Motivation of people with intellectual disabilities in technology design activities: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness

References

• Badia, Marta, M. B. Orgaz, M. A. Verdugo, and Ana M Ullán. 2013. “Patterns and Determinants of Leisure Participation of Youth and Adults with Developmental Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57 (4): 319–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bano, Muneera, and Didar Zowghi. 2015. “A Systematic Review on the Relationship Between User Involvement and System Success.” Information and Software Technology 58: 148–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroudi, Jack J, Margrethe H Olson, and Blake Ives. 1986. “An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction.” Communications of the ACM 29 (3): 232–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, Roy F., Mark R. Leary, and Robert J. Steinberg. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, Pamela, and Susan Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bayor, Andrew A, Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer, Filip Bircanin, Benoit Favre, and Stewart Koplick. 2021. “Toward a Competency-Based Approach to Co-Designing Technologies with People with Intellectual Disability.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 14 (2): 1–33. doi:10.1145/3450355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, Laura, and Hilary Johnson. 2014. “Structured Approaches to Participatory Design for Children: Can Targeting the Needs of Children with Autism Provide Benefits for a Broader Child Population?” Instructional Science 42 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9297-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, Laura, and Hilary Johnson. 2015. “Widening Participation in Technology Design: A Review of the Involvement of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 3: 23–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, Laura, Hilary Johnson, Emma Ashwin, Mark Brosnan, and Beate Grawemeyer. 2012. “Developing IDEAS: Supporting Children with Autism within a Participatory Design Team.” In CHI ‘12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Texas USA, May 5-10, 2012, 2599–2608. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208650.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, Peter, Wolmet Barendregt, Eva Eriksson, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. "Designing technology for and with developmentally diverse children: A systematic literature review." In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Boston, Massachusetts June 21–24, 2015, New York, NY, Association for Computing Machinery 79-88. doi:10.1145/2771839.2771848.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. New York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton, Margot, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. “Design After Design to Bridge Between People Living with Cognitive or Sensory Impairments, Their Friends and Proxies.” CoDesign 11 (1): 4–20. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1009471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caton, Sue, and Melanie Chapman. 2016. “The use of Social Media and People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 41 (2): 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, Deborah, and Caroline Pelletier. 2020. “Deconstructing the co-Production Ideal: Dilemmas of Knowledge and Representation in a co-Design Project with People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 45 (4): 326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinquin, Pierre-Antoine, Pascal Guitton, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2020. “Designing Accessible MOOCs to Expand Educational Opportunities for Persons with Cognitive Impairments.” Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (11): 1101–1119. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1742381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, James C, Joseph B Ryan, Antonis Katsiyannis, Mitchell Yell, and David E Barrett. 2014. “Use of Portable Electronic Assistive Technology to Improve Independent job Performance of Young Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Special Education Technology 29 (3): 15–29. doi:10.1177/016264341402900302.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L, Rosemary Hodges, Louisa Pierson, and Joseph Tomassone. 1992. “Autonomy and Competence as Motivational Factors in Students with Learning Disabilities and Emotional Handicaps.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 25 (7): 457–471. doi:10.1177/002221949202500706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L, and Richard M Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L, and Richard M Ryan. 1991. “A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality.” In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on Motivation, edited by R. Dienstbier, 237–288. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L, and Richard M Ryan. 2000. ““The” What” and” why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.”.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2002. “Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-Determination Research, edited by Edward L. Deci, and Richard M. Ryan, 3–33. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward L, and Richard M Ryan. 2012. ““Motivation, Personality, and Development Within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory.”.” In The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, edited by R. M. Ryan, 85–107. England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dent-Spargo, Rosie. 2018, Sep 3. “Using Self-Determination Theory to Support co-Design Activities.” In CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CC-TEL 2018: Co-Creation in the Design, Development and Implementation of Technology-Enhanced Learning, edited by A. Piotrkowicz, R. Dent-Spargo, S. Dennerlein, I. Koren, P. Antoniou, P. Bailey, T. Treasure-Jones, I. Fronza, and C. Pahl, 1–10. Leeds: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2190/CC-TEL_2018_paper_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fangen, Katrine. 2010. Deltagende Observasjon. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, Christopher, Judith Good, and Alyssa Alcorn. 2012. Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology. In IDC ‘12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Bremen, Germany, June 12-15, 2012, 367–370. New York, NY, Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2307096.2307171.
