937
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Usability: Design and Assessment

The influence of the search complexity and the familiarity with the website on the subjective appraisal of aesthetics, mental effort and usability

, &
Pages 117-132 | Received 27 Apr 2011, Accepted 23 Jun 2013, Published online: 25 Aug 2013

References

  • Berlyne, D.E., 1971. Novelty and attention: controls for retinal adaptation and for stimulus-response specificity. Psychonomic Science, 25 (6), 349–351. doi: 10.3758/BF03335902
  • Bevan, N., 2009. What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods? UXEM’09 Workshop, INTERACT 2009, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Bhatt, G., 2004. Bringing virtual reality for commercial Web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60 (1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.07.002
  • Birkthoff, G.D., 1933. Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Byers, J.C., Bittner, A.C.Jr., and Hill, S.G., 1989. Traditional and raw Task Load Index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary? Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety, I, 481–485.
  • Carte, T.A. and Russell, C.J., 2003. In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 479–501.
  • Cegarra, J. and Chevalier, A., 2008. The use of Tholos software for combining measures of mental workload: toward theoretical and methodological improvements. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (4), 988–1000. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.988
  • Chevalier, A. and Kicka, M., 2006. Web designers and web users: influence of the ergonomic quality of the web site on the information search. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (10), 1031–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.002
  • Chevalier, A., Dommes, A., and Martins, D., 2013. The effects of ageing and website ergonomic quality on Internet information searching. Ageing & Society, 33, 1009–1035. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X12000323
  • Cyr, D., Head, M., and Larios, H., 2010. Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: a multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68 (1–2), 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.005
  • Dillon, A., 2001. Beyond usability: process, outcome and affect in human computer interactions. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 26 (4), 57–69.
  • Dinet, J., Chevalier, A., and Tricot, A., 2012. Information search activity: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62 (2), 49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2012.03.004
  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E., 1972. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 (3), 285–290. doi: 10.1037/h0033731
  • Dommes, A., Chevalier, A., and Lia, S., 2011. The role of cognitive flexibility and vocabulary abilities of younger and older users in searching for information on the Web. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 717–726. doi: 10.1002/acp.1743
  • Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., and Gurrea, R. 2006. The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002
  • Guthrie, J.T., 1988. Locating information in documents: examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23 (2), 178–199. doi: 10.2307/747801
  • Halford, G.S., 1993. Children's understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hamermesh, D. and Parker, A.M., 2005. Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24, 369–376. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
  • Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E., 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, eds. Human mental workload. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 139–184.
  • Hassenzahl, M., 2004. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human–Computer Interaction, 19 (4), 319–349. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
  • Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N., 2006. User experience – a research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology, 25 (2), 91–97. doi: 10.1080/01449290500330331
  • Hassenzahl, M. and Ullrich, D., 2007. To do or not to do: differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers, 19 (4), 429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.05.001
  • Helander, M.G., 2003. Forget about ergonomics in chair design? Focus on aesthetics and comfort! Ergonomics, 46 (13–14), 1306–1319. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610847
  • ISO FDIS 9241-210, 2009. Ergonomics of human system interaction Ergonomics of human system interaction – Part 210: human-centered design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
  • Jacko, J.A., Sears, A., and Sorensen, S.J., 2001. Framework for usability: healthcare professionals and the Internet. Ergonomics, 44 (11), 989–1007. doi: 10.1080/00140130110069202
  • Kiger, J., 1984. The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20 (2), 201–213. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80018-8
  • Kirakowski, J., Claridge, N., and Whitehand, R., 1998. Human centered measures of success in web site design. Proceedings of the human factors and the web workshop, Basking Ridge.
  • Kuhlthau, C.C., 1993. Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Kurosu, M. and Kashimura, K., 1995. Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Conference companion on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM Press, 292–293.
  • Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N., 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 60 (3), 269–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
  • Lazonder, A.W. and Rouet, J.-F., 2008. Information problem solving instruction: some cognitive and metacognitive. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 753–765. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.025
  • Lee, S. and Koubek, R.J., 2010. Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use. Interacting with Computers, 22 (6), 530–543. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.002
  • Li, P., 2008. Doctoral students’ mental models of a web search engine: an exploratory study. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (10-A), 4122.
  • Lindgaard, G. and Dudek, C., 2003. What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15 (3), 429–452. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00063-2
  • Lindgaard, G., et al., 2006. Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (2), 115–126. doi: 10.1080/01449290500330448
  • Ling, J. and van Schaik, P., 2006. The influence of font type and line length on visual search and information retrieval in web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (5), 395–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.08.015
  • Liu, Y., 2003. Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: theoretical foundations and a dual-process methodology. Ergonomics, 46 (13–14), 1273–1292. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610829
  • Marchionini, G., 1995. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
  • Marsico de, M. and Levialdi, S., 2004. Evaluating web sites: exploiting user's expectations. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 60 (3), 381–416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.10.008
  • Moraga, C., et al., 2009. Modeling the intrinsic quality of web portal data. Online Information Review. Available from: http://qaoose.iro.umontreal.ca/camera-ready/web_portal_quality.pdf [Accessed November 2012].
  • Moshagen, M. and Thielsch, M.T., 2010. Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68 (10), 689–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
  • Nielsen, J. and Del Galdo, E.M., 1996. International user interfaces. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Norman, D.A., 2004. Beauty, goodness, and usability. Human–Computer Interaction, 19 (4), 311–318. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1904_1
  • Otter, M. and Johnson, H., 2000. Lost in hyperspace: metrics and mental models. Interacting with Computers, 13 (1), 1–40. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00030-8
  • Paas, F. and van Merriënboer, J.J.G., 1994. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6 (4), 51–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02213420
  • Paas, F., et al., 2003. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 63–71. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
  • Paciorek, A., Chevalier, A., and Léger, L., 2012. The impact of aesthetic level of websites on usability satisfaction and aesthetic perception after navigating. Unpublished document of the Paris-Nanterre University.
  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., and Winkielman, P., 2004. Processing fluency and esthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  • Robins, D. and Holmes, J., 2008. Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44 (1), 386–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
  • Rouet, J.F. and Tricot, A., 1996. Task and activity models in hypertext usage. In: H. Van Oostendorp and S. de Mul, eds. Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood: Ablex, 239–264.
  • Sharit, J., et al., 2008. Investigating the roles of knowledge and cognitive abilities in older adult information seeking on the Web. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 15 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1145/1352782.1352785
  • Schenkman, B.N. and Jönsson, F.U., 2000. Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19 (5), 367–377. doi: 10.1080/014492900750000063
  • Sonderegger, A. and Saeur, J., 2010. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effect on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41 (3), 403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002
  • Strong, D., Lee, Y., and Wang, R., 1997. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40 (5), 103–110. doi: 10.1145/253769.253804
  • Sweller, J., 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 (2), 257–285. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  • Sweller, J., 1999. Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne: ACER Press.
  • Symons, S. and Pressley, M., 1993. Prior knowledge affects text search success and extraction of information. Reading Research Quarterly, 28 (3), 251–259. doi: 10.2307/747997
  • Thielsch, M.T. and Hirschfeld, G., 2012. Spatial frequencies in aesthetic website evaluations – explaining how ultra-rapid evaluations are formed. Ergonomics, 55 (7), 731–742. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.665496
  • Thüring, M. and Mahlke, S., 2007. Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42 (4), 253–264. doi: 10.1080/00207590701396674
  • Tractinsky, N., 1997. Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. CHI 97 conference proceedings. New York: ACM Press, 115–122.
  • Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., and Ikar, D., 2000. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13 (2), 127–145. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
  • Tractinsky, N., et al., 2006. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64 (11), 1071–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009
  • Tuch, A.N., Bargas-Avila, J.A., and Opwis, K., 2010. Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: it's a man's business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6), 1831–1837. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.016
  • Van Schaik, P. and Ling, J., 2009. The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 67 (1), 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.012
  • Veldof, J. and Beavers, K., 2001. Tackling mental models for the online library tutorial. Research Strategies, 18 (1), 3–20. doi: 10.1016/S0734-3310(01)00064-7
  • Wickens, C.D., 2001. Workload and situation awareness. In: P.A. Hancock and P.A. Desmond, eds. Stress, workload and fatigue: theory, research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 443–450.
  • Zajonc, R.B., 1968. The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (2), 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848
  • Zhang, Y., 2008. The influence of mental models on undergraduate students’ searching behavior on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 44 (3), 1330–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.002

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.