On the perceptions and acceptance of artificially intelligent robotics and the psychology of the future elderly

References

• Aldwin, Carolin M., and Michael R. Levenson. 1994. “Aging and Personality Assessment.” Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 14: 182–182.
   Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, Jens B., and Franz J. Neyer. 2012. Psychologie Der Persönlichkeit. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, Wilma A., Justin W. Hart, Elizabeth S. Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. “The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots Over Video-Displayed Agents.” International Journal of Social Robotics 3 (1): 41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, Jenay M., Akanksha Prakash, Tracy L. Mitzner, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2011. Understanding Robot Acceptance. Technical report. Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, Roberta, Amedeo Cesta, Gabriella Cortellessa, Alessandro Macchione, Andrea Orlandini, and Lorenza Tiberio. 2014. “Telepresence Robot at Home: A Long-Term Case Study.” In Ambient Assisted Living, 73–85. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, Elizabeth, I. Han Kuo, Yong In Lee, Joel Rabindran, Ngaire Kerse, Rebecca Stafford, and Bruce A. MacDonald. 2010. “Attitudes and Reactions to a Healthcare Robot.” Telemedicine and e-Health 16 (5): 608–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, Elizabeth, Rebecca Stafford, and Bruce MacDonald. 2009. “Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions.” International Journal of Social Robotics 1 (4): 319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, Avshalom, and Brent W. Roberts. 2001. “Personality Development Across the Life Course: The Argument for Change and Continuity.” Psychological Inquiry 12 (2): 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesta, Amedeo, Gabriella Cortellessa, Andrea Orlandini, and Lorenza Tiberio. 2016. “Long-Term Evaluation of a Telepresence Robot for the Elderly: Methodology and Ecological Case Study.” International Journal of Social Robotics 8 (3): 421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, Neil, and Walter R. Boot. 2009. “Aging and Information Technology Use: Potential and Barriers.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (5): 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claßen, Katrin. 2013. “Zur Psychologie von Technikakzeptanz im höheren Lebensalter: Die Rolle von Technikgenerationen.” Ph.D. thesis, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Fakultät f”ur Verhaltens- und Empirische Kulturwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, Daniela, Allegra Cattani, Santo Di Nuovo, and Alessandro Di Nuovo. 2015. “A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners.” 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan, 555–560. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Conti, Daniela, Santo Di Nuovo, Serafino Buono, and Alessandro Di Nuovo. 2017. “Robots in Education and Care of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Study on Acceptance by Experienced and Future Professionals.” International Journal of Social Robotics 9 (1): 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, Diane J., Juan C. Augusto, and Vikramaditya R. Jakkula. 2009. “Ambient Intelligence: Technologies, Applications, and Opportunities.” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 5 (4): 277–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Paul T., and Robert R. McCrae. 1988. “Personality in Adulthood: A Six-year Longitudinal Study of Self-reports and Spouse Ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5): 853–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin, Joseph F., Lisa A. D'Ambrosio, Bryan Reimer, and Michelle R. Pratt. 2007. “Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare.” 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007, Lyon, France, 1810–1815. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja, Sara J., Neil Charness, Arthur D. Fisk, Christopher Hertzog, Sankaran N Nair, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2006. “Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE).” Psychology and Aging 21 (2): 333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, Eden, J. D. Walker, and Charles Dziuban. 2014. ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Technical report. EDUCAUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, Bjørg, Ulrika Söderhamn, and Olle Söderhamn. 2012. “Self-care Ability Among Home-dwelling Older People in Rural Areas in Southern Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 26 (1): 113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13: 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, Sarv, Robert F. Easley, and J. Michael Crant. 2008. “Research Note how Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use.” Information Systems Research 19 (1): 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, John M., and Naomi K. Takemoto-Chock. 1981. “Factors in the Natural Language of Personality: Re-analysis, Comparison, and Interpretation of Six Major Studies.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 16 (2): 149–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, Andrew, and Michael G. Morris. 1996. “User Acceptance of New Information Technology: Theories and Models.” In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
   Google Scholar
• Ezer, Neta, Arthur D. Fisk, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2009. “Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults.” International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, San Diego, CA, USA, 39–48. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fausset, Cara Bailey, Andrew J. Kelly, Wendy A. Rogers, and Arthur D. Fisk. 2011. “Challenges to Aging in Place: Understanding Home Maintenance Difficulties.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly 25 (2): 125–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feil-Seifer, David, and Maja J. Mataric. 2005. “Defining Socially Assistive Robotics.” 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. ICORR 2005, Chicago, IL, USA, 465–468. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Flandorfer, Priska. 2012. “Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance.” International Journal of Population Research 2012: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, Terrence, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. “A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3-4): 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Vicki A., Emily M. Agree, Linda G. Martin, and Jennifer C. Cornman. 2006. “Trends in the Use of Assistive Technology and Personal Care for Late-life Disability, 1992–2001.” The Gerontologist 46 (1): 124–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friborg, Oddgeir, Dag Barlaug, Monica Martinussen, Jan H. Rosenvinge, and Odin Hjemdal. 2005. “Resilience in Relation to Personality and Intelligence.” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 14 (1): 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich-Gildhoff, Klaus, and Maike Rönnau-Böse. 2014. “Resilienz.” UTB Profile 3290.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, Sabine. 2010. Datenanalyse mit SPSS für Fortgeschrittene 2: Multivariate Verfahren für Querschnittsdaten. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, Maria Vittoria, Massimiliano Scopelliti, and Ferdinando Fornara. 2005. “Elderly People at Home: Technological Help in Everyday Activities.” IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005, Nashville, TN, USA, 365–370. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Lewis R. 1981. “Language and Individual Differences: The Search for Universals in Personality Lexicons.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology 2 (1): 141–165.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, Werner, and Ursula M. Staudinger. 2006. Resilience in Later Adulthood and Old Age: Resources and Potentials for Successful Aging. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, Kerstin Sophie, David Silvera-Tawil, Katsumi Watanabe, and Mari Velonaki. 2016. “The Influence of Robot Appearance and Interactive Ability in HRI: A Cross-Cultural Study.” International Conference on Social Robotics, Kansas City, MO, USA, 392–401. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, Kerstin Sophie, and Katsumi Watanabe. 2014. “Cultural Differences in Perception and Attitude Towards Robots.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 13 (3): 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink, Marcel. 2011. “Exploring the Influence of Age, Gender, Education and Computer Experience on Robot Acceptance by Older Adults.” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Lausanne, Switzerland, 147–148. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink, Marcel, Ben Kröse, Vanessa Evers, and Bob Wielinga. 2010. “Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model.” International Journal of Social Robotics 2 (4): 361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, Philipp Yorck, and Marcus Roth. 2014. Persönlichkeitspsychologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jerram, Kathryn L., and Peter G. Coleman. 1999. “The Big Five Personality Traits and Reporting of Health Problems and Health Behaviour in Old Age.” British Journal of Health Psychology 4 (2): 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, Oliver P., and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. “The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives.” Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research 2 (1999): 102–138.
   Google Scholar
• Koay, Kheng Lee, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Michael L. Walters, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. “Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study.” The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007, Jeju, South Korea, 564–569. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kocalevent, Rüya-Daniela, Markus Zenger, Ines Heinen, Sarah Dwinger, Oliver Decker, and Elmar Br”ahler. 2015. “Resilience in the General Population: Standardization of the Resilience Scale (RS-11).” PloS One 10 (11): e0140322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher, Florian, and Chang Chieh Hang. 2011. “Applying the Disruptive Innovation Framework to the Silver Market.” Ageing International 36 (1): 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, Takanori, Rie Kurosawa, and Seiji Yamada. 2012. “How Does the Difference Between Users Expectations and Perceptions About a Robotic Agent Affect Their Behavior?.” International Journal of Social Robotics 4 (2): 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriz, Sarah, Toni D. Ferro, Pallavi Damera, and John R. Porter. 2010. “Fictional robots as a data source in hri research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations.” RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, Viareggio, Italy, 458–463. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Krogsager, Anders, Nicolaj Segato, and Matthias Rehm. 2014. “Backchannel Head Nods in Danish First Meeting Encounters with a Humanoid Robot: The role of Physical Embodiment.” International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Creta Maris, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 651–662. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, Diana. 2007. “A Life Course Approach to Healthy Aging, Frailty, and Capability.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62 (7): 717–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, Bernhard. 2015. Resilienz im Erwachsenenalter. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Letzring, Tera D., Jack Block, and David C. Funder. 2005. “Ego-control and Ego-resiliency: Generalization of Self-report Scales Based on Personality Descriptions From Acquaintances, Clinicians, and the Self.” Journal of Research in Personality 39 (4): 395–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Dingjun, P. L. Patrick Rau, and Ye Li. 2010. “A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task.” International Journal of Social Robotics 2 (2): 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangunić, Nikola, and Andrina Granić. 2015. “Technology Acceptance Model: a Literature Review From 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melenhorst, Anne-Sophie, and Don G. Bouwhuis. 2004. “When Do Older Adults Consider the Internet? An Exploratory Study of Benefit Perception.” Gerontechnology 3: 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner, Tracy L., Julie B. Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E. Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. “Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (6): 1710–1721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nave, Christopher S., Ryne A. Sherman, David C. Funder, Sarah E. Hampson, and Lewis R. Goldberg. 2010. “On the Contextual Independence of Personality: Teachers Assessments Predict Directly Observed Behavior After Four Decades.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 1 (4): 327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyer, Franz J., Juliane Felber, and Claudia Gebhardt. 2012. “Entwicklung Und Validierung Einer Kurzskala Zur Erfassung Von Technikbereitschaft.” Diagnostica 58: 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, Warren T. 1963. “Toward An Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66 (6): 574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nov, Oded, and Chen Ye. 2008. “Personality and technology acceptance: Personal innovativeness in IT, openness and resistance to change.” Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Walkoloa, HI, USA, 448–448. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Özbekzbek, Volkan, Ümit Alnıaçık, Fatih Koc, M. Emin Akkılıç, and Eda Kaş. 2014. “The Impact of Personality on Technology Acceptance: A Study on Smart Phone Users.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 150: 541–551.
   Google Scholar
• Paunonen, Sampo V. 2003. “Big Five Factors of Personality and Replicated Predictions of Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (2): 411–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Li, Jiajia Zhang, Min Li, Peipei Li, Yu Zhang, Xin Zuo, Yi Miao, and Ying Xu. 2012. “Negative Life Events and Mental Health of Chinese Medical Students: The Effect of Resilience, Personality and Social Support.” Psychiatry Research 196: 138–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, Beatrice. 2007. “The 10-item Big Five Inventory.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23 (3): 193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, Beatrice, and Oliver P. John. 2005. “Kurzversion Des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K).” Diagnostica 51 (4): 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechel, Bernd, Philipa Mladovsky, David Ingleby, Johan P. Mackenbach, and Martin McKee. 2013. “Migration and Health in An Increasingly Diverse Europe.” The Lancet 381 (9873): 1235–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, John W., Alex J. Zautra, and John Stuart Hall. 2010. Handbook of Adult Resilience. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Brent W., and Wendy F. DelVecchio. 2000. “The Rank-order Consistency of Personality Traits From Childhood to Old Age: A Quantitative Review of Longitudinal Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 126 (1): 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Wendy A., and Arthur D. Fisk. 2010. “Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults.” Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 65B (6): 645–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, Gul, Atsushi Oshio, Kanako Taku, and Mari Hirano. 2018. “Resilience and Big Five Personality Traits: a Meta-analysis.” Personality and Individual Differences 127: 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Jörg, Karena Leppert, Thomas Gunzelmann, Bernhard Strauß, and Elmar Brähler. 2005. “Die Resilienzskala–Ein Fragebogen Zur Erfassung Der Psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit Als Personmerkmal.” Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother 53 (1): 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Shahid, Suleman, Emiel Krahmer, and Marc Swerts. 2014. “Child–robot Interaction Across Cultures: How Does Playing a Game with a Social Robot Compare to Playing a Game Alone Or with a Friend?.” Computers in Human Behavior 40: 86–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Meng, Li Liu, Zi Yue Wang, and Lie Wang. 2015. “The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Big Five Personality and Anxiety Among Chinese Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.” PLoS One 10: e0119916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Timothy W. 2006. “Personality As Risk and Resilience in Physical Health.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (5): 227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Craig A., and Leslie D. Kirby. 2011. “The role of appraisal and emotion in coping and adaptation.” The handbook of stress science: Biology, psychology, and health, 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Staudinger, Ursula M., Michael Marsiske, and Paul B. Baltes 1995. “Resilience and Reserve Capacity in Later Adulthood: Potentials and Limits of Development Across the Life Span.” Developmental Psychopathology 2: 801–847.
   Google Scholar
• Suhrcke, Marc, Martin McKee, Regina Sauto Arce, Svetla Tsolova, and Mortensen Jørgen. 2006. “Health Economics: Investment in Health Could Be Good for Europe's Economies.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 333 (7576): 1017–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, Gunnvald B., Jan-Are K. Johnsen, Live Almås-Sørensen, and Joar Vittersø. 2013. “Personality and Technology Acceptance: the Influence of Personality Factors on the Core Constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Behaviour & Information Technology 32 (4): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terracciano, Antonio, Robert R. McCrae, and Paul T. Costa Jr. 2006. “Longitudinal Trajectories in Guilford–Zimmerman Temperament Survey Data: Results From the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61 (2): P108–P116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torta, Elena, Franz Werner, David O. Johnson, James F. Juola, Raymond H. Cuijpers, Marco Bazzani, Johannes Oberzaucher, John Lemberger, Hadas Lewy, and Joseph Bregman. 2014. “Evaluation of a Small Socially-assistive Humanoid Robot in Intelligent Homes for the Care of the Elderly.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 76 (1): 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugade, Michele M., Barbara L. Fredrickson, and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2004. “Psychological Resilience and Positive Emotional Granularity: Examining the Benefits of Positive Emotions on Coping and Health.” Journal of Personality 72: 1161–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Michael G. Morris. 2000. “Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior.” MIS Quarterly 24: 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, and Phillip L. Ackerman. 2000. “A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-making Processes.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83 (1): 33–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, Janine L., Annette Leibing, Nancy Guberman, Jeanne Reeve, and Ruth E. S. Allen. 2012. “The Meaning of “aging in Place” to Older People.” The Gerontologist 52 (3): 357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Qianli, Jamie Ng, Odelia Tan, Zhiyong Huang, Benedict Tay, and Taezoon Park. 2015. “Methodological Issues in Scenario-based Evaluation of Human–robot Interaction.” International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (2): 279–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar