Are mobile phone conversations always so annoying? The ‘need-to-listen’ effect re-visited

REFERENCES

• Bar-Anan, Y., Wilson, T.D., and Gilbert, D.T., 2009. The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions. Emotion, 9 (1), 123–127. doi: 10.1037/a0014607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, J.F., 1968. The effects of negro and white dialectal variations upon attitudes of college students. Speech Monographs, 35 (2), 181–186. doi: 10.1080/03637756809375580
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S.W., 2007. A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony. New Media & Society, 9 (2), 343–363. doi: 10.1177/1461444807075016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile, A.C. and Bradac, J.J., 2001. 10 Attitudes toward language: a review of speaker-evaluation research and a general process model. In: W.B. Gudykunst, ed. Communication Yearbook 25. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 347–382.
   Google Scholar
• Dijst, M., 2009. ICT and social networks: towards a situational perspective on the interaction between corporeal and connected presence. In: R. Kitamura, T. Yoshii, and Y. Toshiyuki, eds. The expanding sphere of travel behavior research. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 45–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dogterom, N., 2011. ICT use in evolving and floating atmospheres: attitudes to ICT use in various public spaces in the Netherlands. Thesis (MRes). Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Emberson, L.L., Lupyan, G., Goldstein, M.H., and Spivey, M.J., 2010. Overheard cell-phone conversations: when less speech is more distracting. Psychological Science, 21, 1383– 1388. doi: 10.1177/0956797610382126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forma, J. and Kaplowitz, S.A., 2012. The perceived rudeness of public cell phone behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31 (10), 947–952. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.520335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., 2005. Mobile telephone and the presentation of self. In: R. Ling and P. Pederson, eds. Mobile communications: re-negotiation of the social sphere. London: Springer, 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, N., 2012. Your life is fully mobile [online]. Time, USA. Available from: http://techland.time.com/2012/08/16/your-life-is-fully-mobile/ [Accessed 5 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P.A., Lesch, M., and Simmons, L., 2003. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35 (4), 501–514. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00028-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L.A., 1989. The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations and intensifiers: powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15 (3), 383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intel PR, 2011. New intel survey finds ‘mobile etiquette’ mishaps are running rampant [online]. Intel, USA. Available from: http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/02/24/new-intel-survey-finds-mobile-etiquette-mishaps-are-running-rampant [Accessed 5 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union, 2013. The world in 2013: facts and figures [online]. Available from: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2013.pdf [Accessed 5 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, D., 2012. Emirates Airlines allows in-flight cell phone chatting [online]. CNET, USA. Available from: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57528381-93/emirates-airlines-allows-in-flight-cell-phone-chatting/ [Accessed 5 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, A., Landstrom, U., Tesarz, M., Soderberg, L., and Akerlund, E., 1996. The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16 (2), 123–136. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsaker, A. and Drakatos, N., 2009. Mobile advertising: the influence of emotional attachment to mobile devices on consumer receptiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15 (4), 267–280. doi: 10.1080/13527260802479664
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., 2004. The mobile connection: the cell phone's impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Mayerowitz, S., 2012. Virgin Atlantic to allow cellphone calls during flights [online]. Huffington Post, USA. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/15/virgin-atlantic-cellphone-calls-during-flights_n_1519611.html [Accessed 15 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Monk, A.F., et al., 2004a. Why are mobile phones annoying? Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (1), 33–42. doi: 10.1080/01449290310001638496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, A.F., Fellas, E., and Ley, E., 2004b. Hearing only one side of normal and mobile phone conversations. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (5), 301–305. Intensity and the decibel scale [online]. Available from: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/sound/u11l2b.cfm [Accessed 3 May 2012]. doi: 10.1080/01449290410001712744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, A., 2001. Intimacy among strangers: on mobile telephone calls in public places. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2 (3), 309–316.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R.L., 1991. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, K., 2012. London set for mobile coverage on underground trains [online]. The Telegraph, UK. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/9323121/London-set-for-mobile-coverage-on-Underground-trains.html [Accessed 5 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Street, R.L., Brady, R.M., and Putman, W.B., 1983. The influence of speech rate stereotypes and rate similarity or listeners’ evaluations of speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2 (1), 37–56. doi: 10.1177/0261927X8300200103
   Google Scholar
• Ward, N., Rivera, A.G., and Vega, A., 2008. Do bystanders and dialog participants differ in preferences for telecommunications channels? 21st international symposium of human factors in telecommunication, 20–27 March 2008, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Available from: http://www.cs.utep.edu/nigel/abstracts/hft.html [Accessed 20 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R. and Leung, L., 1999. Blurring public and private behaviors in public space: policy challenges in the use and improper use of the cell phone. Telematics and Informatics, 16 (1–2), 11–26. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(99)00016-7
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N.D., 1982. Community noise problems: evidence against adaptation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2 (2), 87–97. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(82)80041-8
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T.D. and Gilbert, D.T., 2008. Explaining away: a model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (5), 370–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar