Al₂O₃-CO₂ Nanofluid Transport Properties: A Molecular Dynamics Study and Machine Learning Predictive Modelling

References

• M. H. Esfe, A. Alirezaie, and M. Rejvani, “An applicable study on the thermal conductivity of SWCNT-MgO hybrid nanofluid and price-performance analysis for energy management,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 111, pp. 1202–1210, Jan. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, S. S. Sonawane, and S. H. Sonawane, “Experimental study of thermal conductivity, heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 based nanofluid,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 90, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chandrasekar and S. Suresh, “A review on the mechanisms of heat transport in nanofluids,” Heat Transf. Eng., vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 1136–1150, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/01457630902972744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ramezanizadeh, M. A. Nazari, M. H. Ahmadi, and L. Chen, “A review on the approaches applied for cooling fuel cells,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 139, pp. 517–525, Aug. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Tong, H. Lee, W. Kang, and H. Cho, “Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid and CuO nanofluid,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 159, p. 113959, Aug. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Abdallah, H. Saidani-Scott, and O. E. Abdellatif, “Performance analysis for hybrid PV/T system using low concentration MWCNT (water-based) nanofluid,” Sol. Energy, vol. 181, pp. 108–115, Mar. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, and D. Tsimpoukis, “Enhancing the performance of parabolic trough collectors using nanofluids and turbulators,” Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., vol. 91, pp. 358–375, Aug. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Daneshipour and R. Rafee, “Nanofluids as the circuit fluids of the geothermal borehole heat exchangers,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 81, pp. 34–41, Feb. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bahiraei, et al., “Recent research contributions concerning use of nanofluids in heat exchangers: A critical review,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 133, pp. 137–159, Mar. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. Aybar, M. Sharifpur, M. R. Azizian, M. Mehrabi, and J. P. Meyer, “A review of thermal conductivity models for nanofluids,” Heat Transf. Eng., vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 1085–1110, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2015.987586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wan, et al., “Thermal performance of a miniature loop heat pipe using water–copper nanofluid,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 78, pp. 712–719, Mar. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mohammadi, M. Mohammadi, A. R. Ghahremani, M. B. Shafii, and N. Mohammadi, “Experimental investigation of thermal resistance of a ferrofluidic closed-loop pulsating heat pipe,” Heat Transf. Eng., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2013.810086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ahmed, A. Bhargav, and S. S. Mallajosyula, “Estimating Al2O3–CO2 nanofluid viscosity: A molecular dynamics approach,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 84, no. 3, p. 30902, Dec. 2018. DOI: 10.1051/epjap/2018180200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ahmed, A. Sarode, P. Basarkar, A. Bhargav, and D. Banerjee, “Brownian motion and nanolayer study on thermal conductivity of Al2O3-CO2 nanofluid: A molecular dynamics approach,” Int. J. Transp. Phenom., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Ahmed and A. Bhargav, “Effect of aggregation morphology on thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3-CO2 nanofluid: a molecular dynamics approach,” Nano Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–37, 2021. DOI: 10.1615/NanoSciTechnolIntJ.2020033951.
   Google Scholar
• A. Sarode, Z. Ahmed, P. Basarkar, A. Bhargav, and D. Banerjee, “A molecular dynamics approach of the role of carbon nanotube diameter on thermal interfacial resistance through vibrational mismatch analysis,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., vol. 122, pp. 33–38, Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ahmed and A. Bhargav, “A molecular dynamics approach of the effect of thermal interfacial resistance and nanolayer on enhanced thermal conductivity of Al2O3-CO2 nanofluid,” J. Enh. Heat Transf., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 41–56, 2021. DOI: 10.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.2021037086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Lee, S. H. Lee, and S. Pil Jang, “Do temperature and nanoparticle size affect the thermal conductivity of alumina nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 104, no. 16, p. 161908, 2014. DOI: 10.1063/1.4872164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Angayarkanni, V. Sunny, and J. Philip, “Effect of nanoparticle size, morphology and concentration on specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids,” J. Nanofluids, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 302–309, 2015. DOI: 10.1166/jon.2015.1167.
   Google Scholar
• K. L. Teng, et al., “Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids diagnosis by molecular dynamics simulations,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3710–3718, 2008. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2008.18336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. Jang and S. U. Choi, “Role of Brownian motion in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 4316–4318, 2004. DOI: 10.1063/1.1756684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. K. Das, N. Putra, P. Thiesen, and W. Roetzel, “Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids,” J. Heat Transf., vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 567–574, 2003. DOI: 10.1115/1.1571080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. H. Chon, K. D. Kihm, S. P. Lee, and S. U. Choi, “Empirical correlation finding the role of temperature and particle size for nanofluid (Al2O3) thermal conductivity enhancement,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 87, no. 15, p. 153107, 2005. DOI: 10.1063/1.2093936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Lee, et al., “Effective viscosities and thermal conductivities of aqueous nanofluids containing low volume concentrations of Al2O3 nanoparticles,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 51, no. 11–12, pp. 2651–2656, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, X. Xu, and S. U. Choi, “Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 474–480, 1999. DOI: 10.2514/2.6486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. T. Nguyen, et al., “Viscosity data for Al2O3–water nanofluid—hysteresis: Is heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids reliable,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Pastoriza-Gallego, L. Lugo, J. L. Legido, and M. M. Piñeiro, “Thermal conductivity and Viscosity measurements of ethylene glycol-based Al2O3 nanofluids,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 221, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. Meyer, S. A. Adio, M. Sharifpur, and P. N. Nwosu, “The viscosity of nanofluids: A review of the theoretical, empirical, and numerical models,” Heat Transf. Eng., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 387–421, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2015.1057447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Amani, M. Ameri, and A. Kasaeian, “Hydrothermal characteristics of spinel manganese ferrite nanofluid in a metal foam tube: Modeling of experimental results using artificial neural network,” Heat Transf. Eng., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 627–639, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2018.1436644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Esfe, H. Rostamian, D. Toghraie, and W. M. Yan, “Using artificial neural network to predict thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol with alumina nanoparticle,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 643–648, May 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-016-5506-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Toghyani, M. H. Ahmadi, A. Kasaeian, and A. H. Mohammadi, “Artificial neural network, ANN-PSO and ANN-ICA for modelling the Stirling engine,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 456–468, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2014.986289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, et al., “Application GMDH artificial neural network for modeling of Al2O3/water and Al2O3/ethylene glycol thermal conductivity,” IJHT, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 773–782, 2018. DOI: 10.18280/ijht.360301.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ebrahimi-Moghadam, B. Mohseni-Gharyehsafa, and M. Farzaneh-Gord, “Using artificial neural network and quadratic algorithm for minimizing entropy generation of Al2O3-EG/W nanofluid flow inside parabolic trough solar collector,” Renew. Energy, vol. 129, pp. 473–485, Dec. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Plimpton, P. Crozier, and A. Thompson, “LAMMPS-large-scale atomic/molecular massively parallel simulator,” San. Natl. Lab., vol. 18, pp. 43, Feb. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. R. A. Dezfoli, Z. Adabavazeh, and S. Mehrabian, “A molecular dynamic simulation of the behavior of water molecules inside a carbon nanotube,” Nanomech. Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 2010. DOI: 10.1615/NanomechanicsSciTechnolIntJ.v1.i3.40.
   Google Scholar
• T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, “Particle mesh Ewald: an N⋅ log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 10089–10092, 1993. DOI: 10.1063/1.464397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids Oxford Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• P. Vashishta, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and J. P. Rino, “Interaction potentials for alumina and molecular dynamics simulations of amorphous and liquid alumina,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 103, no. 8, p. 083504, Apr. 2008. DOI: 10.1063/1.2901171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, “VMD: Visual molecular dynamics,” J. Mol. Graph, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. G. Muraleedharan, D. S. Sundaram, A. Henry, and V. Yang, “Thermal conductivity calculation of nano-suspensions using Green–Kubo relations with reduced artificial correlations,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 29, no. 15, p. 155302, Mar. 2017. DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa5f08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. N. William, “What is a support vector machine?,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1565–1567, 2006. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1206-1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Y. Boateng, J. Otoo, and D. A. Abaye, “Basic tenets of classification algorithms k-nearest-neighbor, support vector machine, random forest and neural network: a review,” JDAIP, vol. 08, no. 04, pp. 341–357, 2020. DOI: 10.4236/jdaip.2020.84020.
   Google Scholar
• A. U. Osarogiagbon, F. Khan, R. Venkatesan, and P. Gillard, “Review and analysis of supervised machine learning algorithms for hazardous events in drilling operations,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 147, pp. 367–384, Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, B. Wang, and A. N. Gorban, “Multivariate Gaussian and student-t process regression for multi-output prediction,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 3005–3028, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-019-04687-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar