779-006-0072-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M.R., et al. 2005. SynchroMate: a phatic technology for mediating intimacy. In: Proceedings of DUX: Conference of designing for user experience, San Francisco, CA. New York: American Institute of Graphic Arts, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M.R., et al. 2006. ‘Was it good for you darling?’ Intimacy, sex and critical technical practice. In: Proceedings of sexual interactions workshop, CHI, Montreal, Canada. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. and Baxter, L.A. 1996. Constituting relationships in talk: a taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23 (1), 87–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinter, R. and Eldridge, M. 2003. Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging. In: Proceedings of CHI, New Orleans, LA. New York: ACM Press, 441–448.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., et al., eds. 2008. Being human: human-computer interaction in the year 2020. Cambridge: Microsoft Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, J.J. and Goulding, L. 2004. Intimate objects. In: Proceedings of DIS, Cambridge, MA. New York: ACM Press, 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. and Forlizzi, J. 2007. Slow messaging: intimate communication for couples living at a distance. In: Proceedings of DPPI, Helsinki, Finland. New York: ACM Press, 451–454.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J.-P., et al. 2004. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: current status and future directions. In: D.J. Mashek and A. Aron, eds. Handbook of closeness and intimacy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C.A., Poole, E.S., and Wyche, S.P. 2009. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In: Proceedings of CHI, Boston, MA. New York: ACM Press, 1141–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S. and Denzin, N.K., eds. 2003. Turning points in qualitative research. Tying knots in a handkerchief. Oxford: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mantovani, G. 2002. Internet haze: why new artefacts can enhance situation ambiguity. Culture & Psychology 8 (3), 307–326. doi: 10.1177/1354067X0283003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, G.T. 2001. Technology and social control: the search for the illusive silver bullet. In: N.J. Smelser and P.B. Balte, eds. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 15506–15512.
   Google Scholar
• Meares, R. 2000. Intimacy and alienation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montagu, A. 1971. Touching: the human significance of the skin. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, S. and Mueller, F.F. 2006. Holding hands over a distance: technology probes in an intimate, mobile context. In: Proceedings of OZHCI, Sydney, Australia. New York: ACM Press, 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Pacey, A. 1990. Technology in world civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pacey, A. 1999. Meaning in technology. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman, D. and Duck, S., eds. 1987. Intimate relationships: development dynamics, and deterioration. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K.J. and Roberts, L.J. 2004. Deep intimate connection: self and intimacy in couple relationships. In: D.J. Mashek and A. Aron, eds. Handbook of closeness and intimacy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Satchell, C. 2008. Cultural theory and real world design – dystopian and utopian outcomes. In: Proceedings of CHI, Florence, Italy. New York: ACM Press, 1593–1602.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, K.N., et al. 2004. Devices for sharing thoughts and affection at a distance. In: Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria. New York: ACM Press, 1203–1206.
   Google Scholar
• Vetere, F., et al. 2005. Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In: Proceedings of CHI, Portland, OR. New York: ACM Press, 471–480.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. 2004. Incorporating social shaping into technology planning for 3G/UMTS. In: Proceedings of fifth IEEE international conference on mobile communication technologies, London. New York: IEEE Publications, 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, R. 2006. ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6 (2), 125–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, R. 2007. Transnational ethnographies and anthropological imaginings of migrancy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33 (2), 331–348. doi: 10.1080/13691830601154310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar