716
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Junior secondary students’ acceptance and continuance of e-learning system use: a multi-group analysis across social backgrounds

&
Pages 324-347 | Received 08 Oct 2019, Accepted 12 Aug 2020, Published online: 25 Aug 2020

References

  • Abdullah, F., R. Ward, and E. Ahmed. 2016. “Investigating the Influence of the Most Commonly Used External Variables of TAM on Students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of E-Portfolios.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 75–90.
  • Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.
  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., N. Alias, M. S. Othman, V. I. Marin, and G. Tur. 2018. “A Model of Factors Affecting Learning Performance Through the Use of Social Media in Malaysian Higher Education.” Computers & Education 121: 59–72.
  • Al-Rahmi, W., N. Yahaya, A. Aldraiweesh, M. Alamri, N. Aljarboa, U. Alturki, and A. Aljeraiwi. 2019. “Integrating Technology Acceptance Model With Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students’ Intention to Use E-Learning Systems.” IEEE Access 7: 26797–26809.
  • Amzaourou, O., and D. Oubaha. 2018. “Investigating the Cross-Cultural Dimensions of Educational Web 2.0 Acceptance: The Case of Moroccan and American University Students.” Research in Comparative and International Education 13 (2): 319–341.
  • Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. 2014. Amos 23.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94.
  • Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. 2001a. “An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents of Electronic Commerce Service Continuance.” Decision Support Systems 32 (2): 201–214.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. 2001b. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model.” MIS Quarterly 25 (3): 351–370.
  • Bhattacherjee, A., and C. P. Lin. 2014. “A Unified Model of IT Continuance: Three Complementary Perspectives and Crossover Effects.” European Journal of Information Systems 24 (4): 364–373.
  • Bhattacherjee, A., and G. Premkumar. 2004. “Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test.” MIS Quarterly 28 (2): 229–254.
  • Bourgonjon, J., M. Valcke, R. Soetaert, and T. Schellens. 2010. “Students’ Perceptions about the Use of Video Games in the Classroom.” Computers & Education 54 (4): 1145–1156.
  • Chang, C. T., J. Hajiyev, and C. R. Su. 2017. “Examining the Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-Learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning Approach.” Computers & Education 111: 128–143.
  • Cheng, M., and A. H. K. Yuen. 2018. “Student Continuance of Learning Management System Use: A Longitudinal Exploration.” Computers & Education 120: 241–253.
  • Cheng, M., and A. Yuen. 2019. “Cultural Divides in Acceptance and Continuance of Learning Management System Use: A Longitudinal Study of Teenagers.” Educational Technology, Research and Development 67 (6): 1613–1637.
  • Cheung, R., and D. Vogel. 2013. “Predicting User Acceptance of Collaborative Technologies: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning.” Computers & Education 63: 160–175.
  • Chiu, C.-M., and E. T. G. Wang. 2008. “Understanding Web-Based Learning Continuance Intention: The Role of Subjective Task Value.” Information & Management 45 (3): 194–201.
  • Cho, V., T. C. E. Cheng, and W. M. J. Lai. 2009. “The Role of Perceived User-Interface Design in Continued Usage Intention of Self-Paced E-Learning Tools.” Computers & Education 53 (2): 216–227.
  • Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334.
  • Dağhan, G., and B. Akkoyunlu. 2016. “Modeling the Continuance Usage Intention of Online Learning Environments.” Computers in Human Behavior 60: 198–211.
  • Davis, F. D. 1986. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.
  • Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.
  • DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 1992. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable.” Information Systems Research 3 (1): 60–95.
  • DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4): 9–30.
  • Drennan, J., J. Kennedy, and A. Pisarski. 2005. “Factors Affecting Student Attitudes Toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education.” The Journal of Educational Research 98 (6): 331–338.
  • EDB. 2009. Main Report: Working Group on Textbooks and E-Learning Resources Development. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • EDB. 2012. Report on the Review Surveys of the THIRD Strategy on Information Technology in Education. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, December 2012.
  • Eraslan Yalcin, M., and B. Kutlu. 2019. “Examination of Students’ Acceptance of and Intention to Use Learning Management Systems Using Extended TAM.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (5): 2414–2432.
  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2011. Predicting and Changing Behaviour: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.
  • Garone, A., B. Pynoo, J. Tondeur, C. Cocquyt, S. Vanslambrouck, B. Bruggeman, and K. Struyven. 2019. “Clustering University Teaching Staff Through UTAUT: Implications for the Acceptance of a New Learning Management System.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (5): 2466–2483.
  • Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 1997. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model.” MIS Quarterly 21 (4): 389–400.
  • Gerjets, P. H., and F. W. Hesse. 2004. “When are Powerful Learning Environments Effective? The Role of Learner Activities and of Students’ Conceptions of Educational Technology.” International Journal Of Educational Research 41 (6): 445–465.
  • Gil-Aluja, J. 2004. Fuzzy Sets in the Management of Uncertainty. Berlin, NY: Springer.
  • Gu, X., Y. Zhu, and X. Guo. 2013. “Meeting the “Digital Natives”: Understanding the Acceptance of Technology in Classrooms.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 16 (1): 392–402.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hanif, A., F. Jamal, and M. Imran. 2018. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for Use of E-Learning Systems by Digital Learners.” IEEE Access 6: 73395–73404.
  • Hayashi, A., C. Chen, T. Ryan, and J. Wu. 2004. “The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems.” Journal of Information Systems Education 15 (2): 139–154.
  • Hofstede, G., and G. J. Hofstede. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hossain, L., and A. de Silva. 2009. “Exploring User Acceptance of Technology Using Social Networks.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research 20 (1): 1–18.
  • Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.
  • Hwang, Y., M. Al-Arabiat, and D. H. Shin. 2016. “Understanding Technology Acceptance in a Mandatory Environment: A Literature Review.” Information Development 32 (4): 1266–1283.
  • Islam, A. N. 2015. “The Moderation Effect of User-Type (Educators vs. Students) in Learning Management System Continuance.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (12): 1160–1170.
  • Islam, A. N., and N. Azad. 2015. “Satisfaction and Continuance with a Learning Management System: Comparing Perceptions of Educators and Students.” International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 32 (2): 109–123.
  • Jan, A. U., and V. Contreras. 2011. “Technology Acceptance Model for the Use of Information Technology in Universities.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2): 845–851.
  • Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany. 1999. “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-adoption and Post-adoption Beliefs.” MIS Quarterly 23 (2): 183–213.
  • King, W. R., and J. He. 2006. “A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 43 (6): 740–755.
  • Kline, R. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Lau, G. K. 2014. “Digital Divide in Education: A Shift to Ethical Usage.” Doctoral diss., The University of Hong Kong.
  • Lau, W. W., and A. H. K. Yuen. 2014. “Internet Ethics of Adolescents: Understanding Demographic Differences.” Computers & Education 72: 378–385.
  • Lee, M.-C. 2010. “Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention Toward E-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation–Confirmation Model.” Computers & Education 54 (2): 506–516.
  • Lee, J., H. Cho, G. Gay, B. Davison, and T. Ingraffea. 2003. “Technology Acceptance and Social Networking in Distance Learning.” Educational Technology & Society 6 (2): 50–61.
  • Lee, Y.-H., C. Hsiao, and S. H. Purnomo. 2014. “An Empirical Examination of Individual and System Characteristics on Enhancing E-Learning Acceptance.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 30 (5): 562–579.
  • Lee, J. H., and J. Kim. 2014. “Socio-Demographic Gaps in Mobile Use, Causes, and Consequences: A Multi-Group Analysis of the Mobile Divide Model.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (8): 917–936.
  • Lee, Y., K. A. Kozar, and K. R. Larsen. 2003. “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (1): 752–780.
  • Legris, P., J. Ingham, and P. Collerette. 2003. “Why Do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 40 (3): 191–204.
  • Liao, C., J.-L. Chen, and D. C. Yen. 2007. “Theory of Planning Behavior (TPB) and Customer Satisfaction in the Continued Use of E-Service: An Integrated Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 23 (6): 2804–2822.
  • Liao, H.-L., and H.-P. Lu. 2008. “The Role of Experience and Innovation Characteristics in the Adoption and Continued Use of E-Learning Websites.” Computers & Education 51 (4): 1405–1416.
  • Limayem, M., and C. M. K. Cheung. 2008. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: The Case of Internet-Based Learning Technologies.” Information & Management 45 (4): 227–232.
  • Limayem, M., and C. M. Cheung. 2011. “Predicting the Continued Use of Internet-Based Learning Technologies: The Role of Habit.” Behaviour & Information Technology 30 (1): 91–99.
  • Limayem, M., S. G. Hirt, and C. M. Cheung. 2007. “How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance.” MIS Quarterly 31 (4): 705–737.
  • Lin, K.-M. 2011. “e-Learning Continuance Intention: Moderating Effects of User E-Learning Experience.” Computers & Education 56 (2): 515–526.
  • Lin, W.-S., and C.-H. Wang. 2012. “Antecedences to Continued Intentions of Adopting E-Learning System in Blended Learning Instruction: A Contingency Framework Based on Models of Information System Success and Task-Technology Fit.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 88–99.
  • Liu, I.-F., M. C. Chen, Y. S. Sun, D. Wible, and C.-H. Kuo. 2010. “Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors that Affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community.” Computers & Education 54 (2): 600–610.
  • Liu, D., and X. Guo. 2017. “Exploring Gender Differences in Acceptance of Mobile Computing Devices among College Students.” Information Systems and e-Business Management 15 (1): 197–223.
  • Liu, S.-H., H.-L. Liao, and J. A. Pratt. 2009. “Impact of Media Richness and Flow on E-Learning Technology Acceptance.” Computers & Education 52 (3): 599–607.
  • Ma, Q., and L. Liu. 2004. “The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings.” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16 (1): 59–72.
  • Ma, W. W. K., and A. Yuen. 2011. “E-learning System Acceptance and Usage Pattern.” In Technology Acceptance in Education: Research and Issues, edited by T. Teo, 201–216. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Marangunić, N., and A. Granić. 2015. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 81–95.
  • McArdle, J. J. 2009. “Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data.” Annual Review of Psychology 60: 577–605.
  • McGill, T. J., V. Hobbs, and J. E. Klobas. 2003. “User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean’s Model.” Information Resources Management Journal 16 (1): 24–45.
  • Metallo, C., and R. Agrifoglio. 2015. “The Effects of Generational Differences on Use Continuance of Twitter: An Investigation of Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (9): 869–881.
  • Morris, M. G., and V. Venkatesh. 2000. “Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions: Implications for a Changing Work Force.” Personnel Psychology 53 (2): 375–403.
  • Mou, J., D.-H. Shin, and J. Cohen. 2017. “Understanding Trust and Perceived Usefulness in the Consumer Acceptance of an E-Service: A Longitudinal Investigation.” Behaviour & Information Technology 36 (2): 125–139.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/24783.
  • Ngai, E. W., J. Poon, and Y. Chan. 2007. “Empirical Examination of the Adoption of WebCT Using TAM.” Computers & Education 48 (2): 250–267.
  • Oliver, R. L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4): 460–469.
  • Padilla-MeléNdez, A., A. R. del Aguila-Obra, and A. Garrido-Moreno. 2013. “Perceived Playfulness, Gender Differences and Technology Acceptance Model in a Blended Learning Scenario.” Computers & Education 63: 306–317.
  • Park, S. Y. 2009. “An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioural Intention to Use E-Learning.” Educational Technology & Society 12 (3): 150–162.
  • Park, N., K. M. Lee, and P. H. Cheong. 2007. “University Instructors’ Acceptance of Electronic Courseware: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 163–186.
  • Pelgrum, W. 2008. “School Practices and Conditions for Pedagogy and ICT.” In Pedagogy and ICT Use, edited by N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, and T. Plomp, 67–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Ployhart, R. E., and R. J. Vandenberg. 2010. “Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change.” Journal of Management 36 (1): 94–120.
  • Roca, J. C., C.-M. Chiu, and F. J. Martínez. 2006. “Understanding E-Learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (8): 683–696.
  • Roca, J. C., and M. Gagné. 2008. “Understanding E-learning Continuance Intention in the Workplace: A Self-determination Theory Perspective.” Computers in Human Behaviour 24 (4): 1585–1604.
  • Sangrà, A., D. Vlachopoulos, and N. Cabrera. 2012. “Building an Inclusive Definition of E-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13 (2): 144–159.
  • Sarrab, M., I. Al-Shibli, and N. Badursha. 2016. “An Empirical Study of Factors Driving the Adoption of Mobile Learning in Omani Higher Education.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 (4): 331–349.
  • Schepers, J., and M. Wetzels. 2007. “A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model: Investigating Subjective Norm and Moderation Effects.” Information & Management 44 (1): 90–103.
  • Sharp, J. H. 2006. “Development, Extension, and Application: A Review of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Director 5 (9): 1–11.
  • Shiue, Y. M., and Y. C. Hsu. 2017. “Understanding Factors that Affecting Continuance Usage Intention of Game-Based Learning in the Context of Collaborative Learning.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 13 (10): 6445–6455.
  • Straub, E. T. 2009. “Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2): 625–649.
  • Tao, Y.-H., C.-J. Cheng, and S.-Y. Sun. 2009. “What Influences College Students to Continue Using Business Simulation Games? The Taiwan Experience.” Computers & Education 53 (3): 929–939.
  • Tarhini, A., K. Hone, and X. H. Liu. 2015. “A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Impact of Social, Organisational and Individual Factors on Educational Technology Acceptance Between British and Lebanese University Students.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (4): 739–755.
  • Tarhini, A., K. Hone, X. H. Liu, and T. Tarhini. 2017. “Examining the Moderating Effect of Individual-Level Cultural Values on Users’ Acceptance of E-Learning in Developing Countries: A Structural Equation Modeling of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (3): 306–328.
  • Taylor, S., and P. A. Todd. 1995. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144–176.
  • Teo, A. C., G. W. H. Tan, C. M. Cheah, K. B. Ooi, and K. T. Yew. 2012. “Can the Demographic and Subjective Norms Influence the Adoption of Mobile Banking?” International Journal of Mobile Communications 10 (6): 578–597.
  • Thong, J. Y., S.-J. Hong, and K. Y. Tam. 2006. “The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (9): 799–810.
  • Tosuntaş, Ş. B., E. Karadağ, and S. Orhan. 2015. “The Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Interactive Whiteboard Within the Scope of FATIH Project: A Structural Equation Model Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” Computers & Education 81: 169–178.
  • Venkatesh, V. 2000. “Determinants of PEOU: Integrating Perceived Behavioural Control, Computer Anxiety and Enjoyment into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–365.
  • Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.” Decision Sciences 39 (2): 273–315.
  • Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 1996. “A Model of the Antecedents of PEOU: Development and Test.” Decision Sciences 27 (3): 451–481.
  • Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.
  • Venkatesh, V., and M. G. Morris. 2000. “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior.” MIS Quarterly 24 (1): 115–139.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.
  • Venkatesh, V., J. Y. L. Thong, F. K. Y. Chan, P. J. H. Hu, and S. A. Brown. 2011. “Extending the Two-Stage Information Systems Continuance Model: Incorporating UTAUT Predictors and the Role of Context.” Information Systems Journal 21 (6): 527–555.
  • Venkatesh, V., J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 157–178.
  • Wang, W.-T., and C.-C. Wang. 2009. “An Empirical Study of Instructor Adoption of Web-Based Learning Systems.” Computers & Education 53 (3): 761–774.
  • Williams, M. D., N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2015. “The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A Literature Review.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 28 (3): 443–488.
  • Wu, J.-H., R. D. Tennyson, and T.-L. Hsia. 2010. “A Study of Student Satisfaction in a Blended E-Learning System Environment.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 155–164.
  • Yousafzai, S. Y., G. R. Foxall, and J. G. Pallister. 2007a. “Technology Acceptance: a Meta-Analysis of the TAM: Part 1.” Journal of Modelling in Management 2 (3): 251–280.
  • Yousafzai, S. Y., G. R. Foxall, and J. G. Pallister. 2007b. “Technology Acceptance: A Meta-Analysis of the TAM: Part 2.” Journal of Modelling in Management 2 (3): 281–304.
  • Yuen, A. H. K. 2011. “Teaching Approaches in Blended Learning.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 6 (1): 3–23.
  • Yuen, A., M. Cheng, and F. Chan. 2019. “Student Satisfaction with Learning Management Systems: A Growth Model of Belief and use.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (5): 2520–2535.
  • Yuen, A. H. K., R. Fox, A. Sun, and L. Deng. 2009. “Course Management Systems in Higher Education: Understanding Student Experiences.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 6 (3): 189–205.
  • Yuen, A. H., W. W. Lau, J. H. Park, G. K. Lau, and A. K. Chan. 2016. “Digital Equity and Students’ Home Computing: A Hong Kong Study.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25 (4): 509–518.
  • Yuen, A. H. K., N. W. Law, M. W. Lee, and Y. Lee. 2010. The Changing Face of Education in Hong Kong: Transition into the 21st Century. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, HKU.
  • Yuen, A. H. K., and W. W. Ma. 2002. “Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10 (3): 365–382.
  • Zwain, Ammar Abdulameer Ali. 2019. “Technological Innovativeness and Information Quality as Neoteric Predictors of Users’ Acceptance of Learning Management System.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 16 (3): 239–254.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.