   Google Scholar
• Frielink, Noud, Carlo Schuengel, and Petri JCM Embregts. 2018. “Autonomy Support, Need Satisfaction, and Motivation for Support among Adults with Intellectual Disability: Testing a Self-Determination Theory Model.” American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 123 (1): 33–49. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-123.1.33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• García-Catalá, M. T., M. C. Rodríguez-Sánchez, and E. Martín-Barroso. 2020. “Survey of Indoor Location Technologies and Wayfinding Systems for Users with Cognitive Disabilities in Emergencies.” Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–25. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1849404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrels, Veerle, and Hanne Marie Høybråten Sigstad. 2019. “Motivation for Employment in Norwegian Adults with Mild Intellectual Disability: The Role of Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 (1): 250–261. doi:10.16993/sjdr.639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanouni, Parisa, Tal Jarus, Jill G Zwicker, and Joseph Lucyshyn. 2020. “An Interactive Serious Game to Target Perspective Taking Skills among Children with ASD: A Usability Testing.” Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (16): 1716–1726. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1776770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Julie M, Elizabeth M Hughes, and Joseph B Ryan. 2011. “The use of Assistive Technology to Improve Time Management Skills of a Young Adult with an Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Special Education Technology 26 (3): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, Mona Leigh, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2010. “Investigating the impact of design processes on children.” In IDC ‘10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Barcelona, Spain, June 9 - 12, 2010, 198–201. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1810543.1810570.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Elin Irene Krog, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2013. “You are the real experts! Studying teenagers’ motivation in participatory design”. In IDC ‘13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, June 24-27, 2013, 328–331. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2485760.2485826.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, Niels, Karin Slegers, and Pieter Duysburgh. 2015. “Codesign with People Living with Cognitive or Sensory Impairments: A Case for Method Stories and Uniqueness.” CoDesign 11 (1): 70–82. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1020316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Ole Sejer, Christian Dindler, and Elin Irene Krogh Hansen. 2013. “Understanding Teenagers’ Motivation in Participatory Design.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1 (3-4): 82–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Idit, and Rinat Cohen. 2014. “Assessing Autonomous Motivation in Students with Cognitive Impairment.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 39 (4): 323–332. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.934791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelsaa, Anna M. 2014. “Self-presentations and Intellectual Disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1080/15017419.2012.761159.
   Google Scholar
• Kujala, Sari. 2003. “User Involvement: A Review of the Benefits and Challenges.” Behaviour and Information Technology 22 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/01449290301782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, Giulio E, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O’Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Valeria Chiariello, and Luigina Carrella. 2020. “Everyday Technology to Support Leisure and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Other Disabilities.” Developmental Neurorehabilitation 23 (7): 431–438. doi:10.1080/17518423.2020.1737590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, Giulio E, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O’Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Francesca Scigliuzzo, Mario Signorino, Doretta Oliva, Angela Smaldone, and Maria L La Martire. 2010. “Persons with Multiple Disabilities use Orientation Technology to Find Room Entrances During Indoor Traveling.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 31 (6): 1577–1584. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhaeva, Julia, Christopher Frauenberger, and Katta Spiel. 2016. “Creating creative spaces for co-designing with autistic children: the concept of a “Handlungsspielraum””. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference, Aarhus Denmark, August 15 - 19, 2016, 51–60. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2940299.2940306.
   Google Scholar
• Mankoff, Jennifer, Gillian R Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. “Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology.” In ASSETS ‘10: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Orlando, Florida, USA, October 25–27, 2010, 3-11. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1878803.1878807.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, Emanuela, Janet C Read, and Russell. 2011. Towards a framework of co-design sessions with children. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 2011 Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, 632–635. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_100.
   Google Scholar
• Mechling, Linda C. 2007. “Assistive Technology as a Self-Management Tool for Prompting Students with Intellectual Disabilities to Initiate and Complete Daily Tasks: A Literature Review.” Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 42 (3): 252–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling, Linda C, and Nicole H Seid. 2011. “Use of a Hand-Held Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) to Self-Prompt Pedestrian Travel by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities.” Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 46 (2): 220–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, Michael J., and Allison Druin 2012. “Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI.” In Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. 3rd Edition, edited by Julie Jacko, 1125–1154. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Joan, and Lois Cameron. 2008. “The Effectiveness of Talking Mats [r] with People with Intellectual Disability.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36 (4): 232–241.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Jeanne, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. “Flow Theory and Research.” In Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed), edited by S. J. Lopez, and C. R. Snyder, 195–206. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neidlinger, Kristin, Stephanie Koenderink, and Khiet P Truong. 2021. Give the Body a Voice: Co-design with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities to Create Multisensory Wearables. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI ‘21 Extended Abstracts), Yokohama, Japan, May 8–13, 2021, New York, NY, Association for Computing Machinery 1-6. doi:10.1145/3411763.3451797.
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, Christopher P, and Richard M Ryan. 2009. “Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice.” Theory and Research in Education 7 (2): 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Nota, Laura, Lea Ferrari, Salvatore Soresi, and Michel Wehmeyer. 2007. “Self-Determination, Social Abilities and the Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 51 (11): 850–865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00939.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petner-Arrey, Jami, and Susan R Copeland. 2015. “‘You Have to Care.’perceptions of Promoting Autonomy in Support Settings for Adults with Intellectual Disability.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 43 (1): 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, Anne Marie, Eileen O'Brien, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Terry Winograd. 2006. “SIDES: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development.” In CSCW ‘06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Alberta, Banff, Canada, November 4 - 8, 2006, 1-10. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1180875.1180877.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, Sneha, and Tara French. 2021. “Enabling Genuine Participation in co-Design with Young People with Learning Disabilities.” CoDesign, 1–17. doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.1877728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riege, Andreas M. 2003. “Validity and Reliability Tests in Case Study Research: a Literature Review with “Hands-on” Applications for Each Research Phase.” Qualitative Market Research 6 (2): 75–86. doi:10.1108/13522750310470055.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, Nigel, Bryan Boyle, Yurgos Politis, Nigel Newbutt, Hug-Jen Kuo, and Connie Sung. 2021. “Participatory Technology Design for Autism and Cognitive Disabilities: A Narrative Overview of Issues and Techniques.” In Recent Advances in Technologies for Inclusive Well-Being: Virtual Patients, Gamification and Simulation. Vol. 196, edited by Brooks Anthony, Sheryl Braham, Bill Kapralos, Amy Nakajima, Jane Tyerman, and Lakhmi C. Jain, 469–485. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59608-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard M, and Edward L Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard M, and Edward L Deci. 2017. Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard M, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. “The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach.” Motivation and Emotion 30 (4): 344–360. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, Mugula Chris, Sofie Wass, and Elin Thygesen. 2021. “‘I Got To Answer the Way I Wanted To’: Intellectual Disabilities and Participation in Technology Design Activities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 23 (1): 192–203. doi:10.16993/sjdr.798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B-N., Eva Brandt, and Thomas Binder. 2010. “A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design.” In PDC ‘10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Sydney, Australia, November 29 - December 3, 2010, 195–198. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900476.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B-N, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the new Landscapes of Design.” Co-design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Saturno, Cleiton Eduardo, Alejandro Rafael Garcia Ramirez, Mauro José Conte, Mísia Farhat, and Elaine Carmelita Piucco. 2015. “An Augmentative and Alternative Communication Tool for Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (6): 632–645. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2015.1019567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalock, Robert L, Ruth Luckasson, and Marc J. Tassé. 2021. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports. 12th Ed. Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers, Selina, Katrien Dreessen, and Bieke Zaman. 2018. “Fun as a user gain in participatory design processes involving children: a case study.” In IDC ‘18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway, June 19–22, 2018, 396–404. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3202185.3202763.
   Google Scholar
• Sein, Maung, Ola Henfridsson, Sandeep Purao, Matti Rossi, and Rikard Lindgren. 2011. “Action Design Research.” MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 35–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, Karrie A, Michael L Wehmeyer, Susan B Palmer, Graham G Rifenbark, and Todd D Little. 2015. “Relationships Between Self-Determination and Postschool Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities.” The Journal of Special Education 48 (4): 256–267. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigstad, Hanne Marie H, and Veerle Garrels. 2018. “Facilitating Qualitative Research Interviews for Respondents with Intellectual Disability.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 33 (5): 692–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitbon, Laurianne. 2018. “Engaging IT Students in Co-Design with People with Intellectual Disability.” In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada, Apr. 2018, New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery 1–6. doi:10.1145/3170427.3188620.
   Google Scholar
• Soresi, Salvatore, Laura Nota, and Michael L. Wehmeyer. 2011. “Community Involvement in Promoting Inclusion, Participation and Self-Determination.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1080/13603116.2010.496189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, James P. 2016. Participant Observation. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stancliffe, Roger J. 2001. “Living with Support in the Community: Predictors of Choice and Self-Determination.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 7 (2): 91–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steen, Marc, Menno Manschot, and Nicole De Koning. 2011. “Benefits of co-Design in Service Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 5 (2): 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, Ron, Nicholas David Bowman, Allison Eden, Matthew Grizzard, and Ashley Organ. 2010. “Defining Media Enjoyment as the Satisfaction of Intrinsic Needs.” Journal of Communication 60 (4): 758–777. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2007, January 24. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Resolution. Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/61/106. https://www.refworld.org/docid/45f973632.html.
   Google Scholar
• van Rijn, Helma, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process”. In PDC ‘08: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, October 1–4, 2008, Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University, 178–181. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.5555/1795234.1795266.
   Google Scholar
• Wass, Sofie, Lise Amy Hansen, and Chris Safari. 2020. “Designing Transport Supporting Services Together with Users with Intellectual Disabilities.” In 15th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST 2020, Kristiansand, Norway, December 2–4, 2020, Proceedings. Vol. 12388, edited by Hoffman Sara, Oliver Müller, and Matti Rossi, 56–67. Cham: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L. 2005. “Self-determination and Individuals with Severe Disabilities: Re-Examining Meanings and Misinterpretations.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 30 (3): 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L, and Nancy Bolding. 2001. “Enhanced Self-Determination of Adults with Intellectual Disability as an Outcome of Moving to Community-Based Work or Living Environments.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 45 (5): 371–383. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00342.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L., and Nancy W. Garner. 2003. “The Impact of Personal Characteristics of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disability on Self-Determination and Autonomous Functioning.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 16 (4): 255–265. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00161.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L, and Susan B Palmer. 2003. “Adult Outcomes for Students with Cognitive Disabilities Three-Years After High School: The Impact of Self-Determination.” Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 38 (2): 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L, and Karrie A Shogren. 2017. “Applications of the Self-Determination Construct to Disability.” In Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course, edited by Michael L. Wehmeyer, Karrie A. Shogren, Todd D. Little, and Shane J. Lopez, 111–123. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Cara, Laurianne Sitbon, Margot Brereton, Daniel Johnson, and Stewart Koplick. 2016. “‘Put yourself in the picture’ designing for futures with young adults with intellectual disability.” In OzCHI ‘16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Tasmania, Launceston, Australia, November 29 - December 2, 2016, 271-281. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3010915.3010924.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Yuanying, Jinglan Zhang, Roman Yagovkin, Simone Maniero, Phurpa Wangchunk, and Stewart Koplick. 2014. “Rove n' Rave™ Development: A Partnership between the University and the Disability Service Provider to Build a Social Website for People with an Intellectual Disability.” In OzCHI ‘14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, December 2 - 5, 2014, 531–534. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2686612.2686697.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2017. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar