Strategically reward solvers in crowdsourcing contests: the role of seeker feedback

References

• Adamczyk, S., J. Haller, A. C. Bullinger, and K. Moeslein. 2011. “Knowing Is Silver, Listening Is Gold: On the Importance and Impact of Feedback in IT-Based Innovation Contests.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Afuah, A., and C. L. Tucci. 2012. “Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search.” Academy of Management Review 37 (3): 355–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agerfalk, P. J., and B. Fitzgerald. 2008. “Outsourcing to an Unknown Workfore: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy.” MIS Quarterly 32 (2): 385–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, R. M. 2013. “99designs: An Analysis of Creative Competition in Crowdsourced Design.” In Proceedings of the First Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. Palm Springs, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, A., A. May, and D. Yu. 2016. “The Motivations, Enablers and Barriers for Voluntary Participation in an Online Crowdsourcing Platform.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 923–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L. 2013. “Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community.” Management Science 59 (1): 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., and R. J. Calabrese. 1975. “Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication.” Human Communication Research 1 (2): 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstedt, J., C. Druehl, and A. Mishra. 2016. “Heterogeneous Submission Behavior and its Implications for Success in Innovation Contests with Public Submissions.” Production and Operations Management 25 (7): 1157–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., N. Lacetera, and K. R. Lakhani. 2011. “Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis.” Management Science 57 (5): 843–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. 2008. “Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 14 (1): 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. 2010. “Moving the Crowd at Threadless.” Information, Communication & Society 13 (8): 1122–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, N., H. Nam, P. K. Kannan, and S. Stremersch. 2019. “Tournaments to Crowdsource Innovation: The Role of Moderator Feedback and Participation Intensity.” Journal of Marketing 83 (2): 138–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W., S. Y. Li, J. Ni, and J. J. Zhu. 2021. “What Feedback Matters? The Role of Experience in Motivating Crowdsourcing Innovation.” Production and Operations Management 30 (2): 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, W., X. Guan, S. Ma, and S. Liu. 2019. “Selection of Crowdsourcing Formats: Simultaneous Contest vs Sequential Contest.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 119 (1): 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I., N. Mehta, P. Palvia, V. Taras, and K. Amoako-Gyampah. 2019. “Competition Matters! Self-Efficacy, Effort, and Performance in Crowdsourcing Teams.” Information & Management 56 (8): 103–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, I., J. Zhang, M. Yasar, and S. P. Nerur. 2018. “Strategic Effort Allocation in Online Innovation Tournaments.” Information & Management 55 (3): 396–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducarroz, C., S. Yang, and E. A. Greenleaf. 2016. “Understanding the Impact of In-Process Promotional Messages: An Application to Online Auctions.” Journal of Marketing 80 (2): 80–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, T., A. Poulsen, and M. C. Villeval. 2009. “Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence.” Labour Economics 16 (6): 679–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, J., P. Finnegan, J. Hayes, and P. O’Reilly. 2012. “‘Orchestrating’ Sustainable Crowdsourcing: A Characterisation of Solver Brokerages.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21 (3): 216–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., P. Keinz, and K. Klausberger. 2013. “Does This Sound Like a Fair Deal?” Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Expectations in the Individual’s Decision to Participate in Firm Innovation. Organization Science 24 (5): 1495–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Martinez, M. 2015. “Solver Engagement in Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing Communities: Exploring the Link to Creativity.” Research Policy 44 (8): 1419–1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Martinez, M. 2017. “Inspiring Crowdsourcing Communities to Create Novel Solutions: Competition Design and the Mediating Role of Trust.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117: 296–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., G. Gefen, and E. Carmel. 2016. “How Project Description Length and Expected Duration Affect Bidding and Project Success in Crowdsourcing Software Development.” Journal of Systems and Software 116: 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., N. B. Ellison, and C. Lai. 2011. “First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating.” Communication Research 38 (1): 70–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillier, T., C. Chaffois, M. Belkhouja, Y. Roth, and B. L. Bayus. 2018. “The Effect of Task Instructions in Crowdsourcing Innovative Ideas.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 134 (4): 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Giudice, K. D. 2010. “Crowdsourcing Credibility: The Impact of Audience Feedback on Web Page Credibility.” In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Gol, E. S., M. Stein, and M. Avital. 2018. “Why Take the Risk? Motivations of Highly Skilled Workers to Participate in Crowdworking Platforms.” In the 39th International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Hanns, R., C. Pieters, and Z. He. 2016. “Thinking About U Theorizing and Testing U- and Inverted U-Shaped Relationships in Strategy Research.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (7): 1177–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., P. V. Singh, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2012. “How to Design Crowdsourcing Contest: A Structural Empirical Analysis.” In Proceedings in Conference on Information Systems and Economics. Phenix.
   Google Scholar
• Jian, L., S. Yang, and C. Jiang. 2019. “Managing the Crowds: The Effect of Prize Guarantees and In-Process Feedback on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests.” MIS Quarterly 43 (1): 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. C., and Y. Wang. 2020. “A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Feedback in Ideation Contests.” Production and Operations Management 29 (2): 481–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrimore, L., L. Jiang, J. Larrimore, D. Markowitz, and S. Gorski. 2011. “Peer to Peer Lending: The Relationship Between Language Features, Trustworthiness, and Persuasion Success.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 39: 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. C. B., S. L. Ba, X. X. Li, and J. Stallaert. 2018. “Salience Bias in Crowdsourcing Contests.” Information Systems Research 29 (2): 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., M. Wang, J. Wang, and Y. Xue. 2018. “How Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives Affect Task Effort in Crowdsourcing Contests: A Mediated Moderation Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 81: 168–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. T., and H. Mehlum. 2010. “With or Without U The Appropriate Test for a U-Shaped Relationship.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72 (1): 109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T. X., J. Yang, L. A. Adamic, and Y. Chen. 2014. “Crowdsourcing with All-pay Auctions: A Field Experiment on Taskcn.” Management Science 60 (8): 2020–2037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollok, P., D. Lüttgens, and F. T. Piller. 2019. “Attracting Solutions in Crowdsourcing Contests: The Role of Knowledge Distance, Identity Disclosure, and Seeker Status.” Research Policy 48 (1): 98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, B., L. Shi, B. Xu, and L. Liu. 2012. “Factors Affecting Participation of Solvers in Crowdsourcing: an Empirical Study from China.” Electronic Markets 22 (2): 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stol, K. J., B. Caglayan, and B. Fitzgerald. 2019. “Competition-based Crowdsourcing Software Development: A Multi-Method Study from a Customer Perspective.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 45 (3): 237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, T., H. Gimpel, F. Teschner, and C. Weinhardt. 2015. “How (not) to Incent Crowd Workers: Payment Schemes and Feedback in Crowdsourcing.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 57: 167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Y. Fang, and K. H. Lim. 2012. “Understanding Sustained Participation in Transactional Virtual Communities.” Decision Support Systems 53 (1): 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Y. Fang, and K. H. Lim. 2014. “Understanding Knowledge Contributors’ Satisfaction in Transactional Virtual Communities: A Cost-Benefit Trade-off Perspective.” Information & Management 51 (4): 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and Y. Xu. 2008. “Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving.” Management Science 9 (54): 1529–1543.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. M., J. J. Wang, and W. N. Zhang. 2019. “How to Enhance Solvers’ Continuance Intention in Crowdsourcing Contest: The Role of Interactivity and Fairness Perception.” Online Information Review 44 (1): 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooten, J. O., and K. T. Ulrich. 2017. “Idea Generation and the Role of Feedback: Evidence from Field Experiments with Innovation Tournaments.” Production and Operations Management 26 (1): 80–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., L. A. Adamic, and M. S. Ackerman. 2008. “Competing to Share Expertise: the Taskcn Knowledge Sharing Community.” Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Menlo Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., P. Chen, and P. Palvou. 2009. “Open Innovation: An Empirical Study of Online Contest.” In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H. J., and A. Kankanhalli. 2015. “Investigating the Antecedents of Organizational Task Crowdsourcing.” Information & Management 52 (1): 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, H. J., and A. Kankanhalli. 2017. “Solvers’ Participation in Crowdsourcing Platforms: Examining the Impacts of Trust, and Benefit and Cost Factors.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 26 (2): 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. C., and Q. Zhu. 2014. “Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contest.” Online Information Review 7 (38): 896–917.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., Z. Xie, W. Hou, and D. Li. 2014. “Antecedents of Solution Quality in Crowdsourcing: The Sponsor’s Perspective.” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 15 (3): 212–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar