The influence of national culture on the performance expectancy of e-parliament adoption

References

• Abou-Shouk, M., W. M. Lim, and P. Megicks. 2013. “Internet Adoption by Travel Agents: A Case of Egypt.” International Journal of Tourism Research 15 (3): 298–312. doi: 10.1002/jtr.1876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Shanab, E. A., and A. N. Abu-Baker. 2014. “Using and Buying Mobile Phones in Jordan: Implications for Future Research and the Development of New Methodology.” Technology in Society 38: 103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Agwu, E., and A. Carter. 2014. “Mobile Phone Banking in Nigeria: Benefits, Problems and Prospects.” International Journal of Business & Commerce 3 (6): 50–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., M. Tarmidi, I. Ridzwan, M. Hamid, and R. Roni. 2014. “The Application of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) for Predicting the Usage of E-Zakat Online System.” International Journal of Social Science Research, IJSR 3 (4): 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Adawi, Z., S. Yousafzai, and J. Pallister. 2005. “Conceptual Model of Citizen Adoption of E-Government.” The second international conference on innovations in information technology (IIT'05), 1–10. Dubai, September 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Alatawi, F., Y. Dwevedi, M. Williams, and N. Rana. 2012. “Conceptual Model for Examining Knowledge Management System (KMs) Adoption in Public Sector Organizations in Saudi Arabia.” tGov Workshop 12 (tGOV12), May 8–9, Brunel University, London.
   Google Scholar
• AlAwadhi, S., and A. Morris. 2008. “The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-government Services in Kuwait.” Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, 219. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2000. Standard: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: AAPOR.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, K., and H. Henriksen. 2006. “E-government Maturity Models: Extension of the Layne and Lee Model.” Government Information Quarterly 23 (2): 236–248. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. 2007. “The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4): 244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekhuyzen, J., L. Von Hellens, and M. Siedle. 2005. “Cultural Barriers in the Adoption of Emerging Technologies.” Proceedings of HCI international, 11th international conference on human-computer interaction, New York. Accessed November 23, 2011. http://www.ucd.smartinternet.com.au/Documents/Cultural_Barriers/http://www.ucd.smartinternet.com.au/Documents/Cultural_Barriers/
   Google Scholar
• Benson, A. 2011. “Hospital Information Systems in Nigeria: A Review of Literature.” The Journal of Global Health Care Systems 1 (3): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Binsbergen, W. 2004. Can ICT Belong in Africa, or is it Owned by the North Atlantic Region? Edited by W. M. J. van Binsbergen, R. A. van Dijk, and J. B. Gewald, 107–146. Accessed October 2, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/9621
   Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T. 2008. Coming of Age in “Second Life”: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. 2002. “Technology and the Customer Interface: What Consumers Want in the Physical and Virtual Store?” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 30 (4): 411–432. doi: 10.1177/009207002236914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, C., P. Lucas, and D. Gordon. 2009. “Technology Adoption in Developing Country Contexts: Testing Water for Microbial Contamination.” Aquatest Working Paper, 03, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multi Method Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 56 (2): 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G., C. Cunha, and S. Nascimento. 2004. “Ministers of Parliament and Information and Communication Technologies as a Means of Horizontal and Vertical Communication in Western Europe.” Information Polity 9 (1&2): 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Choudrie, J., E. Umeoji, and C. Forson. 2012. Diffusion of E-government in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study of Culture and Gender. UH Business School Working Papers, University of Hertfordshire, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 1990. “International Marketing and National Character: A Review and Proposal for an Integrative Theory Cited in Nakata, C. and Sivakumar, K. 1996.” Journal of Marketing, 60 (1): 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. Aiken. 2002. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2004. “Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet: Two Case Studies of Online Consultations.” Information, Communication and Society 7 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/1369118042000208870
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2006. “Parliamentary Communication in an Age of Digital Interactivity.” Aslib Proceedings 58 (5): 371–388. doi: 10.1108/00012530610692339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinople, A. 1973. “Masculinity-Femininity: An Exception to a Famous Dictum.” Psychological Bulletin 80 (5): 389–407. doi: 10.1037/h0035334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., and J. Algina. 1986. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F., and V. Venkatesh. 1996. “A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 45 (1): 19–45. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickhäuser, O., M-A. Reinhard, and C. Englert. 2011. “How Task Experience Influences Students’ Performance Expectancies: The Role of Certainty.” Psychological Reports 109 (2): 380–388. doi: 10.2466/07.11.20.PR0.109.5.380-388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. 1978. “Sex Differences in Influenceability.” Psychological Bulletin 85 (1): 86–116. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, G. 1975. The Manager and his Values: An International Perspective from the United States, Japan, Korea, India, and Australia. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A. 1987. “Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Educational Researcher 16: 16–21. doi: 10.3102/0013189X016007016
   Google Scholar
• Golding, P. 2000. “Forthcoming Features: Information and Communications Technologies and the Sociology of the Future.” Sociology 34 (1): 165–184. doi: 10.1017/S0038038500000110
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. T., and E. Langeard. 1975. “A Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Habits and Innovator Characteristics.” Journal of Marketing 39: 34–41. doi: 10.2307/1250899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffeth, R., P. Hom, A. DeNishi, and W. Kirchner. 1980. “A Multivariate Multinational Comparison of Managerial Attitudes.” In Academy of Management Proceedings, edited by R. Huseman, 63–67. New York: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, B., S. Dasgupta, and A. Gupta. 2008. “Adoption of ICT in a Government Organization in a Developing Country: An Empirical Study.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (2): 140–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., T. Kang, S. Salter, and Y. K. Yoo. 2010. “A Cross-country Study on the Effects of National Culture on Earnings Management.” Journal of International Business Studies 41 (1): 123–141. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2008.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1994. “Management Scientists are Human.” Management Science 40 (1): 4–13. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., and M. Bond. 1988. “The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth.” Organizational Dynamics 16 (4): 5–21. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igari, N. 2014. “How to Successfully Promote ICT Usage: A Comparative Analysis of Denmark and Japan.” Telematics and Informatics 31 (1): 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M. 1993. “User Acceptance of Microcomputer Technology: An Empirical Test.” Omega 21 (1): 73–90. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(93)90040-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, I., S. Hong, and M. S. Kang. 2011. “An International Comparison of Technology Adoption: Testing the UTAUT Model.” Information & Management 48 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkeles, A., and D. Levinson. 1969. “National Character: The Study of Modal Personality and Sociocultural Systems.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, 418–506. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., J. R. Evaristo, and M. Srite. 2005. “Levels of Culture and Individual Behavior: An Investigative Perspective.” Journal of Global Information Management 13 (2): 1–20. doi: 10.4018/jgim.2005040101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancy, D. 1993. Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to the Major Traditions, 12–14. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2006. “Paradigm Proliferation as a Good Thing to Think With: Teaching Research in Education as a Wild Profusion.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19 (1): 35–57. doi: 10.1080/09518390500450144
   Google Scholar
• Lean, O. K., S. Zailani, T. Ramayah, and Y. Fernando. 2009. “Factors Influencing Intention to Use E-government Services among Citizens in Malaysia.” International Journal of Information Management 29 (6): 458–475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legris, P., J. Ingham, and P. Collerette. 2003. “Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 40 (3): 191–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., M. Gonzalez, and J. Kaufman. 2012. “Social Selection and Peer Influence in an Online Social Network.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109 (1): 68–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109739109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and R. Kishore. 2006. “How Robust is the UTAUT Instrument? A Multigroup Invariance Analysis in the Context of Acceptance and use of Online Community Weblog Systems.” Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: Achievements, challenges & the future, 183–189. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., C. Kuo, and M. Russell. 1999. “The Impact of Perceived Channel Utilities, Shopping Orientations, and Demographics on the Consumer's Online Buying Behaviour.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5 (2): 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Madonna, S., Jr., A. Wesley, and H. Anderson. 1989. “Situational and Dispositional Social Cues That Define the Machiavellian Orientation.” The Journal of Social Psychology 129 (1): 79–83. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1989.9711701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, E., and P. Palvia. 2001. “Information Technology Acceptance – How Much Do We Know?” Paper presented to Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA. Accessed October 3, 2012. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2001/335/
   Google Scholar
• Marchewka, J., C. Liu, and K. Kostiwa. 2007. “An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software.” Communications of the IIMA 7 (2): 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. 1991. “Predicting User Intention: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Information Systems Research 2 (3): 173–191. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.3.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbeki, T. 1999. Speech at the Annual National Conference of the Black Management Forum, Kempton Park, November 20. http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/1999/mbekizzo.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. 2014. “Transformative ICT Developments Border Conflicts and Qualitative Method.”, Prepared for delivery at the 2014 Western Political Science Association Meeting, Seattle, Washington, 18 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G., and I. Benbasat. 1991. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation.”  Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144–176.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, C., and K. Sivakumar. 1996. “National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review.” Journal of Marketing 60 (1): 61–72. doi: 10.2307/1251888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, G. 1999. A Review of Sample Attrition and Representativeness in Three Longitudinal Surveys. Government Statistical Service Methodology Series No. 13. London: Office of National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K. L., and S. D. Nollen. 1996. “Culture and Congruence: The Fit Between Management Practices and National Culture.” Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4): 753–779. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nistor, N., B. Baltes, M. Dascălu, D. Mihăilă, G. Smeaton, and Ş. Trăuşan-Matu. 2014. “Participation in Virtual Academic Communities of Practice Under the Influence of Technology Acceptance and Community Factors. A Learning Analytics Application.” Computers in Human Behavior 34: 339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. 2007. “Four Models of Political Representation: British MPs and the Use of ICT.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 13 (3): 354–369. doi: 10.1080/13572330701500771
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., and I. Bernstein, eds. 1994. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oshlyansky, L., P. Cairns, and H. Thimbleby. 2007. “Validating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Tool Cross-culturally.” BCS HCI 2, 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Pelosi, N. 2009. “Speaker of the US House of Representatives.” Opening Speech, World E-parliament Conference 2009, Washington, DC. Accessed October 1, 2012. http://www.ictparliament.org/
   Google Scholar
• Qu, W. G., Z. Yang, and Z. Wang. 2011. “Multi-level Framework of Open Source Software Adoption.” Journal of Business Research 64 (9): 997–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, B., and A. R. Ventakachalam. 1996. “Role of National Culture in the Transfer of Information Technology.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 5 (1): 19–35. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(96)80021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srite, M., and E. Karahanna. 2006. “The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance.” MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steers, R. M., A. D. Meyer, and C. J. Sanchez-Runde. 2008. “National Culture and the Adoption of New Technologies.” Journal of World Business 43 (3): 255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toure, K., T. Tchombé, and T. Karsenti, eds. 2008. ICT and Changing Mindsets in Education. Oxford: African Books Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, D. K., K.-h. Lee, I. Vertinsky, and D. A. Wehrung. 1988. “Does Culture Matter? A Cross-cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 52: 81–95. doi: 10.2307/1251635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2012. E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Uzoka, F. M. E. 2008. “Organisational Influences on E-commerce Adoption in a Developing Country Context using UTAUT.” International Journal of Business Information Systems 3 (3): 300–316. doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2008.017287
   Google Scholar
• Vance, A., C. Elie-Dit-Cosaque, and D. W. Straub. 2008. “Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture.” Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (4): 73–100. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., T. Sykes, and X. Zhang. 2011. “‘Just What the Doctor Ordered’: A Revised UTAUT for EMR System Adoption and Use by Doctors.” 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, USA, 1–10. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., J. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.-C., and H.-S. Doong. 2010. “Does Government Effort or Citizen Word-of-Mouth Determine E-government Service Diffusion?” Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (4): 415–422. doi: 10.1080/01449291003639897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., and S. Zaheer. 2010. “Building a Process Model of Local Adaptation of Practices: A Study of Six Sigma Implementation in Korean and US Firms.” Journal of International Business Studies 41 (3): 475–499. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2009.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., Y. Lu, and B. Wang. 2010. “Integrating TTF and UTAUT to Explain Mobile Banking User Adoption.” Computers in Human Behaviour 26 (4): 760–767. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar