Interactive data visualisation for accounting information: a three-fit perspective

References

• Ajayi, O. T. 2014. “Interactive Data Visualization in Accounting Contexts: Impact on User and Decision Outcomes.” The University of Central Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, V., J. C. Bedard, J. R. Phillips, and S. G. Sutton. 2012. “The Impact of Tagging Qualitative Financial The Impact of Tagging Qualitative Financial Information on Investor Decision Making: Implications for XBRL.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13: 2–20. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2011.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., and R. W. Zmud. 2003. “The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communcating the Discipline’s Core Properties.” MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194. doi: 10.2307/30036527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt, J. L., K. Muthusamy, and P. Bir. 2017. “XBRL and the Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information.” Accounting Research Journal 30 (1): 107–126. doi:10.1108/ARJ-11-2014-0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., J. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization, Using Visualization to Think. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinaels, E. 2008. “The Interplay Between Cost Accounting Knowledge and Presentation Formats in Cost-Based Decision-Making.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (6): 582–602. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambra, J., C. S. Wilson, and A. Akter. 2013. “Application of the Task-Technology Fit Model to Structure and Evaluate the Adoption of E-Books by Academics.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1): 48–64. doi: 10.1002/asi.22757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davern, M. J. 2007. “Towards a Unified Theory of Fit: Task, Technology and Individual.” In Information Systems Foundations: Theory, Representation and Reality, 49–69. Acton: ANU E-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davern, M. J., T. Shaft, and D. Te’eni. 2012. “Cognition Matters: Enduring Questions in Cognitive IS Research.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (4): 273–314. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilla, W. N., D. J. Janvrin, and C. Jeffrey. 2013. “The Impact of Graphical Displays of Pro Forma Earnings Information on Professional and Nonprofessional Investors’ Earnings Judgments.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 25 (1): 37–60. doi: 10.2308/bria-50289
   Google Scholar
• Dilla, W. N., D. J. Janvrin, and R. L. Raschke. 2010. “Interactive Data Visualization: A New Directions for Accounting Information Systems Research.” Journal of Information Systems 24 (2): 1–37. doi: 10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Dilla, W. N., and R. L. Raschke. 2015. “Data Visualization for Fraud Detection: Practice Implications and a Call for Future Research.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 16 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2015.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Dimoka, A., I. Benbasat, F. D. Davis, A. R. Dennis, D. Gefen, E. Weber, R. D. Banker, et al. 2012. “On the Use of Neurophysiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for neuroIS.” MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 679–702. doi: 10.2307/41703475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. D., and F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouh, F., D. Breakiron, S. Hamouda, M. F. Farghally, and C. A. Shaffer. 2014. “Exploring Students Learning Behavior with an Interactive Etextbook in Computer Science Courses.” Computers in Human Behavior 41: 478–485. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, J. R., and J. S. Miller. 2004. “The Effects of pro Forma Earnings Disclosures on Analysts’ and Nonprofessional Investors’ Equity Valuation Judgments.” The Accounting Review 79 (3): 667–686. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., F. Pestilli, and K. Börner. 2015. “Self-Portraits of the Brain: Cognitive Science, Data Visualization, and Communicating Brain Structure and Function.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (8): 462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L. 1995. “Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems.” Management Science 41 (12): 1827–1844. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., and R. L. Thomspon. 1995. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance.” MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 213–236. doi: 10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hard, N. J., and M. T. Vanecek. 1991. “The Implications of Tasks and Format on the Use of Financial Information.” Journal of Information Systems 5 (2): 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle. 2015. “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1): 115–135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, F. D., P. E. Hopkins, and D. A. Wood. 2010. “The Effects of Financial Statement Information Proximity and Feedback on Cash Flow Forecasts.” Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (1): 101–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, F., and M. Pronk. 2006. “The Impact of Expertise and Investors’ Use of Online Financial Report Information.” Journal of Accounting Auditing Finance 21 (3): 267–292. doi: 10.1177/0148558X0602100304
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W., J. Y. L. Thong, and K. Y. Tam. 2004. “The Effects of Information Format and Shopping Task on Consumers’ Online Shopping Behavior: A Cognitive Fit Perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (3): 149–184. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawardene, V., S. Sadiq, and M. Indulska. 2013. “An Analysis of Data Quality Dimensions.” ITEE Technical Report. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., and I. Benbasat. 2007. “The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers’ Product Understanding.” MIS Quarterly 31 (3): 475–500. doi: 10.2307/25148804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, W., L. Olfman, T. Ryan, and Y.-T. Park. 2005. “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Data Quality on Decision Performance.” AMCIS 2005 Proceedings, Omaha, NE, 298–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kalawsky, R. S. 2009. “Gaining Greater Insight Through Interactive Visualization: A Human Factors Perspective.” In Trends in Interactive Visualization: State-of-the-Art Survey, edited by L. C. Jain and X. Wu, 119–154. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelton, A. S., and R. R. Pennington. 2012. “Internet Financial Reporting: The Effects of Information Presentation Format and Content Differences on Investor Decision Making.” Computers in Human Behaviour 28 (4): 1178–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelton, A. S., R. R. Pennington, and B. M. Tuttle. 2010. “The Effects of Information Presentation Format on Judgment and Decision Making: A Review of the Information Systems Research.” Journal of Information Systems 24 (2): 79–105. doi: 10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.79
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and B. Yoo. 2000. “Toward the Optimal Link Structure of the Cyber Shopping Mall.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 (3): 531–551. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, H., E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. 2012. “Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios.” IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18 (9): 1520–1536. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2011.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. J. 2008. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. A. 2011. “A Framework for Contextual Information in Digital Collections.” Journal of Documentation 67 (1): 95–143. doi: 10.1108/00220411111105470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C., H. K. Cheng, and H. H. Cheng. 2007. “An Empirical Study of Mobile Commerce in Insurance Industry: Task-Technology Fit and Individual Differences.” Decision Support Systems 43 (1): 95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., R. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson. 2002. “Experimental Research in Financial Accounting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 27: 775–810. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanarachchi, G. A. 2007. “Feasibility of Using Student Subjects in Accounting Experiments: A Review.” Pacific Accounting Review 19 (1): 47–67. doi: 10.1108/01140580710754647
   Google Scholar
• Lurie, N. H., and C. H. Mason. 2007. “Visual Representations: Implication for Decision Making.” Journal of Marketing 71 (1): 160–177. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.71.1.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maines, L. A., and L. S. McDaniel. 2000. “Effects of Comprehensive-Income Characteristics on Nonprofessional Investors’ Judgements: The Role of Financial-Statement Presentation Format.” The Accounting Review 75 (2): 179–207. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, L., G. Lazar, and I. Lazar. 2016. “Effects of Study Levels on Students’ Attitudes Towards Interactive Whiteboards in Higher Education.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 278–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, B. H., T. A. DeFanti, and M. D. Brown. 1987. Visualization in Scientific Computing. New York: ACM SIGGRAPH.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, T. J., and V. J. Hobbs. 2008. “How Students and Instructors Using a Virtual Learning Environment Perceive the Fit Between Technology and Task.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (3): 191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, M. P., and J. S. Cook. 2011. “Fifteen Years of Data and Information Quality Literature: Developing a Research Agenda for Accounting.” Journal of Information Systems 25 (1): 79–108. doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.79.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. “Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (4): 867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsker, R. 2007. “Long Series of Information and Nonprofessional Investors’ Belief Revision.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 19 (1): 197–214. doi: 10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.197
   Google Scholar
• Pinsker, R., and P. Wheeler. 2009. “Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of XBRL-Enabled Financial Statement Analysis and of Firms Providing XBRL-Formatted Information.” International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 6 (3): 241–261. doi: 10.1057/jdg.2009.6
   Google Scholar
• Rensink, R. A. 2014. “On the Prospects for a Science of Visualization.” In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, edited by W. Huang, 147–175. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Rensink, R. A. 2015. “Preparing Undergraduates for Visual Analytics.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 35 (2): 16–20. doi:10.1109/MCG.2015.40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhyne, T.-M. 2003. “Does the Difference Between Information and Scientific Visualization Really Matter?” IEEE Computer Graphics and Application 23 (3): 6–8. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2003.1198256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, S., A. Savikhin, and D. S. Ebert. 2009. “FinVis: Applied Visual Analytics for Personal Financial Planning.” IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Atlantic City, NJ, October 12–13, 195–202. IEEE. doi:10.1109/VAST.2009.5333920.
   Google Scholar
• Schrier, T., M. Erdem, and P. Brewer. 2010. “Merging Task-Technology Fit and Technology Acceptance Models to Assess Guest Empowerment Technology Usage in Hotels.” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 1 (3): 201–217. doi: 10.1108/17579881011078340
   Google Scholar
• Speier, C. 2006. “The Influence of Information Presentation Formats on Complex Task Decision-Making Performance.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64: 1115–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. 2009. Applied Multivariate Statistics For The Social Sciences. 5th ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Person Educations.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, F., T. J. Hess, J. S. Valacich, and J. T. Sweeney. 2014. “The Effects of Visualization and Interactivity on Calibration in Financial Decision-Making.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 26 (1): 25–58. doi: 10.2308/bria-50589
   Google Scholar
• Tate, M., J. Evermann, and G. Gable. 2015. “An Integrated Framework for Theories of Individual Attitudes Toward Technology.” Information & Management 52 (6): 710–727. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. J., and K. A. Cook. 2005. Illuminating the Path - The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Washington, DC: National Visualization and Analytics Center.
   Google Scholar
• Vessey, I. 1991. “Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature.” Decision Sciences 22 (2): 219–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. Y., and D. M. Strong. 1996. “Beyond Accuracy : What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers.” Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4): 5–25. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
   Google Scholar
• Wassink, I., O. Kulyk, B. van Dijk, G. van der Veer, and P. van der Vet. 2008. “Applying a User-Centered Approach to Interactive Visualisation Design.” In Trends in Interactive Visualization, edited by E. Zudilova-Seinstra, T. Adriaansen, and R. van Liere, 175–199. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L. L., Y. L. Chuang, and Y. J. Joung. 2008. “Contextual Multidimensional Browsing.” Computers in Human Behaviour 24 (6): 2873–2888. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J. S., Y. A. Kang, J. T. Stasko, and J. A. Jacko. 2007. “Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13 (6): 1–8. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., and Y. Wang. 2009. “Study on the Function of XBRL and the Enhancement of the Accounting Information Quality Under the Background of Informationization.” International Journal of Business and Management 4 (11): 137–139. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n11p137
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, H., T. Nietzschmann, and D. A. Keim. 2008. “Visual Analytics on the Financial Market: Pixel-Based Analysis and Comparison of Long-Term Investments.” 12th International Conference Information Visualisation, London, July 9–11, Paper 11, 287–295. IEEE.
   Google Scholar