Does computing anger have social elements? A comparison with driving anger

References

• Berkowitz, L. and Harmon-Jones, E., 2004. Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4 (2), 107–130. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod, C., 1984. Technostress. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J.P., 2002. A factor-analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement. British Journal of Psychology, 93 (3), 329–344. doi: 10.1348/000712602760146242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, J.P., 2005. Measuring perceptual and motivational facets of computer control: the development and validation of the computing control scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 21 (5), 791–815. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, J.P., 2006. How human is your computer? Measuring ethopoeic perceptions of computers. In: K. Morgan, C.A. Brebbia, and J.M. Spector, eds. The internet society II: advances in education, commerce and governance. Southampton: WIT Press, 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J.P., 2009. The determinants and expression of computer-related anger. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (6), 1213–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, J.P. and Birkett, P.E., 1995. The development and validation of the computer apathy and anxiety scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13 (1), 41–59. doi: 10.2190/5UPE-80NP-W9WN-BE6W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, J.L., Oetting, E.R., and Lynch, R.S., 1994. Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological Reports, 74 (1), 83–91. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridlund, A.J., 1994. Human facial expression: an evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N.H., 1993. The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7 (3–4), 357–387. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N.H. and Zeelenberg, M., 2001. Appraisal: what is the dependent? In: K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• Galovski, T.E., Malta, L.S., and Blanchard, E.B., 2006. Road rage: assessment and treatment of the angry, aggressive driver. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hudiburg, R.A., 1995. Psychology of computer use XXXIV: the computer hassles scale: subscales, norms and reliability. Psychological Reports, 77 (3), 779–782. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.D., Marakas, G.M., and Palmer, J.W., 2006. Differential social attributions toward computing technology: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64 (5), 446–460. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappas, A., 1996. The sociality of appraisals: impact of social situations on the evaluation of emotion antecedent events and physiological and expressive reactions. In: N. Frijda, ed. Proceedings of the IXth conference of the international society for research on emotions. Storrs, CT: ISRE Publications, 116–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kappas, A., 2001. A metaphor is a metaphor is a metaphor: exorcising the homunculus from appraisal theory. In: K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kappas, A., 2006. Appraisals are direct, immediate, intuitive, and unwitting … and some are reflective … . Cognition and Emotion, 20 (7), 952–975. doi: 10.1080/02699930600616080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H.H., 1967. Attribution theory in social psychology. In: D.L. Vine, ed. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 192–238.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J., Moon, Y., and Picard, R.W., 2002. This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers, 14 (2), 119–140. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens, P., et al., 2003. The appraisal basis of anger: specificity, necessity, and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3 (3), 254–269. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., and Rijmen, F., 2008. Toward disentangling sources of individual differences in appraisal and anger. Journal of Personality, 76 (4), 969–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00511.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajunen, T., Parker, D., and Stradling, S.G., 1998. Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 1 (2), 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, R. and Nutter, A., 2002. A comparison of reported levels and expression of anger in everyday and driving situations. British Journal of Psychology, 93 (3), 407–423. doi: 10.1348/000712602760146521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luczak, H., Roetting, M., and Schmidt, L., 2003. Let's talk: anthropomorphization as a means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices. Ergonomics, 46 (13–14), 1361–1374. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marakas, G.M., Johnson, R.D., and Palmer, J.W., 2000. A theoretical model of differential social attributions toward computing technology: when the metaphor becomes the model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 52 (4), 719–750. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C. and Moon, Y., 2000. Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 81–103. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B., 2001a. Anger on and off the road. British Journal of Psychology, 92 (3), 507–526. doi: 10.1348/000712601162310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B., 2001b. Putting appraisal in context. In: K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, 173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B. and Nass, C., 1996. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I.J. and Smith, C.A., 2001. Appraisal theory: overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In: K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I.J., Antoniou, A.A., and Jose, P.E., 1996. Appraisal determinants of emotions: constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10 (3), 241–277. doi: 10.1080/026999396380240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R., 1976. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K.R., 2001. Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In: K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone, eds. Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. New York: Oxford University Press, 92–120.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.A. and Kirby, L.D., 2004. Appraisal as a pervasive determinant of anger. Emotion, 4 (2), 133–138. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C.A. and Lazarus, R.S., 1990. Emotion and adaptation. In: L.A. Pervin, ed. Handbook of personality theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, 609–637.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.A. and Lazarus, R.S., 1993. Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7 (3–4), 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S., 1984. The second self. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, J-Y., 2004. Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 61 (3), 319–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., et al., 1999. Anger while driving. Transportation Research Part F, 2 (1), 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, P., 1999. The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., et al., 2010. Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (3), 410–435. doi: 10.1037/a0020240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilfong, J.D., 2006. Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (6), 1001–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar