Dignity and use of algorithm in performance evaluation

References

• Adams, J. S. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (L Berkowitz, Ed.) 267–299. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agassi, Judith Buber. 1986. “Dignity in the Workplace Can Work Be Dealienated?” Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alder, G. Stoney, Maureen L. Ambrose, and Terry W. Noel. 2006. “The Effect of Formal Advance Notice and Justification on Internet Monitoring Fairness: Much About Nothing?” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 13 (1): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130011101
   Google Scholar
• Bankins, Sarah. 2021. “The Ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: A Decision-Making Framework.” Ethics and Information Technology 23 (4): 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09619-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankins, Sarah, Paul Formosa, Yannick Griep, and Deborah Richards. 2022. “AI Decision Making with Dignity? Contrasting Workers’ Justice Perceptions of Human and AI Decision Making in a Human Resource Management Context.” Information Systems Frontiers 24: 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10223-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas, Solon, and Andrew D. Selbst. 2016. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104 (3): 671–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, Adam, Seth A. Kaplan, and Daniel J. Beal. 2011. “Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Management 37 (1): 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310376325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J. 1987. “Beyond ‘Voice’: The Influence of Decision-Maker Justification and Sincerity on Procedural Fairness Judgments.” Representative Research in Social Psychology 17 (1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J. 2015. “Interactional Justice: Looking Backward, Looking Forward.” In The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace, edited by R. S. Cropanzano, and Maureen L. Ambrose, 89–107. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., and J. S. Moag. 1986. “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1(5), edited by R. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman, 43–45. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., and D. L. Shapiro. 1988. “Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments.” The Academy of Management Journal 31 (3): 676–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigman, Yochanan E., and Kurt Gray. 2018. “People are Averse to Machines Making Moral Decisions.” Cognition 181 (August): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binns, Reuben, Max Van Kleek, Michael Veale, Ulrik Lyngs, Jun Zhao, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018. “‘It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions.” Conference on human factors in computing systems – proceedings. Vol. 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951
   Google Scholar
• Blanca, María J., Rafael Alarcón, Jaume Arnau, Roser Bono, and Rebecca Bendayan. 2017. “Non-normal Data: Is ANOVA Still a Valid Option.” Psicothema 29 (4): 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobocel, D. Ramona, and Aaron C. Farrell. 1996. “Sex-based Promotion Decisions and Interactional Fairness: Investigating the Influence of Managerial Accounts.” Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.81.1.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhwar, Pawan, Ashish Malik, M. T. Thedushika De Silva, and Praveena Thevisuthan. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence–Challenges and Opportunities for International HRM: A Review and Research Agenda.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 33 (6): 1065–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2035161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, Jason W., Mari Klara Stein, and Tina Blegind Jensen. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Algorithm Aversion in Augmented Decision Making.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 33 (2): 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, Anjali, Sandy J. Wayne, and René Schalk. 2009. “A Sensemaking Model of Employee Evaluation of Psychological Contract Fulfillment: When and How Do Employees Respond to Change?” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 45 (4): 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886309341739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. 2001. “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 386–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, Martha. 2012. “Control and Dignity in Professional, Manual and Service-Sector Employment.” Organization Studies 33 (10): 1383–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612453529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Arteaga, Maria, Riccardo Fogliato, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2020. “A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376638.
   Google Scholar
• De Cremer, David, and Jack McGuire. 2022. “Human–Algorithm Collaboration Works Best if Humans Lead (Because it is Fair!).” Social Justice Research 35 (1): 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00382-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, Berkeley J., Joseph P. Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015. “Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (1): 114–126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2466040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draude, Claude, Goda Klumbyte, Phillip Lücking, and Pat Treusch. 2020. “Situated Algorithms: A Sociotechnical Systemic Approach to Bias.” Online Information Review 44 (2): 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Mengnan, Ninghao Liu, and Xia Hu. 2020. “Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning.” Communications of the ACM 63 (1): 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. 1974. “Noncomparative Justice.” The Philosophical Review 83: 297–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, et al. 2018. “AI4People—an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28 (4): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, Robert. 1998. “Fairness as a Moral Virtue.” In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes, 13–34. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Formosa, Paul, and Catriona Mackenzie. 2014. “Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5): 875–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9487-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formosa, Paul, Wendy Rogers, Sarah Bankins, Yannick Griep, and Deborah Richards. 2022. “Medical AI and Human Dignity: Contrasting Perceptions of Human and Artificially Intelligent (AI) Decision Making in Diagnostic and Medical Resource Allocation Contexts.” Computers in Human Behavior 133 (April): 107296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107296.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Rainer. 2011. “The Ground of Critique: On the Concept of Human Dignity in Social Orders of Justification.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 37 (9): 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711416082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelens, Jolyn, Nicky Dries, Joeri Hofmans, and Roland Pepermans. 2013. “The Role of Perceived Organizational Justice in Shaping the Outcomes of Talent Management: A Research Agenda.” Human Resource Management Review 23 (4): 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuens, Maggie, and Patrick De Pelsmacker. 2017. “Planning and Conducting Experimental Advertising Research and Questionnaire Design.” Journal of Advertising 46 (1): 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1225233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P. 2015. “Human Rights, Human Dignity and Power.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by R. Cruft, S. M. Liao and M. Renzo, 196–213. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Joseph K., and Gabriele Paolacci. 2017. “Crowdsourcing Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 44 (1): 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesevoets, Tessa, David De Cremer, Kim Dierckx, and Alain Van Hiel. 2021. “Human-Machine Collaboration in Managerial Decision Making.” Computers in Human Behavior 119 (February): 106730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, B., E. Hioe, and B. Schaninger. 2018. “The Fairness Factor in Performance Management.” McKinsey Quarterly 2: 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2018. An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, Monica A., and Jeffrey M. Conte. 2003. “The Perceived Fairness of Layoff Practices.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33 (8): 1588–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01965.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, Tim, Martine Cools, and Alexandra Van den Abbeele. 2021. “The Role of Information Accuracy and Justification in Bonus Allocations.” Journal of Management Control 32 (2): 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00312-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, Randy. 2001. Dignity at Work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Lynne. 2017. “On Dignity, a Sense of Dignity, and Inspirational Shame.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 37 (6): 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2017.1334447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Meg Leta. 2017. “The Right to a Human in the Loop: Political Constructions of Computer Automation and Personhood.” Social Studies of Science 47 (2): 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717699716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, O. Sibony, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2021. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. New York, NY: Little, Brown Spark.
   Google Scholar
• Kaibel, C., I. Koch-Bayram, T. Biemann, and M. Mühlenbock. 2019. “Applicant Perceptions of Hiring Algorithms-Uniqueness and Discrimination Experiences as Moderators.” In Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 18172. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2017. The Metaphysics of Morals. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine, and Angèle Christin. 2020. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmister, Suzy. 2020. Contours of Dignity. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers, Laura, Jeroen Meijerink, Giedo Jansen, and Mieke Boon. 2022. “A Capability Approach to Worker Dignity under Algorithmic Management.” Ethics and Information Technology 24 (1): pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, Markus, Kevin Baum, Cornelius J. König, Viviane Hähne, Daniel Oster, and Timo Speith. 2021. “Spare Me the Details: How the Type of Information About Automated Interviews Influences Applicant Reactions.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 29: 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, Markus, Cornelius J. König, and Maria Papathanasiou. 2019a. “Highly Automated Job Interviews: Acceptance Under the Influence of Stakes.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 27 (3): 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, Markus, Cornelius J. König, Diana Ruth Pelipez Sanchez, and Sören Samadi. 2019b. “Highly Automated Interviews: Applicant Reactions and the Organizational Context.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 35 (4): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, Markus, and Richard N. Landers. 2021. “The Future of Artificial Intelligence at Work: A Review on Effects of Decision Automation and Augmentation on Workers Targeted by Algorithms and Third-Party Observers.” Computers in Human Behavior 123 (October 2020): 106878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106878.
   Google Scholar
• Latonero, Mark. 2018. “Governing Artificial Intelligence: Upholding Human Rights & Dignity.” Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DataSociety_Governing_Artificial_Intelligence_Upholding_Human_Rights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Min Kyung. 2018. “Understanding Perception of Algorithmic Decisions: Fairness, Trust, and Emotion in Response to Algorithmic Management.” Big Data & Society 5 (1): 205395171875668. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Brad, Isaac Smith, Max Fowler, and John Licato. 2018. “‘It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’: Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions.” 28th CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1235.
   Google Scholar
• Longoni, Chiara, Andrea Bonezzi, and Carey K. Morewedge. 2019. “Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Consumer Research 46 (4): 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Kristen. 2015. “Workplace Dignity: Communicating Inherent, Earned, and Remediated Dignity.” Journal of Management Studies 52 (5): 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Kristen, Andrew S. Manikas, E. Shaunn Mattingly, and Cole J. Crider. 2017. “Engaging and Misbehaving: How Dignity Affects Employee Work Behaviors.” Organization Studies 38 (11): 1505–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616677634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, Ashish, Pawan Budhwar, Hrishi Mohan, and N. R. Srikanth. 2022. “Employee Experience –the Missing Link for Engaging Employees: Insights from an MNE’s AI-Based HR Ecosystem.” Human Resource Management, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, Ashish, Pawan Budhwar, Charmi Patel, and N. R. Srikanth. 2022. “May the Bots be With You! Delivering HR Cost-Effectiveness and Individualised Employee Experiences in an MNE.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 33 (6): 1148–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1859582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, Ashish, M. T. Thedushika De Silva, Pawan Budhwar, and N. R. Srikanth. 2021. “Elevating Talents’ Experience Through Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Knowledge Sharing: Evidence from an IT-Multinational Enterprise.” Journal of International Management 27 (4): 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1971. Theories of Surplus Value: Volume IV of Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Milkovich, George T, and Alexandra K Wigdor. 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3 (2): 205395171667967. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlmann, Mareike, and Ola Henfridsson. 2019. “What People Hate About Being Managed by Algorithms, According to a Study of Uber Drivers.” Harvard Business Review 30: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Möhlmann, Mareike, Lior Zalmanson, Ola Henfridsson, and Robert Wayne Gregory. 2021. “Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control.” MIS Quarterly 45 (4): 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2021/15333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muellerleile, Chris, and Susan L Robertson. 2018. “Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-Rationality of Neoliberal Capitalism.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 25 (1): 187–216. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.1.0187
   Google Scholar
• Newlands, Gemma. 2021. “Algorithmic Surveillance in the gig Economy: The Organization of Work Through Lefebvrian Conceived Space.” Organization Studies 42 (5): 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, David T., Nathanael J. Fast, Derek J. Harmon, and Southern California and United States. 2020. “When Eliminating Bias Isn’t Fair: Algorithmic Reductionism and Procedural Justice in Human Resource Decisions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 160 (March): 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Marie, and Jingjing Lin. 2016. “Testing for Mediation Effects Under non-Normality and Heteroscedasticity: A Comparison of Classic and Modern Methods.” International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education 3 (1/2): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2016.073643.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Tuyet Mai, and Ashish Malik. 2022. “A Two-Wave Cross-Lagged Study on AI Service Quality: The Moderating Effects of the Job Level and Job Role.” British Journal of Management 33 (3): 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Hyanghee, Daehwan Ahn, Kartik Hosanagar, and Joonhwan Lee. 2021. “Human-AI Interaction in Human Resource Management: Understanding Why Employees Resist Algorithmic Evaluation at Workplaces and how to Mitigate Burdens.” Conference on human factors in computing systems – proceedings, Yokohama, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445304.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, Canice, and Robert Topel. 1993. “Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation.” European Economic Review 37 (2–3): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(93)90024-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prikshat, Verma, Ashish Malik, and Pawan Budhwar. 2023. “AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, Assimilation and Multilevel Consequences.” Human Resource Management Review 33 (1): 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, Marco Tulio, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. “‘Why Should I Trust You?’ Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier.” In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 97–101, San Diego, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n16-3020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, Alex, and Luke Stark. 2016. “Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers.” International Journal of Communication 10: 3758–3784. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, Suprateek, Sutirtha Chatterjee, Xiao Xiao, and Amany Elbanna. 2019. “The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance.” MIS Quarterly 43 (3): 695–719. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2007. “Dignity at Work: Broadening the Agenda.” Organization 14 (4): 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407078053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, Oscar. 1983. “Human Dignity as a Normative Concept.” American Journal of International Law 77 (4): 848–854. https://doi.org/10.2307/2202536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicker, Nadine, Markus Langer, Sonja K. Ötting, Kevin Baum, Cornelius J. König, and Dieter Wallach. 2021. “What to Expect from Opening up ‘Black Boxes’? Comparing Perceptions of Justice Between Human and Automated Agents.” Computers in Human Behavior 122 (April): 106837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106837.
   Google Scholar
• Schmider, Emanuel, Matthias Ziegler, Erik Danay, Luzi Beyer, and Markus Bühner. 2010. “Is it Really Bobust? Reinvestigating the Robustness of ANOVA Against Violations of the Normal Distribution Assumption.” Methodology 6 (4): 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Austin F. R., and Vincent J. Fortunato. 2008. “Factors Influencing Employee Intentions to Provide Honest Upward Feedback Ratings.” Journal of Business and Psychology 22 (3): 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9070-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, Joseph M., and M. Ronald Buckley. 2005. “The Existence and Nature of Racial Bias in Supervisory Ratings.” Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (3): 586–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurm Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Benjamin, and Kristen Lucas. 2019. “Development and Validation of the Workplace Dignity Scale.” Group & Organization Management 44 (1): 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118807784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, J., and Roy F. Baumeister. 2021. The Power of Bad: How the Negativity Effect Rules us and How We Can Rule it. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, Anjali, and Radha R. Sharma. 2019. “Dignity at the Workplace: Evolution of the Construct and Development of Workplace Dignity Scale.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (November): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong, Siliang, Nan Jia, Xueming Luo, and Zheng Fang. 2021. “The Janus Face of Artificial Intelligence Feedback: Deployment Versus Disclosure Effects on Employee Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 42 (9): 1600–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, Daniel B, Allan E Jones, Hope Nora, Frances Svyantek, Emilio Sarabia, and James Alexander. 1988. “Supervisor-subordinate Similarity: Types, Effects, and Mechanisms.” Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (2): 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, Arup, Shaun Pichler, and Ekkirala S. Srinivas. 2005. “The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Performance Appraisal: Evidence from Two Samples – The US and India.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (11): 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500314904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Xingjiao, Luwei Xiao, Yixuan Sun, Junhang Zhang, Tianlong Ma, and Liang He. 2022. “A Survey of Human-in-the-Loop for Machine Learning.” Future Generation Computer Systems 135: 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, Robert B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences.” American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yunfeng, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel K E Bellamy. 2020. “Efect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making.” In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 295–305. Barcelona: Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3351095
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Lixuan, and Christopher Yencha. 2022. “Examining Perceptions Towards Hiring Algorithms.” Technology in Society 68: 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar